Need more info? Please refer to the participant packages.


 Concept-1

What are the strengths and weaknesses of concept 1 and why?

<p style="color: rgb(63, 71, 78); margin-bottom: 1rem;">What do you think this concept's benefits and impacts will be on:</p><ul><li>The way the community looks, feels and moves?</li><li>Providing equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities?</li><li>The amenities/services in your community?</li><li>The health of the rivers and floodplain as it flows from the mountains, through the city and to other communities downstream?</li><li>The long-term supply and quality of water for our community?</li><li>Protecting Calgary's economic core? Should downtown be protected to a higher level?</li><li>The city as a whole?</li></ul>

9 November, 2016

Kim says:

No weaknesses, the city requires Springbank dam to proceed ASAP to protect our downtown core and communities

9 November, 2016

Kim Safton says:

We need this reservoir to protect our city core and communities NOW

8 November, 2016

High and dry says:

Does do nothing for Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. MC creek option is the only goid one that can work for all. Cheapest too!

8 November, 2016

Vanice Simpson says:

The proposed dam at Springbank will not protect everyone on upstream of the Springbank area. Everyone needs flood protection!

8 November, 2016

David H says:

Spingbank is the right solution. McLean Creek is a poor option. Self interest is driving opposition to Springbank.

8 November, 2016

Dave says:

The study has been done by experts in their field - get on with the Springbank option. It's the best option for the people of Calgary.

8 November, 2016

Linda says:

For most downstream benefit & least damage to fish & landowners, dry dam measures should be further upstream than Springbank.

8 November, 2016

Dave says:

Albertans great at working together to recover from disasters but not at working together to prevent them. Www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.

8 November, 2016

yycNorth says:

Looking at riverfront homes in '86 we opted to live on high ground. Flooding was a factor. Why can't people own up to their bad choices?

8 November, 2016

Inner city resident says:

The springbank reservoir is the solution with most benefits and the least cost and disruption. What is the hold up?

8 November, 2016

Evan Welbourn says:

Working with open ground and raw undeveloped earth, is much more economic than repairing developed lands , like downtown.

8 November, 2016

Passionate Calgarian says:

Springbank Reservoir protects the city as a whole. Businesses and homeowners.

8 November, 2016

Evan Welbourn says:

I support upstream reservoirs.

8 November, 2016

Don says:

Equal protection. Downtown more costly to recover so needs more protection. This is best way. Best for whole city, too.

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

is this really a case where a government would rather sacrifice its citizens than take on the environmental lobby? God help us.

8 November, 2016

Jane says:

The 2013 flood did so much damage. It would be criminal to let this event continue to ruin lives, homes, businesses, community. No to SR1.

8 November, 2016

Markj Hornby says:

It is essential to have reservoir capacity in flooding situations. Both the Elbow and Bow require reservoirs in emergency situations.

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

There is no need to turn community against community. Let's all support MC1. It's on land that the gov.ab (ie.we) already own. Why buy more?

8 November, 2016

Greg says:

If berms are good enough for Bragg Creek and RW, they should be good enough for Calgary too

8 November, 2016

SG says:

I am sure Calgary will bully their way into having a dam in Springbank which is sad as I really do believe MC is a better choice for Alberta

8 November, 2016

yycNorth says:

Don't we already have a reservoir? It's called the Glenmore. Dredge the dam thing!! Can't hurt!

8 November, 2016

MW says:

SR1=cesspool. Mosquitoe breeding ground. Not to mention dead animals, fish and sewage. Nice.

8 November, 2016

MW says:

The type of sediment left at SR 1 NOT fertile, would not grow pasture. Is mountain rock. Would be an ugly moonscape. What a crime!

8 November, 2016

MW says:

The taking of private land, businesses and homes when there are viable alternatives is POOR PUBLIC POLICY. Mclean creek please!

8 November, 2016

Floodvictim says:

We are in full support of the Springbank off stream reservoir. Please make this a priority and start building now.

8 November, 2016

Patrick Mc Reavey says:

Protect all community in flood areas. Protect the all the city infrastructure. Get moving before disaster strikes again.

8 November, 2016

Elenore Kubik says:

We must have another reservoir west of Calgary on the Bow River to protect our economic core and communities along the river.

8 November, 2016

SR1 forpublic safety says:

Anti logging will kill MC1. Environmentalists will kill MC1. Lives are at risk. Temporary wet pasture best. SR1 a must for public safety.

8 November, 2016

Get it done says:

Time to take action. It is good for all of Calgary, you can't be a great city with a vulnerable core.

8 November, 2016

Kel Johnston says:

Displacing some of Alberta's founding families when the Maclean Creek option exists that affects no one is a crime.

8 November, 2016

rvander says:

Unless this plan protects all Alberta homes, it should not be completed at any expense. McLean Dam is the answer.

8 November, 2016

Prospring says:

Hands down, this is the most cost effective and best result concept to deal with flood risk in Calgary. For residences and businesses

8 November, 2016

bwalker says:

I believe that the Springbank reservoir is the best of the three concepts as it will be the quickest and least expensive to implement.

8 November, 2016

Andrea says:

Fully supportive of SR1. It's been analzed, assessed and recommended by legions of experts and professionals. Get started now. Please.

8 November, 2016

Andrea says:

SR1 will benefit the city as a whole. It's been studied and analyzed enough. It's time to get on with it!

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

After a week or so of jabbing back and forth the winner is - no one!!! Why can't we all get behind McLean? Everybody wins!

8 November, 2016

Al says:

SR1 has already been objectively proven to be the best solution to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

Springbank opposition are exaggerating??? Meanwhile proponents claim it will save all of Calgary and world hunger too. Let's get real folks

8 November, 2016

Albertans for All says:

Engage best minds/skills to develop Tri-River Joint Reservoir ASAP. for future prosperity as our forefathers did

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

A new cost benefit when gov.ab finally gets pushed into doing one will clearly show McLean is better. Enviro concerns can be mitigated.

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

Objectivity on SR1 was lost in 2014, when the premier announced it was preferred. Since then - bureaucrats striving to please the boss.

8 November, 2016

Best for All says:

Project to protect most communities ASAP presented to NDP GOA. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Need TRJR.

8 November, 2016

Katya says:

Maximum benefit. Build it now.

