
Need more info? Please refer to the participant packages.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of concept 1 and why?
<p style="color: rgb(63, 71, 78); margin-bottom: 1rem;">What do you think this concept's benefits and impacts will be on:</p><ul><li>The way the community looks, feels and moves?</li><li>Providing equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities?</li><li>The amenities/services in your community?</li><li>The health of the rivers and floodplain as it flows from the mountains, through the city and to other communities downstream?</li><li>The long-term supply and quality of water for our community?</li><li>Protecting Calgary's economic core? Should downtown be protected to a higher level?</li><li>The city as a whole?</li></ul>
- Recent
- Popular
- Rising
9 November, 2016
Kim says:
No weaknesses, the city requires Springbank dam to proceed ASAP to protect our downtown core and communities
9 November, 2016
Kim Safton says:
We need this reservoir to protect our city core and communities NOW
8 November, 2016
High and dry says:
Does do nothing for Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. MC creek option is the only goid one that can work for all.
Cheapest too!
8 November, 2016
Vanice Simpson says:
The proposed dam at Springbank will not protect everyone on upstream of the Springbank area. Everyone needs flood protection!
8 November, 2016
David H says:
Spingbank is the right solution. McLean Creek is a poor option. Self interest is driving opposition to Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Dave says:
The study has been done by experts in their field - get on with the Springbank option. It's the best option for the people of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Linda says:
For most downstream benefit & least damage to fish & landowners, dry dam measures should be further upstream than Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Dave says:
Albertans great at working together to recover from disasters but not at working together to prevent them. Www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.
8 November, 2016
yycNorth says:
Looking at riverfront homes in '86 we opted to live on high ground. Flooding was a factor. Why can't people own up to their bad choices?
8 November, 2016
Inner city resident says:
The springbank reservoir is the solution with most benefits and the least cost and disruption. What is the hold up?
8 November, 2016
Evan Welbourn says:
Working with open ground and raw undeveloped earth, is much more economic than repairing developed lands , like downtown.
8 November, 2016
Passionate Calgarian says:
Springbank Reservoir protects the city as a whole. Businesses and homeowners.
8 November, 2016
Evan Welbourn says:
I support upstream reservoirs.
8 November, 2016
Don says:
Equal protection.
Downtown more costly to recover so needs more protection. This is best way.
Best for whole city, too.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
is this really a case where a government would rather sacrifice its citizens than take on the environmental lobby? God help us.
8 November, 2016
Jane says:
The 2013 flood did so much damage. It would be criminal to let this event continue to ruin lives, homes, businesses, community. No to SR1.
8 November, 2016
Markj Hornby says:
It is essential to have reservoir capacity in flooding situations. Both the Elbow and Bow require reservoirs in emergency situations.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
There is no need to turn community against community. Let's all support MC1. It's on land that the gov.ab (ie.we) already own. Why buy more?
8 November, 2016
Greg says:
If berms are good enough for Bragg Creek and RW, they should be good enough for Calgary too
8 November, 2016
SG says:
I am sure Calgary will bully their way into having a dam in Springbank which is sad as I really do believe MC is a better choice for Alberta
8 November, 2016
yycNorth says:
Don't we already have a reservoir? It's called the Glenmore. Dredge the dam thing!! Can't hurt!
8 November, 2016
MW says:
SR1=cesspool. Mosquitoe breeding ground. Not to mention dead animals, fish and sewage. Nice.
8 November, 2016
MW says:
The type of sediment left at SR 1 NOT fertile, would not grow pasture. Is mountain rock. Would be an ugly moonscape. What a crime!
8 November, 2016
MW says:
The taking of private land, businesses and homes when there are viable alternatives is POOR PUBLIC POLICY. Mclean creek please!
8 November, 2016
Floodvictim says:
We are in full support of the Springbank off stream reservoir. Please make this a priority and start building now.
8 November, 2016
Patrick Mc Reavey says:
Protect all community in flood areas. Protect the all the city infrastructure. Get moving before disaster strikes again.
8 November, 2016
Elenore Kubik says:
We must have another reservoir west of Calgary on the Bow River to protect our economic core and communities along the river.
8 November, 2016
SR1 forpublic safety says:
Anti logging will kill MC1. Environmentalists will kill MC1. Lives are at risk. Temporary wet pasture best. SR1 a must for public safety.
8 November, 2016
Get it done says:
Time to take action. It is good for all of Calgary, you can't be a great city with a vulnerable core.
8 November, 2016
Kel Johnston says:
Displacing some of Alberta's founding families when the Maclean Creek option exists that affects no one is a crime.
8 November, 2016
rvander says:
Unless this plan protects all Alberta homes, it should not be completed at any expense. McLean Dam is the answer.
8 November, 2016
Prospring says:
Hands down, this is the most cost effective and best result concept to deal with flood risk in Calgary. For residences and businesses
8 November, 2016
bwalker says:
I believe that the Springbank reservoir is the best of the three concepts as it will be the quickest and least expensive to implement.
8 November, 2016
Andrea says:
Fully supportive of SR1. It's been analzed, assessed and recommended by legions of experts and professionals. Get started now. Please.
8 November, 2016
Andrea says:
SR1 will benefit the city as a whole. It's been studied and analyzed enough. It's time to get on with it!
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
After a week or so of jabbing back and forth the winner is - no one!!! Why can't we all get behind McLean? Everybody wins!
8 November, 2016
Al says:
SR1 has already been objectively proven to be the best solution to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank opposition are exaggerating??? Meanwhile proponents claim it will save all of Calgary and world hunger too. Let's get real folks
8 November, 2016
Albertans for All says:
Engage best minds/skills to develop Tri-River Joint Reservoir ASAP. for future prosperity as our forefathers did
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
A new cost benefit when gov.ab finally gets pushed into doing one will clearly show McLean is better. Enviro concerns can be mitigated.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Objectivity on SR1 was lost in 2014, when the premier announced it was preferred. Since then - bureaucrats striving to please the boss.
8 November, 2016
Best for All says:
Project to protect most communities ASAP presented to NDP GOA. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Need TRJR.
8 November, 2016
Katya says:
Maximum benefit. Build it now.
8 November, 2016
Kyle says:
The science concludes SR1 is the highest cost/benefit and most feasible. Leave it to the experts instead of comments from NIMBY landowners.
8 November, 2016
Kyle says:
Why is SR1 not built yet? Much better to have controlled flood in the prairie than an uncontrolled flood of Calgary communities and downtown
8 November, 2016
Bxn says:
This seems the most logical solution from a cost and effectiveness viewpoint. Land recovers from water naturally; houses do not.
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
Hmmm...Government picking winners & losers instead of acknowledging that all can win, and making it happen...Can someone explain please? MC1
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
Those of us upstream are getting a bit tired of being called "the opposition". Grow up! We're as worthy as Calgarians are.People are people.
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
We are more than a "handful of people upstream". We are PEOPLE upstream who deserve the same degree of protection that Calgary demands.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank is the logical choice for a dry dam. The land can still be used for grazing, parks, nature reserve, etc. Protect against calamity
8 November, 2016
Makes no sense says:
Upstream mitigation IS a reasonable part of the solution, but flooding 7000 acres of farmland is not the right answer. Dam McLean.
8 November, 2016
Makes no sense says:
How is SR1 a "reservoir" when there's no plan to "line" the land with anything to keep water from simply soaking in? Waste of water & land.
8 November, 2016
Get Informed says:
Be informed and make wise choices. With the wealth of information available - Springbank dam is a clear winner. Build it!
8 November, 2016
lornatsta says:
Upstream reservoirs are the answer, few people impacted, good protection, very little environmental impact -during flood and for short time
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Note that above where it estimates 1.9B - that is to do a reservoir on each of the Elbow and Bow Rivers and is not the SR1 cost alone.
8 November, 2016
Jonathan says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
8 November, 2016
Brian says:
In 2012 SR1 =$158M; now = $1.9M & likely to increase yet no updated cost on MC1. Claims of MR1 costing more are unfounded! Look more at MR1!
8 November, 2016
Dano says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution set by far. It is the dominant solution globally for flood mitigation/hydroelectricity.
8 November, 2016
Don says:
The Springbank Reservoir has been well examined and studied. The expert conclusion is that it is a good solution; it ought to be undertaken.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
We really need to evaluate the two options properly and equally.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
The SR1 option will impact one of the last pieces of native prairie and unique habitat left around the city of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
The Mclean creek dam option was never explored to the fullest extent. So how come people say the SR1 is the best option?
8 November, 2016
Dorothy says:
This is not a "them" or "us." Its about protecting the most Calgarians. Springbank dam doesn't do that. It does nothing for downtown.
8 November, 2016
kelly moi says:
Springbok provides a viable flood mitigation option to protect downstream areas of the Elbow river and the downtown as a priority.
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
YYC cannot afford another flood, economically, environmentally, or emotionally. Do SR1 and other mitigation asap.
8 November, 2016
Build Springbank Res says:
It has been over 3 years since the flood. It is time to move on this project!
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
Praying and assuming that another flood will not happen is foolish. Start mitigation with SR1 asap and address other prevention as well.
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
Relocating downtown businesses, Saddledome, historic homes, etc. is not an option. Start with SR1 asap and address Bow flooding as well.
8 November, 2016
BUILD SPRINGBANK says:
There have been several studies concluding that Springbank is the best option, cost wise and enivironmentally. Please get moving on this!
8 November, 2016
Grandpa says:
SR1 liability to present & future Generations. Provide a great treasure Tri-Ri Ed Joint Reservoir of Alberta. All work together For TRJR
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
The plan is to flood the SR1 site every 7 years to ensure everything is working properly. Not ONLY in big flood events like many think.
8 November, 2016
Damn McLean says:
McLean creek is the only good option and it would protect more than just the city of Calgary. The NDP government should be ashamed.
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
The MC1 site is NOT too "wildlife sensitive". 40 years of ATV's, logging, a gas plant, etc...has ensured few animals live at the site.
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
As a Bragg Creek resident, I want the dam IN MY BACK YARD! MC1 for the good of us ALL!
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
The ship on floodplain development in YYC sailed 120 years ago. Subsequent civic govt's have ignored the threat. Concept 1 - NOW!
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
Calgary core, business and communities will remain vulnerable 4 flood seasons later. Let's not make it 5 and counting...
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
SR1 is feasible and gets the job done. Grazing land won't disappear - flood or no flood - It can be restored faster, cheaper than city land
8 November, 2016
NDP flip-flop says:
It seems like there are A LOT of people commenting here who support McLean, which the NDP campaigned upon. We won't let them forget that.
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
YYC and AB cannot afford another flood in any sense of the word - expense, lost productivity, deminished property value=less property taxes.
8 November, 2016
Heartbroken says:
Sad that it appears that all supporting SR1 couldn't care less about Tsuu Ti'na, Springbank, Redwood or Bragg. Where's your compassion?
8 November, 2016
Bragg Creek matters says:
Diversify the economy via tourism by building a lake-like, REAL reservoir at MC1. Win for all Calgarians who come & play in our back yard!
8 November, 2016
Lets Do It says:
I support the Springbank as a long term solution which affects all of Calgarians and Albertans.
8 November, 2016
Lucy says:
Concept #1 is core to every solution. Without it..#2 and #3 don't protect our city.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
According to the Treaty Act, neither SR1, nor MC1 can proceed without the majority of Treaty 7 bands on board. They're not.Indiginous rights
8 November, 2016
Karen Radford says:
We must take action to protect our city and reduce the uncertainty this churn is creating. Springbank needs to happen
8 November, 2016
Karen Radford says:
The Springbank solution has proven to be the best. It has minimal impacts and protects our city. Time to move forward.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
If the berms in Bragg & Redwood fail, the SR1 diversion gates will be so clogged by our debris, they'll likely fail and do no good at all.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
SR1 wouldn't conserve water for times of draught. MC1 would, and would also be a lake-like playground in close proximity to Calgary. Smart!
8 November, 2016
Jim says:
Visit preventingalbertafloods.ca The TRJR. This project is the best solution. Not even considered so far by GoA. No to SR1 help everyone.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The is virtually no environmental impact to building a dry dam and flooding a field every 20-50 years.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The environmental impacts of upstream mitigation are vastly overstated, consider the impact of the contents of 10,000+ homes in the landfill
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
I have some sympathy for those whose land is expropriated or flooded every 50 years, but upstream mitigation is needed for an entire city.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
All flood-prone areas should be protected, starting with the Elbow, then the Bow. Upstream reservoirs address all the issues +minimal impact
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The upstream reservoir would protect our drinking water by slowing the silting up of Glenmore reservoir.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The long-term quality of water would be improved by the Springbank reservoir, by holding back mud and pollutants during and after a flood.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation protects all citizens, whether they live near a river or not, as we all have to pay when floods occur.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution for the entire city, we're all taxpayers and ultimately have to foot the bill when disasters happen
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
I support upstream mitigation as the best solution, we don't want to end up like Los Angeles and turn our rivers into concrete channels.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution, it avoids ugly berms and walls and will preserve the natural beauty of our rivers.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream reservoirs are by far the most effective and least disruptive solutions. Let's push to get Springbank built, then one on the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Simon G says:
The Springbank Project makes a lot of sense- I'm surprised that it hasn't been better supported by the City. It seems to do the job well!
8 November, 2016
Sheldon cameron says:
Please mitigate the possibilities of having another flood like 2013. The downtown city core or surrounding residential home owners beg for
8 November, 2016
Bill Ardley says:
If SR1 is built, tax Calgarians only for the 2 billion. Also for any future upstream floods costs. Build McLean creek and all pay for it
8 November, 2016
Build now! says:
The Springbank project is strongly supported by Calgarians. Environmental impact is negligible compared to the impact of a flood.
8 November, 2016
Action needed says:
Floods happen. Dams get built. Expropriation is older than the hills. Get Springbank built and fix the Bow River too.
8 November, 2016
Stop flooding now says:
So tired of the inflammatory comments about sacrificing Springbank. Most of that grazing land will continue to be available for grazing.
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
Please stop exaggerating. No one is sacrificing Springbank. 3600 acres of grazing land are needed for an important public work. Build SR1
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
My family's farmland was expropriated west of Edmonton for a traffic exchange. We survived. The greater good needs the dam!
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
Expropriating for public works is a concept older than Alberta. Let's get on with Springbank now!
8 November, 2016
Wayne says:
I think this is great although I don't understand why it isn't also combined with a dry dam in the meaclean creek, Allen Bill pond area.
8 November, 2016
Save Calgary says:
Get the facts straight. Both rivers need mitigation to protect the Core. Start with Springbank now!
8 November, 2016
Lesley Kirby says:
Concept 1 protects the city downtown core. Calgary needs to have business and head offices protected.
8 November, 2016
Tired says:
I support Calgary solving it's own dam(n) flooding problems within their own city limits. Leave Springbank out of your selfish plotting.
8 November, 2016
Rideau Resident says:
The land values in Springbank are attributable to the proximity to Calgary. Preserve the value of both. Concept 1 now.
8 November, 2016
Tick tock says:
By the time NDP FORCIBLY takes the land for SR1 from the owners, MC1 could have been near completion, had the NDP kept their word. Sad.
8 November, 2016
LWB says:
Why should we sacrifice long-standing landowners upstream while we continue to allow residential development in flood plains in Calgary?
8 November, 2016
Waste of money says:
Expropriating prime farmland to create a 7000+ acre toxic dust plain is a ridiculous waste of Albertans' money. Smarten up! Dam McLean!
8 November, 2016
Disappointed says:
Calgary needs to solve their own problems within their own city limits. The flood wasn't Springbank's fault. Period.
8 November, 2016
Disgusted says:
Were Calgary a "world class city", it wouldn't insist that others pay for it's shortcomings & poor planning. Mitigate yourselves.
8 November, 2016
Rideau Resident says:
A flood of a similar magnitude to 2013 in the next few years will erode the entire tax base of the city. Concept 1 ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Some facts says:
Calgary planners dropped the ball & now they're making it the problem of innocent people. City planners are to blame, not Springbankers.
8 November, 2016
Paul says:
Easy to implement, cost effective and solves the problem. Protecting Calgary is of highest importance and should be a priority.
8 November, 2016
Nimbys in YYC says:
Don't want unsightly, ineffective berms obstructing your posh river views? Neither does Bragg Creek. Dam McLean! We can all be happy!
8 November, 2016
Yes 2 SR1 says:
Springbank reservoir is needed now! This is the best solution for protecting our downtown, stampede grounds and residential communities.
8 November, 2016
Truth be told says:
Sorry Springbank folks, but who are being the Nimby's? Why let facts get in the way of your lies?
8 November, 2016
Jim says:
I support McLean Creek proposal. It costs less due to nil cost of land. Also protects villages of Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek.
8 November, 2016
Yes 2 YYC mitigation says:
This project needs to proceed asap. The risk and damage to personal and commercial property and the economy more generally is too great!
8 November, 2016
Madge says:
Civic politicians have created this dam rush. Building on flood plains, is no excuse to make others bear the brunt. No to SR1, go elsewhere.
8 November, 2016
GT says:
How can YYC be considered "world class" when we cannot quickly implement flood mitigation? Start with SR1 asap before another flood occurs.
8 November, 2016
Madge says:
Save the core! Fact: Bow River was primary cause(2/3) of CORE & city flooding. Focus on the BOW. Fact:SR1 will not save the Core.
8 November, 2016
Save the City! says:
We need to Build SR1 NOW and MC1 ASAP. We need to protect Calgary from future Flood Devastation! Enough Studies and Surveys! We NEED Action!
8 November, 2016
No Sprinkbank dam! says:
The Calgary residents opposing berms obstructing their river views are the NIMBY's, not the Springbank residents on the chopping block.
8 November, 2016
Berms for everyone! says:
The salesmen are heavily pitching the effectiveness of earthen berms for Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows. No dams! Berms for everyone!
8 November, 2016
Smith says:
This SR1 concept is more politically motivated than scientifically sound. There are other, more effective and viable options.
8 November, 2016
No to SR1 says:
Creating a likely toxic dust bowl, directly in the path of strong winds is seriously insane. No Springbank dry dam! All to the east suffer.
8 November, 2016
Smith says:
It's too costly and has a great negative impact on both the community and enviro, while protecting a prestigious few properties downstream.
8 November, 2016
Angry Creeker says:
We want Calgary protected without sacrificing & displacing others. MC1 is for the good of the many. SR1 is for the good of fewer.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
McLean Creek is off the table for good reasons. Springbank is now the only hope for the Elbow. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Yes to YYC says:
This City cannot grind to a halt again. Let's get this fixed. Springbank now. The Bow ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Build now says:
Very much in favour of Concept 1 - upstream protection on both rivers. Start with Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Build Reservoir says:
Strongly support the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir. It's a necessary public work.
8 November, 2016
Good neighbour says:
I support MC1 as it protects Calgary AND communities upstream, like Bragg Creek, that Calgarians like to frequent. MC1 is simply better.
8 November, 2016
Build ASAP says:
Informed people get that both rivers flood downtown and we need the Springbank reservoir ASAP as a start.
8 November, 2016
Save the Core! says:
Calgarians understand what's at risk. Our economic chugs away in the downtown core. Fix both rivers. Start with SR1
8 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
The majority of these comments support building Springbank now! And fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Bragg Creek matters says:
If earthen berms are "good enough" for Bragg Creek, they're certainly "good enough" for Calgary too. Equal protection for all citizens.
8 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
Please get informed. The Core floods from both rivers - and the Springbank project is the best first step. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Act now! says:
Act now! This City's fragile economy cannot weather another disaster. Fix the Elbow with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
The greater good dictates we need to fix both rivers. Start with the Springbank dry dam for the Elbow and keep looking for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Protect more people says:
Heartwarming to see that the overwhelming majority are AGAINST SR1 & FOR MC1. There might be hope for humanity afterall:) Sacrifice nobody!
8 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
Why should I pay to save flood plain people? Well - they pay for your LRT they never use. They pay for roads they never drive. Public works
8 November, 2016
Yes to Dry Dam says:
Why don't people move out of the flood plain? Because there are 10,000+ homes there. And the entire downtown. Too late. Build protection.
8 November, 2016
TW says:
this needs to be done immediatlt; stop delaying.
8 November, 2016
EM says:
I support Concept 1
8 November, 2016
Yes to Dry Dam says:
Science backs the Springbank reservoir. We need to protect the Core from both rivers. It's the best place to start!
8 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Why is it a dry dam? Because it has minimal environmental impact and we have enough drinking water. Build SR1
8 November, 2016
Yes to protection says:
Will Calgary flood again? Yes - most definitely. Rivers flood. People can protect themselves. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
How could people not get that the Elbow River contributes to flooding the Core? Because they are misinformed. Build SR1 and fix the Bow!
