Need more info? Please refer to the participant packages.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of concept 1 and why?
<p style="color: rgb(63, 71, 78); margin-bottom: 1rem;">What do you think this concept's benefits and impacts will be on:</p><ul><li>The way the community looks, feels and moves?</li><li>Providing equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities?</li><li>The amenities/services in your community?</li><li>The health of the rivers and floodplain as it flows from the mountains, through the city and to other communities downstream?</li><li>The long-term supply and quality of water for our community?</li><li>Protecting Calgary's economic core? Should downtown be protected to a higher level?</li><li>The city as a whole?</li></ul>
- Recent
- Popular
- Rising
9 November, 2016
Kim says:
No weaknesses, the city requires Springbank dam to proceed ASAP to protect our downtown core and communities
9 November, 2016
Kim Safton says:
We need this reservoir to protect our city core and communities NOW
8 November, 2016
High and dry says:
Does do nothing for Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. MC creek option is the only goid one that can work for all.
Cheapest too!
8 November, 2016
Vanice Simpson says:
The proposed dam at Springbank will not protect everyone on upstream of the Springbank area. Everyone needs flood protection!
8 November, 2016
David H says:
Spingbank is the right solution. McLean Creek is a poor option. Self interest is driving opposition to Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Dave says:
The study has been done by experts in their field - get on with the Springbank option. It's the best option for the people of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Linda says:
For most downstream benefit & least damage to fish & landowners, dry dam measures should be further upstream than Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Dave says:
Albertans great at working together to recover from disasters but not at working together to prevent them. Www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.
8 November, 2016
yycNorth says:
Looking at riverfront homes in '86 we opted to live on high ground. Flooding was a factor. Why can't people own up to their bad choices?
8 November, 2016
Inner city resident says:
The springbank reservoir is the solution with most benefits and the least cost and disruption. What is the hold up?
8 November, 2016
Evan Welbourn says:
Working with open ground and raw undeveloped earth, is much more economic than repairing developed lands , like downtown.
8 November, 2016
Passionate Calgarian says:
Springbank Reservoir protects the city as a whole. Businesses and homeowners.
8 November, 2016
Evan Welbourn says:
I support upstream reservoirs.
8 November, 2016
Don says:
Equal protection.
Downtown more costly to recover so needs more protection. This is best way.
Best for whole city, too.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
is this really a case where a government would rather sacrifice its citizens than take on the environmental lobby? God help us.
8 November, 2016
Jane says:
The 2013 flood did so much damage. It would be criminal to let this event continue to ruin lives, homes, businesses, community. No to SR1.
8 November, 2016
Markj Hornby says:
It is essential to have reservoir capacity in flooding situations. Both the Elbow and Bow require reservoirs in emergency situations.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
There is no need to turn community against community. Let's all support MC1. It's on land that the gov.ab (ie.we) already own. Why buy more?
8 November, 2016
Greg says:
If berms are good enough for Bragg Creek and RW, they should be good enough for Calgary too
8 November, 2016
SG says:
I am sure Calgary will bully their way into having a dam in Springbank which is sad as I really do believe MC is a better choice for Alberta
8 November, 2016
yycNorth says:
Don't we already have a reservoir? It's called the Glenmore. Dredge the dam thing!! Can't hurt!
8 November, 2016
MW says:
SR1=cesspool. Mosquitoe breeding ground. Not to mention dead animals, fish and sewage. Nice.
8 November, 2016
MW says:
The type of sediment left at SR 1 NOT fertile, would not grow pasture. Is mountain rock. Would be an ugly moonscape. What a crime!
8 November, 2016
MW says:
The taking of private land, businesses and homes when there are viable alternatives is POOR PUBLIC POLICY. Mclean creek please!
8 November, 2016
Floodvictim says:
We are in full support of the Springbank off stream reservoir. Please make this a priority and start building now.
8 November, 2016
Patrick Mc Reavey says:
Protect all community in flood areas. Protect the all the city infrastructure. Get moving before disaster strikes again.
8 November, 2016
Elenore Kubik says:
We must have another reservoir west of Calgary on the Bow River to protect our economic core and communities along the river.
8 November, 2016
SR1 forpublic safety says:
Anti logging will kill MC1. Environmentalists will kill MC1. Lives are at risk. Temporary wet pasture best. SR1 a must for public safety.
8 November, 2016
Get it done says:
Time to take action. It is good for all of Calgary, you can't be a great city with a vulnerable core.
8 November, 2016
Kel Johnston says:
Displacing some of Alberta's founding families when the Maclean Creek option exists that affects no one is a crime.
8 November, 2016
rvander says:
Unless this plan protects all Alberta homes, it should not be completed at any expense. McLean Dam is the answer.
8 November, 2016
Prospring says:
Hands down, this is the most cost effective and best result concept to deal with flood risk in Calgary. For residences and businesses
8 November, 2016
bwalker says:
I believe that the Springbank reservoir is the best of the three concepts as it will be the quickest and least expensive to implement.
8 November, 2016
Andrea says:
Fully supportive of SR1. It's been analzed, assessed and recommended by legions of experts and professionals. Get started now. Please.
8 November, 2016
Andrea says:
SR1 will benefit the city as a whole. It's been studied and analyzed enough. It's time to get on with it!
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
After a week or so of jabbing back and forth the winner is - no one!!! Why can't we all get behind McLean? Everybody wins!
8 November, 2016
Al says:
SR1 has already been objectively proven to be the best solution to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank opposition are exaggerating??? Meanwhile proponents claim it will save all of Calgary and world hunger too. Let's get real folks
8 November, 2016
Albertans for All says:
Engage best minds/skills to develop Tri-River Joint Reservoir ASAP. for future prosperity as our forefathers did
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
A new cost benefit when gov.ab finally gets pushed into doing one will clearly show McLean is better. Enviro concerns can be mitigated.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Objectivity on SR1 was lost in 2014, when the premier announced it was preferred. Since then - bureaucrats striving to please the boss.
8 November, 2016
Best for All says:
Project to protect most communities ASAP presented to NDP GOA. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Need TRJR.
8 November, 2016
Katya says:
Maximum benefit. Build it now.
8 November, 2016
Kyle says:
The science concludes SR1 is the highest cost/benefit and most feasible. Leave it to the experts instead of comments from NIMBY landowners.
8 November, 2016
Kyle says:
Why is SR1 not built yet? Much better to have controlled flood in the prairie than an uncontrolled flood of Calgary communities and downtown
8 November, 2016
Bxn says:
This seems the most logical solution from a cost and effectiveness viewpoint. Land recovers from water naturally; houses do not.
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
Hmmm...Government picking winners & losers instead of acknowledging that all can win, and making it happen...Can someone explain please? MC1
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
Those of us upstream are getting a bit tired of being called "the opposition". Grow up! We're as worthy as Calgarians are.People are people.
8 November, 2016
Person upstream says:
We are more than a "handful of people upstream". We are PEOPLE upstream who deserve the same degree of protection that Calgary demands.
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank is the logical choice for a dry dam. The land can still be used for grazing, parks, nature reserve, etc. Protect against calamity
8 November, 2016
Makes no sense says:
Upstream mitigation IS a reasonable part of the solution, but flooding 7000 acres of farmland is not the right answer. Dam McLean.
8 November, 2016
Makes no sense says:
How is SR1 a "reservoir" when there's no plan to "line" the land with anything to keep water from simply soaking in? Waste of water & land.
8 November, 2016
Get Informed says:
Be informed and make wise choices. With the wealth of information available - Springbank dam is a clear winner. Build it!
8 November, 2016
lornatsta says:
Upstream reservoirs are the answer, few people impacted, good protection, very little environmental impact -during flood and for short time
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Note that above where it estimates 1.9B - that is to do a reservoir on each of the Elbow and Bow Rivers and is not the SR1 cost alone.
8 November, 2016
Jonathan says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
8 November, 2016
Brian says:
In 2012 SR1 =$158M; now = $1.9M & likely to increase yet no updated cost on MC1. Claims of MR1 costing more are unfounded! Look more at MR1!
8 November, 2016
Dano says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution set by far. It is the dominant solution globally for flood mitigation/hydroelectricity.
8 November, 2016
Don says:
The Springbank Reservoir has been well examined and studied. The expert conclusion is that it is a good solution; it ought to be undertaken.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
We really need to evaluate the two options properly and equally.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
The SR1 option will impact one of the last pieces of native prairie and unique habitat left around the city of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Dam Mclean says:
The Mclean creek dam option was never explored to the fullest extent. So how come people say the SR1 is the best option?
8 November, 2016
Dorothy says:
This is not a "them" or "us." Its about protecting the most Calgarians. Springbank dam doesn't do that. It does nothing for downtown.
8 November, 2016
kelly moi says:
Springbok provides a viable flood mitigation option to protect downstream areas of the Elbow river and the downtown as a priority.
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
YYC cannot afford another flood, economically, environmentally, or emotionally. Do SR1 and other mitigation asap.
8 November, 2016
Build Springbank Res says:
It has been over 3 years since the flood. It is time to move on this project!
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
Praying and assuming that another flood will not happen is foolish. Start mitigation with SR1 asap and address other prevention as well.
8 November, 2016
Concerned Taxpayer says:
Relocating downtown businesses, Saddledome, historic homes, etc. is not an option. Start with SR1 asap and address Bow flooding as well.
8 November, 2016
BUILD SPRINGBANK says:
There have been several studies concluding that Springbank is the best option, cost wise and enivironmentally. Please get moving on this!
8 November, 2016
Grandpa says:
SR1 liability to present & future Generations. Provide a great treasure Tri-Ri Ed Joint Reservoir of Alberta. All work together For TRJR
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
The plan is to flood the SR1 site every 7 years to ensure everything is working properly. Not ONLY in big flood events like many think.
8 November, 2016
Damn McLean says:
McLean creek is the only good option and it would protect more than just the city of Calgary. The NDP government should be ashamed.
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
The MC1 site is NOT too "wildlife sensitive". 40 years of ATV's, logging, a gas plant, etc...has ensured few animals live at the site.
8 November, 2016
In my back yard says:
As a Bragg Creek resident, I want the dam IN MY BACK YARD! MC1 for the good of us ALL!
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
The ship on floodplain development in YYC sailed 120 years ago. Subsequent civic govt's have ignored the threat. Concept 1 - NOW!
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
Calgary core, business and communities will remain vulnerable 4 flood seasons later. Let's not make it 5 and counting...
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
SR1 is feasible and gets the job done. Grazing land won't disappear - flood or no flood - It can be restored faster, cheaper than city land
8 November, 2016
NDP flip-flop says:
It seems like there are A LOT of people commenting here who support McLean, which the NDP campaigned upon. We won't let them forget that.
8 November, 2016
Sitting Duck says:
YYC and AB cannot afford another flood in any sense of the word - expense, lost productivity, deminished property value=less property taxes.
8 November, 2016
Heartbroken says:
Sad that it appears that all supporting SR1 couldn't care less about Tsuu Ti'na, Springbank, Redwood or Bragg. Where's your compassion?