8 November, 2016

Kyle says:

The science concludes SR1 is the highest cost/benefit and most feasible. Leave it to the experts instead of comments from NIMBY landowners.

8 November, 2016

Kyle says:

Why is SR1 not built yet? Much better to have controlled flood in the prairie than an uncontrolled flood of Calgary communities and downtown

8 November, 2016

Bxn says:

This seems the most logical solution from a cost and effectiveness viewpoint. Land recovers from water naturally; houses do not.

8 November, 2016

Person upstream says:

Hmmm...Government picking winners & losers instead of acknowledging that all can win, and making it happen...Can someone explain please? MC1

8 November, 2016

Person upstream says:

Those of us upstream are getting a bit tired of being called "the opposition". Grow up! We're as worthy as Calgarians are.People are people.

8 November, 2016

Person upstream says:

We are more than a "handful of people upstream". We are PEOPLE upstream who deserve the same degree of protection that Calgary demands.

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

Springbank is the logical choice for a dry dam. The land can still be used for grazing, parks, nature reserve, etc. Protect against calamity

8 November, 2016

Makes no sense says:

Upstream mitigation IS a reasonable part of the solution, but flooding 7000 acres of farmland is not the right answer. Dam McLean.

8 November, 2016

Makes no sense says:

How is SR1 a "reservoir" when there's no plan to "line" the land with anything to keep water from simply soaking in? Waste of water & land.

8 November, 2016

Get Informed says:

Be informed and make wise choices. With the wealth of information available - Springbank dam is a clear winner. Build it!

8 November, 2016

lornatsta says:

Upstream reservoirs are the answer, few people impacted, good protection, very little environmental impact -during flood and for short time

8 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

Note that above where it estimates 1.9B - that is to do a reservoir on each of the Elbow and Bow Rivers and is not the SR1 cost alone.

8 November, 2016

Jonathan says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

8 November, 2016

Brian says:

In 2012 SR1 =$158M; now = $1.9M & likely to increase yet no updated cost on MC1. Claims of MR1 costing more are unfounded! Look more at MR1!

8 November, 2016

Dano says:

Upstream mitigation is the best solution set by far. It is the dominant solution globally for flood mitigation/hydroelectricity.

8 November, 2016

Don says:

The Springbank Reservoir has been well examined and studied. The expert conclusion is that it is a good solution; it ought to be undertaken.

8 November, 2016

Dam Mclean says:

We really need to evaluate the two options properly and equally.

8 November, 2016

Dam Mclean says:

The SR1 option will impact one of the last pieces of native prairie and unique habitat left around the city of Calgary.

8 November, 2016

Dam Mclean says:

The Mclean creek dam option was never explored to the fullest extent. So how come people say the SR1 is the best option?

8 November, 2016

Dorothy says:

This is not a "them" or "us." Its about protecting the most Calgarians. Springbank dam doesn't do that. It does nothing for downtown.

8 November, 2016

kelly moi says:

Springbok provides a viable flood mitigation option to protect downstream areas of the Elbow river and the downtown as a priority.

8 November, 2016

Concerned Taxpayer says:

YYC cannot afford another flood, economically, environmentally, or emotionally. Do SR1 and other mitigation asap.

8 November, 2016

Build Springbank Res says:

It has been over 3 years since the flood. It is time to move on this project!

8 November, 2016

Concerned Taxpayer says:

Praying and assuming that another flood will not happen is foolish. Start mitigation with SR1 asap and address other prevention as well.

8 November, 2016

Concerned Taxpayer says:

Relocating downtown businesses, Saddledome, historic homes, etc. is not an option. Start with SR1 asap and address Bow flooding as well.

8 November, 2016

BUILD SPRINGBANK says:

There have been several studies concluding that Springbank is the best option, cost wise and enivironmentally. Please get moving on this!

8 November, 2016

Grandpa says:

SR1 liability to present & future Generations. Provide a great treasure Tri-Ri Ed Joint Reservoir of Alberta. All work together For TRJR

8 November, 2016

In my back yard says:

The plan is to flood the SR1 site every 7 years to ensure everything is working properly. Not ONLY in big flood events like many think.

8 November, 2016

Damn McLean says:

McLean creek is the only good option and it would protect more than just the city of Calgary. The NDP government should be ashamed.

8 November, 2016

In my back yard says:

The MC1 site is NOT too "wildlife sensitive". 40 years of ATV's, logging, a gas plant, etc...has ensured few animals live at the site.

8 November, 2016

In my back yard says:

As a Bragg Creek resident, I want the dam IN MY BACK YARD! MC1 for the good of us ALL!

8 November, 2016

Sitting Duck says:

The ship on floodplain development in YYC sailed 120 years ago. Subsequent civic govt's have ignored the threat. Concept 1 - NOW!

8 November, 2016

Sitting Duck says:

Calgary core, business and communities will remain vulnerable 4 flood seasons later. Let's not make it 5 and counting...

8 November, 2016

Sitting Duck says:

SR1 is feasible and gets the job done. Grazing land won't disappear - flood or no flood - It can be restored faster, cheaper than city land

8 November, 2016

NDP flip-flop says:

It seems like there are A LOT of people commenting here who support McLean, which the NDP campaigned upon. We won't let them forget that.

8 November, 2016

Sitting Duck says:

YYC and AB cannot afford another flood in any sense of the word - expense, lost productivity, deminished property value=less property taxes.

8 November, 2016

Heartbroken says:

Sad that it appears that all supporting SR1 couldn't care less about Tsuu Ti'na, Springbank, Redwood or Bragg. Where's your compassion?

8 November, 2016

Bragg Creek matters says:

Diversify the economy via tourism by building a lake-like, REAL reservoir at MC1. Win for all Calgarians who come & play in our back yard!

8 November, 2016

Lets Do It says:

I support the Springbank as a long term solution which affects all of Calgarians and Albertans.

8 November, 2016

Lucy says:

Concept #1 is core to every solution. Without it..#2 and #3 don't protect our city.

8 November, 2016

McLean is best says:

According to the Treaty Act, neither SR1, nor MC1 can proceed without the majority of Treaty 7 bands on board. They're not.Indiginous rights

8 November, 2016

Karen Radford says:

We must take action to protect our city and reduce the uncertainty this churn is creating. Springbank needs to happen

8 November, 2016

Karen Radford says:

The Springbank solution has proven to be the best. It has minimal impacts and protects our city. Time to move forward.