8 November, 2016
John Simpson says:
Maclean Creek dry dam protects more people, costs less, with lower environmental impact than SR1. Respect those outside Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Why is there such misleading information out there about the Springbank dam? Because a few people don't want it. Calgary needs it!
8 November, 2016
david beckwermert says:
Upstream reservoirs are the way to go for all the reasons listed
8 November, 2016
Fix both rivers says:
Is the Springbank dry dam just about fancy houses on the river? Ah .... NO! It's about the economic engine of Canada. Start with SR1!
8 November, 2016
Save the core says:
Does the Elbow flood downtown? Yes. Does the Bow? Obviously. Fix both and start with Springbank dry dam.
8 November, 2016
Yes to dry dam says:
Yes the Elbow River contributes to flooding downtown. And City Hall. Informed people get this. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Downtown needs you says:
Get informed. Understand what's at risk. Protect downtown from both rivers. Start with Springbank dry dam.
8 November, 2016
SR1 is a start says:
Everyone in Calgary relies on the Core in some way. Protect it now. Stop flooding on both rivers. Yes to SR1.
8 November, 2016
SLK says:
This protects only part of Calgary, ruins valuable agri-land and does not protect upstream Tsuu T'ina, Redwood Meadows or Bragg Creek.
8 November, 2016
Save Downtown says:
Informed people understand that the Core needs protection from BOTH RIVERS. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
Don't be swayed by falsities, exaggerations and biased "survey" data. This City needs the Springbank reservoir. Both rivers flood the Core.
8 November, 2016
Gordon w Ross says:
I support the spring bank project,we need this in place now to protect our economy & communities affected we cannot afford another flood!!!!
8 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Informed people understand that the Springbank dry dam is the only viable solution for the Elbow. Let's get it done!
8 November, 2016
Mitigation now! says:
All studies point to Springbank as the best project for the Elbow. Build it and keep searching for a Bow solution. Protect this City!
8 November, 2016
Build now says:
It's happening. The Environmental Impact Assessment is underway. Keep it going and fix the Bow too!
8 November, 2016
Yes to protection says:
Best case scenario is flood protection by 2020. We can't afford any more waiting. Get this done and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Build Springbank says:
Calgary is a huge city and warrants protection. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too. It's time!
8 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
Another foot of water and the downtown would have been shut down for months - because elevators and HVAC would have been ruined. Fix this!
8 November, 2016
Brian Farewell says:
This is the quickest and cheapist solution to cut back on Elbow River flow and is urgent.
8 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
This City has had 10+ major floods in the past century. It's going to keep happening - until we build protection. Start with Springbank!
8 November, 2016
Build it! says:
No more dithering. Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
WW says:
Yes to Springbank dry dam - the City is vulnerable. It's an important public work. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Build it now! says:
Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow too. Calgary needs this!
8 November, 2016
Johns88 says:
I do not support the Springbank Reservoir. The Maclean Creek dry dam protects more than just Calgary with less destruction of habitat.
8 November, 2016
Eric K says:
I'm 100% for this cost effective solution that provides minimal environmental damage using the existing flood prone areas.
8 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Enough talk! After 3+ years of "study" it is time to protect downtown Calgary. Build Springbank ASAP.
8 November, 2016
ckayser says:
This solution is clearly the most logical, effective, and will offer the most immediate and beneficial protection to Calgarians.
8 November, 2016
Warren says:
It is for the greater good and most economically viable.
8 November, 2016
Rural citizens count says:
The Elbow is the primary water source for the Tsuu Ti'na Nation. I don't believe they support SR1. They count as much as the Calgarians.
8 November, 2016
Save Springbank says:
Keep up the fight SR1 residents! There are MANY of us supporting you! Dam McLean! Protect more people. Sacrifice none. Stop the division!
8 November, 2016
Derek says:
I am 100% for this project. The tangible and intangible costs of a future flood for the city, province and nation are not acceptable.
8 November, 2016
Save Springbank says:
Use the natural basin of McLean to build an actual reservoir to conserve water for times of draught. SR1 soaks into the land & wastes water.
8 November, 2016
Michelle says:
Yes to the Springbank Reservoir! Even Nenshi knows we need it to protect Downtown Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Build it says:
Environmentalists have significant env. concerns including they will not allow trees cut at MC1. People lives are at risk. Build SR1 ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Asm269 says:
Springbank off-street reservoir is the best option and needs to be implemented ASAP!
8 November, 2016
Ginny says:
Upstream resevoirs are a necessary measure. Since the city cant be relocated, the water needs to be diverted.
8 November, 2016
Michelle Williams says:
Disagree with Springbank, protect more people/areas upstream - equally protect all - McLean Creek more fair and smarter choice.
8 November, 2016
Michelle says:
Two governments have given their word that upstream mitigation would happen. Live up to your word and make it happen!
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank saving downtown is a myth. Still I would champion McLean Creek as a means to protect Elbow River communities and those upstream.
8 November, 2016
Lew says:
Best concept for actually addressing the most potential harm.
8 November, 2016
Ward Mallabone says:
I think it will be beneficial not only for the affected flood areas but the city as a whole
8 November, 2016
kmendham says:
I support the upstream mitigation of a Springbank reservoir as the most cost effective and expedient and practical solution to mitigating
8 November, 2016
John says:
Upstream reservoirs must be implemented to protect the core/communities. Other approaches: disruptive/discriminatory/of questionable effect
8 November, 2016
Bill says:
No dam! Build berms and barriers. Use crown land at McLean Creek.
8 November, 2016
SG says:
#Albertastrong. Maclean Creek protects Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Calgary and Springbank. Even the NDP knew this truth pre election.
8 November, 2016
Kay says:
This dam will NOT achieve what you have been told. It will NOT protect the downtown core, only Elbow. McLean will protect far more.
8 November, 2016
Maurice W. says:
Calgary and Canada's GDP cannot afford to have the downtown core shut again. We need the upstream reservoir.
8 November, 2016
Bert says:
NDP has already destroyed oil industry. Now going after farmers. This dam would not help the Bow River or downtown area. No dam
8 November, 2016
Richard L. says:
Get on with this proposal. It was recommended by the experts, but has been sidelined by interest groups.
8 November, 2016
Sunnyside says:
A Springbank reservoir makes abundant sense. Compared to catastrophic flooding, it's a bargain. The city was built in valleys; get over it.
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
SR1 was not chosen by experts. GoA cherry picked from the Deltares report, ignoring the emphasis on "Make room for the River" Use Crown land
8 November, 2016
Jodi says:
I am a two time flood victim. I am in support of the Springbank reservoir. This is the best option for the city of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
James C. says:
I support concept 1. Floods occur frequently and 2013 proved that they threaten Calgary's entire downtown core, Stampede and Saddledome.
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
Rivers are still stronger than any mitigation. Accept consequences of your decision. Crown land and options exist upstream. SR1is wrong.
8 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
Sad to see people pushing for the destruction of someone else's homes, businesses and property to secure their own agenda. How un-Albertan!
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
Staying on a floodplain is a choice. Flood mitigation is going to happen. Pushing consequences onto other Albertans is wrong. No to SR1.
8 November, 2016
Elizabeth M says:
Hello, I support the springbank reservoir. As a resident of elbow park, this proposal is the best option to protect the downtown core.
8 November, 2016
Jumping Pound Guy says:
Springbank will not be a beautiful lake with sailboats and cottages. Imagine a 7000 acre catch basin with rocks & silt & chain link fence.
8 November, 2016
Bob says:
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
This is easily the most effective, efficient flood mitigation solution.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Build Springbank now! Calgary remains vulnerable. And find a solution for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Shauna says:
This mitigation is paramount for the vitality of the city of Calgary. It's urgency is immediate to protect the citizens and infrastructure
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
When Springbank is shown to be over $600M and McLean is $$350M, then can we all get behind McLean Creek?
8 November, 2016
Rick Simonton says:
In favour of upstream reservoirs.Would bring back the feeling of community. All buy out lots would be sold and new single family homes built
8 November, 2016
Shannon says:
We are a city built at the confluence of 2 rivers and must mitigate our flood risk to protect ourselves! I support the SR1 project.
8 November, 2016
Gary says:
This has been studied to death and shown to be the best first step to protecting against a repeat of the 2013 flood.
8 November, 2016
TerryMyles says:
This plan offers the best protection to most citizens with the least adverse effect on river flows or water quality.
7 November, 2016
Concerned Citizen says:
I have attended many meetings on the flood mitigation for our city. The Springbank Reservoir proposal seems the most logical for the problem
7 November, 2016
Embarrassed says:
As Calgarians, we are embarrassed that Calgary's Elbow River residents would want to expropriate other peoples' land to protect themselves!
7 November, 2016
Barb Morin says:
I care and am concerned but don't feel capable of making a well-informed decision about solutions.
7 November, 2016
Citizens are EQUAL says:
The first berm in Bragg Creek HASN'T even begun to be built. Anyone saying Bragg Creek already has mitigation started is wrong.
7 November, 2016
Alan Brimacombe says:
I just want this project to get under way to protect my home and my family. Every spring s tension occurs in my family that lasts for months
7 November, 2016
not happy says:
The Springbank dam increases flood risk to Springbank homes. The cost is ridiculous. Consider McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Grampa says:
TRJR would provide flood protection quickest. We have built great projects so don't let leaders tell us the. BEST too difficult
7 November, 2016
Mike B says:
Bow River Reservoir- there are no plans and no money to actually build a Bow River reservoir in our lifetimes, so this concept is a failure.
7 November, 2016
Robert Dick says:
I like this concept as it achieves so much in terms of preserving the Elbow as a healthy river, but the dry dam is there when needed.
7 November, 2016
Mikkel says:
Enviro and technical assessments are years away. Calgary wants assurance "ASAP". SR1 for 1.9B is an absolute terrible solution.
7 November, 2016
Grampa says:
SR1 embarrassment to our generation. City would still be vulnerable as gambles on size of flood. Leave great legacy Tri-River Joint Reservoi
7 November, 2016
Citizens are EQUAL says:
The Springbank Landowners' rights are being thrown out the window. DON'T build/rebuild on a flood plain! Poor city planners are at fault.
7 November, 2016
Rick B. says:
Springbank is not VITAL to the survival of Calgary. This project is misleading and has been since the get go.
7 November, 2016
DL says:
The trade-off of land (fairly compensated for) for the protection of Calgary is a no-brainer. We cannot afford to wait any longer.
7 November, 2016
staciattba@gmail.com says:
If $33 million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for Bragg Creek, then $330million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for equal, not superior citizens in Calgary
7 November, 2016
JJ says:
We should go ahead with both Upstream Reservoir Projects!!! We have studied this enough! It is time to take action before we suffer again!!
7 November, 2016
Ben says:
Lost our home in the flood. Moved to Springbank. So I strongly oppose SR1.More effective, less intrusive mitigation is available.
7 November, 2016
Shannon says:
It is critical that the springbank resevoir and Glenmore Dam upgrades move forward ASAP. It is indisputably in the public interest.
7 November, 2016
staciattba@gmail.com says:
The cost shown above DOES NOT include the cost of purchasing the land from the Springbank residents! This is misleading.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Many were affected. Many need protection. Work together & all can benefit. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca Tri-River joint Reservoir AB
7 November, 2016
Jocelyn says:
Springbank is the best solution to protect Calgary . Do not waste another year.
7 November, 2016
Blair M says:
vital to the protection of the city of Calgary. Vital that it is built ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
We need to do this project to protect Calgary from future flooding and mitigate future damages! The risk of doing nothing is too high!!!
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Water is a treasure not our enemy. Respect & value it with much needed water bank in mountain valley. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
I want my tax$ helping the masses. McLean or Tri-River Jt Reservoir would protect more Albertans than SR1. And use Crown land not private!
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Big problems require big minds to solve. Utilize great opportunity offered. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Reservoir AB
7 November, 2016
Hails says:
Protecting the economic core and the surrounding community are addressed by this concept so I support it wholeheartedly.
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
Why would you support SR1 when it will not protect you from Bow River flooding. Downtown suffered from the Bow, not Elbow!
7 November, 2016
K says:
"SR1 impacts the least amount of people"? Maclean Creek is on government owned land and a res there would protect Calgary + upstream towns.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Enlist expertise of committed engineers,environmentalists hydrologists politicians. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Res
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
Alternatives to SR1 were not studied. More political science was involved selling SR1 as fast&cheap! Fed Govt see red flags, time will tell!
7 November, 2016
Thanks says:
I like concept 1 as the preferred option.
7 November, 2016
Sue Desmaries says:
As a Calgarian, I can't in good conscience support SR1. Don't make others pay for the city's decision to develop/live on a floodplain.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Provide equal protection to all. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River joint Reservoir of Alberta
7 November, 2016
Gretel says:
Let's get the Springbank Reservoir built before a flood wipes out downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Naomi says:
Several expert studies agreed this is the best option to effectively protect Calgary from a 1/100 year flood. Expedite the construction!
7 November, 2016
Peter Brimacombe says:
Impacts the least amount of people
Best cost benefit ratio
Least environmental impacts
2 governments have determined its the best option
7 November, 2016
D says:
Build berms in YYC. It's good enough for Bragg Creek?
No to SR1 and Yes to MC1
Seems like a well organized blitz for the SR1 crowd tonite.
7 November, 2016
joel says:
All I'm seeing here from SR1 supporters is: save my skin, screw everyone else! Not the Alberta way when there is a solution for all. Go MC1!
7 November, 2016
Ian says:
Springbank was selected by experts as the best solution to mitigate against the dire consequences of another flood like 2013. Let's do it!
7 November, 2016
K says:
I do not support SR1. It protects to few at to high a cost. Build on gov. land so everyone wins.
7 November, 2016
Todd says:
Save our families and our lives, complete the Springbank Res now!
7 November, 2016
K says:
Why dam perfectly good farmland and homes when Maclean creek (on crown land!) could be damed and used for tourism and wildlife habitat?
7 November, 2016
Patrick says:
The time is now to complete the SBR. Until it is done 100,000+ Calgarians live in fear of another catastrophic event like 2013.
7 November, 2016
Cam says:
Cncpt 1 has the best balance between protecting Calgary's downtown, and river communities, and the cost and effectiveness of other choices
7 November, 2016
Patricia Steele says:
I support the Springbank option. I feel upstream flood mitigation is critical to the long term viability of the City as a whole.
7 November, 2016
Justin says:
We urgently need to build the Springbank off stream reservoir project . Do not waste another year.
7 November, 2016
Doug says:
I am a strong supporter of the spring bank reservoir. This has taken a very long time to move this project forward and protect the downtown
7 November, 2016
Lillian says:
I strongly support the Springbank Dry Dam project and act now
7 November, 2016
Adam says:
Please build the Springbank Dam project ASAP
7 November, 2016
Oscar says:
Please do it. I understand the importance of community engagement but it's more important to act and implement programs to protect our city.
7 November, 2016
Jay says:
Springbank res should be the #1 solution and needs to be completed asap.It is practical & cost effective and will save lives & billions of $
7 November, 2016
sam says:
Yes to Springbank Dry Dam project. Please start right away.
7 November, 2016
EBA says:
Immediate protection of people and property. Longer term solutions should still be looked at and Sprinbank off stream first.
7 November, 2016
Victor Juchymenko says:
As a professional engineer, my opinion is that this is the no brainer option.
7 November, 2016
Jeanette says:
Both SR1 and MC1 will sacrifice wildlife habitat, but MC1 is on crown land and will protect more communities. Talk about the greater good!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
It took multiple rewrites of the Deltares report to get to even a luke warm endorsement of SR. That's not science, that is politics.
7 November, 2016
Jeanette says:
Please actually read the studies on SR1, it's not the magical solution it's being promoted to be! Build at MacLean instead...
7 November, 2016
Matt says:
Upstream mitigation on the Elbow River makes sense and needs to happen!
Support Springbank Dry Reservoir and /or McLean Creek Reservoir.
7 November, 2016
Cam inglis says:
It is the most complete way to protect the city core and its residents and impacts the fewest citizens
7 November, 2016
Calgarian says:
Upstream mitigation must be put in place ASAP. Insurance providers will not bail out the same people they helped in 2013.
7 November, 2016
JCB says:
The Springbank Reservoir is the best option for protecting Calgary's downtown core.
7 November, 2016
Matt Weir says:
I support the upstream Springbank Damming, in order to mitigate the flow of runoff and other variables collecting on the Elbow River
7 November, 2016
Neil says:
SB reservoir is the most objective solution.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Deltares report was based on preliminary engineering design by AMEC in 2014. This decision was not based on thorough science. Gotta call BS
7 November, 2016
Unbelievable says:
3 years after the flood, I can't believe we are debating whether flooding land or downtown homes and businesses is preferable.
7 November, 2016
CD says:
Being more concerned about fields covered in silt, rather than hundreds of families' homes filled with mud is selfish and misguided
7 November, 2016
Stan says:
From a macro, long term view, SB reservoir is a must. We need to act now!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
The process to get to SR1 was neither thorough nor objective. Only stakeholders consulted were within Calgary city limits. McLean is better
7 November, 2016
Rob-Elbow says:
Upstream reservoir was my initial and pervasive solution to the downstream flooding effects.
7 November, 2016
animji says:
This is very important for our city.
7 November, 2016
dmaucoin says:
Three years into this process and we are still discussing this. Build the Springbank Dam and get on with it.
7 November, 2016
concord says:
Springbank must go ahead. Calgary is the economic engine of Alberta and almost was completely flooded if the Elbow continued to rise.
7 November, 2016
Pat says:
I support the Springbank Reservoir project and urge that it be completed as quickly as possible to mitigate flooding and drought.
7 November, 2016
Mike says:
Complaints of potential "mudflats" and "ruined" grasslands are complete exaggerations. The parkland flooded in 2013 has completely regrown.
7 November, 2016
neil says:
reduce environmental impact from any sizable flood compared to dry dam impact.
7 November, 2016
Calgary resident says:
All the alternatives have been studied thoroughly and this is the clear and most practical solution to protect our city
7 November, 2016
neil says:
decease stress of over 100,000 people directly effected in 2013. protect downtown Calgary and surrounding areas from huge potential losses.
7 November, 2016
HJM says:
This is by far the best option. By next spring, it will be 4 years, the communities and the city cannot afford to wait any longer.
7 November, 2016
Steve says:
Please go ahead with SR1 ASAP! The City can not go through another 2013 flood and neither can my family! It makes sense cost wise!
7 November, 2016
Kathy says:
I support construction of dam in springbank (flood mitigation).
7 November, 2016
Anne says:
I cannot support SR1 and am astounded at how many wish to secure their own well being at the expense of others. Please build MacLean creek!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
I am a Calgarian and will stand with my Elbow River neighbours to support McLean Creek. I will not support harm to my Springbank neighbours
7 November, 2016
Protect our City says:
We came within a foot or so of losing downtown and impacting many more Calgarian residences and businesses. Mitigation makes sense.
7 November, 2016
Common Sense says:
People who don't like a result complain about the process. Springbank reservoir just makes too much sense.
7 November, 2016
Michael says:
The Springbank reservoir was selected after a thorough and objective evaluation of all viable alternatives.
7 November, 2016
Andrea says:
The Springbank reservoir is vital to protect the most people for the least impact.
7 November, 2016
mclean better says:
Strengths - someone thought of it
Weakness - doesn't consider McLean Cr
Mclean Creek doesn't take private land, SR1 will be a mudflat
7 November, 2016
Susan says:
After attending a flood mitigation workshop and exploring the concepts in depth, full implementation of the Springbank reservoir is urgent!!
7 November, 2016
David Evans says:
The strength of concept 1 lies in its dual purpose. It provides both flood protection measures and used to retain water during drought.
7 November, 2016
MC says:
SR1 is far too expensive and does not protect enough people- if we can all agree on MC1 we can all benefit.
7 November, 2016
SEM says:
This is NOT a popularity contest. The best solution should be based on science, monetary benefits and quick implementation.
7 November, 2016
kevinL says:
We must build springbank reservoir! Benefits far outweigh the cost. We must protect downtown & the hundreds of homes in river neighborhoods
7 November, 2016
YYCtoobig says:
Inappropriate and overbuilt solution for homes built on flood plain. Reservoir further upstream to create mountain recreation opportunities.
7 November, 2016
C.W. says:
I support the position of The Calgary River Communities Action Group
7 November, 2016
C& a says:
We are fully support
7 November, 2016
YYC says:
Protection of Alberta's economic centre is vital. Fully support SR1. Build it asap!
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
I support the Springbank Project. Do it now.