8 November, 2016
Bragg Creek matters says:
Diversify the economy via tourism by building a lake-like, REAL reservoir at MC1. Win for all Calgarians who come & play in our back yard!
8 November, 2016
Lets Do It says:
I support the Springbank as a long term solution which affects all of Calgarians and Albertans.
8 November, 2016
Lucy says:
Concept #1 is core to every solution. Without it..#2 and #3 don't protect our city.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
According to the Treaty Act, neither SR1, nor MC1 can proceed without the majority of Treaty 7 bands on board. They're not.Indiginous rights
8 November, 2016
Karen Radford says:
We must take action to protect our city and reduce the uncertainty this churn is creating. Springbank needs to happen
8 November, 2016
Karen Radford says:
The Springbank solution has proven to be the best. It has minimal impacts and protects our city. Time to move forward.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
If the berms in Bragg & Redwood fail, the SR1 diversion gates will be so clogged by our debris, they'll likely fail and do no good at all.
8 November, 2016
McLean is best says:
SR1 wouldn't conserve water for times of draught. MC1 would, and would also be a lake-like playground in close proximity to Calgary. Smart!
8 November, 2016
Jim says:
Visit preventingalbertafloods.ca The TRJR. This project is the best solution. Not even considered so far by GoA. No to SR1 help everyone.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The is virtually no environmental impact to building a dry dam and flooding a field every 20-50 years.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The environmental impacts of upstream mitigation are vastly overstated, consider the impact of the contents of 10,000+ homes in the landfill
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
I have some sympathy for those whose land is expropriated or flooded every 50 years, but upstream mitigation is needed for an entire city.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
All flood-prone areas should be protected, starting with the Elbow, then the Bow. Upstream reservoirs address all the issues +minimal impact
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The upstream reservoir would protect our drinking water by slowing the silting up of Glenmore reservoir.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
The long-term quality of water would be improved by the Springbank reservoir, by holding back mud and pollutants during and after a flood.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation protects all citizens, whether they live near a river or not, as we all have to pay when floods occur.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution for the entire city, we're all taxpayers and ultimately have to foot the bill when disasters happen
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
I support upstream mitigation as the best solution, we don't want to end up like Los Angeles and turn our rivers into concrete channels.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream mitigation is the best solution, it avoids ugly berms and walls and will preserve the natural beauty of our rivers.
8 November, 2016
Sandman says:
Upstream reservoirs are by far the most effective and least disruptive solutions. Let's push to get Springbank built, then one on the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Simon G says:
The Springbank Project makes a lot of sense- I'm surprised that it hasn't been better supported by the City. It seems to do the job well!
8 November, 2016
Sheldon cameron says:
Please mitigate the possibilities of having another flood like 2013. The downtown city core or surrounding residential home owners beg for
8 November, 2016
Bill Ardley says:
If SR1 is built, tax Calgarians only for the 2 billion. Also for any future upstream floods costs. Build McLean creek and all pay for it
8 November, 2016
Build now! says:
The Springbank project is strongly supported by Calgarians. Environmental impact is negligible compared to the impact of a flood.
8 November, 2016
Action needed says:
Floods happen. Dams get built. Expropriation is older than the hills. Get Springbank built and fix the Bow River too.
8 November, 2016
Stop flooding now says:
So tired of the inflammatory comments about sacrificing Springbank. Most of that grazing land will continue to be available for grazing.
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
Please stop exaggerating. No one is sacrificing Springbank. 3600 acres of grazing land are needed for an important public work. Build SR1
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
My family's farmland was expropriated west of Edmonton for a traffic exchange. We survived. The greater good needs the dam!
8 November, 2016
Build the Dam says:
Expropriating for public works is a concept older than Alberta. Let's get on with Springbank now!
8 November, 2016
Wayne says:
I think this is great although I don't understand why it isn't also combined with a dry dam in the meaclean creek, Allen Bill pond area.
8 November, 2016
Save Calgary says:
Get the facts straight. Both rivers need mitigation to protect the Core. Start with Springbank now!
8 November, 2016
Lesley Kirby says:
Concept 1 protects the city downtown core. Calgary needs to have business and head offices protected.
8 November, 2016
Tired says:
I support Calgary solving it's own dam(n) flooding problems within their own city limits. Leave Springbank out of your selfish plotting.
8 November, 2016
Rideau Resident says:
The land values in Springbank are attributable to the proximity to Calgary. Preserve the value of both. Concept 1 now.
8 November, 2016
Tick tock says:
By the time NDP FORCIBLY takes the land for SR1 from the owners, MC1 could have been near completion, had the NDP kept their word. Sad.
8 November, 2016
LWB says:
Why should we sacrifice long-standing landowners upstream while we continue to allow residential development in flood plains in Calgary?
8 November, 2016
Waste of money says:
Expropriating prime farmland to create a 7000+ acre toxic dust plain is a ridiculous waste of Albertans' money. Smarten up! Dam McLean!
8 November, 2016
Disappointed says:
Calgary needs to solve their own problems within their own city limits. The flood wasn't Springbank's fault. Period.
8 November, 2016
Disgusted says:
Were Calgary a "world class city", it wouldn't insist that others pay for it's shortcomings & poor planning. Mitigate yourselves.
8 November, 2016
Rideau Resident says:
A flood of a similar magnitude to 2013 in the next few years will erode the entire tax base of the city. Concept 1 ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Some facts says:
Calgary planners dropped the ball & now they're making it the problem of innocent people. City planners are to blame, not Springbankers.
8 November, 2016
Paul says:
Easy to implement, cost effective and solves the problem. Protecting Calgary is of highest importance and should be a priority.
8 November, 2016
Nimbys in YYC says:
Don't want unsightly, ineffective berms obstructing your posh river views? Neither does Bragg Creek. Dam McLean! We can all be happy!
8 November, 2016
Yes 2 SR1 says:
Springbank reservoir is needed now! This is the best solution for protecting our downtown, stampede grounds and residential communities.
8 November, 2016
Truth be told says:
Sorry Springbank folks, but who are being the Nimby's? Why let facts get in the way of your lies?
8 November, 2016
Jim says:
I support McLean Creek proposal. It costs less due to nil cost of land. Also protects villages of Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek.
8 November, 2016
Yes 2 YYC mitigation says:
This project needs to proceed asap. The risk and damage to personal and commercial property and the economy more generally is too great!
8 November, 2016
Madge says:
Civic politicians have created this dam rush. Building on flood plains, is no excuse to make others bear the brunt. No to SR1, go elsewhere.
8 November, 2016
GT says:
How can YYC be considered "world class" when we cannot quickly implement flood mitigation? Start with SR1 asap before another flood occurs.
8 November, 2016
Madge says:
Save the core! Fact: Bow River was primary cause(2/3) of CORE & city flooding. Focus on the BOW. Fact:SR1 will not save the Core.
8 November, 2016
Save the City! says:
We need to Build SR1 NOW and MC1 ASAP. We need to protect Calgary from future Flood Devastation! Enough Studies and Surveys! We NEED Action!
8 November, 2016
No Sprinkbank dam! says:
The Calgary residents opposing berms obstructing their river views are the NIMBY's, not the Springbank residents on the chopping block.
8 November, 2016
Berms for everyone! says:
The salesmen are heavily pitching the effectiveness of earthen berms for Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows. No dams! Berms for everyone!
8 November, 2016
Smith says:
This SR1 concept is more politically motivated than scientifically sound. There are other, more effective and viable options.
8 November, 2016
No to SR1 says:
Creating a likely toxic dust bowl, directly in the path of strong winds is seriously insane. No Springbank dry dam! All to the east suffer.
8 November, 2016
Smith says:
It's too costly and has a great negative impact on both the community and enviro, while protecting a prestigious few properties downstream.
8 November, 2016
Angry Creeker says:
We want Calgary protected without sacrificing & displacing others. MC1 is for the good of the many. SR1 is for the good of fewer.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
McLean Creek is off the table for good reasons. Springbank is now the only hope for the Elbow. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Yes to YYC says:
This City cannot grind to a halt again. Let's get this fixed. Springbank now. The Bow ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Build now says:
Very much in favour of Concept 1 - upstream protection on both rivers. Start with Springbank.
8 November, 2016
Build Reservoir says:
Strongly support the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir. It's a necessary public work.
8 November, 2016
Good neighbour says:
I support MC1 as it protects Calgary AND communities upstream, like Bragg Creek, that Calgarians like to frequent. MC1 is simply better.
8 November, 2016
Build ASAP says:
Informed people get that both rivers flood downtown and we need the Springbank reservoir ASAP as a start.
8 November, 2016
Save the Core! says:
Calgarians understand what's at risk. Our economic chugs away in the downtown core. Fix both rivers. Start with SR1
8 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
The majority of these comments support building Springbank now! And fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Bragg Creek matters says:
If earthen berms are "good enough" for Bragg Creek, they're certainly "good enough" for Calgary too. Equal protection for all citizens.
8 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
Please get informed. The Core floods from both rivers - and the Springbank project is the best first step. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Act now! says:
Act now! This City's fragile economy cannot weather another disaster. Fix the Elbow with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
The greater good dictates we need to fix both rivers. Start with the Springbank dry dam for the Elbow and keep looking for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Protect more people says:
Heartwarming to see that the overwhelming majority are AGAINST SR1 & FOR MC1. There might be hope for humanity afterall:) Sacrifice nobody!
8 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
Why should I pay to save flood plain people? Well - they pay for your LRT they never use. They pay for roads they never drive. Public works
8 November, 2016
Yes to Dry Dam says:
Why don't people move out of the flood plain? Because there are 10,000+ homes there. And the entire downtown. Too late. Build protection.
8 November, 2016
TW says:
this needs to be done immediatlt; stop delaying.
8 November, 2016
EM says:
I support Concept 1
8 November, 2016
Yes to Dry Dam says:
Science backs the Springbank reservoir. We need to protect the Core from both rivers. It's the best place to start!
8 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Why is it a dry dam? Because it has minimal environmental impact and we have enough drinking water. Build SR1
8 November, 2016
Yes to protection says:
Will Calgary flood again? Yes - most definitely. Rivers flood. People can protect themselves. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
How could people not get that the Elbow River contributes to flooding the Core? Because they are misinformed. Build SR1 and fix the Bow!
8 November, 2016
John Simpson says:
Maclean Creek dry dam protects more people, costs less, with lower environmental impact than SR1. Respect those outside Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Why is there such misleading information out there about the Springbank dam? Because a few people don't want it. Calgary needs it!
8 November, 2016
david beckwermert says:
Upstream reservoirs are the way to go for all the reasons listed
8 November, 2016
Fix both rivers says:
Is the Springbank dry dam just about fancy houses on the river? Ah .... NO! It's about the economic engine of Canada. Start with SR1!
8 November, 2016
Save the core says:
Does the Elbow flood downtown? Yes. Does the Bow? Obviously. Fix both and start with Springbank dry dam.
8 November, 2016
Yes to dry dam says:
Yes the Elbow River contributes to flooding downtown. And City Hall. Informed people get this. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Downtown needs you says:
Get informed. Understand what's at risk. Protect downtown from both rivers. Start with Springbank dry dam.