8 November, 2016

McLean is best says:

If the berms in Bragg & Redwood fail, the SR1 diversion gates will be so clogged by our debris, they'll likely fail and do no good at all.

8 November, 2016

McLean is best says:

SR1 wouldn't conserve water for times of draught. MC1 would, and would also be a lake-like playground in close proximity to Calgary. Smart!

8 November, 2016

Jim says:

Visit preventingalbertafloods.ca The TRJR. This project is the best solution. Not even considered so far by GoA. No to SR1 help everyone.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

The is virtually no environmental impact to building a dry dam and flooding a field every 20-50 years.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

The environmental impacts of upstream mitigation are vastly overstated, consider the impact of the contents of 10,000+ homes in the landfill

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

I have some sympathy for those whose land is expropriated or flooded every 50 years, but upstream mitigation is needed for an entire city.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

All flood-prone areas should be protected, starting with the Elbow, then the Bow. Upstream reservoirs address all the issues +minimal impact

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

The upstream reservoir would protect our drinking water by slowing the silting up of Glenmore reservoir.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

The long-term quality of water would be improved by the Springbank reservoir, by holding back mud and pollutants during and after a flood.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

Upstream mitigation protects all citizens, whether they live near a river or not, as we all have to pay when floods occur.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

Upstream mitigation is the best solution for the entire city, we're all taxpayers and ultimately have to foot the bill when disasters happen

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

I support upstream mitigation as the best solution, we don't want to end up like Los Angeles and turn our rivers into concrete channels.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

Upstream mitigation is the best solution, it avoids ugly berms and walls and will preserve the natural beauty of our rivers.

8 November, 2016

Sandman says:

Upstream reservoirs are by far the most effective and least disruptive solutions. Let's push to get Springbank built, then one on the Bow.

8 November, 2016

Simon G says:

The Springbank Project makes a lot of sense- I'm surprised that it hasn't been better supported by the City. It seems to do the job well!

8 November, 2016

Sheldon cameron says:

Please mitigate the possibilities of having another flood like 2013. The downtown city core or surrounding residential home owners beg for

8 November, 2016

Bill Ardley says:

If SR1 is built, tax Calgarians only for the 2 billion. Also for any future upstream floods costs. Build McLean creek and all pay for it

8 November, 2016

Build now! says:

The Springbank project is strongly supported by Calgarians. Environmental impact is negligible compared to the impact of a flood.

8 November, 2016

Action needed says:

Floods happen. Dams get built. Expropriation is older than the hills. Get Springbank built and fix the Bow River too.

8 November, 2016

Stop flooding now says:

So tired of the inflammatory comments about sacrificing Springbank. Most of that grazing land will continue to be available for grazing.

8 November, 2016

Build the Dam says:

Please stop exaggerating. No one is sacrificing Springbank. 3600 acres of grazing land are needed for an important public work. Build SR1

8 November, 2016

Build the Dam says:

My family's farmland was expropriated west of Edmonton for a traffic exchange. We survived. The greater good needs the dam!

8 November, 2016

Build the Dam says:

Expropriating for public works is a concept older than Alberta. Let's get on with Springbank now!

8 November, 2016

Wayne says:

I think this is great although I don't understand why it isn't also combined with a dry dam in the meaclean creek, Allen Bill pond area.

8 November, 2016

Save Calgary says:

Get the facts straight. Both rivers need mitigation to protect the Core. Start with Springbank now!

8 November, 2016

Lesley Kirby says:

Concept 1 protects the city downtown core. Calgary needs to have business and head offices protected.

8 November, 2016

Tired says:

I support Calgary solving it's own dam(n) flooding problems within their own city limits. Leave Springbank out of your selfish plotting.

8 November, 2016

Rideau Resident says:

The land values in Springbank are attributable to the proximity to Calgary. Preserve the value of both. Concept 1 now.

8 November, 2016

Tick tock says:

By the time NDP FORCIBLY takes the land for SR1 from the owners, MC1 could have been near completion, had the NDP kept their word. Sad.

8 November, 2016

LWB says:

Why should we sacrifice long-standing landowners upstream while we continue to allow residential development in flood plains in Calgary?

8 November, 2016

Waste of money says:

Expropriating prime farmland to create a 7000+ acre toxic dust plain is a ridiculous waste of Albertans' money. Smarten up! Dam McLean!

8 November, 2016

Disappointed says:

Calgary needs to solve their own problems within their own city limits. The flood wasn't Springbank's fault. Period.

8 November, 2016

Disgusted says:

Were Calgary a "world class city", it wouldn't insist that others pay for it's shortcomings & poor planning. Mitigate yourselves.

8 November, 2016

Rideau Resident says:

A flood of a similar magnitude to 2013 in the next few years will erode the entire tax base of the city. Concept 1 ASAP.

8 November, 2016

Some facts says:

Calgary planners dropped the ball & now they're making it the problem of innocent people. City planners are to blame, not Springbankers.

8 November, 2016

Paul says:

Easy to implement, cost effective and solves the problem. Protecting Calgary is of highest importance and should be a priority.

8 November, 2016

Nimbys in YYC says:

Don't want unsightly, ineffective berms obstructing your posh river views? Neither does Bragg Creek. Dam McLean! We can all be happy!

8 November, 2016

Yes 2 SR1 says:

Springbank reservoir is needed now! This is the best solution for protecting our downtown, stampede grounds and residential communities.

8 November, 2016

Truth be told says:

Sorry Springbank folks, but who are being the Nimby's? Why let facts get in the way of your lies?

8 November, 2016

Jim says:

I support McLean Creek proposal. It costs less due to nil cost of land. Also protects villages of Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek.

8 November, 2016

Yes 2 YYC mitigation says:

This project needs to proceed asap. The risk and damage to personal and commercial property and the economy more generally is too great!

8 November, 2016

Madge says:

Civic politicians have created this dam rush. Building on flood plains, is no excuse to make others bear the brunt. No to SR1, go elsewhere.

8 November, 2016

GT says:

How can YYC be considered "world class" when we cannot quickly implement flood mitigation? Start with SR1 asap before another flood occurs.