7 November, 2016
C. W. says:
Mitation needs to begin on this project (Concept 1) and be completed quickly to prevent another 2013 diaster so costly to all Albertans.
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
Calgary suffered severe flooding in 2005 and in 2013. These floods caused massive economic and personal losses. Prevent further flooding now
7 November, 2016
Sandy says:
Dams are required to protect the low lying areas in Calgary, let's get on with it!
7 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it!
7 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
Let's get this project underway before we run into another event similar to 2013!!! The whole downtown is at risk!!!
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
SR1 is NOT the cheaper option. An honest cost assessment has not been done. Much more land needed than proposed, wildlife affected as well.
7 November, 2016
Robert Edgar says:
Strength is a must in order to protect Calgary
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
A FEW springbank landowners? How ignorant and selfish can you possibly be! Hilarious! MC1 to protect several communities! Do your research.
7 November, 2016
Make it happen says:
Protecting Calgary's downtown, infrastructure, and Communities. Minimizing potential loss of life.
7 November, 2016
Flooded twice says:
We must do this. Sometimes the "needs of the many" outweigh the "needs of the few" - not just in the movies. Get it done!
7 November, 2016
Steve says:
SR1 has been studied by environmental companies and two governments. Stop the time wasting and build it before another 2013 flood arrives!
7 November, 2016
Siren says:
an upstream reservoir may unfortunately impact some individuals, but it is necessary to protect the city as a whole
7 November, 2016
Johannes devries says:
The springbank diversion plan is an absolute necessity
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbankers are NIMBYs? what does that make those who only want the Elbow in their backyard at certain flow rates?
7 November, 2016
No to SR1 says:
The cost benefit analysis has grossly underestimated the cost of SR1. You were warned if it goes through it's not the cheapest/best option.
7 November, 2016
Shannon says:
This is not just about Calgary! Maclean Creek won't destroy our heritage ranches & protects Bragg Creek!
7 November, 2016
John says:
The most cost effective option to achieve flood mitigation goals. Maximum effect, minimum disruption. But treat those affected fairly!
7 November, 2016
Nadir says:
This seems the best option but I would leave the decision to the experts. The main issue is to do something to mitigate Calgary flooding.
7 November, 2016
Len Sandrin says:
Upstream mitigation is absolutely necessary to prevent catastrophic flooding in the city. It is the most important piece of the solution
7 November, 2016
Flooded out says:
Get it done already
7 November, 2016
Mh says:
Springbank will be a good start. We need this for the city and as someone who was flooded out in 2013, will go a long way for piece of mind
7 November, 2016
Mightbeuseful says:
Where will the folks from Springbank bring their kid's 4H animals if the Calgary Stampede Grounds are underwater?
What about flames fans?
7 November, 2016
Andrew says:
I fully support the concept of an upstream dam to protect the city. If Springbank is the best location for this, then so be it.
7 November, 2016
No $$$ says:
Why should any of my tax $ be spent for people who buy homes in low areas, then want the us to save them. You made your choice live with it
7 November, 2016
Linda Taylor says:
I support the Springbank option which has been reviewed & confirmed as the best option to protect Calgary & further downstream communities.
7 November, 2016
Blake O'Brien says:
This seems like the only logical "solution" to me.
7 November, 2016
Bob G says:
As victims of 2013 flood, it is a misconception that we were offered buyouts and that insurance covered our losses. It cost us huge $.
7 November, 2016
Lynn G says:
We strongly support the Springbank Reservoir project to protect our communities and the downtown. We cannot afford another 2013 flood.
7 November, 2016
Brandon says:
what is the cost to clean out the debris after a flood event? I'm concerned about air quality from a dust bowl.
7 November, 2016
Paul Baay says:
This seems to be the he only long term solution to properly protect the economy of one of the most vibrant cities in the world.
7 November, 2016
Brandon says:
It is not cost effective. The concept design is only protecting a select few communities over smaller towns and communities outside Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Arthur says:
I want and support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project. This is the best option . What are we waiting for?????????
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project-------we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
DS says:
Our neighborhood and city urgently need mitigation. The Springbank dam is the best solution from a cost-benefit perspective.
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support Springbank off-stream Project-----we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary '
7 November, 2016
Mrs. Harper says:
Fact-Alberta Gov't Environment Dept has never studied SR1-Ask them yourself-They have never seen the file. Biggest myth this is well studied
7 November, 2016
Pat says:
With the amount of damage done in 2013, the reservoir is the only answer. Stop talking about this and let's have some action.
7 November, 2016
HCole says:
Is this not a provincially funded project? Why is only Calgary being protected and not other Albertan communities? No to SR1, Yes to MC1.
7 November, 2016
HCole says:
I don't want my tax dollars going toward a project that only protects some while sacrificing others.
7 November, 2016
RickyG says:
An upstream Elbow River dam is a better solution protecting more communities like Bragg, Redwood, Springbank and Tnai lands along with Calga
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support the "Springbank offstream Reservoir Project,
Mary
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Maximize use of excess water to areas of the province that are drought prone. Irrigation!
7 November, 2016
H says:
The Sprinbank Reservoir solution is the most effective and well thought out solution to avoid a repeat disaster and needs to proceed ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Hannah Geist says:
Why doesn't this map show the full scale of the dry dam (almost the size of Airdrie!)? More misinformation meant to push SR1. Go Maclean.
7 November, 2016
SR1 Please says:
We have seen the destruction of a large portion of the City of Calgary. Not convinced that SR1 will destroy grassland. It doesn't equate.
7 November, 2016
hgfjg says:
Has anyone even looked at the plans for SR1? They have water running uphill! No to Springbank! Dam Maclean, protect everyone!
7 November, 2016
Maureen says:
The SB reservoir has been studied and best serves the city .It has been approved; a few neg private interests should change the decision
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
RockyView County is opposed to SR1. They state it will sterilize farmland, contaminate water and pollute the air. No upside for RVC. Yes MC1
7 November, 2016
BL says:
I fully support the Springbank option. It protects river communities BUT just as importantly, protects downtown businesses -small & large.
7 November, 2016
T says:
The Springbank Option has been reviewed by a number of experts and comes out as the best alternative overall. It's time to committ to it.
7 November, 2016
DJ says:
As a flooded resident I can tell you that the biggest myth is that we were offered a buyout, or indeed any public funds at all.We paid!
7 November, 2016
Greg L. says:
Doesn't anyone realize 2013 was a freak occurrence that will never happen again in our lifetimes? Why ruin any communities over nothing?
7 November, 2016
no sr1 says:
What ever happened to being good neighbours? A dam at MacLean Creek would offer the most protection without further destroying communities.
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Prague floods. Vienna does not. They figured it out and DID something!
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Instead of buying land, agree to cover crop or property losses if and when flood occurs. MB farmers still farm beside the dike.
7 November, 2016
CW says:
The Springbank option has been throughly vetted by two governing parties (Conservatives & NDP). Please end the delays and begin construction
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
If downtown Calgary is not protected head offices will leave Calgary particularly in light of the higher tax rate that now exists in AB.
7 November, 2016
Tyler says:
AS albertans are paying for this, it must protect the most albertans possible. Not just YYC Elbow River communities.
7 November, 2016
Eric M says:
I feel Springbank dam is not right. Protect more people is a must. SR1 does not provide equal protection to all citizens, in YYC our out
7 November, 2016
Maria says:
Springbank is the most viable option to protect homes, businesses and important city infrastructure. Calgary cannot afford another 2013.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
Springbank's wide input channel will safely ingest large debris (many large trees) whereas McLean's narrow flow channel is susceptible. Duh
7 November, 2016
Tom Kent says:
great idea. need to protect downtown and water from Elbow wants to go to Bow once it overflows banks. get Springbank done soon!
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
With the Springbank project being closely positioned to the City, it provides snow/rain protection sourced on the greatest land area. Duh.
7 November, 2016
Mary Saucier says:
By far my biggest concern to the time it is taking to begin the Spring bank Reservoir!!!! What is the hold-up?
7 November, 2016
Mary Saucier says:
My biggest worry just now is that the decision to build the upstream reservoir on the Elbow river, which caused by far the greatest damage
7 November, 2016
Darlene rogers says:
I am not an environmentalist nor do I have scientific credentials but it makes sense to protect our city from upstream activity.
7 November, 2016
PTSD says:
Yes, still PTSD symptoms! Action on Springbank is needed to protect YYC lives, businesses and homes and to help turn around our economy.
7 November, 2016
fklein68 says:
I fully support this concept. I think it would protect the city with very little negative impact. Only some 20 landowners would be affected
7 November, 2016
F Cropper says:
SR-1 needs to go ahead as soon as possible to protect the citizens of Calgary and the downtown core.
Do not wait!
7 November, 2016
Jean Beca says:
Equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities
Protect Calgary's economic core? I live in Rideau Rocksbough.DOIT
7 November, 2016
Richard says:
These upstream reservoirs are essential to protect people and property in Calgary. Building dykes/concrete walls is not enough; we need both
7 November, 2016
Rich says:
Properly assess the McLean Creek option using recent data (NOT the outdated data of the previous and current governments)
7 November, 2016
DnT says:
Flood Mitigation is critical to the long term safety and prosperity of Calgary. Springbank is the best option for Calgary, period.
7 November, 2016
Roxboro Owner says:
SR1 has been thoroughly studied, and has been rigorously compared to the alternatives. It is clearly the choice to be made. Action is needed
7 November, 2016
Dooley r says:
Clearly this is required since the repeat of a 2013 flood or worse would have a terrible impact on the city, Alberta and nationally.
7 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Environmentalists will stall McLean Creek indefinitely. We need flood protection now, so I support Springbank and improving Glenmore Dam.
7 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Two provincial governments have agreed on Springbank. Let's proceed. We cannot afford another downtown flood, caused by the Elbow River.
7 November, 2016
ratfink says:
There is no comparison between the massive damage to an entire city from another flood, and the minimal disruption to a few landowners.
7 November, 2016
Jason says:
It is ludicrous this decision is based on public opinion versus which will protect the city the best. Concept 1 is the best choice.
7 November, 2016
HD says:
The environmental impact of flooded appliances and building materials headed for the landfill is enormous compared to water in a field.
7 November, 2016
ratfink says:
Please get this project underway. It will protect everyone. Don't let a few vocal landers owners obstruct the right solution.
7 November, 2016
dbe says:
Build the springbank reservoir asap. Enough time has been wasted.
7 November, 2016
DJ says:
SR1 would have prevented tens of thousands of families losing their homes and billions of dollars in damage.
Build it now!
7 November, 2016
Allan says:
Need to protect Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows as well as Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Agata korth says:
Please just get this dry dam completed, we've all discussed this every which way possible....we are sick of discussing, just get it built!!!
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Baloney that a few dozen people can NIMBY and keep Calgary at risk. Expropriate, the rent pasture back to the original owner. SR1 NOW
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Floods caused many BILLIONS of damage. And will happen again. Do not forget 2013. SR1 NOW
7 November, 2016
NDM says:
Maclean Creek is the best initiative and perhaps finding an insurance company that insures for floods in the interim.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Naysayers complain that dust will blow out of SR1. Don't they think dust will blow out of flooded Calgary? SR1 NOW.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
SR1 land will still be grazing land 99% of the time. It is not lost, in spite of what a VERY FEW NIMBY types say.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Springbank is the best choice. Being downstream of McLean Creek the Springbank option can catch water from the mountains AND the foothills
7 November, 2016
Mbhannam says:
It is now going on four years post flood. Our neighbourhood is still rebuilding. PLEASE build the spring bank dam and let us rest easy.
7 November, 2016
Angelique says:
Protecting our city and rivers are mandatory. This is the strongest option to prevent and assist in another devastating flood.
7 November, 2016
Mandy says:
The ability to support a 2013 flood level is essential to protect not just residents along the Elbow river, but also Calgary's economic core
7 November, 2016
MB says:
Please get moving on SR1. The benefit to the entire inner city of Calgary outweighs the concerns of a few Springbank residents.
7 November, 2016
PP28 says:
does nothing to protect the communities of Bragg Creek or Redwood Meadows. It will destroy heritage farm lands and families in Springbank
7 November, 2016
Tim says:
Springbank dry dam is the best solution.
7 November, 2016
Sally says:
Since when did destruction of a community become an acceptable choice when there are alternatives? Mclean Creek, the Tunnel or Tri River!
7 November, 2016
BM says:
Action SR-1. McLean Creek will never happen so stop putting it out as some viable option. You're all just distracting from viable options.
7 November, 2016
Rachel says:
It seems like a few dozen landowners against hundreds of thousands of Albertans that need the downtown core protected. Let's move on SR1
7 November, 2016
protect everyone says:
Upstream mitigation is LONG overdue. Build SR 1 before another catastrophic flood affects ALL Calgarians.
7 November, 2016
BM says:
Action SR-1. Three years have passed since Calgary was shutdown. Stop the navel gazing. It's embarrassing. Springbank will be fine.
7 November, 2016
SR1 please says:
Sediment management is easier in a dry reservoir as the reservoir is not continually subject to daily sedimentation - flood events only.
7 November, 2016
gm says:
Build! The Springbank Dry Dam is the best choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary
7 November, 2016
Michael Mulloy says:
I am in favour of the Springbank reservoir
7 November, 2016
Conrad says:
Calgary cannot afford another flood.We must build the Springbank dry dam!!!
7 November, 2016
tdwr says:
The Springbank Project is in the public interest of the City of Calgary, and the operations of downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
david says:
best overall option ... fully support this plan.
7 November, 2016
Percy Lazdins says:
Not an option. as it makes no sense!!!! Does not protect Red Wood Meadows, Bragg Creek and residences in between.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Protection of Calgary must be top priority given the number of people with property and livelihoods at risk.
7 November, 2016
NH says:
We support the Springbank Dry Dam. Please act quickly to protect the homes of families in the path of Elbow River flooding.
7 November, 2016
Bbiddell says:
Please proceed with spring bank- this will benefit the most people and homes by far and we can't risk this extensive damage again!
7 November, 2016
Living on a hill says:
Pandering to rich fools who buy riverfront property and then cry when it floods. Work with Mother Nature and buy out flood plain properties
7 November, 2016
Paul V. says:
I think this solution affects the least amount of people and is a fair balance to all parties. Please proceed ASAP.
7 November, 2016
LMH says:
Protect our city. Build SR1. It will benefit the majority. We need mitigation now!
7 November, 2016
Kim says:
We need to do this ASAP!!!
7 November, 2016
Build springbank says:
Protect downtown calgary and build spring bank
7 November, 2016
MR says:
The Springbank Dry Dam is the essential choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary and Alberta.
7 November, 2016
Bryan W says:
Springbank Reservoir is the best solution: its quick, relatively inexpensive and least likely to run into environmental roadblocks.
7 November, 2016
David Calnan says:
I support the idea. It is low impact and low cost solution. It will protect in some flood events and provide needed time in all.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Maclean Creek is not necessary to protect those upstream of SR1 & will take 10 years to be put in place, if ever.
7 November, 2016
Springbank says:
Import to proceed with spring bank due to cost benefit to the downtown corr
7 November, 2016
Sue says:
Build Springbank. It is the best option for the money and for the environment. The Elbow flooded downtown Calgary!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Residents upstream of SR1 have already seen mitigation measures instituted to protect Red Wood Meadows & Bragg Creek
7 November, 2016
Linda Gardner says:
We need to get moving on this as soon as possible. Time is of the essence. The further we are away from 2013, people start forgetting.
7 November, 2016
BowRiverResident says:
There needs to be more than just operational changes on the Ghost Reservoir - need more storage capacity on the Bow to properly protect YYC!
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
The destruction of pristine grasslands & agricultural land is disturbing. What is motivating the NDP to renege on their stance b4 election?
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Require Springbank reservoir to be built ASAP - the #of residents hurt by flooding greatly outweighs the few well off landowners impacted
7 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
Just curious if the DDSB folks realize the folly of their arguments? 2 very different governments came to the same conclusion. YES TO SR1!!
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
This approach causes environmental & ecological damage to the Springbank area, and leaving the effluent in situ introduces health concerns.
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
This plan is not the most comprehensive solution available as it provides no protection to Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows.
7 November, 2016
Gail M says:
Calgary residents expect empathy for flooding, yet show none for their upstream neighbours? Dam MacLean Creek and keep everyone safe!
7 November, 2016
SR1 yes says:
Nutrients from floods can be beneficial to grasslands. City waste in our rivers can't be good for downstream irrigation / municipalities.
7 November, 2016
JKS says:
ruining springbank to protect Calgary still does nothing for those residents upstream of springbank, other solutions make more sense.
7 November, 2016
James says:
Maclean offers protection to the most number of people and costs are predictable. SR1 will cost the province too much for coverage of few.
7 November, 2016
EB says:
The health and economics of the whole city, along Bow and Elbow Rivers, hangs in the balance as we stall on mitigation upstream. Build it.
7 November, 2016
SR1 now says:
Rockyview is moving ahead with local flood mitigation in Bragg Creek. We also need to protect a large population in Calgary.
7 November, 2016
SG says:
Maclean Creek is the best option. Protection to Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Elbow residents. Even NDP knew this to be true pre election
7 November, 2016
sdb says:
Springbank has been proven to be the best option, with less environmental impact. DO IT QUICKLY! Protect Calgary.
7 November, 2016
ka says:
the options have been analyzed and springbank is the best option to protect the elbow and downtown. Do not delay
7 November, 2016
Anthony says:
The govt's figures for land acquisition at Springbank are way too low. What is really going on here? And the proposed dam is ENORMOUS.
7 November, 2016
Coexistance says:
Off Stream storage would be empty most often. Could off stream reservoir land continue to be used for grazing in non flood season? SR1 go!
7 November, 2016
Margaret says:
Buying 6800 acres of farmland makes no sense. It would cost us tax-payers billions and not be effective. Build berms and barriers.
7 November, 2016
PTSD says:
It is ridiculous that a handful of people upstream of Calgary continues to put the entire city at risk. Build Springbank soon!
7 November, 2016
Sandra says:
People seem to think that a dam at Springbank will protect ALL Calgary. It won't. It will only protect along the Elbow River,
7 November, 2016
Grass and Cattle says:
Temporary flooding of grasslands could work for livestock and grassland. Mclean Creek would require massive clear cutting of trees.
7 November, 2016
dc says:
Why is this a popularity contest? We need upstream mitigation measures now. Two successive government have chosen SR1. Get on with it!!!
7 November, 2016
Luellaj says:
This option provides no protection for any community upstream of Springbank. Use McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Action Required says:
Options have been closely analyzed. SR1 has the best CB ratio and the least environmental impact. Time for action. SR1 Please!
7 November, 2016
Practical Catchment2 says:
80% of the excess runoff is generated in the mountains before it ever gets to Bragg Creek. SRI being downstream of Mclean does not help.
7 November, 2016
Practical Catchment says:
SR1 is closer to Calgary and will catch more upstream runoff than McLean Creek ever could. SR1's proximity to Calgary makes more sense.
7 November, 2016
Marc says:
Such a bad plan. Springbank resevoir makes no sense - cost or practical considerations. Protect upstream communities! Use MacLean Creek!
7 November, 2016
Flood Safety Risk says:
One death from flooding is too many; it could easily have been much worse. Failure to protect a major City is unacceptable. SR1 ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Fisheries says:
Off Stream storage has less impact on fisheries. Stream flow interruptions are minimum during normal operating stream flow. Yes Sr1!
7 November, 2016
emee says:
We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Please proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.
7 November, 2016
WMR says:
This option makes the most sense considering all perspectives: environmental, community impact and financial.
Proceed NOW!
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
SR1 avoids the need for walls 6m to 10m high along the Elbow, RUINING community. Confined by walls, flood water height will be greater!
7 November, 2016
Sustainability says:
Off Stream Storage is more sustainable to manage in the long term. Build SR1 Now
7 November, 2016
Cost of No Action says:
The Environmental Cost of doing nothing is too great. Flooded Calgary businesses pollute our rivers. Build Sr1 now.
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
Safety DICTATES SR1. It is only 10m high and can avoid being used before it is safely finalized - unlike MacLean Creek (50m high).
7 November, 2016
Fran says:
Enough fear mongering. No one in Calgary was harmed by any toxic dust - and we had all of Calgary's sewer in our basements. Yes to SR1
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
Safety is ALL IMPORTANT with dams, particularly high dams (50m) like MacLean Creek. Poor rock and vulnerable during the lengthy construction
7 November, 2016
Long Term Vision says:
The Environmental cost of not building SR1 is too Great. 90,000 tons of incremental waste in Calgary Landfills from 2013 alone. Build SR1!