8 November, 2016
SR1 is a start says:
Everyone in Calgary relies on the Core in some way. Protect it now. Stop flooding on both rivers. Yes to SR1.
8 November, 2016
SLK says:
This protects only part of Calgary, ruins valuable agri-land and does not protect upstream Tsuu T'ina, Redwood Meadows or Bragg Creek.
8 November, 2016
Save Downtown says:
Informed people understand that the Core needs protection from BOTH RIVERS. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
Don't be swayed by falsities, exaggerations and biased "survey" data. This City needs the Springbank reservoir. Both rivers flood the Core.
8 November, 2016
Gordon w Ross says:
I support the spring bank project,we need this in place now to protect our economy & communities affected we cannot afford another flood!!!!
8 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Informed people understand that the Springbank dry dam is the only viable solution for the Elbow. Let's get it done!
8 November, 2016
Mitigation now! says:
All studies point to Springbank as the best project for the Elbow. Build it and keep searching for a Bow solution. Protect this City!
8 November, 2016
Build now says:
It's happening. The Environmental Impact Assessment is underway. Keep it going and fix the Bow too!
8 November, 2016
Yes to protection says:
Best case scenario is flood protection by 2020. We can't afford any more waiting. Get this done and fix the Bow too.
8 November, 2016
Build Springbank says:
Calgary is a huge city and warrants protection. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too. It's time!
8 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
Another foot of water and the downtown would have been shut down for months - because elevators and HVAC would have been ruined. Fix this!
8 November, 2016
Brian Farewell says:
This is the quickest and cheapist solution to cut back on Elbow River flow and is urgent.
8 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
This City has had 10+ major floods in the past century. It's going to keep happening - until we build protection. Start with Springbank!
8 November, 2016
Build it! says:
No more dithering. Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
WW says:
Yes to Springbank dry dam - the City is vulnerable. It's an important public work. Build it!
8 November, 2016
Build it now! says:
Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow too. Calgary needs this!
8 November, 2016
Johns88 says:
I do not support the Springbank Reservoir. The Maclean Creek dry dam protects more than just Calgary with less destruction of habitat.
8 November, 2016
Eric K says:
I'm 100% for this cost effective solution that provides minimal environmental damage using the existing flood prone areas.
8 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Enough talk! After 3+ years of "study" it is time to protect downtown Calgary. Build Springbank ASAP.
8 November, 2016
ckayser says:
This solution is clearly the most logical, effective, and will offer the most immediate and beneficial protection to Calgarians.
8 November, 2016
Warren says:
It is for the greater good and most economically viable.
8 November, 2016
Rural citizens count says:
The Elbow is the primary water source for the Tsuu Ti'na Nation. I don't believe they support SR1. They count as much as the Calgarians.
8 November, 2016
Save Springbank says:
Keep up the fight SR1 residents! There are MANY of us supporting you! Dam McLean! Protect more people. Sacrifice none. Stop the division!
8 November, 2016
Derek says:
I am 100% for this project. The tangible and intangible costs of a future flood for the city, province and nation are not acceptable.
8 November, 2016
Save Springbank says:
Use the natural basin of McLean to build an actual reservoir to conserve water for times of draught. SR1 soaks into the land & wastes water.
8 November, 2016
Michelle says:
Yes to the Springbank Reservoir! Even Nenshi knows we need it to protect Downtown Calgary.
8 November, 2016
Build it says:
Environmentalists have significant env. concerns including they will not allow trees cut at MC1. People lives are at risk. Build SR1 ASAP.
8 November, 2016
Asm269 says:
Springbank off-street reservoir is the best option and needs to be implemented ASAP!
8 November, 2016
Ginny says:
Upstream resevoirs are a necessary measure. Since the city cant be relocated, the water needs to be diverted.
8 November, 2016
Michelle Williams says:
Disagree with Springbank, protect more people/areas upstream - equally protect all - McLean Creek more fair and smarter choice.
8 November, 2016
Michelle says:
Two governments have given their word that upstream mitigation would happen. Live up to your word and make it happen!
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbank saving downtown is a myth. Still I would champion McLean Creek as a means to protect Elbow River communities and those upstream.
8 November, 2016
Lew says:
Best concept for actually addressing the most potential harm.
8 November, 2016
Ward Mallabone says:
I think it will be beneficial not only for the affected flood areas but the city as a whole
8 November, 2016
kmendham says:
I support the upstream mitigation of a Springbank reservoir as the most cost effective and expedient and practical solution to mitigating
8 November, 2016
John says:
Upstream reservoirs must be implemented to protect the core/communities. Other approaches: disruptive/discriminatory/of questionable effect
8 November, 2016
Bill says:
No dam! Build berms and barriers. Use crown land at McLean Creek.
8 November, 2016
SG says:
#Albertastrong. Maclean Creek protects Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Calgary and Springbank. Even the NDP knew this truth pre election.
8 November, 2016
Kay says:
This dam will NOT achieve what you have been told. It will NOT protect the downtown core, only Elbow. McLean will protect far more.
8 November, 2016
Maurice W. says:
Calgary and Canada's GDP cannot afford to have the downtown core shut again. We need the upstream reservoir.
8 November, 2016
Bert says:
NDP has already destroyed oil industry. Now going after farmers. This dam would not help the Bow River or downtown area. No dam
8 November, 2016
Richard L. says:
Get on with this proposal. It was recommended by the experts, but has been sidelined by interest groups.
8 November, 2016
Sunnyside says:
A Springbank reservoir makes abundant sense. Compared to catastrophic flooding, it's a bargain. The city was built in valleys; get over it.
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
SR1 was not chosen by experts. GoA cherry picked from the Deltares report, ignoring the emphasis on "Make room for the River" Use Crown land
8 November, 2016
Jodi says:
I am a two time flood victim. I am in support of the Springbank reservoir. This is the best option for the city of Calgary.
8 November, 2016
James C. says:
I support concept 1. Floods occur frequently and 2013 proved that they threaten Calgary's entire downtown core, Stampede and Saddledome.
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
Rivers are still stronger than any mitigation. Accept consequences of your decision. Crown land and options exist upstream. SR1is wrong.
8 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
Sad to see people pushing for the destruction of someone else's homes, businesses and property to secure their own agenda. How un-Albertan!
8 November, 2016
Brenda L. says:
Staying on a floodplain is a choice. Flood mitigation is going to happen. Pushing consequences onto other Albertans is wrong. No to SR1.
8 November, 2016
Elizabeth M says:
Hello, I support the springbank reservoir. As a resident of elbow park, this proposal is the best option to protect the downtown core.
8 November, 2016
Jumping Pound Guy says:
Springbank will not be a beautiful lake with sailboats and cottages. Imagine a 7000 acre catch basin with rocks & silt & chain link fence.
8 November, 2016
Bob says:
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
This is easily the most effective, efficient flood mitigation solution.
8 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Build Springbank now! Calgary remains vulnerable. And find a solution for the Bow.
8 November, 2016
Shauna says:
This mitigation is paramount for the vitality of the city of Calgary. It's urgency is immediate to protect the citizens and infrastructure
8 November, 2016
Tom says:
When Springbank is shown to be over $600M and McLean is $$350M, then can we all get behind McLean Creek?
8 November, 2016
Rick Simonton says:
In favour of upstream reservoirs.Would bring back the feeling of community. All buy out lots would be sold and new single family homes built
8 November, 2016
Shannon says:
We are a city built at the confluence of 2 rivers and must mitigate our flood risk to protect ourselves! I support the SR1 project.
8 November, 2016
Gary says:
This has been studied to death and shown to be the best first step to protecting against a repeat of the 2013 flood.
8 November, 2016
TerryMyles says:
This plan offers the best protection to most citizens with the least adverse effect on river flows or water quality.
7 November, 2016
Concerned Citizen says:
I have attended many meetings on the flood mitigation for our city. The Springbank Reservoir proposal seems the most logical for the problem
7 November, 2016
Embarrassed says:
As Calgarians, we are embarrassed that Calgary's Elbow River residents would want to expropriate other peoples' land to protect themselves!
7 November, 2016
Barb Morin says:
I care and am concerned but don't feel capable of making a well-informed decision about solutions.
7 November, 2016
Citizens are EQUAL says:
The first berm in Bragg Creek HASN'T even begun to be built. Anyone saying Bragg Creek already has mitigation started is wrong.
7 November, 2016
Alan Brimacombe says:
I just want this project to get under way to protect my home and my family. Every spring s tension occurs in my family that lasts for months
7 November, 2016
not happy says:
The Springbank dam increases flood risk to Springbank homes. The cost is ridiculous. Consider McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Grampa says:
TRJR would provide flood protection quickest. We have built great projects so don't let leaders tell us the. BEST too difficult
7 November, 2016
Mike B says:
Bow River Reservoir- there are no plans and no money to actually build a Bow River reservoir in our lifetimes, so this concept is a failure.
7 November, 2016
Robert Dick says:
I like this concept as it achieves so much in terms of preserving the Elbow as a healthy river, but the dry dam is there when needed.
7 November, 2016
Mikkel says:
Enviro and technical assessments are years away. Calgary wants assurance "ASAP". SR1 for 1.9B is an absolute terrible solution.
7 November, 2016
Grampa says:
SR1 embarrassment to our generation. City would still be vulnerable as gambles on size of flood. Leave great legacy Tri-River Joint Reservoi
7 November, 2016
Citizens are EQUAL says:
The Springbank Landowners' rights are being thrown out the window. DON'T build/rebuild on a flood plain! Poor city planners are at fault.
7 November, 2016
Rick B. says:
Springbank is not VITAL to the survival of Calgary. This project is misleading and has been since the get go.
7 November, 2016
DL says:
The trade-off of land (fairly compensated for) for the protection of Calgary is a no-brainer. We cannot afford to wait any longer.
7 November, 2016
staciattba@gmail.com says:
If $33 million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for Bragg Creek, then $330million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for equal, not superior citizens in Calgary
7 November, 2016
JJ says:
We should go ahead with both Upstream Reservoir Projects!!! We have studied this enough! It is time to take action before we suffer again!!
7 November, 2016
Ben says:
Lost our home in the flood. Moved to Springbank. So I strongly oppose SR1.More effective, less intrusive mitigation is available.
7 November, 2016
Shannon says:
It is critical that the springbank resevoir and Glenmore Dam upgrades move forward ASAP. It is indisputably in the public interest.
7 November, 2016
staciattba@gmail.com says:
The cost shown above DOES NOT include the cost of purchasing the land from the Springbank residents! This is misleading.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Many were affected. Many need protection. Work together & all can benefit. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca Tri-River joint Reservoir AB
7 November, 2016
Jocelyn says:
Springbank is the best solution to protect Calgary . Do not waste another year.
7 November, 2016
Blair M says:
vital to the protection of the city of Calgary. Vital that it is built ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
We need to do this project to protect Calgary from future flooding and mitigate future damages! The risk of doing nothing is too high!!!
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Water is a treasure not our enemy. Respect & value it with much needed water bank in mountain valley. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
I want my tax$ helping the masses. McLean or Tri-River Jt Reservoir would protect more Albertans than SR1. And use Crown land not private!