8 November, 2016

Madge says:

Save the core! Fact: Bow River was primary cause(2/3) of CORE & city flooding. Focus on the BOW. Fact:SR1 will not save the Core.

8 November, 2016

Save the City! says:

We need to Build SR1 NOW and MC1 ASAP. We need to protect Calgary from future Flood Devastation! Enough Studies and Surveys! We NEED Action!

8 November, 2016

No Sprinkbank dam! says:

The Calgary residents opposing berms obstructing their river views are the NIMBY's, not the Springbank residents on the chopping block.

8 November, 2016

Berms for everyone! says:

The salesmen are heavily pitching the effectiveness of earthen berms for Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows. No dams! Berms for everyone!

8 November, 2016

Smith says:

This SR1 concept is more politically motivated than scientifically sound. There are other, more effective and viable options.

8 November, 2016

No to SR1 says:

Creating a likely toxic dust bowl, directly in the path of strong winds is seriously insane. No Springbank dry dam! All to the east suffer.

8 November, 2016

Smith says:

It's too costly and has a great negative impact on both the community and enviro, while protecting a prestigious few properties downstream.

8 November, 2016

Angry Creeker says:

We want Calgary protected without sacrificing & displacing others. MC1 is for the good of the many. SR1 is for the good of fewer.

8 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

McLean Creek is off the table for good reasons. Springbank is now the only hope for the Elbow. Build it!

8 November, 2016

Yes to YYC says:

This City cannot grind to a halt again. Let's get this fixed. Springbank now. The Bow ASAP.

8 November, 2016

Build now says:

Very much in favour of Concept 1 - upstream protection on both rivers. Start with Springbank.

8 November, 2016

Build Reservoir says:

Strongly support the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir. It's a necessary public work.

8 November, 2016

Good neighbour says:

I support MC1 as it protects Calgary AND communities upstream, like Bragg Creek, that Calgarians like to frequent. MC1 is simply better.

8 November, 2016

Build ASAP says:

Informed people get that both rivers flood downtown and we need the Springbank reservoir ASAP as a start.

8 November, 2016

Save the Core! says:

Calgarians understand what's at risk. Our economic chugs away in the downtown core. Fix both rivers. Start with SR1

8 November, 2016

Yes to mitigation says:

The majority of these comments support building Springbank now! And fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Bragg Creek matters says:

If earthen berms are "good enough" for Bragg Creek, they're certainly "good enough" for Calgary too. Equal protection for all citizens.

8 November, 2016

Yes to mitigation says:

Please get informed. The Core floods from both rivers - and the Springbank project is the best first step. Build it!

8 November, 2016

Act now! says:

Act now! This City's fragile economy cannot weather another disaster. Fix the Elbow with SR1 and fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Greater Good says:

The greater good dictates we need to fix both rivers. Start with the Springbank dry dam for the Elbow and keep looking for the Bow.

8 November, 2016

Protect more people says:

Heartwarming to see that the overwhelming majority are AGAINST SR1 & FOR MC1. There might be hope for humanity afterall:) Sacrifice nobody!

8 November, 2016

Greater Good says:

Why should I pay to save flood plain people? Well - they pay for your LRT they never use. They pay for roads they never drive. Public works

8 November, 2016

Yes to Dry Dam says:

Why don't people move out of the flood plain? Because there are 10,000+ homes there. And the entire downtown. Too late. Build protection.

8 November, 2016

TW says:

this needs to be done immediatlt; stop delaying.

8 November, 2016

EM says:

I support Concept 1

8 November, 2016

Yes to Dry Dam says:

Science backs the Springbank reservoir. We need to protect the Core from both rivers. It's the best place to start!

8 November, 2016

Yes to SR1 says:

Why is it a dry dam? Because it has minimal environmental impact and we have enough drinking water. Build SR1

8 November, 2016

Yes to protection says:

Will Calgary flood again? Yes - most definitely. Rivers flood. People can protect themselves. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

How could people not get that the Elbow River contributes to flooding the Core? Because they are misinformed. Build SR1 and fix the Bow!

8 November, 2016

John Simpson says:

Maclean Creek dry dam protects more people, costs less, with lower environmental impact than SR1. Respect those outside Calgary.

8 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

Why is there such misleading information out there about the Springbank dam? Because a few people don't want it. Calgary needs it!

8 November, 2016

david beckwermert says:

Upstream reservoirs are the way to go for all the reasons listed

8 November, 2016

Fix both rivers says:

Is the Springbank dry dam just about fancy houses on the river? Ah .... NO! It's about the economic engine of Canada. Start with SR1!

8 November, 2016

Save the core says:

Does the Elbow flood downtown? Yes. Does the Bow? Obviously. Fix both and start with Springbank dry dam.

8 November, 2016

Yes to dry dam says:

Yes the Elbow River contributes to flooding downtown. And City Hall. Informed people get this. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Downtown needs you says:

Get informed. Understand what's at risk. Protect downtown from both rivers. Start with Springbank dry dam.

8 November, 2016

SR1 is a start says:

Everyone in Calgary relies on the Core in some way. Protect it now. Stop flooding on both rivers. Yes to SR1.

8 November, 2016

SLK says:

This protects only part of Calgary, ruins valuable agri-land and does not protect upstream Tsuu T'ina, Redwood Meadows or Bragg Creek.

8 November, 2016

Save Downtown says:

Informed people understand that the Core needs protection from BOTH RIVERS. Start with SR1 and fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Save the Core says:

Don't be swayed by falsities, exaggerations and biased "survey" data. This City needs the Springbank reservoir. Both rivers flood the Core.

8 November, 2016

Gordon w Ross says:

I support the spring bank project,we need this in place now to protect our economy & communities affected we cannot afford another flood!!!!

8 November, 2016

Yes to SR1 says:

Informed people understand that the Springbank dry dam is the only viable solution for the Elbow. Let's get it done!

8 November, 2016

Mitigation now! says:

All studies point to Springbank as the best project for the Elbow. Build it and keep searching for a Bow solution. Protect this City!

8 November, 2016

Build now says:

It's happening. The Environmental Impact Assessment is underway. Keep it going and fix the Bow too!

8 November, 2016

Yes to protection says:

Best case scenario is flood protection by 2020. We can't afford any more waiting. Get this done and fix the Bow too.