7 November, 2016
Protect us! says:
8 grizzlies in Springbank? They'll be just fine. The grizzly corridor at McLean Creek however will pose a major problem. Build Springbank!
7 November, 2016
Build the reservoir says:
Do you seriously think the professional environmentalists will let McLean Creek see the light of day? Not likely. Build SR1. Only option.
7 November, 2016
Build it! says:
The dry dam is being engineered as a reservoir that could be used for longer term containment, e.g., if a drought. It's the best option!
7 November, 2016
Enough already says:
Toxic flood mud? Really? Fear mongering is all that is. Your grassland will survive. All our lawns did just fine. Build the dry dam.
7 November, 2016
Stop fear mongering says:
The province will remediate any harm to the Springbank land. No one did that for Calgary and all the grass survived just fine. Build SR1!!
7 November, 2016
build SR1 says:
Very tired of the fear mongering. Flood mud will not kill your pasture. City parks and lawns all recovered without any mitigation.
7 November, 2016
False Info says:
Parks all over the city were covered in flood mud. Guess what? After some rain they all looked good as new. Nothing died. Build SR1!
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
RE SR1, the current EIA is taking FAR too long. Cut time in half and let the NRCB decide if it is adequate. SR1 s/b flood ready Spring 2019.
7 November, 2016
Sara says:
Ranchland is not usable after flooding. Lack of oxygen and light kills grassland. Disease laden dust bowl left. Google dry dam photos.
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
SR1 will put river water on prairie grass a couple of times a century. Zero environmental impact compared to power plants, refineries, etc.
7 November, 2016
James Cran says:
Springbank is absolutely the best item. It is cheap and quick to build and safe during construction while MacLean Creek is dangerous (50m hi
7 November, 2016
Sara says:
SR1 will kill the grassland, contaminate groundwater and blow diseases towards Calgary. Environmental concerns are real. Use McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Colleen says:
Upstream reservoirs are a good idea, but why not further upstream than Bragg Creek, why Springbank?
7 November, 2016
Colleen says:
Why are Springbank and communities upstream from Springbank considered acceptable sacrifices? Calgarians need to consider others too.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
The so called "independent" study done by Deltares was not much more than a book report. Lots of "according to the reports" in it. Dam MC.
7 November, 2016
John says:
We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Time to proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Khan says:
SR1 has far less impact to the environment as MC is further upstream, affecting countless wildlife habitats. SR1 is the smart choice.
7 November, 2016
BL says:
SR1 has been researched and has been shown to be the best option. It has been over 3 yrs since the flood and time for SR1 to proceed.
7 November, 2016
Calgary-1 says:
Springbank was approved by two separate government bodies, after extensive studies, scientific data was used to come to the right conclusion
7 November, 2016
CM says:
Please explain how can they acquire 6,800 acres of prime ranchland (and riverfront) at a cost of only $40 million? Less than $6K per acre?
7 November, 2016
kc says:
@Basement Water: Why are Urban lives and livelihoods more important than rural ones? The MacLean dam would protect everyone!
7 November, 2016
Mbetzner says:
We absolutely need protective measures for both the Bow River and the Elbow river. Massive property damage occurred along both systems.
7 November, 2016
kc says:
Drought will be a much bigger issue in the coming years than flooding. What good will a dry dam do? Build MC1!
7 November, 2016
LLG says:
Why should some be sacrificed for the good of others when an option to protect everyone exists? Dam MacLean Creek!
7 November, 2016
K says:
@ Martin: SR1 opponents care VERY MUCH about flood mitigation that works for all involved, that's why we are pushing for MacLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
I support the Bow River reservoir. It's a necessity for flood mitigation in Calgary.
7 November, 2016
rsw says:
Springbank is necessary and benefits ALL Calgarians. We must protect the core and Springbank is the BEST option.
7 November, 2016
LL says:
I support the Springbank project.
7 November, 2016
Evonne says:
DO NOT unnecessarily delay the Springbank mitigation project. The Springbank Project is in the best interests of Calgarians and Albertans.
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
The Springbank dam will protect from the environmental damage of the massive clean up and rebuild. One years worth of landfill usage for ex
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
The cost benefit analysis of losing the downtown core for an extended period (which almost happened last time) needs to be considered.
7 November, 2016
Concerned citizen says:
As an individual who wants flood mitigation and has reviewed all options, I see MANY issues with SR1. MC1 protects more ppl. No to SR1.
7 November, 2016
Basement Water says:
Note to the selfish lot of Springbank land owners; this is about protecting a city & lives NOT some farmland.
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
An independent study, confirmed by the NDP, have identified Springbank as the best upstream solution for the Elbow River
7 November, 2016
Calgary-1 says:
We need protection for the city of Calgary, downtown core, and the 100,000 residents that were last affected by the flood. SR1!!!
7 November, 2016
Terri says:
Only those who live outside Springbank support this dam, not those who actually will be affected by the project. It's an unhealthy choice.
7 November, 2016
#WOEISME says:
Poor Springbank owners, your soooooo right. Let a city of 1M plus be vulnerable so your cattle can graze. Build it!
7 November, 2016
mly says:
MacLean Creek - YES!!!! No to SR! Where does Bragg Creek fit into this scenario?? Why would we want to be exclusive?
7 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
There is simply no way that MacLean Creek, given environmental concerns, would ever be built - so build SR1. Now. Period.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
97% of letters to CEAA were against SR1. These well researched, carefully drafted letters outlined many environmental concerns. No to SR1.
7 November, 2016
Martin says:
I support SR1 - Don't Dam Springbank don't care about mitigation. Period.
7 November, 2016
Bob says:
I fully support SR1!
7 November, 2016
MelanieS says:
Why not manage dams better? Lower Ghost and Bearspaw every spring? Nice star on map please show actual size of Springbank Drydam. McLean #1.
7 November, 2016
Nenshi says:
MacLean Creek is a better solution. Cheaper, faster, and helps all involved communities.
7 November, 2016
Greg says:
The options have been well studied (i.e., SR1, MacLean Creek Dam and the Glenmore Tunnel) - the conclusion is that SR1 is best.
7 November, 2016
ProtectYYC says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
7 November, 2016
Save YYC says:
Premier Prentice picked the SR1 as the best option after a full review. Don't kid yourself - Mclean Creek will never be built.
7 November, 2016
PProtectYYC says:
The Springbank reservoir is a NO-BRAINER! Sorry Springbank residents, the very few of you affected cannot deny a city of 1.1M protection.
7 November, 2016
LaurieEH says:
SR1 will contaminate Calgary water & ruin agricultural lands & wildlife habitat for YEARS! Dam McLean Creek & protect EVERYONE upstream!
7 November, 2016
Donna Robinson says:
Residents of Springbank should not be flooded out to save those in the City of Calgary. Use Maclean Creek option to protect everyone.
7 November, 2016
Clay Robinson says:
Maclean Creek protects everyone on the Elbow River including Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. Springbank protects only the City of Calgary
7 November, 2016
Calgary now says:
I strongly support the Springbank project. The landowners will be treated fairly and receive far better compensation than any flood victims
7 November, 2016
Aileen for YYC says:
Stop flood water from entering the City - starting with the Springbank project. It's the only hope for protecting our future as a City.
7 November, 2016
Modernize YYC says:
We are a modern City and we need modern protection! Build the springbank off-stream reservoir and figure out how to fix the Bow.
7 November, 2016
Karen W says:
Duff's Ditch had opponents too - but is now viewed as a huge success! Get on with it Alberta - build the Springbank project!
7 November, 2016
Yes to protection! says:
Yes to Springbank! We can't leave the downtown vulnerable. Both rivers flood the Core - start now!
7 November, 2016
Build now! says:
Springbank land is grazing land and can continue to be used for that the majority of the time. Build the dry dam and protect the City!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
8 Grizzle bears settled and are living in the proposed Dam area, not to mention countless other animals. Don't destroy their habitats.
7 November, 2016
SR1 says:
Inconvenient Truth: Yes - SR1 protects the Core which is flooded by BOTH RIVERS! Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Calgary needs protection - just like every other major city in the world. Start with Springbank - build the dry dam ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
Good job province for acting swiftly post-flood to find solutions. Build SR1 now and find solutions on the Bow. Protect Calgary!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
These are heritage ranches that have had generations ranching and farming on them. But why would Albertans care about that?
7 November, 2016
Merran says:
Build Springbank dry dam now! And find a solution on the Bow. The province is doing a great job- keep it up!
7 November, 2016
SR1 Now says:
The province acted swiftly post-2013 flood to find solutions for flooding. SR1 is the first project that needs building. Fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Val in Calgary says:
I strongly support protecting Calgary and the first project we need to get done is the Springbank dry dam.
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
Yes, protect downtown. Springbank does NOT protect downtown. Other options need review. No to SR1, it is misguided.
7 November, 2016
Meg says:
Yes to the Springbank Dry Dam! It's doable. It's needed. It must be done!
7 November, 2016
Calgary says:
Save Canada's economic engine and start with the Springbank Off-stream Reservoir!
7 November, 2016
AB says:
This Concept - flood infrastructure on both rivers - is absolutely the way to go. Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
SaveCalgary says:
Tearing down homes and skyscrapers in Calgary is not a viable solution. Springbank project is. Build it ASAP and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
The Springbank Dam will be a health hazard to anyone who lives down wind or down stream, they have no plans to clean it up after flooding it
7 November, 2016
Urgent!! says:
The Elbow and Bow Rivers both flood downtown. Start with SR1 for the Elbow and find solutions for the Bow. It's urgent!
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
The BOW River caused the majority of the City's grief. WHY is a fix on the Elbow being pushed? SR1 is bad public policy and irresponsible.
7 November, 2016
Still Vulnerable says:
Yes to Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir! It's about time. Look at Duff's Ditch? A 70 year dry spell has left us complacent. Wait no longer
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
There are other options that don't destroy one community to save another, choose McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Protect us! says:
The majority may not be as loud as the minority - but make no mistake, this City wants the Springbank project built ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Paul YYC says:
SAVE THE CORE or whoever you are, stop spamming under different names. It only shows desperation.
7 November, 2016
Save the city says:
Calgary was built on the confluence of two rivers. Both need fixing. Start with Springbank dry dam and find a solution for the Bow!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
The Springbank reservoir is bad public policy, a health hazard after it being flooded and is a huge environmental impact to animals homes
7 November, 2016
LM says:
It's ludicrous that no action has yet been taken, almost 4 years after the flood. Build Springbank! It is objectively the best choice.
7 November, 2016
Calgary! says:
Springbank is the best solution for Calgary. Do not delay. Prioritize this important public works project! Work with the province!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
Why is it okay to flood out one community to save another when they live on a flood plain. Why punish one community to save another.
7 November, 2016
Save our City says:
I strongly support the Springbank project. It protects thousands of homes and businesses and is needed to protect the Core.
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
McLean Dam and Tri-River Joint Reservoir were not thoroughly reviewed as options. Springbank Dry Dam is irresponsible water management.
7 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
Yes to Springbank Off-stream Reservoir. Protect the downtown by fixing both rivers ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Build Springbank! says:
City water engineers have repeatedly said the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown - which cannot be protected without fixing both rivers.
7 November, 2016
Protect Downtown says:
Both rivers flood the Core - the centre of our City and basis of our province's economy. Build Springbank and find a fix for the Bow!
7 November, 2016
No more flooding! says:
Like all mitigation measures, the Springbank dam will negatively affect some, but will benefit a much larger community and economic centre.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 4: SR1 will create ideal conditions for the breeding of Mosquitos. Zika mosquitos have made it to Canada. Calgary next?
7 November, 2016
Protect the Core says:
Calgary needs the Springbank dam and a fix on the Bow. Both are needed to protect the downtown Core, City Hall, the East Village, etc.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth3: Agricultural lands can be used after flooding. 90 days without oxygen or light will kill all vegetation and crops.
7 November, 2016
LMack says:
The Springbank project has already been objectively proven to be the best to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.
7 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Build SR1. There is strong support in Calgary. Along with empathy for the Springbank landowners - but they will be treated fairly.
7 November, 2016
Save Downtown says:
The Core floods from both rivers. We can't save the core without upstream mitigation on both. Start with Springbank and find a fix for Bow!
7 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
The City of Calgary knows that the Elbow contributes to flooding the downtown. Fix both rivers - starting with the Springbank project.
7 November, 2016
Fix the Elbow! says:
Calgary wants SR1. Yes - the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown. Both rivers need fixing. Let's get on with fixing the Elbow ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 2: Stantec Project Report 5.3.5. Residue from SR1 may contain raw sewage susceptible to blow into Calgary on west winds.
7 November, 2016
Average citizen says:
Springbank background suggests that governments are listening to private wealthy people Vs looking at wise spending of provincial tax dollar
7 November, 2016
Save Calgary! says:
There is strong support in Calgary for the Springbank reservoir - especially amongst those well informed. It's our only option. Build it!
7 November, 2016
Save the City says:
Calgary needs the Springbank dry dam. Using private land for public works is an old concept. Happens all the time for the greater good.
7 November, 2016
LW says:
Springbank Reservoir is presented as a " quick Fix" Do we want quick fix or spend our tax dollars cost effectively. good for all
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
SR1 opposers are not against prudent flood mitigation. City Land Use needs review. City needs a plan, not on the backs of others!
7 November, 2016
save calgary says:
Yes to the Springbank dry dam. It makes sense. Keep the flood water out of the City. The land will be useable for grazing when no flood.
7 November, 2016
LW says:
Springbank Reservoir .. most overall costly project . Combined costs for it, Bragg Creek, Redwood meadows, and First nations besides losses
7 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
Build Springbank! The government is being pragmatic. McLean Creek would never get built. Too many contingencies. Expropriation is normal.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 1: Stantec Project Report 5.3.4. SR1 may contaminate groundwater and wells. Springbank relies on clean water wells.
7 November, 2016
Baymare says:
The Springbank Reservoir- is bad public policy. Does not protect Bragg Creek, Redwood or Tsuu Tina. It takes homes, heritage and businesses.
7 November, 2016
Stop Floods! says:
Yes to Springbank! McLean Creek has too many contingencies and will never get built. Where does that leave Calgary? Protect YYC!
7 November, 2016
Stop Floods! says:
The less vocal majority wants SR1. Anyone informed on flood mitigation understands why it's the best solution. Fix the river!
7 November, 2016
YesSR1 says:
I strongly support building the Springbank project and finding a solution for the Bow. Please do not delay! Their is strong support!
7 November, 2016
Fix YYC says:
Calgary is vulnerable to floods. Why?? It's embarrassing. Please build SR1 ASAP and find a solution on the Bow.
7 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
Yes to Springbank Dry Dam. The City needs protection. And find a solution for the Bow too.
7 November, 2016
City wants SR1 says:
Build SR1. Calgary needs it and everyone wants it! Strong support in the City for those informed on flood mitigation.
7 November, 2016
Prioritize fixes! says:
We need the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir and a fix for the Bow. Please make this a priority for the City!
7 November, 2016
Yes to dry dam says:
Springbank landowners will be fairly compensated and many will be able to retain the grazing use of their land. Please build SR1!
7 November, 2016
Build the dam says:
Studies have shown SR1 to be the best contender. Please build it ASAP - this City cannot handle another devastating flood.
7 November, 2016
BP says:
Upstream Reservoirs are a good solution to protect Calgary's communities & economic core. Proceed with Springbank & a Bow River Reservoir.
7 November, 2016
Yes to the dry dam says:
There is strong support for SR1 - in spite of a vocal minority. Expropriation is an oft-used tool for public works. Build SR1.
7 November, 2016
Urgent Fix Needed says:
Please build SR1 right away. 2020 is the best timeline. It's so far off! Every year the City is at risk.
7 November, 2016
Upstream Mitigation says:
We need upstream protection on both rivers. Find a solution for the Bow and build SR1 ASAP. The vocal minority will be fairly compensated.
7 November, 2016
Ross C says:
As an Alberta taxpayer and YYC resident and business owner, SR1 is wrong. A dam at McLean is the responsible thing to do.
7 November, 2016
Fix Calgary says:
Build SR1 for the Elbow and find a solution for the Bow ASAP. This City needs protection. ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
It's embarrassing this City has no flood protection - it's had more than dozen major floods in the past 120 years. Get SR1 done!
7 November, 2016
Yes to Springbank says:
It's unfortunate that expropriation may be required - but it's quite common for public works. Build Springbank ASAP!
7 November, 2016
calgary citizen says:
We Must protect the city, a few will be inconvenienced, but properly compensated. the land in question is not historically significant.
7 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Springbank is essential. The city remains vulnerable and this is the best identified option. Bragg Creek protection is already underway.
7 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Build Springbank as soon as possible. The city cannot afford another devastating flood. And find an upstream solution for the Bow River!
7 November, 2016
kc says:
Rehab what's left of Maclean Creek (now a giant gravel pit full of atvs) into a dam/rec area/ natural habitat. Protection on crown land.
7 November, 2016
cdorr says:
I strongly support the Springbank Reservoir. Please move to protect our inner city communities and downtown. It's time.
7 November, 2016
KC says:
No to SR1! It destroys yet another community and protects only a fraction of the people Maclean Creek would!
7 November, 2016
Hal Couillard says:
Carving up valuable and historic agricultural land is insane as an alternative. Maclean Creek is already owned by the crown. Go there.
7 November, 2016
JN says:
The economics here are a lie! Land values are incorrect and no costs for expropriations. The Cost benefit makes no sense. A fail. A lie.
7 November, 2016
Adrian Nagy says:
I do no t agree with the proposed plan, I believe that their are alternatives that are probably better and less intrusive to the parties
7 November, 2016
K says:
Damming McLean Creek will protect more people and doesn't destroy another community. And is already government owned land
7 November, 2016
Anne says:
Environmentalists and First Nations against this plan. Build berms and use McLean.
7 November, 2016
Lucy says:
This option does not protect downtown or anywhere along the Bow. It is a strange and unproductive idea. What is really in the govt's mind?
7 November, 2016
Lesley says:
No Springbank Dam! Environmentally dangerous and unpopular with Calgarians. Use crown land at McLean Creek
7 November, 2016
DL says:
This is the best plan. It is so important we make this happen. The benefits are significant.
6 November, 2016
Keep Your Promise says:
NO to SR1. McLean Cr protects more people and doesn't destroy another community. Bow caused most damage to Calgary.SR1is bad public policy.
6 November, 2016
Ryan says:
More research needs to be conducted for the McLean Creek dam. It's crown land, and will provide a recreational area in the future. NO to SR1
6 November, 2016
Shawn says:
This is the best plan. Let's go ahead and get the Springbank and Bow reservoirs done!
6 November, 2016
SG says:
What happened to #AlbertaStrong? Stop looking to destroy the ranching community in Springbank and consider the other options. Maclean Creek.
6 November, 2016
sg says:
I support the springbank reservoir project. This must be completed soon to protect the economically vital portions of the city.
6 November, 2016
Concerned says:
Both Springbank and additional dams on the Bow River are needed to avoid another national catastrophe which will cost billions.
6 November, 2016
Concerned says:
Downtown Calgary and all the communities along the Elbow and Bow rivers must be protected from future floods. Concept 1 is the best option.
6 November, 2016
Jamie says:
SR1 is not cost effective, and proposed costs have not been realistic up to this point.
6 November, 2016
Jamie says:
Why should one community should be protected at the cost of several others?? Dam McLean, Say NO to SR1.
6 November, 2016
Mark says:
People against SR1 want Calgary protected. They just don't want Springbank destroyed as well. McLean Creek is the best option.
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
Springbank wants flood mitigation to benefit all. Build MC1 and everyone wins.
6 November, 2016
Larry says:
Springbank Dam will destroy 6,800 acres of ecologically significant private land. McLean Creek land is free and will protect far more people
6 November, 2016
CW says:
Flood mitigation should never involve flooding one community to protect another. SR1 is poor public policy.
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
SR1 does not provide any benefit other than in the event of a flood- build McLean for drought and flood protection.
6 November, 2016
SR1 is wrong says:
If I had been a victim of the 2013 flood the last thing I'd want is to fling injurious affection onto anyone else for my future well being.
6 November, 2016
DM says:
"YES" to the McLean Creek Dam
"No" to the Springbank Dam.
6 November, 2016
SW says:
Completely against Damning Springbank. A complete eye sore
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 5 - SR will prevent $billions of damage. $750 million according to report on gov.ab. SR will cost more than that. Dam McLean Cr
6 November, 2016
Deborah Ward says:
This is devastating to a longstanding rural community with founding forefathers still in this area. more common sense approach needed
6 November, 2016
PG says:
Given the risks to downtown Calgary and affected communities, and the ~ $6 billion cost of previous flood damage, SR-1 is a must!