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Big problems require big minds to solve. Utilize great opportunity offered. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Reservoir AB
7 November, 2016
Hails says:
Protecting the economic core and the surrounding community are addressed by this concept so I support it wholeheartedly.
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
Why would you support SR1 when it will not protect you from Bow River flooding. Downtown suffered from the Bow, not Elbow!
7 November, 2016
K says:
"SR1 impacts the least amount of people"? Maclean Creek is on government owned land and a res there would protect Calgary + upstream towns.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Enlist expertise of committed engineers,environmentalists hydrologists politicians. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Res
7 November, 2016
SR1 boondoggle says:
Alternatives to SR1 were not studied. More political science was involved selling SR1 as fast&cheap! Fed Govt see red flags, time will tell!
7 November, 2016
Thanks says:
I like concept 1 as the preferred option.
7 November, 2016
Sue Desmaries says:
As a Calgarian, I can't in good conscience support SR1. Don't make others pay for the city's decision to develop/live on a floodplain.
7 November, 2016
For All Albertans says:
Provide equal protection to all. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River joint Reservoir of Alberta
7 November, 2016
Gretel says:
Let's get the Springbank Reservoir built before a flood wipes out downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Naomi says:
Several expert studies agreed this is the best option to effectively protect Calgary from a 1/100 year flood. Expedite the construction!
7 November, 2016
Peter Brimacombe says:
Impacts the least amount of people
Best cost benefit ratio
Least environmental impacts
2 governments have determined its the best option
7 November, 2016
D says:
Build berms in YYC. It's good enough for Bragg Creek?
No to SR1 and Yes to MC1
Seems like a well organized blitz for the SR1 crowd tonite.
7 November, 2016
joel says:
All I'm seeing here from SR1 supporters is: save my skin, screw everyone else! Not the Alberta way when there is a solution for all. Go MC1!
7 November, 2016
Ian says:
Springbank was selected by experts as the best solution to mitigate against the dire consequences of another flood like 2013. Let's do it!
7 November, 2016
K says:
I do not support SR1. It protects to few at to high a cost. Build on gov. land so everyone wins.
7 November, 2016
Todd says:
Save our families and our lives, complete the Springbank Res now!
7 November, 2016
K says:
Why dam perfectly good farmland and homes when Maclean creek (on crown land!) could be damed and used for tourism and wildlife habitat?
7 November, 2016
Patrick says:
The time is now to complete the SBR. Until it is done 100,000+ Calgarians live in fear of another catastrophic event like 2013.
7 November, 2016
Cam says:
Cncpt 1 has the best balance between protecting Calgary's downtown, and river communities, and the cost and effectiveness of other choices
7 November, 2016
Patricia Steele says:
I support the Springbank option. I feel upstream flood mitigation is critical to the long term viability of the City as a whole.
7 November, 2016
Justin says:
We urgently need to build the Springbank off stream reservoir project . Do not waste another year.
7 November, 2016
Doug says:
I am a strong supporter of the spring bank reservoir. This has taken a very long time to move this project forward and protect the downtown
7 November, 2016
Lillian says:
I strongly support the Springbank Dry Dam project and act now
7 November, 2016
Adam says:
Please build the Springbank Dam project ASAP
7 November, 2016
Oscar says:
Please do it. I understand the importance of community engagement but it's more important to act and implement programs to protect our city.
7 November, 2016
Jay says:
Springbank res should be the #1 solution and needs to be completed asap.It is practical & cost effective and will save lives & billions of $
7 November, 2016
sam says:
Yes to Springbank Dry Dam project. Please start right away.
7 November, 2016
EBA says:
Immediate protection of people and property. Longer term solutions should still be looked at and Sprinbank off stream first.
7 November, 2016
Victor Juchymenko says:
As a professional engineer, my opinion is that this is the no brainer option.
7 November, 2016
Jeanette says:
Both SR1 and MC1 will sacrifice wildlife habitat, but MC1 is on crown land and will protect more communities. Talk about the greater good!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
It took multiple rewrites of the Deltares report to get to even a luke warm endorsement of SR. That's not science, that is politics.
7 November, 2016
Jeanette says:
Please actually read the studies on SR1, it's not the magical solution it's being promoted to be! Build at MacLean instead...
7 November, 2016
Matt says:
Upstream mitigation on the Elbow River makes sense and needs to happen!
Support Springbank Dry Reservoir and /or McLean Creek Reservoir.
7 November, 2016
Cam inglis says:
It is the most complete way to protect the city core and its residents and impacts the fewest citizens
7 November, 2016
Calgarian says:
Upstream mitigation must be put in place ASAP. Insurance providers will not bail out the same people they helped in 2013.
7 November, 2016
JCB says:
The Springbank Reservoir is the best option for protecting Calgary's downtown core.
7 November, 2016
Matt Weir says:
I support the upstream Springbank Damming, in order to mitigate the flow of runoff and other variables collecting on the Elbow River
7 November, 2016
Neil says:
SB reservoir is the most objective solution.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Deltares report was based on preliminary engineering design by AMEC in 2014. This decision was not based on thorough science. Gotta call BS
7 November, 2016
Unbelievable says:
3 years after the flood, I can't believe we are debating whether flooding land or downtown homes and businesses is preferable.
7 November, 2016
CD says:
Being more concerned about fields covered in silt, rather than hundreds of families' homes filled with mud is selfish and misguided
7 November, 2016
Stan says:
From a macro, long term view, SB reservoir is a must. We need to act now!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
The process to get to SR1 was neither thorough nor objective. Only stakeholders consulted were within Calgary city limits. McLean is better
7 November, 2016
Rob-Elbow says:
Upstream reservoir was my initial and pervasive solution to the downstream flooding effects.
7 November, 2016
animji says:
This is very important for our city.
7 November, 2016
dmaucoin says:
Three years into this process and we are still discussing this. Build the Springbank Dam and get on with it.
7 November, 2016
concord says:
Springbank must go ahead. Calgary is the economic engine of Alberta and almost was completely flooded if the Elbow continued to rise.
7 November, 2016
Pat says:
I support the Springbank Reservoir project and urge that it be completed as quickly as possible to mitigate flooding and drought.
7 November, 2016
Mike says:
Complaints of potential "mudflats" and "ruined" grasslands are complete exaggerations. The parkland flooded in 2013 has completely regrown.
7 November, 2016
neil says:
reduce environmental impact from any sizable flood compared to dry dam impact.
7 November, 2016
Calgary resident says:
All the alternatives have been studied thoroughly and this is the clear and most practical solution to protect our city
7 November, 2016
neil says:
decease stress of over 100,000 people directly effected in 2013. protect downtown Calgary and surrounding areas from huge potential losses.
7 November, 2016
HJM says:
This is by far the best option. By next spring, it will be 4 years, the communities and the city cannot afford to wait any longer.
7 November, 2016
Steve says:
Please go ahead with SR1 ASAP! The City can not go through another 2013 flood and neither can my family! It makes sense cost wise!
7 November, 2016
Kathy says:
I support construction of dam in springbank (flood mitigation).
7 November, 2016
Anne says:
I cannot support SR1 and am astounded at how many wish to secure their own well being at the expense of others. Please build MacLean creek!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
I am a Calgarian and will stand with my Elbow River neighbours to support McLean Creek. I will not support harm to my Springbank neighbours
7 November, 2016
Protect our City says:
We came within a foot or so of losing downtown and impacting many more Calgarian residences and businesses. Mitigation makes sense.
7 November, 2016
Common Sense says:
People who don't like a result complain about the process. Springbank reservoir just makes too much sense.
7 November, 2016
Michael says:
The Springbank reservoir was selected after a thorough and objective evaluation of all viable alternatives.
7 November, 2016
Andrea says:
The Springbank reservoir is vital to protect the most people for the least impact.
7 November, 2016
mclean better says:
Strengths - someone thought of it
Weakness - doesn't consider McLean Cr
Mclean Creek doesn't take private land, SR1 will be a mudflat
7 November, 2016
Susan says:
After attending a flood mitigation workshop and exploring the concepts in depth, full implementation of the Springbank reservoir is urgent!!
7 November, 2016
David Evans says:
The strength of concept 1 lies in its dual purpose. It provides both flood protection measures and used to retain water during drought.
7 November, 2016
MC says:
SR1 is far too expensive and does not protect enough people- if we can all agree on MC1 we can all benefit.
7 November, 2016
SEM says:
This is NOT a popularity contest. The best solution should be based on science, monetary benefits and quick implementation.
7 November, 2016
kevinL says:
We must build springbank reservoir! Benefits far outweigh the cost. We must protect downtown & the hundreds of homes in river neighborhoods
7 November, 2016
YYCtoobig says:
Inappropriate and overbuilt solution for homes built on flood plain. Reservoir further upstream to create mountain recreation opportunities.
7 November, 2016
C.W. says:
I support the position of The Calgary River Communities Action Group
7 November, 2016
C& a says:
We are fully support
7 November, 2016
YYC says:
Protection of Alberta's economic centre is vital. Fully support SR1. Build it asap!
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
I support the Springbank Project. Do it now.
7 November, 2016
C. W. says:
Mitation needs to begin on this project (Concept 1) and be completed quickly to prevent another 2013 diaster so costly to all Albertans.
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
Calgary suffered severe flooding in 2005 and in 2013. These floods caused massive economic and personal losses. Prevent further flooding now
7 November, 2016
Sandy says:
Dams are required to protect the low lying areas in Calgary, let's get on with it!
7 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it!
7 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
Let's get this project underway before we run into another event similar to 2013!!! The whole downtown is at risk!!!
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
SR1 is NOT the cheaper option. An honest cost assessment has not been done. Much more land needed than proposed, wildlife affected as well.
7 November, 2016
Robert Edgar says:
Strength is a must in order to protect Calgary
7 November, 2016
Betty says:
A FEW springbank landowners? How ignorant and selfish can you possibly be! Hilarious! MC1 to protect several communities! Do your research.
7 November, 2016
Make it happen says:
Protecting Calgary's downtown, infrastructure, and Communities. Minimizing potential loss of life.
7 November, 2016
Flooded twice says:
We must do this. Sometimes the "needs of the many" outweigh the "needs of the few" - not just in the movies. Get it done!
7 November, 2016
Steve says:
SR1 has been studied by environmental companies and two governments. Stop the time wasting and build it before another 2013 flood arrives!
7 November, 2016
Siren says:
an upstream reservoir may unfortunately impact some individuals, but it is necessary to protect the city as a whole
7 November, 2016
Johannes devries says:
The springbank diversion plan is an absolute necessity
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Springbankers are NIMBYs? what does that make those who only want the Elbow in their backyard at certain flow rates?
7 November, 2016
No to SR1 says:
The cost benefit analysis has grossly underestimated the cost of SR1. You were warned if it goes through it's not the cheapest/best option.
7 November, 2016
Shannon says:
This is not just about Calgary! Maclean Creek won't destroy our heritage ranches & protects Bragg Creek!