8 November, 2016

Build Springbank says:

Calgary is a huge city and warrants protection. Start with Springbank and fix the Bow too. It's time!

8 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

Another foot of water and the downtown would have been shut down for months - because elevators and HVAC would have been ruined. Fix this!

8 November, 2016

Brian Farewell says:

This is the quickest and cheapist solution to cut back on Elbow River flow and is urgent.

8 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

This City has had 10+ major floods in the past century. It's going to keep happening - until we build protection. Start with Springbank!

8 November, 2016

Build it! says:

No more dithering. Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow.

8 November, 2016

WW says:

Yes to Springbank dry dam - the City is vulnerable. It's an important public work. Build it!

8 November, 2016

Build it now! says:

Build SR1 and find a solution for the Bow too. Calgary needs this!

8 November, 2016

Johns88 says:

I do not support the Springbank Reservoir. The Maclean Creek dry dam protects more than just Calgary with less destruction of habitat.

8 November, 2016

Eric K says:

I'm 100% for this cost effective solution that provides minimal environmental damage using the existing flood prone areas.

8 November, 2016

Concerned owner says:

Enough talk! After 3+ years of "study" it is time to protect downtown Calgary. Build Springbank ASAP.

8 November, 2016

ckayser says:

This solution is clearly the most logical, effective, and will offer the most immediate and beneficial protection to Calgarians.

8 November, 2016

Warren says:

It is for the greater good and most economically viable.

8 November, 2016

Rural citizens count says:

The Elbow is the primary water source for the Tsuu Ti'na Nation. I don't believe they support SR1. They count as much as the Calgarians.

8 November, 2016

Save Springbank says:

Keep up the fight SR1 residents! There are MANY of us supporting you! Dam McLean! Protect more people. Sacrifice none. Stop the division!

8 November, 2016

Derek says:

I am 100% for this project. The tangible and intangible costs of a future flood for the city, province and nation are not acceptable.

8 November, 2016

Save Springbank says:

Use the natural basin of McLean to build an actual reservoir to conserve water for times of draught. SR1 soaks into the land & wastes water.

8 November, 2016

Michelle says:

Yes to the Springbank Reservoir! Even Nenshi knows we need it to protect Downtown Calgary.

8 November, 2016

Build it says:

Environmentalists have significant env. concerns including they will not allow trees cut at MC1. People lives are at risk. Build SR1 ASAP.

8 November, 2016

Asm269 says:

Springbank off-street reservoir is the best option and needs to be implemented ASAP!

8 November, 2016

Ginny says:

Upstream resevoirs are a necessary measure. Since the city cant be relocated, the water needs to be diverted.

8 November, 2016

Michelle Williams says:

Disagree with Springbank, protect more people/areas upstream - equally protect all - McLean Creek more fair and smarter choice.

8 November, 2016

Michelle says:

Two governments have given their word that upstream mitigation would happen. Live up to your word and make it happen!

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

Springbank saving downtown is a myth. Still I would champion McLean Creek as a means to protect Elbow River communities and those upstream.

8 November, 2016

Lew says:

Best concept for actually addressing the most potential harm.

8 November, 2016

Ward Mallabone says:

I think it will be beneficial not only for the affected flood areas but the city as a whole

8 November, 2016

kmendham says:

I support the upstream mitigation of a Springbank reservoir as the most cost effective and expedient and practical solution to mitigating

8 November, 2016

John says:

Upstream reservoirs must be implemented to protect the core/communities. Other approaches: disruptive/discriminatory/of questionable effect

8 November, 2016

Bill says:

No dam! Build berms and barriers. Use crown land at McLean Creek.

8 November, 2016

SG says:

#Albertastrong. Maclean Creek protects Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Calgary and Springbank. Even the NDP knew this truth pre election.

8 November, 2016

Kay says:

This dam will NOT achieve what you have been told. It will NOT protect the downtown core, only Elbow. McLean will protect far more.

8 November, 2016

Maurice W. says:

Calgary and Canada's GDP cannot afford to have the downtown core shut again. We need the upstream reservoir.

8 November, 2016

Bert says:

NDP has already destroyed oil industry. Now going after farmers. This dam would not help the Bow River or downtown area. No dam

8 November, 2016

Richard L. says:

Get on with this proposal. It was recommended by the experts, but has been sidelined by interest groups.

8 November, 2016

Sunnyside says:

A Springbank reservoir makes abundant sense. Compared to catastrophic flooding, it's a bargain. The city was built in valleys; get over it.

8 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

SR1 was not chosen by experts. GoA cherry picked from the Deltares report, ignoring the emphasis on "Make room for the River" Use Crown land

8 November, 2016

Jodi says:

I am a two time flood victim. I am in support of the Springbank reservoir. This is the best option for the city of Calgary.

8 November, 2016

James C. says:

I support concept 1. Floods occur frequently and 2013 proved that they threaten Calgary's entire downtown core, Stampede and Saddledome.

8 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

Rivers are still stronger than any mitigation. Accept consequences of your decision. Crown land and options exist upstream. SR1is wrong.

8 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

Sad to see people pushing for the destruction of someone else's homes, businesses and property to secure their own agenda. How un-Albertan!

8 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

Staying on a floodplain is a choice. Flood mitigation is going to happen. Pushing consequences onto other Albertans is wrong. No to SR1.

8 November, 2016

Elizabeth M says:

Hello, I support the springbank reservoir. As a resident of elbow park, this proposal is the best option to protect the downtown core.

8 November, 2016

Jumping Pound Guy says:

Springbank will not be a beautiful lake with sailboats and cottages. Imagine a 7000 acre catch basin with rocks & silt & chain link fence.

8 November, 2016

Bob says:

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. This is easily the most effective, efficient flood mitigation solution.

8 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

Build Springbank now! Calgary remains vulnerable. And find a solution for the Bow.

8 November, 2016

Shauna says:

This mitigation is paramount for the vitality of the city of Calgary. It's urgency is immediate to protect the citizens and infrastructure

8 November, 2016

Tom says:

When Springbank is shown to be over $600M and McLean is $$350M, then can we all get behind McLean Creek?