6 November, 2016
HM says:
SR1 studies only go so far. Who knows where the ranching sediment will end up? Likely in Calgary drinking water and filling up Glenmore dam.
6 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
The Springbank project and the raising plates on the dam are a big and vital start to full flood mitigation. Downtown Calgary is at risk.
6 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
I am a very strong proponent of upstream flood mitigation and I believe that the two projects that are in process are absolutely mandatory.
6 November, 2016
HEM says:
Map needs to show the entire 6300 acres that flood will effect for SR1. Private land grab. MC1 would be on crown land saving all communities
6 November, 2016
MK says:
The City of Calgary needs to align with the Province's efforts in support of Springbank off stream reservoir
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
How can diverting water kilometres off stream to stagnate possibly be more natural than holding it within the river valley? Dam McLean Cr.
6 November, 2016
LAR says:
McLean proposal offers better protection for more folks & use of Crown lands would be fair for all at risk, urban and rural Albertans alike.
6 November, 2016
No more floods says:
I'm in favor of the Springbank Reservoir. This project is taking way too long. Let's get on with it. Save the inner city.
6 November, 2016
D says:
Springbank off stream reservoir is the superior solution and should proceed first.
6 November, 2016
C.R. says:
No to Springbank, Yes to MacLean.
6 November, 2016
Protect downtown yyc says:
More than 3 years post flood and all we have to show is fingers crossed that there is no new flood. Time to act!!!
6 November, 2016
hoffthehammer says:
It is essential that we undertake the construction of the Springbank upstream reservoir to protect the city.
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 3 (again) SR opponents are against flood mitigation. Fact - We have consistently advocated for McLean Cr to protect more Albertans
6 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
SR1 SUPPORTER u r proving why you guys dig a deeper hole for ur selves with every statement.
6 November, 2016
Mark says:
McLean protects more people and communities without destroying valuable farm and ranch land. SR1 is a mistake that should not be built.
6 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
Poor SR1 SUPPORTER. Take people's homes and biz and community cause of ur wet drywall. Typical attitude from these FOLKS. Drywall B4 PEOPLE?
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Here's an idea. Let's have the Prov offer the buy-out to every impacted homeowner in the City at the 2012 tax assessment. Any guess on cost?
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
One wonders if the SR1 opponents spent any time at all seeing first hand the devastation in Calgary. How much drywall did they pull down??
6 November, 2016
YYC FLOOD RESIDENT says:
SR1 SUPPORTER you fighting a losing battle. Get behind McLean and lets get mitigation.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
The facts and science support SR1. Look at the studies done. They all support SR1 over the other options. It can get built.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Isn't this the "false equivalencies" like Trump/Clinton? And the mis-information in these anti-SR1 comments? Stunning.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
22 ranch land owners and, what, 1 residence? vs 80000 evacuees, thousands of buildings, hundreds of families, and $billions. Really?
6 November, 2016
RFLOG1 says:
The cost of SR1 will continue to mushroom. I strongly support the McLean Creek option as was promised as part of the NDP election platform.
6 November, 2016
P C says:
To support Springbank is to support ignorance over reason. Protect more than a few, sacrifice no one. DONT DAM SPRINGBANK!
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
...and Bragg Creek and upstream areas are now building $33m worth of 1/100 protection
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Make no mistake. The SR1 opposition in Springbank fundamentally don't care about ANY infrastructure on the Elbow.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
McLean Creek will never get built if SR1 dies. You wanna see opposition? Just wait for that.
6 November, 2016
SHL says:
Let's get this flood mitigation in place ASAP. Springbank is the obvious choice
6 November, 2016
Mightbeuseful says:
Use the Springbank land folks, it's only needed should a flood event ever happen again. Remember the tax base is generated downstream.
6 November, 2016
David Chalack says:
Control the Bow by another dam upstream--this is the most important/impactful/economic initiative to protect our city and my lot in Bowness
6 November, 2016
Elbow Valley says:
Our mother's home in Elbow Park was hit hard. BUT. We strongly oppose SR 1 and support McLean. Use Crown land and protect more areas.
6 November, 2016
Jumping Pound Guy says:
Home owners below Glenmore Dam have already been given a buyout option. Anyone left now wants a Springbank floodplain. Buyout Elbow Park.
6 November, 2016
Z24GIRL says:
Would those individuals pro SR1 be willing to give up their homes, businesses and heritage for minimal compensation? Not likely!
6 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
We need flood mitigation. But let's ALL get behind McLean as it protects the most people. As a cohesive group we would get it done!!
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
Springbank is a valuable cultural and agricultural site. It is productive farm and ranch land - It would be a mistake to destroy it.
6 November, 2016
Dave says:
You already own the land at McLean, so use it to protect many. Don't wreck Springbank to protect a few.
6 November, 2016
Helen says:
This would be quite wrong. McLean Creek is the right answer. Downtown needs the protection.
6 November, 2016
Colin says:
The proposed figures for land purchase at Springbank are far too low for an area almost the size of Airdrie. This sounds like theft to me.
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
McLean protects Calgary, Bragg Creek, Redwood and is on Crown land. Gov't experts say enviro concerns can be mitigated. Build McLean!
6 November, 2016
Colin says:
Use McLean Creek! Already have land. Why buy more at vast expense? And why is it not better to protect downtown from the Bow?
6 November, 2016
Denise says:
This is best option. Please protect thousands of residents and businesses. And a life was lost, let's not forget what it really protects.
6 November, 2016
deejay says:
Instead of flood mitigation the focus needs to be on water management. Drought is an ominous concern also. SR1 doesn't cut it.
6 November, 2016
ranchman 1 says:
GOA said no to MacLean because grizzlies are protected. Grizzlies are now in Springbank - eating our profit and the City's food. Now what?
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
Springbank will not protect enough people to be a feasible option; it is being pushed through at the expense of one community over another.
6 November, 2016
Jim says:
Berms work for all except wealthy communities along Elbow. They like mitigation that costs taxpayers 10 times and does harm to others.
6 November, 2016
Debra says:
No to Concept 1 Maclean Creek is the obvious solution for the majority.
6 November, 2016
Trapper says:
All Ab will pay 4 a few. Purchasing the land is the biggest cost Ab already owns McClean creek it's a natural site reality is dead NDP - RIP
6 November, 2016
Trapper says:
highest unemployment to date thousands of forclosures the city and province want to build a dam a cancer hospital a golf coarse and ringroad
6 November, 2016
Jessica says:
Destroying one community to protect a FEW is disgraceful. MacLean Creek protects more communities and is already crown land.
6 November, 2016
Harold says:
Bonavista resident/Nov5 Is that really true bureaucrats refused to examine Tri-River Joint Reservoir?? Springbank DRY dam is a boondoggle!!
6 November, 2016
Dr R B Church says:
The real problem is that Springbank slough will be a up wind site for new Aedes mosquitoes species/ Zika outbreak as a health hazard.
6 November, 2016
Justin says:
Wjat about the people of Bragg Creek? They are still not included with this? McLean Creek is the obvious choice.
6 November, 2016
MW says:
NO SR1! Silt and debris left behind would shower anyone downwind with particles containing dead animals and sewage. Not healthy!
6 November, 2016
Murray says:
Time is of the essence. Calgary needs protection. No option is perfect, without environmental & social issues. Concept 1 has best balance.
6 November, 2016
Tom Mullane says:
Upstream flood mitigation protects core areas of the city. I support dams for water storage and flood protection.
5 November, 2016
Sam says:
Benefit to *all* those downstream Even if it costs more now, need to do the right thing for long term health of ALL communities (2/2
5 November, 2016
Sam says:
Downriver needs to be protected but so do the heritage, agricultural, Indigenous, and other areas upriver. SR1 destroys those w/o true (1/2)
5 November, 2016
Sam says:
Why is the first question about the way the community looks/feels/moves? This should first and foremostmost be about protecting Albertans
5 November, 2016
Sam says:
Flooding one community to *potentially* save another & not save all the communities that might be affected is a bad idea & bad public policy
5 November, 2016
Bonavista resident. says:
GOA only puts forward two options despite promising to examine all. Tri-River Joint Reservoir was turned down by bureaucrats, not experts.
5 November, 2016
Dave says:
Only Tri-River Joint Reservoir would protect from spring floods plus conserve water. Best for Albertans. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.
5 November, 2016
C. Michael Fellows says:
How will ranchers be compensated for deprivation of grazing and home loss during water storage at Springbank?
5 November, 2016
C. Michael Fellows says:
Calgary needs more water storage for growth in the city and recreation. MacLean Creek provides both. Springbank can't.
5 November, 2016
Jumping Pound Guy says:
Anyone who supports Springbank Dam is either politically motivated - misinformed or has self interests to protect- Better options upstream
5 November, 2016
C. Michael Fellows says:
I several open houses on Springbank dry reservoir. I have never received an credible explanation why MacLean Creek isn't a better option.
5 November, 2016
Sara says:
Zika virus was found in Canada. Climate Change warms Canada. SR1 leaves behind countless pools of stagnant water. Zika mosquitos breed.
5 November, 2016
Linda says:
The springbank reservoir is a great idea. I support it fully. We must protect the city and those who live and work along the Elbow river.
5 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
No SR1! Silt and debris left behind will shower pathogens over people downwind of the site. Not healthy!
5 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
GoA claim after SR1 flooding it's back to business as usual on the land. Fluvial clastic sediment and denudation will NOT support that!
5 November, 2016
Tom says:
The 2013 flood was a 1 in 200/250 year event. Why has the gov.ab and city not disclosed this fact? Let's take the time to get this right.
5 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
IBI reported 2/3 of damages to Calgary were from the Bow. Focus on the Bow and berm Elbow River. GoA are paying for berms in Bragg Creek!
5 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
This is not Albertans pulling together. How is this okay to sacrifice one community to serve so few at enormous cost to Albertans? NO to SR1
5 November, 2016
MW says:
NO SR1! Silt and debris left behind will shower pathogens over anyone living downwind of the site. NOT HEALTHY!!
5 November, 2016
Emma says:
The pro-SR1 arguments come across to me as futile and impatient. Now tell me, why not Maclean Creek?
5 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 8 - Bragg Creek and Redwood will be protected by berms. Then why did the gov.ab tell Calgary River Group that berms inevitably fail?
5 November, 2016
Grant Gunderson says:
It amazes me that 20 families with political connections can hugely increase the risk borne by hundreds of thousands of downstream residents
5 November, 2016
yycNorth says:
No to SR1. Terrible cost/benefit balance. GoA needs to come clean on this! Go McLean. An area to protect all with potential for recreation.
5 November, 2016
Grant Smith says:
McLean Creek would provide protection for Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Native lands including Redwood Golf Course. More cost effective
5 November, 2016
Ellis F says:
The proposed site for the Springbank dam is full of wildlife. This area, so close to Calgary, is a treasure which needs to be preserved.
5 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 7- opposition to Springbank dam is only 20 landowners. This is insulting to the thousands of Albertans who support a dam at McLean Cr.
5 November, 2016
James Pasieka says:
We absolutely need the Springbank Off Stream reservoir. It's been through enough technical and political analysis. Get the EIA done ASAP.
5 November, 2016
Diane says:
Build the Springbank dry dam. It's cost effective and can be completed quickly. It's been 3 years since the flood. let's get this done.
5 November, 2016
Dave says:
McLean Creek is obviously the best choice. All parties are protected while being the most cost effective! McLean Creek protects more!
5 November, 2016
Land owner rights! says:
McLean Creek option will protect more folks/areas, cost less & save heritage, food-producing lands. Springbank idea is the wrong one!
5 November, 2016
Build The Reservoir says:
I support building the Springbank Reservoir. This project is taking way too long. Time to get on with it. too many delays.
5 November, 2016
McLean Creek instead says:
Bad plan. Springbank dam won't protect Bragg Creek (of whom many work in Calgary) like the McLean creek solution will. Do NOT support this!
5 November, 2016
Don't Flood Calgary says:
I support SR1. The City of Calgary and my family were hit hard by the 2013 flood and I donty want to ever see that happen again.
5 November, 2016
Trapper says:
2 flood in more than 200 years is this cost necessary. Do u want to pay 4it should Springbank pay, how bout the province McClean Creek
5 November, 2016
Don Newton says:
The Springbank dry dam is obviously the best choice.
5 November, 2016
Peter McMurray says:
Let's get moving forward with the Springbank dam!!
5 November, 2016
Sally Littlechild says:
Build the Springbank dry dam. Expropriation of the land may be required.
5 November, 2016
Judy says:
Why the delay with the most cost effective solution. We need to protect Calgary, High River etc. Get this done !
5 November, 2016
Judy says:
The city of Calgary, High River and other outlying areas can not afford another flood, build Springbank, the most cost effective solution.
5 November, 2016
Kel says:
We need the Springbank dry dam.
5 November, 2016
Chris says:
I support the building of the Springbank dam.
5 November, 2016
Martin says:
Build the Springbank dry dam!!
5 November, 2016
Alice says:
What happens to Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek when the canal system entering the dam plugs with debris? logs rocks etc like Cougar Creek?
5 November, 2016
Alice says:
This is taking the livelihood of some of the best agriculture land in Canada out of production for the few houses built on a flood plain
5 November, 2016
Trapper says:
Yes to McClean Creek. Protect Bragg Creek , Redwood Meadows and everything downstream Why should everyone payfor building in flood plain
5 November, 2016
Trapper says:
No to Springbank, No to the NDP who changed there original choice,,Yes to protecting heritage families and agricultural life.
5 November, 2016
Brian says:
McLean Creek offers less protection, has higher environmental impact and will take longer & cost more to approve & complete than Springbank.
5 November, 2016
Brian says:
Springbank is strongly supported by thousands of downstream residents vs. approx 20 individual landowners & others without a direct stake.
5 November, 2016
Miss Patt says:
NO to Springbank!! Our Government needs to protect as many ALBERTANS (not just Calgarians) as possible by using McLean Creek.
5 November, 2016
CW says:
Why should all Albertans pay for those who continue to build/live in flood plains? Take responsibility for your own life choices.
5 November, 2016
Ellis F says:
A Springbank dam does nothing for Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows or TsuuT'ina Nation. McLean Creek on gov't-owned land is a much better choice
5 November, 2016
Mrs. Walker says:
Wake up guys! McLean Creek is the only option best for all parties. Support an option that doesn't help one group while injuring others.
5 November, 2016
Terrill Shoults says:
What about protecting Bragg Creek, Red Wood Meadows by the suggested Central reservoir at the vicinity of the Sheep River.
Extent of type???
5 November, 2016
Les says:
Ridiculous waste of tax-payer money. Little protection. It would make much more sense to protect downtown from the Bow.
5 November, 2016
Richard says:
Berms and Barriers can eliminate the devastating effects of flooding along the Elbow River in most scenarios. Consider them.
5 November, 2016
Richard says:
A berm at the same elevation as the bike path in Erlton to tow onto the Talisman Center hill would have prevented flooding our homes in 2005
5 November, 2016
Richard says:
Springbank Reservoir. I appeal to the landowners of Springbank to do what they can to help mitigate the impact of flood disasters on Calgary
5 November, 2016
Richard says:
The springbank Reservoir is the lowest cost / highest benefit project when it comes to protecting the city of Calgary's neighbourhoods
5 November, 2016
Richard says:
The Springbank Reservoir is needed infrastructure for the province.
5 November, 2016
Mac says:
Springbank is not the place! Far too expensive for very little gain. Farmers' live and livelihoods would be devastated.
5 November, 2016
Munlaw2 says:
It is unfortunate that there is a negative impact by SR1 to 16 upstream landowners, but it seems to be the single best cost effective sol'n.
5 November, 2016
Norm F says:
McLean Creek better and doesn't penalize Springbank and other areas for the City allowing people to build on flood plain.
5 November, 2016
Heth says:
Cost ludicrously high. Does nothing for downtown Calgary and businesses there. Devastates wonderful ranch land and ranchers' lives.
5 November, 2016
John says:
I believe Springbank is the most feasible economically and in terms of early impact. We need to get it down, but fairly compensate.
5 November, 2016
Duke says:
Build it at McLean creek. We should not penalize people in Springbank at the expense of Calgarians (and I'm a Calgarian saying this).
5 November, 2016
Carol says:
It is time to make decisions and get flood mitigation and protection moving forward to protect our city from the Bow and Elbow Rivers.
5 November, 2016
Karl L. says:
Do not sacrafice one area to protect another! There are better options that protects all. Homes do not have to be destroyed in the process.
5 November, 2016
PaulineH says:
Please stop and think about what SR1 will do to your upstream neighbours. Do your own independent research. There are other options!
5 November, 2016
Kerrie says:
Think back to 2013. Reflect on the effects of global climate change. The downsides of the Springbank proposal pale in comparison.
5 November, 2016
Susan Rees says:
I support upstream reservoirs. Downtown must be protected from future flooding.
5 November, 2016
Shelly says:
Providing flood prevention in YYC means you will flood some place else to compensate. One place sacrificed for another. McLean Creek <people
5 November, 2016
SG says:
It is sad to have communities fighting against each other. Equally sad is that we are talking about destroying one of these communities.
5 November, 2016
SamanthaK says:
The Springbank Reservoir is the best option to protect Calgary's economic core and vital urban communities against another flood.
5 November, 2016
CW says:
All Albertans will pay. Any project of this size and expense should be put to an ALBERTA-WIDE REFERENDUM.
5 November, 2016
Forseth Elizabeth says:
I strongly support the Springbank Offstream Reservoir idea as the best solution for flood future mitigation for Calgary.
5 November, 2016
WendyD says:
The Springbank Reservoir is the best option for protecting all property downstream of the Glenmore Dam (from overland flow & groundwater).
5 November, 2016
Jim says:
All "concepts" have some downsides. Dithering is a greater downside. We cannot afford to lose downtown Calgary again, so let's get this done
5 November, 2016
Chris says:
I am against this concept as the city/ province could use public land farther up stream for this mitigation project. Mclean Creek is better.
5 November, 2016
zenapw says:
DON'T DO THE SBR! I know many ppl that live in the proposed SB floodplain; 1family has a 100yr working ranch. This will destroy their lives.
5 November, 2016
Rose says:
McLean Creek is the better choice. It perfects more communities, and would provide a nice recreational area.
4 November, 2016
Flood Zone Owner says:
Start campaigning for McLean people!!! It will be built sooner with less resistance.
4 November, 2016
mamak says:
McLean Creek is the obvious choice if you look at the facts, more people need to read the real facts, do your research people.
4 November, 2016
Anthony says:
There is a thousand residents in Redwood Meadows alone that all predominantly work in Calgary and support its economy. Protect us too
4 November, 2016
Dave A says:
Unanimous consensus will never happen. Implement the professional's recommendations, build SR1, and save our city. Enough already...
4 November, 2016
Sue G says:
McLean Creek!
4 November, 2016
Sue G says:
Springbank is one of the most picturesque beautiful areas. If you do this, you will trash one of Alberta's jewels. Shame on you!
4 November, 2016
Sue G says:
Do not steal from the original settlers to give to those without the forethought to build away from flood plains or move after repeat floods
4 November, 2016
DM says:
The McLean project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect "the most" neighbourhoods and Calgary. I support it 100%.
4 November, 2016
Sue G says:
DamNing Springbank destroys our heritage, the original settlers who had the good sense to know where to build so as not to flood.
4 November, 2016
DL says:
We are completely in favour of the Springbank Off Stream Reservoir. Please stop studying... and start building.
4 November, 2016
Sue G says:
Poor choice! Too expensive. Sacrifices Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and the Tsuu Tina Nation. Destroys our heritage.
4 November, 2016
Dan Wise says:
Dam Mclean Creek I can.t bieleve that any calgarian would support dam spring bank when the other would save redwood meadows and bragg creek
4 November, 2016
Robert says:
We need to prevent another flood of the city. To do nothing is not exceptable.
4 November, 2016
Lorne W says:
Springbank Cost/Benefit does not justify building. Not to mention on going costs which also were not included.
4 November, 2016
KCpatrol says:
What will be done with all the silt that fills up the Springbank reservoir and creates a potential dust bowl
4 November, 2016
PC says:
Alberta's struggling: Schools and healthcare need help. Unemployment rising. Nenshi says 1in 10 live in poverty in YYC . NO WAY to SR1
4 November, 2016
MS says:
If you oppose SR1, do you really think McLean Creek would go ahead without environmental protests? What else are you suggesting could work?