7 November, 2016
John says:
The most cost effective option to achieve flood mitigation goals. Maximum effect, minimum disruption. But treat those affected fairly!
7 November, 2016
Nadir says:
This seems the best option but I would leave the decision to the experts. The main issue is to do something to mitigate Calgary flooding.
7 November, 2016
Len Sandrin says:
Upstream mitigation is absolutely necessary to prevent catastrophic flooding in the city. It is the most important piece of the solution
7 November, 2016
Flooded out says:
Get it done already
7 November, 2016
Mh says:
Springbank will be a good start. We need this for the city and as someone who was flooded out in 2013, will go a long way for piece of mind
7 November, 2016
Mightbeuseful says:
Where will the folks from Springbank bring their kid's 4H animals if the Calgary Stampede Grounds are underwater?
What about flames fans?
7 November, 2016
Andrew says:
I fully support the concept of an upstream dam to protect the city. If Springbank is the best location for this, then so be it.
7 November, 2016
No $$$ says:
Why should any of my tax $ be spent for people who buy homes in low areas, then want the us to save them. You made your choice live with it
7 November, 2016
Linda Taylor says:
I support the Springbank option which has been reviewed & confirmed as the best option to protect Calgary & further downstream communities.
7 November, 2016
Blake O'Brien says:
This seems like the only logical "solution" to me.
7 November, 2016
Bob G says:
As victims of 2013 flood, it is a misconception that we were offered buyouts and that insurance covered our losses. It cost us huge $.
7 November, 2016
Lynn G says:
We strongly support the Springbank Reservoir project to protect our communities and the downtown. We cannot afford another 2013 flood.
7 November, 2016
Brandon says:
what is the cost to clean out the debris after a flood event? I'm concerned about air quality from a dust bowl.
7 November, 2016
Paul Baay says:
This seems to be the he only long term solution to properly protect the economy of one of the most vibrant cities in the world.
7 November, 2016
Brandon says:
It is not cost effective. The concept design is only protecting a select few communities over smaller towns and communities outside Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Arthur says:
I want and support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project. This is the best option . What are we waiting for?????????
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project-------we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
DS says:
Our neighborhood and city urgently need mitigation. The Springbank dam is the best solution from a cost-benefit perspective.
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support Springbank off-stream Project-----we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary '
7 November, 2016
Mrs. Harper says:
Fact-Alberta Gov't Environment Dept has never studied SR1-Ask them yourself-They have never seen the file. Biggest myth this is well studied
7 November, 2016
Pat says:
With the amount of damage done in 2013, the reservoir is the only answer. Stop talking about this and let's have some action.
7 November, 2016
HCole says:
Is this not a provincially funded project? Why is only Calgary being protected and not other Albertan communities? No to SR1, Yes to MC1.
7 November, 2016
HCole says:
I don't want my tax dollars going toward a project that only protects some while sacrificing others.
7 November, 2016
RickyG says:
An upstream Elbow River dam is a better solution protecting more communities like Bragg, Redwood, Springbank and Tnai lands along with Calga
7 November, 2016
Mary says:
I strongly support the "Springbank offstream Reservoir Project,
Mary
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Maximize use of excess water to areas of the province that are drought prone. Irrigation!
7 November, 2016
H says:
The Sprinbank Reservoir solution is the most effective and well thought out solution to avoid a repeat disaster and needs to proceed ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Hannah Geist says:
Why doesn't this map show the full scale of the dry dam (almost the size of Airdrie!)? More misinformation meant to push SR1. Go Maclean.
7 November, 2016
SR1 Please says:
We have seen the destruction of a large portion of the City of Calgary. Not convinced that SR1 will destroy grassland. It doesn't equate.
7 November, 2016
hgfjg says:
Has anyone even looked at the plans for SR1? They have water running uphill! No to Springbank! Dam Maclean, protect everyone!
7 November, 2016
Maureen says:
The SB reservoir has been studied and best serves the city .It has been approved; a few neg private interests should change the decision
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
RockyView County is opposed to SR1. They state it will sterilize farmland, contaminate water and pollute the air. No upside for RVC. Yes MC1
7 November, 2016
BL says:
I fully support the Springbank option. It protects river communities BUT just as importantly, protects downtown businesses -small & large.
7 November, 2016
T says:
The Springbank Option has been reviewed by a number of experts and comes out as the best alternative overall. It's time to committ to it.
7 November, 2016
DJ says:
As a flooded resident I can tell you that the biggest myth is that we were offered a buyout, or indeed any public funds at all.We paid!
7 November, 2016
Greg L. says:
Doesn't anyone realize 2013 was a freak occurrence that will never happen again in our lifetimes? Why ruin any communities over nothing?
7 November, 2016
no sr1 says:
What ever happened to being good neighbours? A dam at MacLean Creek would offer the most protection without further destroying communities.
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Prague floods. Vienna does not. They figured it out and DID something!
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
Instead of buying land, agree to cover crop or property losses if and when flood occurs. MB farmers still farm beside the dike.
7 November, 2016
CW says:
The Springbank option has been throughly vetted by two governing parties (Conservatives & NDP). Please end the delays and begin construction
7 November, 2016
basyas says:
If downtown Calgary is not protected head offices will leave Calgary particularly in light of the higher tax rate that now exists in AB.
7 November, 2016
Tyler says:
AS albertans are paying for this, it must protect the most albertans possible. Not just YYC Elbow River communities.
7 November, 2016
Eric M says:
I feel Springbank dam is not right. Protect more people is a must. SR1 does not provide equal protection to all citizens, in YYC our out
7 November, 2016
Maria says:
Springbank is the most viable option to protect homes, businesses and important city infrastructure. Calgary cannot afford another 2013.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
Springbank's wide input channel will safely ingest large debris (many large trees) whereas McLean's narrow flow channel is susceptible. Duh
7 November, 2016
Tom Kent says:
great idea. need to protect downtown and water from Elbow wants to go to Bow once it overflows banks. get Springbank done soon!
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
With the Springbank project being closely positioned to the City, it provides snow/rain protection sourced on the greatest land area. Duh.
7 November, 2016
Mary Saucier says:
By far my biggest concern to the time it is taking to begin the Spring bank Reservoir!!!! What is the hold-up?
7 November, 2016
Mary Saucier says:
My biggest worry just now is that the decision to build the upstream reservoir on the Elbow river, which caused by far the greatest damage
7 November, 2016
Darlene rogers says:
I am not an environmentalist nor do I have scientific credentials but it makes sense to protect our city from upstream activity.
7 November, 2016
PTSD says:
Yes, still PTSD symptoms! Action on Springbank is needed to protect YYC lives, businesses and homes and to help turn around our economy.
7 November, 2016
fklein68 says:
I fully support this concept. I think it would protect the city with very little negative impact. Only some 20 landowners would be affected
7 November, 2016
F Cropper says:
SR-1 needs to go ahead as soon as possible to protect the citizens of Calgary and the downtown core.
Do not wait!
7 November, 2016
Jean Beca says:
Equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities
Protect Calgary's economic core? I live in Rideau Rocksbough.DOIT
7 November, 2016
Richard says:
These upstream reservoirs are essential to protect people and property in Calgary. Building dykes/concrete walls is not enough; we need both
7 November, 2016
Rich says:
Properly assess the McLean Creek option using recent data (NOT the outdated data of the previous and current governments)
7 November, 2016
DnT says:
Flood Mitigation is critical to the long term safety and prosperity of Calgary. Springbank is the best option for Calgary, period.
7 November, 2016
Roxboro Owner says:
SR1 has been thoroughly studied, and has been rigorously compared to the alternatives. It is clearly the choice to be made. Action is needed
7 November, 2016
Dooley r says:
Clearly this is required since the repeat of a 2013 flood or worse would have a terrible impact on the city, Alberta and nationally.
7 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Environmentalists will stall McLean Creek indefinitely. We need flood protection now, so I support Springbank and improving Glenmore Dam.
7 November, 2016
Concerned owner says:
Two provincial governments have agreed on Springbank. Let's proceed. We cannot afford another downtown flood, caused by the Elbow River.
7 November, 2016
ratfink says:
There is no comparison between the massive damage to an entire city from another flood, and the minimal disruption to a few landowners.
7 November, 2016
Jason says:
It is ludicrous this decision is based on public opinion versus which will protect the city the best. Concept 1 is the best choice.
7 November, 2016
HD says:
The environmental impact of flooded appliances and building materials headed for the landfill is enormous compared to water in a field.
7 November, 2016
ratfink says:
Please get this project underway. It will protect everyone. Don't let a few vocal landers owners obstruct the right solution.
7 November, 2016
dbe says:
Build the springbank reservoir asap. Enough time has been wasted.
7 November, 2016
DJ says:
SR1 would have prevented tens of thousands of families losing their homes and billions of dollars in damage.
Build it now!
7 November, 2016
Allan says:
Need to protect Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows as well as Calgary.
7 November, 2016
Agata korth says:
Please just get this dry dam completed, we've all discussed this every which way possible....we are sick of discussing, just get it built!!!
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Baloney that a few dozen people can NIMBY and keep Calgary at risk. Expropriate, the rent pasture back to the original owner. SR1 NOW
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Floods caused many BILLIONS of damage. And will happen again. Do not forget 2013. SR1 NOW
7 November, 2016
NDM says:
Maclean Creek is the best initiative and perhaps finding an insurance company that insures for floods in the interim.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Naysayers complain that dust will blow out of SR1. Don't they think dust will blow out of flooded Calgary? SR1 NOW.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
SR1 land will still be grazing land 99% of the time. It is not lost, in spite of what a VERY FEW NIMBY types say.
7 November, 2016
SR1 NOW says:
Springbank is the best choice. Being downstream of McLean Creek the Springbank option can catch water from the mountains AND the foothills
7 November, 2016
Mbhannam says:
It is now going on four years post flood. Our neighbourhood is still rebuilding. PLEASE build the spring bank dam and let us rest easy.
7 November, 2016
Angelique says:
Protecting our city and rivers are mandatory. This is the strongest option to prevent and assist in another devastating flood.
7 November, 2016
Mandy says:
The ability to support a 2013 flood level is essential to protect not just residents along the Elbow river, but also Calgary's economic core
7 November, 2016
MB says:
Please get moving on SR1. The benefit to the entire inner city of Calgary outweighs the concerns of a few Springbank residents.
7 November, 2016
PP28 says:
does nothing to protect the communities of Bragg Creek or Redwood Meadows. It will destroy heritage farm lands and families in Springbank
7 November, 2016
Tim says:
Springbank dry dam is the best solution.
7 November, 2016
Sally says:
Since when did destruction of a community become an acceptable choice when there are alternatives? Mclean Creek, the Tunnel or Tri River!
7 November, 2016
BM says:
Action SR-1. McLean Creek will never happen so stop putting it out as some viable option. You're all just distracting from viable options.
7 November, 2016
Rachel says:
It seems like a few dozen landowners against hundreds of thousands of Albertans that need the downtown core protected. Let's move on SR1
7 November, 2016
protect everyone says:
Upstream mitigation is LONG overdue. Build SR 1 before another catastrophic flood affects ALL Calgarians.