8 November, 2016

Rick Simonton says:

In favour of upstream reservoirs.Would bring back the feeling of community. All buy out lots would be sold and new single family homes built

8 November, 2016

Shannon says:

We are a city built at the confluence of 2 rivers and must mitigate our flood risk to protect ourselves! I support the SR1 project.

8 November, 2016

Gary says:

This has been studied to death and shown to be the best first step to protecting against a repeat of the 2013 flood.

8 November, 2016

TerryMyles says:

This plan offers the best protection to most citizens with the least adverse effect on river flows or water quality.

7 November, 2016

Concerned Citizen says:

I have attended many meetings on the flood mitigation for our city. The Springbank Reservoir proposal seems the most logical for the problem

7 November, 2016

Embarrassed says:

As Calgarians, we are embarrassed that Calgary's Elbow River residents would want to expropriate other peoples' land to protect themselves!

7 November, 2016

Barb Morin says:

I care and am concerned but don't feel capable of making a well-informed decision about solutions.

7 November, 2016

Citizens are EQUAL says:

The first berm in Bragg Creek HASN'T even begun to be built. Anyone saying Bragg Creek already has mitigation started is wrong.

7 November, 2016

Alan Brimacombe says:

I just want this project to get under way to protect my home and my family. Every spring s tension occurs in my family that lasts for months

7 November, 2016

not happy says:

The Springbank dam increases flood risk to Springbank homes. The cost is ridiculous. Consider McLean Creek.

7 November, 2016

Grampa says:

TRJR would provide flood protection quickest. We have built great projects so don't let leaders tell us the. BEST too difficult

7 November, 2016

Mike B says:

Bow River Reservoir- there are no plans and no money to actually build a Bow River reservoir in our lifetimes, so this concept is a failure.

7 November, 2016

Robert Dick says:

I like this concept as it achieves so much in terms of preserving the Elbow as a healthy river, but the dry dam is there when needed.

7 November, 2016

Mikkel says:

Enviro and technical assessments are years away. Calgary wants assurance "ASAP". SR1 for 1.9B is an absolute terrible solution.

7 November, 2016

Grampa says:

SR1 embarrassment to our generation. City would still be vulnerable as gambles on size of flood. Leave great legacy Tri-River Joint Reservoi

7 November, 2016

Citizens are EQUAL says:

The Springbank Landowners' rights are being thrown out the window. DON'T build/rebuild on a flood plain! Poor city planners are at fault.

7 November, 2016

Rick B. says:

Springbank is not VITAL to the survival of Calgary. This project is misleading and has been since the get go.

7 November, 2016

DL says:

The trade-off of land (fairly compensated for) for the protection of Calgary is a no-brainer. We cannot afford to wait any longer.

7 November, 2016

staciattba@gmail.com says:

If $33 million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for Bragg Creek, then $330million in berms is GOOD ENOUGH for equal, not superior citizens in Calgary

7 November, 2016

JJ says:

We should go ahead with both Upstream Reservoir Projects!!! We have studied this enough! It is time to take action before we suffer again!!

7 November, 2016

Ben says:

Lost our home in the flood. Moved to Springbank. So I strongly oppose SR1.More effective, less intrusive mitigation is available.

7 November, 2016

Shannon says:

It is critical that the springbank resevoir and Glenmore Dam upgrades move forward ASAP. It is indisputably in the public interest.

7 November, 2016

staciattba@gmail.com says:

The cost shown above DOES NOT include the cost of purchasing the land from the Springbank residents! This is misleading.

7 November, 2016

For All Albertans says:

Many were affected. Many need protection. Work together & all can benefit. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca Tri-River joint Reservoir AB

7 November, 2016

Jocelyn says:

Springbank is the best solution to protect Calgary . Do not waste another year.

7 November, 2016

Blair M says:

vital to the protection of the city of Calgary. Vital that it is built ASAP.

7 November, 2016

Jeff says:

We need to do this project to protect Calgary from future flooding and mitigate future damages! The risk of doing nothing is too high!!!

7 November, 2016

For All Albertans says:

Water is a treasure not our enemy. Respect & value it with much needed water bank in mountain valley. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.

7 November, 2016

SR1 boondoggle says:

I want my tax$ helping the masses. McLean or Tri-River Jt Reservoir would protect more Albertans than SR1. And use Crown land not private!

7 November, 2016

For All Albertans says:

Big problems require big minds to solve. Utilize great opportunity offered. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Reservoir AB

7 November, 2016

Hails says:

Protecting the economic core and the surrounding community are addressed by this concept so I support it wholeheartedly.

7 November, 2016

SR1 boondoggle says:

Why would you support SR1 when it will not protect you from Bow River flooding. Downtown suffered from the Bow, not Elbow!

7 November, 2016

K says:

"SR1 impacts the least amount of people"? Maclean Creek is on government owned land and a res there would protect Calgary + upstream towns.

7 November, 2016

For All Albertans says:

Enlist expertise of committed engineers,environmentalists hydrologists politicians. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River Joint Res

7 November, 2016

SR1 boondoggle says:

Alternatives to SR1 were not studied. More political science was involved selling SR1 as fast&cheap! Fed Govt see red flags, time will tell!

7 November, 2016

Thanks says:

I like concept 1 as the preferred option.

7 November, 2016

Sue Desmaries says:

As a Calgarian, I can't in good conscience support SR1. Don't make others pay for the city's decision to develop/live on a floodplain.

7 November, 2016

For All Albertans says:

Provide equal protection to all. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca. Tri-River joint Reservoir of Alberta

7 November, 2016

Gretel says:

Let's get the Springbank Reservoir built before a flood wipes out downtown Calgary.

7 November, 2016

Naomi says:

Several expert studies agreed this is the best option to effectively protect Calgary from a 1/100 year flood. Expedite the construction!

7 November, 2016

Peter Brimacombe says:

Impacts the least amount of people Best cost benefit ratio Least environmental impacts 2 governments have determined its the best option

7 November, 2016

D says:

Build berms in YYC. It's good enough for Bragg Creek? No to SR1 and Yes to MC1 Seems like a well organized blitz for the SR1 crowd tonite.

7 November, 2016

joel says:

All I'm seeing here from SR1 supporters is: save my skin, screw everyone else! Not the Alberta way when there is a solution for all. Go MC1!

7 November, 2016

Ian says:

Springbank was selected by experts as the best solution to mitigate against the dire consequences of another flood like 2013. Let's do it!