4 November, 2016
MS says:
We need the province on board. They need to support upstream measures for both Bow and Elbow. The province can't afford another flood.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
All options other than berms lie outside the City's jurisdiction. Berms would need negotiations with too many homeowners, wouldn't happen.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
Anyone who spend months cleaning and rebuilding a flooded home wants action soon. Doing nothing is not an option. SR1 is the best we have.
4 November, 2016
Greg S says:
Springbank Resevoir is the best option to protect the downtown and downstream residents. Construction should begin as soon as possible.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
SR1 isn't perfect, but it's the most feasible and most likely to actually happen. McLean Creek would have environmental protests for years.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
Calgary's economic core is on the Bow. The Bow has the largest volume and flow rate. Upstream measures are necessary, not optional!
4 November, 2016
kymf says:
Transportation impact to school buses and tractor trailers bypassing city not evaluated in the Springbank Dam assessment.
4 November, 2016
NoSpringbank says:
Too costly, unfair expropriation, not faster, McLean better site and protection alternative for all.
4 November, 2016
kymf says:
Springbank Dam cost will ballon due to dewatering required and sediment/erosion control. No costs included in current estimate for these
4 November, 2016
kymf says:
Contaminated dust blowing from the Springbank Dam to the east would impact agricultural and ranching operations and the City of Calgary
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 6 -Springbank Dam has been well studied. As of a couple of months ago, they didn't even how they would drain the dam thing.
4 November, 2016
kymf says:
Springbank Dam would result in a significant visual impact to tourists travelling on TransCanada Hwy
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
The province has put forward no rational debris and solids management plan for the SR1 reservoir. Eastern slope floods are debris flows.
4 November, 2016
kymf says:
Springbank dam would harm sensitive wildlife species that reside in the area and damage fish habitat.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
The SR1reservoi r will create a debris field, full of fluvial clastic sediments, that will be airborne particulate matter during Chinooks.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
Under sluice gates installed on existing facilities allow for safe passing of the front end of a flood, preserving storage for the back end.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
Under sluice gates installed on existing facilities allow for safe passing of the front end of a flood, preserving storage for the back end.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
Under sluice gates installed on the existing facilities allow for natural sediment flushing and restoration of lost storage capacity.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
Under sluice gates installed on the existing facilities allow for maximizing the existing "Live" reservoir storage volume.
4 November, 2016
EBA says:
Create an ability to manage extreme flows of water into Calgary is critical to our communities reasonable protection.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
Install undersluce gates in Glenmore, Bearspaw, and Ghost. Drain all of these empty during flood season. Safely pass the front of a flood.
4 November, 2016
Ghost River says:
The Springbank reservoir is an ill-conceived concept, promoted by self serving interests that have no conception of fluvial
dynamic systems.
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 5 - Springbank dam will save billions in damage. Gov.ab reports say $750 million, a little bit less than Springbank will cost.
4 November, 2016
GLS@YYC says:
The provincial and municipal govts need to remove emotion and rhetoric from the decision making and implement the Springbank reservoir proje
4 November, 2016
GLS@YYC says:
Need to proceed with this well studied mitigation project. The cost of inaction far exceeds any downsides of the project
4 November, 2016
Jeannette says:
It won't work! Clear cuts need to be stopped on the east slopes and the existing reseviours should have been lowered and better managed.
4 November, 2016
Leigh Blakely says:
The dam in Springbank is not right. I don't want my taxes to pay to sacrifice one community to save another.
4 November, 2016
MG says:
Way too expensive to protect a few while destroying another community. Use the dams we have.
4 November, 2016
yes to springbank! says:
Majority of flood mitigation professionals support Springbank. It's not perfect, but it's our best option by a landslide. Enough said.
4 November, 2016
Frank says:
Flood mitigation must be done. Billions in losses cannot happen again. The government has been collecting high taxes on these properties
4 November, 2016
Tom Yeoman says:
Yes, Springbank will be expensive but so will another flood WHEN (not if) it occurs. Let's build Springbank.
4 November, 2016
Jess says:
This is a great project to protect our city with least impact on people and environment.
4 November, 2016
Genavieve says:
Destroying one community to save another is not the right choice when there are other upstream options!
4 November, 2016
Jenna says:
I think springbank dam will not protect enough of Calgary to make it worthwhile.
4 November, 2016
Hal says:
@ckayser why should they? They didn't build on a flood plain...
4 November, 2016
Sean M says:
Upstream protection is required. Springbank is the right place as numerous studies have shown. Get on with it. Downtown needs protection.
4 November, 2016
jenb says:
SR1 has relied almost entirely on misinformation to gain supporters. Don't Dam Springbank!
4 November, 2016
Jenny36 says:
Destroying one community to save another is not a responsible option. An upstream reservoir is a good idea, just go further upstream.
4 November, 2016
Janevirtue says:
We absolutely need upstream reservoirs in order to protect business closures from 5 days to months with huge financial losses.
4 November, 2016
CC says:
Dams give illusion of protection at great public expense, degrade river ecology. Voluntary buyouts & floodproofing structures best use of $
4 November, 2016
Rosemary P says:
Cost is too high and doesn't consider the negative effects to Bragg Creek and Springbank residents, as well as drinking water.
4 November, 2016
dave says:
Too expensive as is.
McLean Creek, if at all.
4 November, 2016
RMB says:
For the greater good, do the right thing and build Springbank.
4 November, 2016
BB says:
This is by far and away the most viable option. Lets get on with it!!!!
4 November, 2016
Alana says:
Why is it okay to destroy someone's home to protect someone else's. Don't dam Springbank! McLean Creek is a way better option!
4 November, 2016
MS says:
Suggesting residents on the river are rich and deserve what they got forgets about all of Downtown and those who rent in Bowness, Sunnyside.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
Flow rate on the Bow is much greater than the Elbow yet other than Ghost Dam level lowering, NOTHING has been done. Downtown is on the Bow.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
It is not feasible to create berms from one end of Calgary to the other. Too many kilometers. Need an upstream option for the Bow.
4 November, 2016
MS says:
We need upstream solutions for the Bow! Soon! It is the largest river, affects all of downtown even more than the Elbow did.
4 November, 2016
George says:
Taking the land of those who did not build in the floodplain to protect those who did seems completely unjust
4 November, 2016
Steve says:
Is turning some of the most valuable land into a moonscape dry dam the best idea the government can come up with? Good grief.
4 November, 2016
JOhn says:
For Greg - People in Springbank do NOT object to flood mitigation, they say its better placed where more people will be protected
4 November, 2016
SherryZ says:
McLean Creek best option! Protects more & would make a great recreation area. Allen Bill Pond was wiped out in 2013.
Drive out Hwy 66!!!!
4 November, 2016
ScienceRules says:
The Mclean Creek Dry dam is best for the Elbow (diversion to Spgbk not feasible) and enhancement of Ghost and BearsPaw dams for the Bow.
4 November, 2016
Adrian says:
What happened to the tunnel from the reservoir to the Bow?
4 November, 2016
Lorraine Mackintosh says:
I believe that we are overdue already in not having a project such as this already underway.. The city was devastated by the last flood .
4 November, 2016
Adrian says:
What about fixing the bridges over the Elbow? These are huge flow barriers,
4 November, 2016
Adrian says:
This is the only plan the city is entertaining which will protect the city when the next flood comes. And it will come. it must go ahead
4 November, 2016
SG says:
Maclean Creek is the way to go. Protection to Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Elbow residents. Even NDP knew this to be true pre election.
4 November, 2016
LLH says:
Trying to control the river is always a bad idea! Look for solutions that are environmentally sound and protect a larger portion of Calgary.
4 November, 2016
LLH says:
Hey Calgary be a good neighbour! Let's find solutions that protect more people, cost less money and doesn't destroy a community !
4 November, 2016
LLH says:
It's not cheaper, it's not faster and it doesn't protect enough people! It's not fair to spend that amount on two communities!
4 November, 2016
Derick says:
The cost has been understated and the benefits are not as good as the Kananaskis project. Don't Dam Springbank
4 November, 2016
Jim says:
It is very unfortunate that some made this into an US vs THEM debate. McLean Creek helps everyone harms no one and would be underway by now.
4 November, 2016
C Nadeau says:
All the people this protects are millionaires - Frankly i don't want to spend my families money to invest in their properties.
4 November, 2016
C Nadeau says:
This seems like a long term solution for something that will likely not happen. The cost is very high to protect a very limited number of
4 November, 2016
CW says:
SR1 does NOT meet the "needs of the many." It only promises to protect a couple of Calgary communities. The Bow is the threat to DT YYC.
4 November, 2016
Frank says:
Springbank dam does little to protect downtown. It is most vulnerable to a Bow River flood.
4 November, 2016
Bill says:
Maclean creek is the only viable solution for flood mitigation
4 November, 2016
cm115 says:
I live in Riverbend in Calgary. Damming springbank is a terrible idea. Why are the lives of Calgarians more important than rural people?
4 November, 2016
Derrick Jewlal says:
Nothing is possible that will protect Calgary from all flood scenarios. Be self insured, or move to high ground. Not a new idea. Waste of $$
4 November, 2016
findlaym says:
no new reservoir construction, no loss of fish or wildlife habitat. Lower costs, faster construction. The only drawback is the rich NIMBY's
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 4 - Springbank will be the cheapest option - wait until the new cost estimates come out, McLean Creek will look really cheap
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 3 - Springbank opponents are against flood mitigation - we have consistently advocated for McLean Creek to protect the most Albertans
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 2 - McLean Creek cannot ever be built - check the studies, it doesn't say that anywhere
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 1 - Springbank Dam protects all of downtown. Check the studies - the Bow is the downtown threat.
4 November, 2016
CW says:
NO to SR1. All Albertans should know that this project is being forced on them WITHOUT transparency, and no good science to back it up.
4 November, 2016
Cameron Peters says:
YES to SR1. Unless we are willing to relocate Downtown and Calgary's older neighborhoods, this is by far the best approach.
4 November, 2016
Sean says:
I support the Springbank mitigation project to ensure protection for the communities and lives impacted by the 2013 flood.
4 November, 2016
jpb says:
This shouldn't be a beauty contest about who can click the most. Science and economics show SR-1 is the best option, let's not be silly.
4 November, 2016
CW says:
NO to SR1. Other options were never fully investigated. All Albertans should be concerned about how their money is being spent.
4 November, 2016
GE says:
Option 1 needs to be McLean Creek...protects the most people and property, and stops everyone's bitching!
4 November, 2016
robin says:
Upstream dam in McLean Creek protects Calgary AND protect Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Tsuu T’ina & Springbank. Protect the most people!
4 November, 2016
Gary says:
This is a short sited proposal that only has City of Calgary interests in mind, what about residents in Bragg and Redwood?
4 November, 2016
Anne-Marie says:
An integral part of a long-term solution for the City of Calgary as a whole. Important to protect downtown Core & sustainability of city.
4 November, 2016
dee says:
Building at McLean Creek is the only option worth pursuing. From minimal cost to protecting the most communities.
4 November, 2016
P C says:
The Bow has been proven to be the risk to downtown. Google it. Springbank is on the wrong river.
4 November, 2016
Dragan says:
Fantastic. This returns multiples of the hard costs and many more times the soft costs (individual's losses, pain and economic disruptions)
4 November, 2016
GC says:
The flood had a massive impact on many home owners and businesses. Concept 1 is the most immediate approach to help protect the city
4 November, 2016
Robert Lehodey says:
A good long term solution that will clearly benefit the City - it eliminates risk and will increase property values in the flood plain.
4 November, 2016
Bruce says:
Build at McLean Creek and protect Calgary-Springbank-Red Wood Meadows and Bragg Creek. All experienced devastating flooding and damage.
4 November, 2016
Calgary Urban Eq. says:
The Springbank Reservoir is indisputably the best solution for the Elbow River, which contributed an estimated 70% of the 2013 flood damage.
4 November, 2016
jpb says:
Most of the Springbank landowners are multimillionaires. The value of their land is in future development, not ranching. Greed is petty.
4 November, 2016
jpb says:
The Springbank reservoir project will save money, and more importantly, lives. The potential of liability is too high to play games.
4 November, 2016
aepd says:
Stop building dams. They don't stop floods. They upset the natural flow and ecology of the river.
4 November, 2016
Krausert says:
the city needs to look after its downtown core as well as the neighboring communities. with out the downtown we don't have a city.
4 November, 2016
mcgoverness says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
4 November, 2016
westways says:
It is imperative that we go ahead with the Springbank reservoir. We need to protect the city from the inevitable climate change damages.
4 November, 2016
Nancy says:
Still dealing with health issues & financial losses! There will be MORE DISASTROUS WEATHER EVENTS so why are we dithering? Get on with SR1!!
4 November, 2016
Ian Bryden says:
Concept 1, after thorough study, has been shown to be the best alternative to protect Elbow properties and the Downtown Business Area.
4 November, 2016
CH says:
Please get this project as presented going. We do not want to go through this again.
4 November, 2016
Peter C says:
Springbok does not protect enough people. It is not the best idea nor will it be fast. There are better options for all.
4 November, 2016
BG says:
This concept seems to be the most expedient to keep our family and homes safe from another devastating flood . Let's move on this ASAP.
4 November, 2016
Lyn dean says:
I absolutely disagree with the spring bank reservoir. There are better options than this. Why can't the option of McLean creek be conside
4 November, 2016
Forbes Newman says:
Spring Bank reservoir is the best idea by a long shot. It needs to be done ASAP. Every delay puts the entire city at risk.
4 November, 2016
Barb says:
SR1 needs to get done as soon as possible. We are putting our city at risk every year until it is done.
4 November, 2016
Brian Purcell says:
Hurry up and get it done already - it's been over 3 years since 2013 flood and NOTHING has happened to protect downstream communities & city
4 November, 2016
Brian Purcell says:
Upstream mitigation is essential to protect the city and downstream communities. Potential env impacts pale in comparison to other impacts
4 November, 2016
Carsten Jensen says:
We need upstream mitigation, the costs of doing nothing are too high
4 November, 2016
CB says:
The Springbank upstream reservoir must be completed as soon as possible. Failing to do so puts the whole city in jeopardy.
4 November, 2016
Carl says:
The Springbank upstream reservoir is a vital first step in protecting the city. Please get on with it.
4 November, 2016
Chad says:
A multi-faceted approach is needed, including the construction of SR1. Let's also do some local protection (barriers) in the interim.
4 November, 2016
hopefull in Elbow Pk says:
Calgary needs this
4 November, 2016
Doug says:
SR1 must proceed immediately. Thousands of homes will be protected from next flood while some farmland will be flooded temporarily.
4 November, 2016
Greg says:
This is not a referendum on who wants what. The province has the responsibility & obligation to get this done to protect assets and lives!
4 November, 2016
KSL says:
It's time to stop the decision paralysis and pursue projects for the greater good. Important decisions are seldom universally agreed upon.
4 November, 2016
KSL says:
The human and financial costs of another flood are not acceptable, for people and businesses across the socioeconomic spectrum.
4 November, 2016
Doug says:
Springbank upstream reservoir is a concept that must see reality as soon as possible. Cost effective, fast to implement and low env. impact
4 November, 2016
KSL says:
We must support objective analysis. Here, the recommendation was Springbank. Doing nothing is not an option. The risks are apparent to all.
4 November, 2016
Greg says:
Objections to this project from a few Springbank residents are solely based upon self interest with no regard for the greater good.
4 November, 2016
Greg says:
It has been made clear from assessments that this upstream project is in the best interest of the Calgary as a whole - businesses & homes.
4 November, 2016
ckayser says:
Protecting downtown is common sense, as is protecting the homes of thousands who live near our rivers! When is something going to be done?
4 November, 2016
ckayser says:
The Province and City delays are playing Russian Roulette with the city of Calgary, its homeowners, and the prosperity of Calgary businesses
4 November, 2016
ckayser says:
If the Springbank residents want to veto this idea, let them put up their homes as collateral to compensate for future floods in Calgary
4 November, 2016
ckayser says:
How can the City or Province continue to show more concern for a few in Springbank, than the well-being of thousands of Calgarians???
4 November, 2016
ckayser says:
When compared to all other proposed solutions, this makes the most sense. Don't let 20 homeowners rule against the best solution
4 November, 2016
Cam says:
The risk of flooding the downtown core again is unacceptable to all citizens. We must proceed with the Springbank off-stream reservoir.
4 November, 2016
Cam says:
The question is not "whether" we will see another flood, but "when". Proceed with Springbank off-stream reservoir.
4 November, 2016
Haozhang says:
I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam.
4 November, 2016
Tom says:
gov.ab figures - $750M damage caused by Elbow River for 1 in 100 year flood. Over half is residential. Downtown core is a Bow River issue.
4 November, 2016
Cam says:
As a long time inner city resident - please proceed with the Springbank off-stream reservoir ASAP.
4 November, 2016
chris2 says:
Think long-term folks. Build the Springbank Reservoir to protect all future generations living in Calgary. What a legacy to leave.
4 November, 2016
chris2 says:
The Springbank Reservoir is an essential economic protection system for the City of Calgary. The cost/benefit for just this is worth it!!!
4 November, 2016
Dave Putnam says:
Upstream reservoirs are critical to providing long term, cost effective and environmentally sound flood protection for the Calgary area.
4 November, 2016
LDQ says:
I think it is crucial for the city to build the Springbank reservoir to protect the economic core and improve moral of the city
4 November, 2016
Garry says:
Please get on with flood mitigation ASAP. Doing nothing is not acceptable. 20 landowners should not override 100,000 affected citizens.
4 November, 2016
Scooter says:
Stop the political B.S. Build the dam
4 November, 2016
Shirley says:
I believe we need the springbank project is a must do option. We need some serious mitigation now not after the next flood.
4 November, 2016
DVH says:
Springbank is the obvious choice for the Elbow mitigation.. It has the least footprint, and is the cheapest and fastest option. Get moving!
4 November, 2016
SMO says:
People need to stop obsessing about 'rich' people's property and focus on protecting our city. We must get this project completed.
4 November, 2016
David S says:
The Springbank project is needed. It is a economically reasonable solution to a predictable problem.
4 November, 2016
Suzanne says:
Sprinkbank has been deemed to be the most efficient and environmentally wise choice. Please move forward with this project quickly!!
4 November, 2016
Richard Maire says:
We can't allow a couple of wealthy land owners in Springbank to delay the building of the much needed Springbank dry dam.
4 November, 2016
Jack says:
Enough talking,build Springbank dry dam.
4 November, 2016
HJM says:
Flood mitigation is essential to maintain vibrant inner city communities of Calgary. Springbank is the best option, let's get on with it!
4 November, 2016
Greg S says:
The potential cost of doing nothing runs in the billions. I firmly believe that the Springbank reservoir is necessary for the greater good.
4 November, 2016
TS says:
SR1 provides the best chance to protect Calgary as the nearest upstream, feasible solution. More will be impacted by a lack of action.
4 November, 2016
DR says:
Upstream mitigation is critical for the city of calgary . The downtown core is at risk, city hall, stampede grounds, the zoo , and more.
4 November, 2016
gboje says:
This is essential to the future well being of the City of Calgary. Please get on with it!
4 November, 2016
George says:
What if climate change makes the flooding even worse and we have to build both projects?
Let's get 'at least' Springbank done!
4 November, 2016
sf says:
We can not listen to inferior source about the "best flood mitigation" the experts have been commissioned, studied & reported. Start SR1 now
4 November, 2016
sf says:
Flood mitigation is essential for Calgary and surrounding communities and will become more so in future years. Listen to the experts. Build.
4 November, 2016
sf says:
We've hired experts and exhaustively studied the flood mitigation. The experts suggest Springbank Dam. What are we waiting for?
4 November, 2016
sf says:
The province of Alberta has funding set aside for infrastructure building and the springbank dam is clearly the best solution.Lets get going
4 November, 2016
Gary Cronin says:
Essential for the future of Calgary. Another flood would be devastating for downtown businesses and we would see companies leave Calgary
4 November, 2016
George says:
Benefit analysis - is $2.6 billion EVERY TIME there is a flood.
This inaction is insane, more than 3 years later and we're still debating?
4 November, 2016
Michelle says:
We must protect our communities and our downtown economy and have to build the Springbank reservoir. We are exposed and must act faster.
4 November, 2016
GT says:
Urgent action required to protect Calgary. Please proceed with Springbank as soon as possible,
4 November, 2016
robert mitchell says:
It is the best option available and will offer protection to Calgary - and downstream communities - from another flood.
4 November, 2016
K Podavin says:
Calgary must be protected from a flood shutting it down - flood is too costly ($ & emotionally). We need protection (like other cities)!
4 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
For example: original c/b analysis....2 million to raise highway 22. Now they say 19 million! UPDATE the Cost benefit analysis!
4 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
The province needs to release an updated cost benefit analysis on SR 1. It is NOT cheap. Close to 1 billion $$!