7 November, 2016
BM says:
Action SR-1. Three years have passed since Calgary was shutdown. Stop the navel gazing. It's embarrassing. Springbank will be fine.
7 November, 2016
SR1 please says:
Sediment management is easier in a dry reservoir as the reservoir is not continually subject to daily sedimentation - flood events only.
7 November, 2016
gm says:
Build! The Springbank Dry Dam is the best choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary
7 November, 2016
Michael Mulloy says:
I am in favour of the Springbank reservoir
7 November, 2016
Conrad says:
Calgary cannot afford another flood.We must build the Springbank dry dam!!!
7 November, 2016
tdwr says:
The Springbank Project is in the public interest of the City of Calgary, and the operations of downtown Calgary.
7 November, 2016
david says:
best overall option ... fully support this plan.
7 November, 2016
Percy Lazdins says:
Not an option. as it makes no sense!!!! Does not protect Red Wood Meadows, Bragg Creek and residences in between.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Protection of Calgary must be top priority given the number of people with property and livelihoods at risk.
7 November, 2016
NH says:
We support the Springbank Dry Dam. Please act quickly to protect the homes of families in the path of Elbow River flooding.
7 November, 2016
Bbiddell says:
Please proceed with spring bank- this will benefit the most people and homes by far and we can't risk this extensive damage again!
7 November, 2016
Living on a hill says:
Pandering to rich fools who buy riverfront property and then cry when it floods. Work with Mother Nature and buy out flood plain properties
7 November, 2016
Paul V. says:
I think this solution affects the least amount of people and is a fair balance to all parties. Please proceed ASAP.
7 November, 2016
LMH says:
Protect our city. Build SR1. It will benefit the majority. We need mitigation now!
7 November, 2016
Kim says:
We need to do this ASAP!!!
7 November, 2016
Build springbank says:
Protect downtown calgary and build spring bank
7 November, 2016
MR says:
The Springbank Dry Dam is the essential choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary and Alberta.
7 November, 2016
Bryan W says:
Springbank Reservoir is the best solution: its quick, relatively inexpensive and least likely to run into environmental roadblocks.
7 November, 2016
David Calnan says:
I support the idea. It is low impact and low cost solution. It will protect in some flood events and provide needed time in all.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Maclean Creek is not necessary to protect those upstream of SR1 & will take 10 years to be put in place, if ever.
7 November, 2016
Springbank says:
Import to proceed with spring bank due to cost benefit to the downtown corr
7 November, 2016
Sue says:
Build Springbank. It is the best option for the money and for the environment. The Elbow flooded downtown Calgary!
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Residents upstream of SR1 have already seen mitigation measures instituted to protect Red Wood Meadows & Bragg Creek
7 November, 2016
Linda Gardner says:
We need to get moving on this as soon as possible. Time is of the essence. The further we are away from 2013, people start forgetting.
7 November, 2016
BowRiverResident says:
There needs to be more than just operational changes on the Ghost Reservoir - need more storage capacity on the Bow to properly protect YYC!
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
The destruction of pristine grasslands & agricultural land is disturbing. What is motivating the NDP to renege on their stance b4 election?
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
Require Springbank reservoir to be built ASAP - the #of residents hurt by flooding greatly outweighs the few well off landowners impacted
7 November, 2016
Greater Good says:
Just curious if the DDSB folks realize the folly of their arguments? 2 very different governments came to the same conclusion. YES TO SR1!!
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
This approach causes environmental & ecological damage to the Springbank area, and leaving the effluent in situ introduces health concerns.
7 November, 2016
SRCJ says:
This plan is not the most comprehensive solution available as it provides no protection to Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows.
7 November, 2016
Gail M says:
Calgary residents expect empathy for flooding, yet show none for their upstream neighbours? Dam MacLean Creek and keep everyone safe!
7 November, 2016
SR1 yes says:
Nutrients from floods can be beneficial to grasslands. City waste in our rivers can't be good for downstream irrigation / municipalities.
7 November, 2016
JKS says:
ruining springbank to protect Calgary still does nothing for those residents upstream of springbank, other solutions make more sense.
7 November, 2016
James says:
Maclean offers protection to the most number of people and costs are predictable. SR1 will cost the province too much for coverage of few.
7 November, 2016
EB says:
The health and economics of the whole city, along Bow and Elbow Rivers, hangs in the balance as we stall on mitigation upstream. Build it.
7 November, 2016
SR1 now says:
Rockyview is moving ahead with local flood mitigation in Bragg Creek. We also need to protect a large population in Calgary.
7 November, 2016
SG says:
Maclean Creek is the best option. Protection to Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Elbow residents. Even NDP knew this to be true pre election
7 November, 2016
sdb says:
Springbank has been proven to be the best option, with less environmental impact. DO IT QUICKLY! Protect Calgary.
7 November, 2016
ka says:
the options have been analyzed and springbank is the best option to protect the elbow and downtown. Do not delay
7 November, 2016
Anthony says:
The govt's figures for land acquisition at Springbank are way too low. What is really going on here? And the proposed dam is ENORMOUS.
7 November, 2016
Coexistance says:
Off Stream storage would be empty most often. Could off stream reservoir land continue to be used for grazing in non flood season? SR1 go!
7 November, 2016
Margaret says:
Buying 6800 acres of farmland makes no sense. It would cost us tax-payers billions and not be effective. Build berms and barriers.
7 November, 2016
PTSD says:
It is ridiculous that a handful of people upstream of Calgary continues to put the entire city at risk. Build Springbank soon!
7 November, 2016
Sandra says:
People seem to think that a dam at Springbank will protect ALL Calgary. It won't. It will only protect along the Elbow River,
7 November, 2016
Grass and Cattle says:
Temporary flooding of grasslands could work for livestock and grassland. Mclean Creek would require massive clear cutting of trees.
7 November, 2016
dc says:
Why is this a popularity contest? We need upstream mitigation measures now. Two successive government have chosen SR1. Get on with it!!!
7 November, 2016
Luellaj says:
This option provides no protection for any community upstream of Springbank. Use McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Action Required says:
Options have been closely analyzed. SR1 has the best CB ratio and the least environmental impact. Time for action. SR1 Please!
7 November, 2016
Practical Catchment2 says:
80% of the excess runoff is generated in the mountains before it ever gets to Bragg Creek. SRI being downstream of Mclean does not help.
7 November, 2016
Practical Catchment says:
SR1 is closer to Calgary and will catch more upstream runoff than McLean Creek ever could. SR1's proximity to Calgary makes more sense.
7 November, 2016
Marc says:
Such a bad plan. Springbank resevoir makes no sense - cost or practical considerations. Protect upstream communities! Use MacLean Creek!
7 November, 2016
Flood Safety Risk says:
One death from flooding is too many; it could easily have been much worse. Failure to protect a major City is unacceptable. SR1 ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Fisheries says:
Off Stream storage has less impact on fisheries. Stream flow interruptions are minimum during normal operating stream flow. Yes Sr1!
7 November, 2016
emee says:
We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Please proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.
7 November, 2016
WMR says:
This option makes the most sense considering all perspectives: environmental, community impact and financial.
Proceed NOW!
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
SR1 avoids the need for walls 6m to 10m high along the Elbow, RUINING community. Confined by walls, flood water height will be greater!
7 November, 2016
Sustainability says:
Off Stream Storage is more sustainable to manage in the long term. Build SR1 Now
7 November, 2016
Cost of No Action says:
The Environmental Cost of doing nothing is too great. Flooded Calgary businesses pollute our rivers. Build Sr1 now.
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
Safety DICTATES SR1. It is only 10m high and can avoid being used before it is safely finalized - unlike MacLean Creek (50m high).
7 November, 2016
Fran says:
Enough fear mongering. No one in Calgary was harmed by any toxic dust - and we had all of Calgary's sewer in our basements. Yes to SR1
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
Safety is ALL IMPORTANT with dams, particularly high dams (50m) like MacLean Creek. Poor rock and vulnerable during the lengthy construction
7 November, 2016
Long Term Vision says:
The Environmental cost of not building SR1 is too Great. 90,000 tons of incremental waste in Calgary Landfills from 2013 alone. Build SR1!
7 November, 2016
Protect us! says:
8 grizzlies in Springbank? They'll be just fine. The grizzly corridor at McLean Creek however will pose a major problem. Build Springbank!
7 November, 2016
Build the reservoir says:
Do you seriously think the professional environmentalists will let McLean Creek see the light of day? Not likely. Build SR1. Only option.
7 November, 2016
Build it! says:
The dry dam is being engineered as a reservoir that could be used for longer term containment, e.g., if a drought. It's the best option!
7 November, 2016
Enough already says:
Toxic flood mud? Really? Fear mongering is all that is. Your grassland will survive. All our lawns did just fine. Build the dry dam.
7 November, 2016
Stop fear mongering says:
The province will remediate any harm to the Springbank land. No one did that for Calgary and all the grass survived just fine. Build SR1!!
7 November, 2016
build SR1 says:
Very tired of the fear mongering. Flood mud will not kill your pasture. City parks and lawns all recovered without any mitigation.
7 November, 2016
False Info says:
Parks all over the city were covered in flood mud. Guess what? After some rain they all looked good as new. Nothing died. Build SR1!
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
RE SR1, the current EIA is taking FAR too long. Cut time in half and let the NRCB decide if it is adequate. SR1 s/b flood ready Spring 2019.
7 November, 2016
Sara says:
Ranchland is not usable after flooding. Lack of oxygen and light kills grassland. Disease laden dust bowl left. Google dry dam photos.
7 November, 2016
JamesYYC says:
SR1 will put river water on prairie grass a couple of times a century. Zero environmental impact compared to power plants, refineries, etc.
7 November, 2016
James Cran says:
Springbank is absolutely the best item. It is cheap and quick to build and safe during construction while MacLean Creek is dangerous (50m hi
7 November, 2016
Sara says:
SR1 will kill the grassland, contaminate groundwater and blow diseases towards Calgary. Environmental concerns are real. Use McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Colleen says:
Upstream reservoirs are a good idea, but why not further upstream than Bragg Creek, why Springbank?
7 November, 2016
Colleen says:
Why are Springbank and communities upstream from Springbank considered acceptable sacrifices? Calgarians need to consider others too.
7 November, 2016
Tom says:
The so called "independent" study done by Deltares was not much more than a book report. Lots of "according to the reports" in it. Dam MC.
7 November, 2016
John says:
We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Time to proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Khan says:
SR1 has far less impact to the environment as MC is further upstream, affecting countless wildlife habitats. SR1 is the smart choice.
7 November, 2016
BL says:
SR1 has been researched and has been shown to be the best option. It has been over 3 yrs since the flood and time for SR1 to proceed.
7 November, 2016
Calgary-1 says:
Springbank was approved by two separate government bodies, after extensive studies, scientific data was used to come to the right conclusion
7 November, 2016
CM says:
Please explain how can they acquire 6,800 acres of prime ranchland (and riverfront) at a cost of only $40 million? Less than $6K per acre?