7 November, 2016

K says:

I do not support SR1. It protects to few at to high a cost. Build on gov. land so everyone wins.

7 November, 2016

Todd says:

Save our families and our lives, complete the Springbank Res now!

7 November, 2016

K says:

Why dam perfectly good farmland and homes when Maclean creek (on crown land!) could be damed and used for tourism and wildlife habitat?

7 November, 2016

Patrick says:

The time is now to complete the SBR. Until it is done 100,000+ Calgarians live in fear of another catastrophic event like 2013.

7 November, 2016

Cam says:

Cncpt 1 has the best balance between protecting Calgary's downtown, and river communities, and the cost and effectiveness of other choices

7 November, 2016

Patricia Steele says:

I support the Springbank option. I feel upstream flood mitigation is critical to the long term viability of the City as a whole.

7 November, 2016

Justin says:

We urgently need to build the Springbank off stream reservoir project . Do not waste another year.

7 November, 2016

Doug says:

I am a strong supporter of the spring bank reservoir. This has taken a very long time to move this project forward and protect the downtown

7 November, 2016

Lillian says:

I strongly support the Springbank Dry Dam project and act now

7 November, 2016

Adam says:

Please build the Springbank Dam project ASAP

7 November, 2016

Oscar says:

Please do it. I understand the importance of community engagement but it's more important to act and implement programs to protect our city.

7 November, 2016

Jay says:

Springbank res should be the #1 solution and needs to be completed asap.It is practical & cost effective and will save lives & billions of $

7 November, 2016

sam says:

Yes to Springbank Dry Dam project. Please start right away.

7 November, 2016

EBA says:

Immediate protection of people and property. Longer term solutions should still be looked at and Sprinbank off stream first.

7 November, 2016

Victor Juchymenko says:

As a professional engineer, my opinion is that this is the no brainer option.

7 November, 2016

Jeanette says:

Both SR1 and MC1 will sacrifice wildlife habitat, but MC1 is on crown land and will protect more communities. Talk about the greater good!

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

It took multiple rewrites of the Deltares report to get to even a luke warm endorsement of SR. That's not science, that is politics.

7 November, 2016

Jeanette says:

Please actually read the studies on SR1, it's not the magical solution it's being promoted to be! Build at MacLean instead...

7 November, 2016

Matt says:

Upstream mitigation on the Elbow River makes sense and needs to happen! Support Springbank Dry Reservoir and /or McLean Creek Reservoir.

7 November, 2016

Cam inglis says:

It is the most complete way to protect the city core and its residents and impacts the fewest citizens

7 November, 2016

Calgarian says:

Upstream mitigation must be put in place ASAP. Insurance providers will not bail out the same people they helped in 2013.

7 November, 2016

JCB says:

The Springbank Reservoir is the best option for protecting Calgary's downtown core.

7 November, 2016

Matt Weir says:

I support the upstream Springbank Damming, in order to mitigate the flow of runoff and other variables collecting on the Elbow River

7 November, 2016

Neil says:

SB reservoir is the most objective solution.

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Deltares report was based on preliminary engineering design by AMEC in 2014. This decision was not based on thorough science. Gotta call BS

7 November, 2016

Unbelievable says:

3 years after the flood, I can't believe we are debating whether flooding land or downtown homes and businesses is preferable.

7 November, 2016

CD says:

Being more concerned about fields covered in silt, rather than hundreds of families' homes filled with mud is selfish and misguided

7 November, 2016

Stan says:

From a macro, long term view, SB reservoir is a must. We need to act now!

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

The process to get to SR1 was neither thorough nor objective. Only stakeholders consulted were within Calgary city limits. McLean is better

7 November, 2016

Rob-Elbow says:

Upstream reservoir was my initial and pervasive solution to the downstream flooding effects.

7 November, 2016

animji says:

This is very important for our city.

7 November, 2016

dmaucoin says:

Three years into this process and we are still discussing this. Build the Springbank Dam and get on with it.

7 November, 2016

concord says:

Springbank must go ahead. Calgary is the economic engine of Alberta and almost was completely flooded if the Elbow continued to rise.

7 November, 2016

Pat says:

I support the Springbank Reservoir project and urge that it be completed as quickly as possible to mitigate flooding and drought.

7 November, 2016

Mike says:

Complaints of potential "mudflats" and "ruined" grasslands are complete exaggerations. The parkland flooded in 2013 has completely regrown.

7 November, 2016

neil says:

reduce environmental impact from any sizable flood compared to dry dam impact.

7 November, 2016

Calgary resident says:

All the alternatives have been studied thoroughly and this is the clear and most practical solution to protect our city

7 November, 2016

neil says:

decease stress of over 100,000 people directly effected in 2013. protect downtown Calgary and surrounding areas from huge potential losses.

7 November, 2016

HJM says:

This is by far the best option. By next spring, it will be 4 years, the communities and the city cannot afford to wait any longer.

7 November, 2016

Steve says:

Please go ahead with SR1 ASAP! The City can not go through another 2013 flood and neither can my family! It makes sense cost wise!

7 November, 2016

Kathy says:

I support construction of dam in springbank (flood mitigation).

7 November, 2016

Anne says:

I cannot support SR1 and am astounded at how many wish to secure their own well being at the expense of others. Please build MacLean creek!

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

I am a Calgarian and will stand with my Elbow River neighbours to support McLean Creek. I will not support harm to my Springbank neighbours

7 November, 2016

Protect our City says:

We came within a foot or so of losing downtown and impacting many more Calgarian residences and businesses. Mitigation makes sense.

7 November, 2016

Common Sense says:

People who don't like a result complain about the process. Springbank reservoir just makes too much sense.

7 November, 2016

Michael says:

The Springbank reservoir was selected after a thorough and objective evaluation of all viable alternatives.

7 November, 2016

Andrea says:

The Springbank reservoir is vital to protect the most people for the least impact.

7 November, 2016

mclean better says:

Strengths - someone thought of it Weakness - doesn't consider McLean Cr Mclean Creek doesn't take private land, SR1 will be a mudflat

7 November, 2016

Susan says:

After attending a flood mitigation workshop and exploring the concepts in depth, full implementation of the Springbank reservoir is urgent!!