4 November, 2016
Bill says:
Generating electricity on a reservoir used once in many years is ridiculous!
Mitigating drought not feasible for the same reason.
Build now!
4 November, 2016
WV says:
SR-1 protects not just the Elbow valley, but the downtown of Calgary as well. It is the nearest shovel ready project. Do it now!
4 November, 2016
JBRideau says:
Calgary cannot be a serious competitive world class city without basic infrastructure, including fundamental flood control. Alberta's loss
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
“Springbank DAM is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would sink in water in minutes and there is no backup plan?
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
SR1 can NOT generate electricity?
Not the best for the money.
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
SR1 can NOT mitigate drought?
Not the best for the money.
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
Deltares and IBI, hired consultants warned SR1 is not the best option and could cause full damages; unfortunately many don’t know this fact.
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
Deltares and IBI, hired consultants warned SR1 in not the best option and could cause full damages; unfortunately many don’t know this fact.
3 November, 2016
Janet Davies says:
I support the mitigation measures for Bowness. You had to have lived in that community in 2013 to understand the trauma the flood caused.
3 November, 2016
DGB Riverdale says:
I strongly support SR1 ASAP. Both cost and c/b ratio are reasonable. SR1 land exposure is minimal, especially with new Glenmore Dam gates.
3 November, 2016
Tom Yeoman says:
Calgary has a long history of serious flooding. It seems with each flood, damage costs are higher and higher. Let's at least do Springbank
3 November, 2016
Stephen. Brown says:
We have wasted 3 valuable years of dithering about the need to protect Calgary from another devistating flood .The solutions are know.
3 November, 2016
Tom Yeoman says:
Building Springbank seems a logical thing with cost/benefit 1.4 to protect WHOLE downtown area
3 November, 2016
SR1 A NO GO says:
Springbank is not the answer. Come on peeps, there are alternatives everyone can get behind. Work on a solution for all.
3 November, 2016
APG says:
This project not an us vs. them debate. Studies are clear. Springbank dry dam will protect ALL citizens of Calgary. Let's get started!
3 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
With climate change we may be facing drought. A dry dam makes absolutely no sense at all. A dam at McLean addresses both flood and drought!
3 November, 2016
Tom says:
Calgary River Group calls Springbank the opposition. Springbank calls for a dam at McLean Creek to protect Calgary. Hmmmm?
3 November, 2016
Evelyn says:
Experts recommend bldg the reservoirs. I say let's get on with it. Not to do so would be irresponsible.
3 November, 2016
Bowness Resident says:
Flood/Drought, we need reservoirs. Build the dams and insure they are controlled by someone in charge with no conflicting priority.
3 November, 2016
Tom says:
Premier declares SR the best. Bureaucracy and consultants reports support Premier. Deltares does book report on consultant report. Science?
3 November, 2016
Suzanne says:
International experts in this field have already said this is the best option. Time to take action.
3 November, 2016
Suzanne says:
The environmental and economic impacts of NOT proceeding with this project are clear. Build the reservoirs now!
3 November, 2016
Douglas T says:
I have attended the information sessions. The Springbank project definitely seems to be a worthy project
3 November, 2016
CAH says:
The needs of the many outweigh the concerns of the few. The Springbank Project should be started immediately
3 November, 2016
DClarkT says:
The Sprinbank mitigation project provides significant benefits at a modest cost. It's long over due to be started.
3 November, 2016
Andy says:
Build the dam without anymore delay. We need to protect our city!
3 November, 2016
Robin says:
We are wasting valuable time. Build the Springband Project!!!!
3 November, 2016
Cathy steedman says:
So much has been spent on rebuilding and strengthening the river banks, stampede park tee. It will all be destroyed with another flood.
3 November, 2016
Cathy steedman says:
We need to bring people back to the empty lots and build. No more ghost town streets! Can't happen when people are scared of flooding.
3 November, 2016
Cathy steedman says:
This could ncept will protect our inner city neighbourhoods and most importantly downtown Calgary! It will bring buyers back to my neighbour
3 November, 2016
Andrea Gould says:
please proceed with Springbank dry reservoir ASAP! Calgary can't handle another flood economically or mentally.
3 November, 2016
DNR says:
SR1 does not pass the "designed for worst case scenario" test. Deltares warned it could be overcome in flood circumstances similar to 2013.
3 November, 2016
DNR says:
GOA hired Amec & IBI to submit proposals on SR1 & MC1 & Deltares to choose between them. TRJR was result of researching all possible sites.
3 November, 2016
Deejay says:
Water needs to be managed in times of flood and drought. McLean Creek dam would do both.
3 November, 2016
Tom says:
Gov.ab tells calgary River group berms likely to fail. Gov.ab tells Bragg Creek berms will keep you safe. McLean Creek keeps both safe.
3 November, 2016
marina paperny says:
This is critical infrastructure for this City as a whole. It must be done without delay. The sooner the better.
3 November, 2016
Linda Hayes says:
Time has come to stop the procrastination and start protecting the city. The downtown core can't handle another flood. Another year????
3 November, 2016
Alex McCartney says:
The sooner the better.Build the Springbank dry dam.
3 November, 2016
Robert Levin says:
Our entire family supports the construction of the Springbank dam.
3 November, 2016
City dweller says:
I've been to all the open houses on flood mitigation and SR1 made by far the most sense. Stop wasting time and start flood proofing YYC
3 November, 2016
Dave says:
Elbow River uncontrollable by time it reaches Bragg Creek. Consultant Deltares warned SR1 could be overcome in some flood circumstances.
3 November, 2016
Dave says:
Opportunity with TRJR for flood management, water conservation, hydro power, recreation & income generation. Leave legacy future generations
3 November, 2016
Dave says:
Water Experts advise Alberta needs a `Water Bank` & Tri-River Reservoir would provide this for flood prevention water conservation.
3 November, 2016
Dave says:
Start ASAP an EIA & CEIA on Tri-River Joint Reservoir site. Protection for all communities could be provided quickest with this project.
3 November, 2016
Dave says:
Manage rivers in the mountain valley before they become uncontrollable. See Tri-River Reservoir project www.preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
Junbao Wu says:
Option #1 is to complete the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir.
3 November, 2016
Junbao Wu says:
Calgary is a dynamic city that was severely damaged in 2013. The downtown and affected surrounding neighbourhoods cannot afford a repeat.
3 November, 2016
Louise G says:
This has been studied to death already. It is time to move forward with this project.
Another major flood is just around the corner Calgary
3 November, 2016
Linda verhun says:
Strength - instead of going on popular vote; do what is right for the city. Protect downtown and others. Weigh landfill impact after flood.
3 November, 2016
Steve says:
Two very different provincial governments came to the same conclusion. It must make sense. Let's proceed with SR1 and move on from the flood
3 November, 2016
Bonavista resident says:
Tri-River Joint Reservoir would provide flood prevention soonest once diversion channels built.See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
Margaret Nielsen says:
Concept 1 will help prevent or at least minimize the catastrophic effect of a 2013 flood - the faster Springbank can happen the better
3 November, 2016
Steve says:
reservoirs have the best economics and most certainty of protection. Let's protect the City Of Calgary to the benefit of all Albertans
3 November, 2016
John C says:
Springbank Reservoir. Yes! The best option by far. Why are we still debating this?
3 November, 2016
Marilyn W says:
I support the Springbank Reservoir 100%. Enough already! Let's do this!
3 November, 2016
Tom Edwards says:
Calgarians demand immediate action on building the Springbank dry dam.
3 November, 2016
Fred says:
Build the Springbank dry dam.
3 November, 2016
ratfink says:
Concept 1 will prevent the catastrophic environmental, property and economic damage of the flood of 2013. Why spend money on half measures?
3 November, 2016
Barbara McGregor says:
I think all of the above confirm that Springbank MUST be built.
3 November, 2016
JH says:
Environmental impact studies are not a drawback to any project. McLean Creek has extreme environmental impacts. SR1 less so.
3 November, 2016
Bacardi says:
As a river community homeowner, I wholly support the Springbank Reservoir as viable and necessary for downstream flood mitigation
3 November, 2016
Jorg says:
The Springbank dam project should proceed. There is no viable alternative! Why this is taking so long to approve is beyond me.
3 November, 2016
crjmca says:
This is the most effective solution that will safeguard the most people, although it may not be large enough to cope with a larger flood
3 November, 2016
Terry says:
I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam ASAP.
3 November, 2016
Michael B. says:
I support the Springbank Reservoir project. Get on and build it!
3 November, 2016
LH says:
Our city cannot afford another flood like 2013. Springbank reservoir has been shown as the best alternative and should be built.
3 November, 2016
Kelly Brett says:
This design will cause some concern amongst the people directly affected but thousands of peoples live were literally destroyed in the flood
3 November, 2016
Michael B. says:
How much longer are we going to place the economic hub of Western Canada, the City of Calgary, at risk while we delay the inevitable?
3 November, 2016
Cathy McAvoy says:
We need to get moving on the Springbank reservoir ASAP to protect our communities. Too much time has passed already. It's the best option!
3 November, 2016
CWH says:
I support the Springbank Reservoir project. This project has been recommended at by experts from Holland.
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary Now! says:
Calgary and Alberta cannot afford another flood. The Springbank reservoir should be built without delay.
3 November, 2016
NR says:
SR1 destroys fish & wildlife, water quality & land & as size of future floods unknown no guarantee safety. www.preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
Cathy McAvoy says:
I believe this option provides for the best protection with the least environmental impact and the shortest time frame.
3 November, 2016
Xiumei Feng says:
I strongly support springbank project!
3 November, 2016
Xiumei Feng says:
Upstream Springbank is the best option for our city and citizens devastated affected!
3 November, 2016
Shep Secter says:
Build springbok reservoir ASAP. Both my OFFIC and my home were flooded last time!!! Two separate buildings
3 November, 2016
NR says:
The Bassano dam was severely threatened in 2013. What would happen if SR1 failed so close to Calgary? See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
Yes to Springbank! says:
I strongly support building the Springbank reservoir to protect the City of Calgary.
3 November, 2016
RM says:
This project is needed and makes sense to protect a large number of home and the downtown core. Let's get on with it.
3 November, 2016
F. C. says:
Springbank dam is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would be drown in minutes. There is no backup plan, bad idea
3 November, 2016
NR says:
See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca for info re The Tri-River Joint Reservoir of Alberta for quickest flood protection to most communities.
3 November, 2016
RDC says:
I support the springbank reservoir project. There are tradeoffs 4 public good. Environmental impact of the "do nothing" option far worse.
3 November, 2016
Cmcdermid says:
The Springbank Reservoir has been shown time and time again to be the the most effective tool for preventing another 2013 incident. Do it.
3 November, 2016
F.C. says:
Springbank dam is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would be drown in matter of minutes. There is no backup plan
3 November, 2016
Cori says:
The entire downtown core was affected by the 2013 flood. We can't let this happen again! We need action immediately.
3 November, 2016
Steve says:
Postponing the decision to proceed with the Springbank project places Calgary at continued risk, in a particularly tedious time for our city
3 November, 2016
Deborah Provias says:
The negative environmental impact will be significant if we don't proceed with Springbank. The river areas still haven't recovered from 2013
3 November, 2016
JK0001 says:
It is imperative, particularly given the current fragility of the Calgary economy, that our inner city communities & families are protected.
3 November, 2016
Michael says:
Fully support the Springbank project. All families downstream should never have to endure the hardship of another flood like 2013.
3 November, 2016
E.G. says:
The proposed “TRJR" solution is a better solution than the Springbank dam "SR1" or McLean C, read more at: http://preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
M Palmer says:
Numerous studies conclude Springbank reservoir is the most cost effective mitigation measure. Let's not waste any more time and build it now
3 November, 2016
E.G.J. says:
There is a better solution than SR1 or McLean C., it is called the “TRJR. read more at: http://preventingalbertafloods.ca
3 November, 2016
Mendy Chernos says:
Springbank option is the obviously preferable option that absolutely needs to be implemented immediately without any further delay.
3 November, 2016
Jim says:
Calgary is a dynamic city that was severely damaged in 2013. The downtown and affected surrounding neighbourhoods cannot afford a repeat.
3 November, 2016
Nancy says:
I believe it is essential that an upstream reservoir at Springbank be created! A flood like 2013 cannot be allowed to happen again!
3 November, 2016
strainj says:
fully support the dry dam- critical to protect 1000's of calgary homes, downtwn core and environment from flood damage-pls get on with it!
3 November, 2016
JH says:
The water supply for Calgary is predominately the Glenmore Dam. It needs the protection of the Springbank Reservoir.
3 November, 2016
JH says:
Calgary will be protected with the Spring Reservoir. Not "luxury" homeowners, but all river valley inhabitants!
3 November, 2016
grbbenny says:
The primary strength of this concept is the protection afforded to the City and the revitalization of the neighbourhoods in the flood zone.
3 November, 2016
martha oconnor says:
Upstream mitigation is mandatory for the safety of the people of Calgary and to protect peoples homes and the economic core of the city
3 November, 2016
SaveYYC says:
SR1 must happen. Calgary's entire downtown is at risk. The economy is already too fragile and we cannot survive another flood.
3 November, 2016
George says:
I support this
3 November, 2016
easy choice says:
The choice: Siding w a few stubborn land owners vs. Protecting the economic engine of Alberta. Support Springbank, it just makes sense.
3 November, 2016
Kyle says:
Do not let bad NIMBY neighbors influence what is in the best interest of a hundred thousand Calgaryians and our infrastructure. Build SR1!
3 November, 2016
DC says:
SR1 is the closest project to Calgary, so will protect Calgary from Elbow flooding from the widest variety of storms
3 November, 2016
DC says:
SR1 affects the health of the rivers and floodplain the least as it is an off-stream project.
3 November, 2016
DC says:
I understand that tied in with SR1, are berms at Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek. With these 3, all communities are equally protected
3 November, 2016
Upstream Mitigation says:
Upstream infrastructure is how sophisticated, modern cities protect against disaster. Build Springbank and find solutions for the Bow. Now
3 November, 2016
BuildSpringbank says:
Springbank is an amazing opportunity for this City - let's get this done. A C+ rating for flood readiness for Calgary is embarrassing.
3 November, 2016
BLB says:
Flood mitigation infrastructure is very common in Europe and Asia - because all major cities are built around waterways. Build SR1!
3 November, 2016
MW says:
SR 1 will end up costing a billion dollars or more. Update the cost benefit analysis. As a taxpayer I demand it!
3 November, 2016
Fix the problem says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
Flood defense construction is planned for Bragg Creek. Mclean Creek is unfeasible. SR1 best option to protect YYC. We must protect downtown!
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
I support SR1-is less costly, will have less environmental impact, shorter timelines & capture more runoff. YYC needs protection. Lets do it
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it. Let’s get it done!
3 November, 2016
M says:
It has been shown that Springbank will cost more than we have been told - so why support SBD when McLean Creek will "save Calgary" & MORE
3 November, 2016
M says:
"Save Calgary" building at Mclean Creek WILL save Calgary as well as many others without taking away land from people and agricultural land
3 November, 2016
ranchman 1 says:
Wealthy landowners? Gosh that could include the houses along the Elbow in Calgary, couldn't it?
3 November, 2016
ranchman 1 says:
All this talk about saving downtown Calgary - only Bow River changes can do that. SO DO IT.
3 November, 2016
Darwin Perrier says:
Building a ssolution on provincial land at mclean creek can restore the recreation in the area, protect Bragg creek, redwood and springbank
3 November, 2016
Jim says:
Everyone wants protection for their businesses and homes. This concept destroys some for the sake of others. Unfair, UnAlbertan, unjust.
3 November, 2016
JB240 says:
I strongly support SR1. Calgary cannot withstand another flood like 2013, would be devastating for our fragile economy. Please proceed!!
3 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it.
3 November, 2016
Kevin Wagner says:
Put the reservoir upstream of Bragg Creek in Mclean Creek which protects ALL communities and it creates a recreation area. Use common sense
3 November, 2016
No More Floods says:
Remember that 5 lives were lost in the 2013 flood. More than property damage is at stake. Calgary cannot afford another flood.
3 November, 2016
No More Floods says:
An earthen dike is proposed to protect Bragg Creek. Springbank will have less environmental impact and is less costly than McLean Creek.
3 November, 2016
No More Floods says:
Many opposed Duff's Ditch near Winnipeg. It has since prevented over $100 billion in flood damages. No more delay over a vocal minority.
3 November, 2016
No More Floods says:
Two governments and many studies have found Springbank to be the best alternative to protect Calgary. I support it. Let's get it done!
3 November, 2016
cm115 says:
Damming Spring bank will ruin pristine land, and destroy homes.
3 November, 2016
MW says:
Springbank is rich in wildlife. It would be turned into an ugly moonscape devoid of life. We should work WITH nature, not against it!
3 November, 2016
Tom says:
I am a Calgarian and oppose the Springbank dam. Expropriation of private homes/land is wrong when McLean Creek option is on gov't land.
2 November, 2016
YYC Flood Zone Resid says:
No one posting here will live to see another major flood. '13 was one-in-a-million combo of events. Don't destroy Springbank because of it.
2 November, 2016
PRC says:
SCIENCE? LOL!!
A baseless, un-researched Prentice attempt to get Dirks elected in Calgary Elbow - only science in SR1 is political science!
2 November, 2016
bob says:
Stand w science and oppose fear. Support Springbank!!
2 November, 2016
Philip says:
Seems as though the provincial govt and Calgary city council want the most expensive solution.
2 November, 2016
Deejay says:
Wonder how well the City of Calgary will cope with the putrefaction of water after it has been festering in a shallow dam in Springbank.
2 November, 2016
MW says:
Springbank Reservoir would be a shameful misuse of a beautiful area of Alberta. Our children will question our sanity.
2 November, 2016
RancherS says:
A dry dam at Springbank will take away heritage farm land, be an eyesore and displace wildlife and people. McLean creek all the way!
2 November, 2016
smcyyc says:
I don't see any strengths in this concept. The environmental impact and cost to taxpayers are ridiculously high and unnecessary.
2 November, 2016
smcyyc says:
I don't see any strengths in this proposal. There is no mitigation relief for Bragg Creek, McLean Creek, or Redwood Meadows.
2 November, 2016
Deejay says:
Pushing a door from both sides will never open it. If we all get on one side and give it a good shove we could get on with a dam at McLean!
2 November, 2016
R.takir says:
As a citizen of the city of Calgary, I strongly oppose the building of this Dam. It will be more expensive and protect less people!
2 November, 2016
Billy Goat says:
Lets think of everyone in making this huge decision.
It's not just about Calgary !!!
Mcleen creek is the logical solution
2 November, 2016
Common Sense Guy says:
Springbank makes sense. Don't let a handful of wealthy landowners tell you otherwise. Most studies support it's construction. Save Calgary!
2 November, 2016
Phil C says:
Win-win solution: Dredge and deepen Glenmore as it has gotten so full of debris and lost capacity. Don't Dam Springbank!
2 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank Dam protecting downtown is classic misdirection. The downtown core is threatened by the Bow, not the Elbow.
2 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
YYC downtown core needs protection with over 1 million people relying on it as an economic engine. This is not just a homeowner issue.
2 November, 2016
Canuckistan2010 says:
Try managing the 3 dams we already have better. You can lower Ghost every spring and let it fill up..same with Bearspaw and Glenmore.
2 November, 2016
Act Now says:
Storing water on open field a few days every couple decades rather than have it clean out the heart of Calgary kinda makes common sense. SR1
2 November, 2016
Act Now says:
Many opponents to SR1 don't care if any mitigation is ever built if that project dies. They will be well compensated and have continued use
2 November, 2016
Act Now says:
For a cost less than the Airport Tunnel, this city can be protected. SR1 is achievable and is the only realistic option.
2 November, 2016
Act Now says:
Far and away Spring Bank is the right choice. If it dies, so does mitigation on the Elbow and Calgary can no longer be exposed to that risk
2 November, 2016
Protect Downtown Cal says:
It has been 40 months since the flood. We need to put a plan in place now and the SR1 is the best option.
2 November, 2016
Protect Downtown Cal says:
I strongly support the Springbank dam. We need to protect the downtown! A catastrophic flood in downtown would paralyze Calgary forever.
2 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
Flood defense construction is planned for Bragg Creek. Mclean Creek is unfeasible. SR1 best option to protect YYC. We must protect downtown!
2 November, 2016
LB says:
NDP gov campaigned on stopping the Springbank dam because it does not protect communities such as Bragg Creek. McLean Creek would. Land grab
2 November, 2016
LB says:
Stealing land which has belonged to families for generations in order to protect a few rich people whose homes are on a flood plain- wrong!