7 November, 2016
kc says:
@Basement Water: Why are Urban lives and livelihoods more important than rural ones? The MacLean dam would protect everyone!
7 November, 2016
Mbetzner says:
We absolutely need protective measures for both the Bow River and the Elbow river. Massive property damage occurred along both systems.
7 November, 2016
kc says:
Drought will be a much bigger issue in the coming years than flooding. What good will a dry dam do? Build MC1!
7 November, 2016
LLG says:
Why should some be sacrificed for the good of others when an option to protect everyone exists? Dam MacLean Creek!
7 November, 2016
K says:
@ Martin: SR1 opponents care VERY MUCH about flood mitigation that works for all involved, that's why we are pushing for MacLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Jeff says:
I support the Bow River reservoir. It's a necessity for flood mitigation in Calgary.
7 November, 2016
rsw says:
Springbank is necessary and benefits ALL Calgarians. We must protect the core and Springbank is the BEST option.
7 November, 2016
LL says:
I support the Springbank project.
7 November, 2016
Evonne says:
DO NOT unnecessarily delay the Springbank mitigation project. The Springbank Project is in the best interests of Calgarians and Albertans.
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
The Springbank dam will protect from the environmental damage of the massive clean up and rebuild. One years worth of landfill usage for ex
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
The cost benefit analysis of losing the downtown core for an extended period (which almost happened last time) needs to be considered.
7 November, 2016
Concerned citizen says:
As an individual who wants flood mitigation and has reviewed all options, I see MANY issues with SR1. MC1 protects more ppl. No to SR1.
7 November, 2016
Basement Water says:
Note to the selfish lot of Springbank land owners; this is about protecting a city & lives NOT some farmland.
7 November, 2016
Paul says:
An independent study, confirmed by the NDP, have identified Springbank as the best upstream solution for the Elbow River
7 November, 2016
Calgary-1 says:
We need protection for the city of Calgary, downtown core, and the 100,000 residents that were last affected by the flood. SR1!!!
7 November, 2016
Terri says:
Only those who live outside Springbank support this dam, not those who actually will be affected by the project. It's an unhealthy choice.
7 November, 2016
#WOEISME says:
Poor Springbank owners, your soooooo right. Let a city of 1M plus be vulnerable so your cattle can graze. Build it!
7 November, 2016
mly says:
MacLean Creek - YES!!!! No to SR! Where does Bragg Creek fit into this scenario?? Why would we want to be exclusive?
7 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
There is simply no way that MacLean Creek, given environmental concerns, would ever be built - so build SR1. Now. Period.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
97% of letters to CEAA were against SR1. These well researched, carefully drafted letters outlined many environmental concerns. No to SR1.
7 November, 2016
Martin says:
I support SR1 - Don't Dam Springbank don't care about mitigation. Period.
7 November, 2016
Bob says:
I fully support SR1!
7 November, 2016
MelanieS says:
Why not manage dams better? Lower Ghost and Bearspaw every spring? Nice star on map please show actual size of Springbank Drydam. McLean #1.
7 November, 2016
Nenshi says:
MacLean Creek is a better solution. Cheaper, faster, and helps all involved communities.
7 November, 2016
Greg says:
The options have been well studied (i.e., SR1, MacLean Creek Dam and the Glenmore Tunnel) - the conclusion is that SR1 is best.
7 November, 2016
ProtectYYC says:
The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.
7 November, 2016
Save YYC says:
Premier Prentice picked the SR1 as the best option after a full review. Don't kid yourself - Mclean Creek will never be built.
7 November, 2016
PProtectYYC says:
The Springbank reservoir is a NO-BRAINER! Sorry Springbank residents, the very few of you affected cannot deny a city of 1.1M protection.
7 November, 2016
LaurieEH says:
SR1 will contaminate Calgary water & ruin agricultural lands & wildlife habitat for YEARS! Dam McLean Creek & protect EVERYONE upstream!
7 November, 2016
Donna Robinson says:
Residents of Springbank should not be flooded out to save those in the City of Calgary. Use Maclean Creek option to protect everyone.
7 November, 2016
Clay Robinson says:
Maclean Creek protects everyone on the Elbow River including Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. Springbank protects only the City of Calgary
7 November, 2016
Calgary now says:
I strongly support the Springbank project. The landowners will be treated fairly and receive far better compensation than any flood victims
7 November, 2016
Aileen for YYC says:
Stop flood water from entering the City - starting with the Springbank project. It's the only hope for protecting our future as a City.
7 November, 2016
Modernize YYC says:
We are a modern City and we need modern protection! Build the springbank off-stream reservoir and figure out how to fix the Bow.
7 November, 2016
Karen W says:
Duff's Ditch had opponents too - but is now viewed as a huge success! Get on with it Alberta - build the Springbank project!
7 November, 2016
Yes to protection! says:
Yes to Springbank! We can't leave the downtown vulnerable. Both rivers flood the Core - start now!
7 November, 2016
Build now! says:
Springbank land is grazing land and can continue to be used for that the majority of the time. Build the dry dam and protect the City!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
8 Grizzle bears settled and are living in the proposed Dam area, not to mention countless other animals. Don't destroy their habitats.
7 November, 2016
SR1 says:
Inconvenient Truth: Yes - SR1 protects the Core which is flooded by BOTH RIVERS! Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Calgary needs protection - just like every other major city in the world. Start with Springbank - build the dry dam ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
Good job province for acting swiftly post-flood to find solutions. Build SR1 now and find solutions on the Bow. Protect Calgary!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
These are heritage ranches that have had generations ranching and farming on them. But why would Albertans care about that?
7 November, 2016
Merran says:
Build Springbank dry dam now! And find a solution on the Bow. The province is doing a great job- keep it up!
7 November, 2016
SR1 Now says:
The province acted swiftly post-2013 flood to find solutions for flooding. SR1 is the first project that needs building. Fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Val in Calgary says:
I strongly support protecting Calgary and the first project we need to get done is the Springbank dry dam.
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
Yes, protect downtown. Springbank does NOT protect downtown. Other options need review. No to SR1, it is misguided.
7 November, 2016
Meg says:
Yes to the Springbank Dry Dam! It's doable. It's needed. It must be done!
7 November, 2016
Calgary says:
Save Canada's economic engine and start with the Springbank Off-stream Reservoir!
7 November, 2016
AB says:
This Concept - flood infrastructure on both rivers - is absolutely the way to go. Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
SaveCalgary says:
Tearing down homes and skyscrapers in Calgary is not a viable solution. Springbank project is. Build it ASAP and fix the Bow too!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
The Springbank Dam will be a health hazard to anyone who lives down wind or down stream, they have no plans to clean it up after flooding it
7 November, 2016
Urgent!! says:
The Elbow and Bow Rivers both flood downtown. Start with SR1 for the Elbow and find solutions for the Bow. It's urgent!
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
The BOW River caused the majority of the City's grief. WHY is a fix on the Elbow being pushed? SR1 is bad public policy and irresponsible.
7 November, 2016
Still Vulnerable says:
Yes to Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir! It's about time. Look at Duff's Ditch? A 70 year dry spell has left us complacent. Wait no longer
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
There are other options that don't destroy one community to save another, choose McLean Creek.
7 November, 2016
Protect us! says:
The majority may not be as loud as the minority - but make no mistake, this City wants the Springbank project built ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Paul YYC says:
SAVE THE CORE or whoever you are, stop spamming under different names. It only shows desperation.
7 November, 2016
Save the city says:
Calgary was built on the confluence of two rivers. Both need fixing. Start with Springbank dry dam and find a solution for the Bow!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
The Springbank reservoir is bad public policy, a health hazard after it being flooded and is a huge environmental impact to animals homes
7 November, 2016
LM says:
It's ludicrous that no action has yet been taken, almost 4 years after the flood. Build Springbank! It is objectively the best choice.
7 November, 2016
Calgary! says:
Springbank is the best solution for Calgary. Do not delay. Prioritize this important public works project! Work with the province!
7 November, 2016
Say no says:
Why is it okay to flood out one community to save another when they live on a flood plain. Why punish one community to save another.
7 November, 2016
Save our City says:
I strongly support the Springbank project. It protects thousands of homes and businesses and is needed to protect the Core.
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
McLean Dam and Tri-River Joint Reservoir were not thoroughly reviewed as options. Springbank Dry Dam is irresponsible water management.
7 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
Yes to Springbank Off-stream Reservoir. Protect the downtown by fixing both rivers ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Build Springbank! says:
City water engineers have repeatedly said the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown - which cannot be protected without fixing both rivers.
7 November, 2016
Protect Downtown says:
Both rivers flood the Core - the centre of our City and basis of our province's economy. Build Springbank and find a fix for the Bow!
7 November, 2016
No more flooding! says:
Like all mitigation measures, the Springbank dam will negatively affect some, but will benefit a much larger community and economic centre.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 4: SR1 will create ideal conditions for the breeding of Mosquitos. Zika mosquitos have made it to Canada. Calgary next?
7 November, 2016
Protect the Core says:
Calgary needs the Springbank dam and a fix on the Bow. Both are needed to protect the downtown Core, City Hall, the East Village, etc.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth3: Agricultural lands can be used after flooding. 90 days without oxygen or light will kill all vegetation and crops.
7 November, 2016
LMack says:
The Springbank project has already been objectively proven to be the best to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.
7 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Build SR1. There is strong support in Calgary. Along with empathy for the Springbank landowners - but they will be treated fairly.
7 November, 2016
Save Downtown says:
The Core floods from both rivers. We can't save the core without upstream mitigation on both. Start with Springbank and find a fix for Bow!
7 November, 2016
Save the Core says:
The City of Calgary knows that the Elbow contributes to flooding the downtown. Fix both rivers - starting with the Springbank project.
7 November, 2016
Fix the Elbow! says:
Calgary wants SR1. Yes - the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown. Both rivers need fixing. Let's get on with fixing the Elbow ASAP.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 2: Stantec Project Report 5.3.5. Residue from SR1 may contain raw sewage susceptible to blow into Calgary on west winds.
7 November, 2016
Average citizen says:
Springbank background suggests that governments are listening to private wealthy people Vs looking at wise spending of provincial tax dollar
7 November, 2016
Save Calgary! says:
There is strong support in Calgary for the Springbank reservoir - especially amongst those well informed. It's our only option. Build it!
7 November, 2016
Save the City says:
Calgary needs the Springbank dry dam. Using private land for public works is an old concept. Happens all the time for the greater good.
7 November, 2016
LW says:
Springbank Reservoir is presented as a " quick Fix" Do we want quick fix or spend our tax dollars cost effectively. good for all
7 November, 2016
Harold says:
SR1 opposers are not against prudent flood mitigation. City Land Use needs review. City needs a plan, not on the backs of others!
7 November, 2016
save calgary says:
Yes to the Springbank dry dam. It makes sense. Keep the flood water out of the City. The land will be useable for grazing when no flood.
7 November, 2016
LW says:
Springbank Reservoir .. most overall costly project . Combined costs for it, Bragg Creek, Redwood meadows, and First nations besides losses
7 November, 2016
Yes to mitigation says:
Build Springbank! The government is being pragmatic. McLean Creek would never get built. Too many contingencies. Expropriation is normal.
7 November, 2016
Jim says:
Inconvenient Truth 1: Stantec Project Report 5.3.4. SR1 may contaminate groundwater and wells. Springbank relies on clean water wells.
7 November, 2016
Baymare says:
The Springbank Reservoir- is bad public policy. Does not protect Bragg Creek, Redwood or Tsuu Tina. It takes homes, heritage and businesses.
7 November, 2016
Stop Floods! says:
Yes to Springbank! McLean Creek has too many contingencies and will never get built. Where does that leave Calgary? Protect YYC!
7 November, 2016
Stop Floods! says:
The less vocal majority wants SR1. Anyone informed on flood mitigation understands why it's the best solution. Fix the river!
7 November, 2016
YesSR1 says:
I strongly support building the Springbank project and finding a solution for the Bow. Please do not delay! Their is strong support!
7 November, 2016
Fix YYC says:
Calgary is vulnerable to floods. Why?? It's embarrassing. Please build SR1 ASAP and find a solution on the Bow.
7 November, 2016
Protect YYC says:
Yes to Springbank Dry Dam. The City needs protection. And find a solution for the Bow too.
7 November, 2016
City wants SR1 says:
Build SR1. Calgary needs it and everyone wants it! Strong support in the City for those informed on flood mitigation.
7 November, 2016
Prioritize fixes! says:
We need the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir and a fix for the Bow. Please make this a priority for the City!
7 November, 2016
Yes to dry dam says:
Springbank landowners will be fairly compensated and many will be able to retain the grazing use of their land. Please build SR1!
7 November, 2016
Build the dam says:
Studies have shown SR1 to be the best contender. Please build it ASAP - this City cannot handle another devastating flood.
7 November, 2016
BP says:
Upstream Reservoirs are a good solution to protect Calgary's communities & economic core. Proceed with Springbank & a Bow River Reservoir.
7 November, 2016
Yes to the dry dam says:
There is strong support for SR1 - in spite of a vocal minority. Expropriation is an oft-used tool for public works. Build SR1.
7 November, 2016
Urgent Fix Needed says:
Please build SR1 right away. 2020 is the best timeline. It's so far off! Every year the City is at risk.
7 November, 2016
Upstream Mitigation says:
We need upstream protection on both rivers. Find a solution for the Bow and build SR1 ASAP. The vocal minority will be fairly compensated.
7 November, 2016
Ross C says:
As an Alberta taxpayer and YYC resident and business owner, SR1 is wrong. A dam at McLean is the responsible thing to do.
7 November, 2016
Fix Calgary says:
Build SR1 for the Elbow and find a solution for the Bow ASAP. This City needs protection. ASAP!
7 November, 2016
Protect Calgary says:
It's embarrassing this City has no flood protection - it's had more than dozen major floods in the past 120 years. Get SR1 done!
7 November, 2016
Yes to Springbank says:
It's unfortunate that expropriation may be required - but it's quite common for public works. Build Springbank ASAP!
7 November, 2016
calgary citizen says:
We Must protect the city, a few will be inconvenienced, but properly compensated. the land in question is not historically significant.
7 November, 2016
Build SR1 says:
Springbank is essential. The city remains vulnerable and this is the best identified option. Bragg Creek protection is already underway.
7 November, 2016
Yes to SR1 says:
Build Springbank as soon as possible. The city cannot afford another devastating flood. And find an upstream solution for the Bow River!
7 November, 2016
kc says:
Rehab what's left of Maclean Creek (now a giant gravel pit full of atvs) into a dam/rec area/ natural habitat. Protection on crown land.
7 November, 2016
cdorr says:
I strongly support the Springbank Reservoir. Please move to protect our inner city communities and downtown. It's time.
7 November, 2016
KC says:
No to SR1! It destroys yet another community and protects only a fraction of the people Maclean Creek would!
7 November, 2016
Hal Couillard says:
Carving up valuable and historic agricultural land is insane as an alternative. Maclean Creek is already owned by the crown. Go there.
7 November, 2016
JN says:
The economics here are a lie! Land values are incorrect and no costs for expropriations. The Cost benefit makes no sense. A fail. A lie.
7 November, 2016
Adrian Nagy says:
I do no t agree with the proposed plan, I believe that their are alternatives that are probably better and less intrusive to the parties
7 November, 2016
K says:
Damming McLean Creek will protect more people and doesn't destroy another community. And is already government owned land
7 November, 2016
Anne says:
Environmentalists and First Nations against this plan. Build berms and use McLean.
7 November, 2016
Lucy says:
This option does not protect downtown or anywhere along the Bow. It is a strange and unproductive idea. What is really in the govt's mind?
7 November, 2016
Lesley says:
No Springbank Dam! Environmentally dangerous and unpopular with Calgarians. Use crown land at McLean Creek
7 November, 2016
DL says:
This is the best plan. It is so important we make this happen. The benefits are significant.
6 November, 2016
Keep Your Promise says:
NO to SR1. McLean Cr protects more people and doesn't destroy another community. Bow caused most damage to Calgary.SR1is bad public policy.
6 November, 2016
Ryan says:
More research needs to be conducted for the McLean Creek dam. It's crown land, and will provide a recreational area in the future. NO to SR1
6 November, 2016
Shawn says:
This is the best plan. Let's go ahead and get the Springbank and Bow reservoirs done!
6 November, 2016
SG says:
What happened to #AlbertaStrong? Stop looking to destroy the ranching community in Springbank and consider the other options. Maclean Creek.
6 November, 2016
sg says:
I support the springbank reservoir project. This must be completed soon to protect the economically vital portions of the city.
6 November, 2016
Concerned says:
Both Springbank and additional dams on the Bow River are needed to avoid another national catastrophe which will cost billions.
6 November, 2016
Concerned says:
Downtown Calgary and all the communities along the Elbow and Bow rivers must be protected from future floods. Concept 1 is the best option.
6 November, 2016
Jamie says:
SR1 is not cost effective, and proposed costs have not been realistic up to this point.
6 November, 2016
Jamie says:
Why should one community should be protected at the cost of several others?? Dam McLean, Say NO to SR1.
6 November, 2016
Mark says:
People against SR1 want Calgary protected. They just don't want Springbank destroyed as well. McLean Creek is the best option.
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
Springbank wants flood mitigation to benefit all. Build MC1 and everyone wins.
6 November, 2016
Larry says:
Springbank Dam will destroy 6,800 acres of ecologically significant private land. McLean Creek land is free and will protect far more people
6 November, 2016
CW says:
Flood mitigation should never involve flooding one community to protect another. SR1 is poor public policy.
6 November, 2016
Marlene says:
SR1 does not provide any benefit other than in the event of a flood- build McLean for drought and flood protection.
6 November, 2016
SR1 is wrong says:
If I had been a victim of the 2013 flood the last thing I'd want is to fling injurious affection onto anyone else for my future well being.
6 November, 2016
DM says:
"YES" to the McLean Creek Dam
"No" to the Springbank Dam.
6 November, 2016
SW says:
Completely against Damning Springbank. A complete eye sore
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 5 - SR will prevent $billions of damage. $750 million according to report on gov.ab. SR will cost more than that. Dam McLean Cr
6 November, 2016
Deborah Ward says:
This is devastating to a longstanding rural community with founding forefathers still in this area. more common sense approach needed
6 November, 2016
PG says:
Given the risks to downtown Calgary and affected communities, and the ~ $6 billion cost of previous flood damage, SR-1 is a must!
6 November, 2016
HM says:
SR1 studies only go so far. Who knows where the ranching sediment will end up? Likely in Calgary drinking water and filling up Glenmore dam.
6 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
The Springbank project and the raising plates on the dam are a big and vital start to full flood mitigation. Downtown Calgary is at risk.
6 November, 2016
Larry Fichtner says:
I am a very strong proponent of upstream flood mitigation and I believe that the two projects that are in process are absolutely mandatory.
6 November, 2016
HEM says:
Map needs to show the entire 6300 acres that flood will effect for SR1. Private land grab. MC1 would be on crown land saving all communities
6 November, 2016
MK says:
The City of Calgary needs to align with the Province's efforts in support of Springbank off stream reservoir
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
How can diverting water kilometres off stream to stagnate possibly be more natural than holding it within the river valley? Dam McLean Cr.
6 November, 2016
LAR says:
McLean proposal offers better protection for more folks & use of Crown lands would be fair for all at risk, urban and rural Albertans alike.
6 November, 2016
No more floods says:
I'm in favor of the Springbank Reservoir. This project is taking way too long. Let's get on with it. Save the inner city.
6 November, 2016
D says:
Springbank off stream reservoir is the superior solution and should proceed first.
6 November, 2016
C.R. says:
No to Springbank, Yes to MacLean.
6 November, 2016
Protect downtown yyc says:
More than 3 years post flood and all we have to show is fingers crossed that there is no new flood. Time to act!!!
6 November, 2016
hoffthehammer says:
It is essential that we undertake the construction of the Springbank upstream reservoir to protect the city.
6 November, 2016
Tom says:
Myth 3 (again) SR opponents are against flood mitigation. Fact - We have consistently advocated for McLean Cr to protect more Albertans
6 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
SR1 SUPPORTER u r proving why you guys dig a deeper hole for ur selves with every statement.
6 November, 2016
Mark says:
McLean protects more people and communities without destroying valuable farm and ranch land. SR1 is a mistake that should not be built.
6 November, 2016
NO SR1 says:
Poor SR1 SUPPORTER. Take people's homes and biz and community cause of ur wet drywall. Typical attitude from these FOLKS. Drywall B4 PEOPLE?
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Here's an idea. Let's have the Prov offer the buy-out to every impacted homeowner in the City at the 2012 tax assessment. Any guess on cost?
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
One wonders if the SR1 opponents spent any time at all seeing first hand the devastation in Calgary. How much drywall did they pull down??
6 November, 2016
YYC FLOOD RESIDENT says:
SR1 SUPPORTER you fighting a losing battle. Get behind McLean and lets get mitigation.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
The facts and science support SR1. Look at the studies done. They all support SR1 over the other options. It can get built.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Isn't this the "false equivalencies" like Trump/Clinton? And the mis-information in these anti-SR1 comments? Stunning.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
22 ranch land owners and, what, 1 residence? vs 80000 evacuees, thousands of buildings, hundreds of families, and $billions. Really?
6 November, 2016
RFLOG1 says:
The cost of SR1 will continue to mushroom. I strongly support the McLean Creek option as was promised as part of the NDP election platform.
6 November, 2016
P C says:
To support Springbank is to support ignorance over reason. Protect more than a few, sacrifice no one. DONT DAM SPRINGBANK!
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
...and Bragg Creek and upstream areas are now building $33m worth of 1/100 protection
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
Make no mistake. The SR1 opposition in Springbank fundamentally don't care about ANY infrastructure on the Elbow.
6 November, 2016
SR1 Supporter says:
McLean Creek will never get built if SR1 dies. You wanna see opposition? Just wait for that.
6 November, 2016
SHL says:
Let's get this flood mitigation in place ASAP. Springbank is the o