2 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
I support SR1-is less costly, will have less environmental impact, shorter timelines & capture more runoff. YYC needs protection. Lets do it
2 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it. Let's get it done!
2 November, 2016
SG says:
It is not just about Calgary! The Springbank Dam has negative effects on Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Springbank!! Don't Dam Springbank!
2 November, 2016
Dr Karen Massey says:
I support the idea of a dam, it just needs to be upstream of Bragg Creek for more bang for the BILLION dollars. No more secret on cost.
2 November, 2016
Dr Karen Massey says:
There is considerable erosion from a flood on the Elbow. An upstream dam would help manage this major problem.
2 November, 2016
Dr Karen Massey says:
The cost of a Springbank Reservoir alone is over $1 Billion dollars. Let's spend this money wisely upstream of Bragg Creek.
2 November, 2016
Dr Karen Massey says:
Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows also need to be protected. Build a reservoir further upstream.
2 November, 2016
Dr Karen Massey says:
The Springbank dry dam would not provide drought protection as the water will be released back into the Elbow on a graduated basis in 30days
2 November, 2016
MM says:
My family does NOT support the Springbank Dam. I stand with the overwhelming % of Alberta taxpayers who should not bear this burden.
2 November, 2016
MM says:
My family supports the Springbank dam. I stand with the overwhelming % of flood engineers and flood mitigation experts that also support it.
2 November, 2016
john elbow park says:
I strongly support the Springback diversion project, mainly for protection of the of the communities along the Elbow River and city core
2 November, 2016
MW says:
Springbank would only accomodate a flood the size of 2013. Anything larger would breach the dam. I'm glad I don't live downstream!
2 November, 2016
MW says:
The taking of private land, homes and businesses when there is a viable alternative on public land is POOR PUBLIC POLICY
2 November, 2016
M says:
People opposed to the Springbank Dam still want to protect Calgary - we also want to protect surrounding communities & not take away land
2 November, 2016
Carter says:
1. Protects Calgary's commercial center.
2. Avoids downstream environmental disaster of what a flood picks up in a city
2 November, 2016
pioneerlady says:
The Springbank reservoir is basically a land grab by Calgary developers over the rural communities.
2 November, 2016
pioneerlady says:
Springbank is NOT the best option for flood mitigation, it destroys valuable farmland that will be needed in the future. Clear flood zones.
2 November, 2016
M says:
what exactly does "objectively proven" mean?? Mclean Creek makes more sense as it would also protect Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows
2 November, 2016
Kevin wilson says:
Mclean creek is the logical solution
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
Did it ever occur to some that perhaps the SBD project isn't about protection? Could be about future development around a lake in the area!
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
Expropriating homes and land from families that have been there for generations is a crime! Some self serving people don't care.
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
The area in question is a huge wildlife corridor! Too bad you don't care about them either. I do and I don't live in the area.
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
It's a shame that you people that support the dam don't give a dam about the rest of the folks affected. Says a lot about your character.
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
SBD will be a health hazard to all down stream. It's in the documents. Check it out! Your water and air will be polluted if a flood.
2 November, 2016
Sanbill says:
McLean Creek can provide a future water source for Calgary and equally protect all communities. It won't steal land and homes from families.
2 November, 2016
Jennifer B. says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Mike says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Craig says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Jamie says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Marco says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Arianna says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
2 November, 2016
Jon Beatz says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Theatre Mom says:
McLean dam seems to be a much better option - I do not believe it has been adequately explored by the province.
1 November, 2016
Diane says:
I support the Springbank reservoir project. It has been shown to be a good solution to help prevent future flooding in Calgsry.
1 November, 2016
Deejay says:
Dam McLean Creek and build on the recreational area it already is. A solution to flood mitigation and one that all could enjoy.
1 November, 2016
RT says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Scott Jenkins says:
I support this project. This project has been proven to be the best solution.
1 November, 2016
Tana says:
By the way, your "box" for comments is a joke - doesn't allow for well thought-out comments as you limit the amount of words.
1 November, 2016
Terri says:
Contrary to what people believe, the Springbank reservoir will not be the healthiest or least expensive option.
1 November, 2016
Terri says:
There are better options than the Springbank reservoir ... spend the time and do the studies to protect Springbank citizens and wildlife.
1 November, 2016
Sarah says:
Upstream flood mitigation is essential to protect Calgary's economy and the city as a whole. This project appears to have the best balance.
1 November, 2016
Beverley says:
Please go through with the mitigation....my family and I are counting on it!!!
1 November, 2016
shoults says:
A recent article in the Cochrane Eagle (October 13, 2016, by Lindsay Seewalt. The Tri-River Joint Reservoir Project.
Please read this.
1 November, 2016
Kymf says:
Springbank costs have been grossly understated. Groundwater studies have not been completed & dewatering costs not included.
1 November, 2016
Tom says:
If we had all supported McLean Creek two years ago, construction would have started by now. Instead we have community vs community.kinda sad
1 November, 2016
Dan Wise says:
the fish after a flood will be devistated they will end up in dry resivor and die it will elemate them from the elbow river
1 November, 2016
Dan Wise says:
it will impact migrating of the elk with the inflow channel crossing though there route as well as other animals /fish will be most impact
1 November, 2016
Dan Wise says:
it may not work unproven in moutain and forest regions witch could block inflow and do catitrofic damage to the fish as well
1 November, 2016
Terry says:
There is another option (McLean Creek) so Calgary can have protection beyond this option...
1 November, 2016
Dan Wise says:
please dam mclean creek and save calgary and bragg creek and red wood meadows it will great water for times of drought and possibley hydro
1 November, 2016
Terry says:
It will put a local community at risk (Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Tsuu Tina)...not very neighbourly
Restricts westward development
1 November, 2016
K says:
Why should those who built ABOVE floodplain loose everything to those who decided to build/live on a KNOWN FLOODPLAIN?
1 November, 2016
RGodderis says:
Springbank is the wrong choice. A betterChoice is in theMountains protecting 3 RiverValleys & Bragg Creek, TsaTina Nation, Redwood Meadows.
1 November, 2016
TF says:
Dear folks of YYC's elite areas: insure, move, or accept wet carpet every 100 years. UnAlbertan to expect others to pay for your lifestyle.
1 November, 2016
mike martin says:
Strongly support the project. It would be foolish of Calgary to knowingly ignore the environmental, human and economic risks of not acting.
1 November, 2016
Jessica Minovitch says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
IG says:
McLean dam provides recreation opportunities, protection for communities upstream of Calgary and potentially helps long term water supply fo
1 November, 2016
IG says:
Springbank dry dam is not a cost effective or ecologically sound option. It does nothing to benefit any of the points asked.
1 November, 2016
PRC says:
Springbank won't protect downtown. That has been proven and reported on. Claims of this are false.
1 November, 2016
Bbbn says:
Too few communities protected. Very little if any protection of downtown Calgary. Bad idea for Springbank. Bad for Elbow River ecology.
1 November, 2016
anita james says:
where there are families who may be displaced expropriated because of this plan, then the authorities must find another way, democracy first
1 November, 2016
SKearl says:
I fully support the Springbank project. It's the best option to protect 1000s of homes and DT Calgary (the economic engine of AB).
1 November, 2016
CD says:
Downtown Calgary affected vs. a small # of compensated landowners. Best proven protection is Springbank - it's crucial for our economy
1 November, 2016
ESL says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Janine Clarke says:
McLean Dam would protect more people. It's on crown lands--would be far less expensive and displace fewer people. I support McLean Dam!
1 November, 2016
Dave Reesor says:
After use, SDD will leave an unsightly mud flat. The next year it will become a dust bowl affecting all downwind including West Calgary
1 November, 2016
CK says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Grant MacKenzie says:
The Springbank project is the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. 1000's will benefit vs a few who will get cashed.
1 November, 2016
JKV says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
RSW says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Jon says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
Jon says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
rachwest says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
1 November, 2016
DDSB says:
It is not Calgary, but how about Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows? In case the project is not funded solely by the city...
1 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
Springbank Dam only serves a few posh areas along the Elbow - Readeau/Roxboro and Elbow Park. NO ONE ELSE! It's POLITICS before PEOPLE again
1 November, 2016
Tom says:
Impact on ALL communities indicates that McLean Creek is clearly the best. Environmental impacts could be mitigated and its on crown land.
1 November, 2016
ranchman1 says:
SR1 removes 8000 acres of local food production in order to help houses approved by City decisions? Wrong!
1 November, 2016
ranchman1 says:
SR1 will have no impact on downtown. That was the swollen groundwater from the underground Bow River that underlies all of downtown.
1 November, 2016
ranchman1 says:
Grizzly bears have been sited all summer on the 8000 acres ranch land to be destroyed. They are a protected species.
1 November, 2016
ranchman1 says:
Calgary thinks it is correct to use my provincial tax dollars to solve the problems they created?
1 November, 2016
Phil says:
Springbank not the right answer. Too expensive, protects too few while downtown left exposed. McLean Dam would at least protect more people.
1 November, 2016
Adriana says:
I am very strongly supportive of the Springbank reservoir! Please help protect Calgary now!
1 November, 2016
Adriana says:
To prevent devastating damage to downtown, it is worthwhile to construct SR1 to protect Calgary's economic viability
1 November, 2016
Jim says:
Dry residue from SR1 will contain pathogens. Prevailing winds will blow dust into Calgary. Read Stantec SR1 Project Report 5.3.5.
1 November, 2016
Adriana says:
I wholly support SR1 - it is by far the cheaper and most effective solution!
1 November, 2016
Jim says:
SR1 will contaminate groundwater and wells in surrounding communities. Google Stantec SR1 Project Description 5.3.4. Remember Walkerton.
1 November, 2016
Jim says:
SR1 will leave may shallow pools of stagnant water behind. Mosquitos will breed. Zika is in Canada. Is Calgary next.?
31 October, 2016
Tom says:
I am concerned about the water quality that would be released into the Elbow from the Springbank reservoir. Keep the river in the river bed.
31 October, 2016
Tom says:
McLean Creek is the option that should be pursued. I don't understand why we would so willingly cause damage to our neighbours to the west.
31 October, 2016
Don E. says:
Terrible destruction of good land when land around the city will become increasingly scarce. Use Maclean Creek which already partially
31 October, 2016
Mary says:
An upstream solution is necessary but must include west of Bragg creek. Rural not responsible for poor development practices of the past
31 October, 2016
altadiva says:
While it is important to consider the effect that new reservoirs may have on river health, surely these can be built with minimal impact
31 October, 2016
altadiva says:
As a homeowner in Bowness, who was forced to evacuate in June 2013, I support the construction of a new reservoir for the Bow River upstream
31 October, 2016
R.J. says:
Dam project simply transfers costs and damage to Springbank. Can't we do better than to destroy one community to (try to) save another?
31 October, 2016
CC says:
Springbank is not fast, cheap or easy as it was promoted. Alternative options available, such as McLean Creek & TriRiver need consideration
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
The GOA was offered a solution that would protect our river communities. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca and demand action of your reps.
31 October, 2016
AJ says:
MacLean Creek. Cheaper, protects more communities and provides recreation for Calgary.
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
Taxpayer funds should be used to protect all communities to the highest levels as is possible with an expert water management project TRJR.
31 October, 2016
AJ says:
Springbank is too costly. Will be over $1/2 a billion after land is purchased at market price even during the downturn. Use Crown land.
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
Calgary's economic core MUST be protected to the highest of levels. Springbank is not designed for "worst case scenario" (Deltares Report)
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
Water is our most precious resource and Springbank does nothing for long=term supply and quality of water for Albertans.
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
Springbank does not ensure the health of the river & floodplain as diverting it then returning it to the river would add many pollutants
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
32 communities were devastated in the 2013 flood so a comprehensive solution such as Tri-River Joint Reservoir of Alberta is needed.
31 October, 2016
Noelle Read says:
Destroy a beautiful area which citizens and tourists enjoy when travelling to the mountains. Hinder traffic flow. Destroy wildlife habitat
31 October, 2016
DDSB says:
no strength
weekness
nature will be destroyed
pepole will loose properties
Toxic waste will be spread over the area with erery flood
31 October, 2016
jack says:
Dry dam, yuck! Makes no economic or environmental sense, has to be a better solution than the Springbank project.
31 October, 2016
hoffthehammer says:
I am very supportive of the Springbank project and I would like to see it go ahead as soon as possible. Calgary cannot another disaster.
31 October, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank does little to protect the downtown core. The Bow is bigger threat. Use existing dams more wisely.
31 October, 2016
Tom says:
Rural communities should not have to pay the price - this is only a viable option if crown land is used.
31 October, 2016
Cameron says:
Calgary's inner city and downtown core remain totally vulnerable. The Springbank reservoir MUST proceed ASAP. Lowest cost/highest impact.
31 October, 2016
bracken says:
Global warming necessitates protective action as businesses & residences cannot be re-located from Calgary's river valleys without huge cost
31 October, 2016
bracken says:
Lowest environmental impact of all alternatives; necessary to protect both residential communities and downtown core. Move fwd ASAP.
31 October, 2016
Morten says:
Vastly too expensive. And totally unfair to Springbank. Build a reservoir at McLean Creek instead.
31 October, 2016
Purdys says:
YES! This is our #1 choice for upstream flood mitigation. We live in East Elbow Park + were devastated with the last flood. We support 100%
31 October, 2016
Kyle Keith says:
Great concept! The Springbank reservoir should be the #1 priority. Low enviro impact & big YYC protection. Push the province to build.
30 October, 2016
Peter says:
I am in favour of the upstream reservoirs as I feel it will have the least impact overall while maintaining Calgary as a world class city.
30 October, 2016
Bill says:
If best technical, environmental and economic analyses result in the SR-1 proposal, then let's stop the open houses and start building!
30 October, 2016
Brenda says:
The Springbank reservoir is essential to flood mitigation along the Elbow River. This will protect downtown as well as neighborhoods.
29 October, 2016
Flood Victim #117000 says:
Please, Please, Please..... Build the Springbank Reservoir now!!!!! Enough talk. Do something.
29 October, 2016
Patricia says:
I wholeheartedly support the Sprinkbank reservoir. If development, and indeed life, are a balance this option provides the lowest impact.
29 October, 2016
Jan F says:
Our riverbanks need aesthetic protection from erosion but are only bandaid solutions to flooding. Springbank Dam needs to be built NOW!
29 October, 2016
Jan F says:
Springbank has been studied/analyzed for over 3 years-only feasible solution! ALL levels of govt need to show some leadership!
29 October, 2016
Ken says:
Also agree with Cheryl. A 140 character limit is frustrating, and limits our capacity to provide meaningful fact based input.
29 October, 2016
Ken says:
Agree with Maureen. Any reservoir, if considered, should be multi-use? Changes benefit/cost. Why is Springbank dry?
29 October, 2016
maureen says:
Preferred option. Provides provisions for drought as well, and communities downstream from Calgary as well. Greater cost/benefit
29 October, 2016
Suzanne says:
Moving forward with Springbank is the only sensible course of action to protect downtown Calgary from the next flood. Please act quickly.
29 October, 2016
Glenn says:
My home and business were substantially affected by the 2013 flood. I completely support the Springbank project and urge quick action.
29 October, 2016
KHayes says:
ected as we have built the downtown core on a flood plain and requires upstream mitigation sooner rather than later.
29 October, 2016
Geoff Granville says:
please ensure you total up the # of citizens in favour of Springbank option and give that info to the prov and CEAA - and to the Herald.
28 October, 2016
Kerrie says:
The 2013 flood was devastating to Calgary's economy and to its citizens. The negative effects of the Springbank reservoir pale in comparison
28 October, 2016
Caroline says:
-good beginning keeping the Elbow at 2005 flood level.
The culvert from the Glenmore to the Bow - essential. The downtown MUST be protected
28 October, 2016
Barbara McGregor says:
I think that the amount of time and energy being expended to resolve this matter is ridiculous. Build Springbank.
28 October, 2016
Terry Fishman says:
I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam and the increase capacity of the Glenmore dam.
28 October, 2016
Ed Engstrom says:
As I live in the Elbow River flood zone, I believe upstream protection is a task mandatory for my elected government to execute asap. Nike.
28 October, 2016
Cheryl says:
We need affordable flood insurance!! Upstream reservoirs will help, but equal in-city berms/barriers would also protect neighbourhoods
28 October, 2016
Cheryl says:
A 140 character limit is very frustrating!!! If you REALLY want feedback, make it easier to do so!!
28 October, 2016
Cheryl says:
The City should Install permanent or seasonal berms along the Elbow to protect the inner city neighbourhoods. The dam is taking too long!!!
28 October, 2016
Cheryl says:
Our family has huge support for the Springbank Reservoir, as we believe this will provide excellent protection for downstream residents.
28 October, 2016
James Meadow says:
It is critical that this viable flood mitigation project move forward with due dispatch. As time goes on, people begin to forget.
28 October, 2016
urenpat says:
The clamshell type Springbank reservoir looks good. Another flood of Elbow Park and Roxborough will destroy these historic areas. Do it now!
28 October, 2016
Tom Yeoman says:
It is VERY important to protect residential districts AND downtown Calgary by building Springbank Reservoir
28 October, 2016
Tom Yeoman says:
I want to `Register' my whole-hearted support for building the Springbank reservoir.
28 October, 2016
Blair M says:
I am strongly in favor of the Springbank Dry Dam project. It needs to be approved and constructed ASAP in order to protect Calgary.
28 October, 2016
Steve says:
It seems as though downtown Calgary needs to be protected and the Spring bank reservoir is the best way to accomplish that.
28 October, 2016
Douglas Long says:
As an affected citizen, both as a home owner and as a businessman in Calgary, I support the Springbank dam
28 October, 2016
Louise G says:
I am strongly in favour of proceeding with the Springbank Dry Dam project as soon as possible.
We can not wait for the next flood.
Please!
28 October, 2016
grbbenny says:
The Springbank Project must proceed-the concept has been extensively studied and found to be the best option. Let's get on with it.
28 October, 2016
stefan says:
The upstream solutions are the only viable solutions. Yes, it will impact a few landowners but will protect downtown and thus our economy
28 October, 2016
Steve says:
SR1 has been proven to protect our downtown and neighbourhoods. Please find ways to speed this project up to project our City.
28 October, 2016
Randy Leighy says:
@livesonahill, thank you for prioritizing 3 fields and a couple cows over hundreds of homes and thousands of people's lives.
28 October, 2016
Randy Leighy says:
Springbank residents, please remember the dam will rarely be filled, and when it is filled, you will be saving thousands of people's homes.
25 October, 2016
livesonahill says:
upstream projects are hugely expensive, environmentally controversial and shift the mitigation impact to people who will not get the benefit
24 October, 2016
Eric says:
In favour of these proposals - additional and substantial ongoing benefits for southern Alberta in years of low moisture
23 October, 2016
Justin says:
This is the best option. Effort should be made to explore the potential electrical generation opportunities associated with the Bow dam.
23 October, 2016
Truth Seeker says:
IBI estimates total damages for the Bow River at $1.07B, how can you estimate C-B ratio when location & size of the reservoir is unknown?
23 October, 2016
Truth Seeker says:
This is a disgrace. No info about reservoir location & size. An AMEC study has already been done, release it to the public.
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
One measure of the adequacy of community flood mitigation is that flood insurance is available and affordable.
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
Flood mitigation infrastructure must protect against reasonably foreseeable future floods so that affordable flood insurance would be avail.
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
Implement management improvements at TransAlta’s reservoirs while enabling rapid lowering of Ghost to balance flood, drought and recreation
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
At least one new dam upstream of Calgary should be built, but with the recognition that completion is likely decades in the future.
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
Protection for mixed-income Sunnyside must match the protection provided to the downtown condos of the wealthy.
23 October, 2016
Charlie Lund says:
Build TBL justified berms now while waiting decades for upstream mitigation.
22 October, 2016
Brian Castle says:
Need barriers in combination with dams - not enuf protection
22 October, 2016
Debbie Young says:
some blanket protection and management of flows & drought
-could not take forever to get approved funded and built=no protection for 20 yrs
-
Concept 2: Barriers along the Bow and Elbow Rivers
Concept 3: Upstream Reservoir and Barriers along the Bow River
Non-Structural Measures: Land Use Policies and Bylaws
About
You see the results of decisions made by The City of Calgary every day. Get involved and provide your input on City projects and programs. Together we can build a better city.
Contact Us
Have questions or want to learn more about a project, contact us below:
Phone | 311 or 403-268-CITY (2489) |
---|---|
engage@calgary.ca | |
Website | www.calgary.ca |