7 November, 2016

David Evans says:

The strength of concept 1 lies in its dual purpose. It provides both flood protection measures and used to retain water during drought.

7 November, 2016

MC says:

SR1 is far too expensive and does not protect enough people- if we can all agree on MC1 we can all benefit.

7 November, 2016

SEM says:

This is NOT a popularity contest. The best solution should be based on science, monetary benefits and quick implementation.

7 November, 2016

kevinL says:

We must build springbank reservoir! Benefits far outweigh the cost. We must protect downtown & the hundreds of homes in river neighborhoods

7 November, 2016

YYCtoobig says:

Inappropriate and overbuilt solution for homes built on flood plain. Reservoir further upstream to create mountain recreation opportunities.

7 November, 2016

C.W. says:

I support the position of The Calgary River Communities Action Group

7 November, 2016

C& a says:

We are fully support

7 November, 2016

YYC says:

Protection of Alberta's economic centre is vital. Fully support SR1. Build it asap!

7 November, 2016

Betty says:

I support the Springbank Project. Do it now.

7 November, 2016

C. W. says:

Mitation needs to begin on this project (Concept 1) and be completed quickly to prevent another 2013 diaster so costly to all Albertans.

7 November, 2016

Betty says:

Calgary suffered severe flooding in 2005 and in 2013. These floods caused massive economic and personal losses. Prevent further flooding now

7 November, 2016

Sandy says:

Dams are required to protect the low lying areas in Calgary, let's get on with it!

7 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it!

7 November, 2016

Larry Fichtner says:

Let's get this project underway before we run into another event similar to 2013!!! The whole downtown is at risk!!!

7 November, 2016

Betty says:

SR1 is NOT the cheaper option. An honest cost assessment has not been done. Much more land needed than proposed, wildlife affected as well.

7 November, 2016

Robert Edgar says:

Strength is a must in order to protect Calgary

7 November, 2016

Betty says:

A FEW springbank landowners? How ignorant and selfish can you possibly be! Hilarious! MC1 to protect several communities! Do your research.

7 November, 2016

Make it happen says:

Protecting Calgary's downtown, infrastructure, and Communities. Minimizing potential loss of life.

7 November, 2016

Flooded twice says:

We must do this. Sometimes the "needs of the many" outweigh the "needs of the few" - not just in the movies. Get it done!

7 November, 2016

Steve says:

SR1 has been studied by environmental companies and two governments. Stop the time wasting and build it before another 2013 flood arrives!

7 November, 2016

Siren says:

an upstream reservoir may unfortunately impact some individuals, but it is necessary to protect the city as a whole

7 November, 2016

Johannes devries says:

The springbank diversion plan is an absolute necessity

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Springbankers are NIMBYs? what does that make those who only want the Elbow in their backyard at certain flow rates?

7 November, 2016

No to SR1 says:

The cost benefit analysis has grossly underestimated the cost of SR1. You were warned if it goes through it's not the cheapest/best option.

7 November, 2016

Shannon says:

This is not just about Calgary! Maclean Creek won't destroy our heritage ranches & protects Bragg Creek!

7 November, 2016

John says:

The most cost effective option to achieve flood mitigation goals. Maximum effect, minimum disruption. But treat those affected fairly!

7 November, 2016

Nadir says:

This seems the best option but I would leave the decision to the experts. The main issue is to do something to mitigate Calgary flooding.

7 November, 2016

Len Sandrin says:

Upstream mitigation is absolutely necessary to prevent catastrophic flooding in the city. It is the most important piece of the solution

7 November, 2016

Flooded out says:

Get it done already

7 November, 2016

Mh says:

Springbank will be a good start. We need this for the city and as someone who was flooded out in 2013, will go a long way for piece of mind

7 November, 2016

Mightbeuseful says:

Where will the folks from Springbank bring their kid's 4H animals if the Calgary Stampede Grounds are underwater? What about flames fans?

7 November, 2016

Andrew says:

I fully support the concept of an upstream dam to protect the city. If Springbank is the best location for this, then so be it.

7 November, 2016

No $$$ says:

Why should any of my tax $ be spent for people who buy homes in low areas, then want the us to save them. You made your choice live with it

7 November, 2016

Linda Taylor says:

I support the Springbank option which has been reviewed & confirmed as the best option to protect Calgary & further downstream communities.

7 November, 2016

Blake O'Brien says:

This seems like the only logical "solution" to me.

7 November, 2016

Bob G says:

As victims of 2013 flood, it is a misconception that we were offered buyouts and that insurance covered our losses. It cost us huge $.

7 November, 2016

Lynn G says:

We strongly support the Springbank Reservoir project to protect our communities and the downtown. We cannot afford another 2013 flood.

7 November, 2016

Brandon says:

what is the cost to clean out the debris after a flood event? I'm concerned about air quality from a dust bowl.

7 November, 2016

Paul Baay says:

This seems to be the he only long term solution to properly protect the economy of one of the most vibrant cities in the world.

7 November, 2016

Brandon says:

It is not cost effective. The concept design is only protecting a select few communities over smaller towns and communities outside Calgary.

7 November, 2016

Arthur says:

I want and support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project. This is the best option . What are we waiting for?????????

7 November, 2016

Mary says:

I strongly support the Springbank off-stream Reservoir Project-------we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary.

7 November, 2016

DS says:

Our neighborhood and city urgently need mitigation. The Springbank dam is the best solution from a cost-benefit perspective.

7 November, 2016

Mary says:

I strongly support Springbank off-stream Project-----we must protect our communities and downtown Calgary '

7 November, 2016

Mrs. Harper says:

Fact-Alberta Gov't Environment Dept has never studied SR1-Ask them yourself-They have never seen the file. Biggest myth this is well studied

7 November, 2016

Pat says:

With the amount of damage done in 2013, the reservoir is the only answer. Stop talking about this and let's have some action.

7 November, 2016

HCole says:

Is this not a provincially funded project? Why is only Calgary being protected and not other Albertan communities? No to SR1, Yes to MC1.

7 November, 2016

HCole says:

I don't want my tax dollars going toward a project that only protects some while sacrificing others.

7 November, 2016

RickyG says:

An upstream Elbow River dam is a better solution protecting more communities like Bragg, Redwood, Springbank and Tnai lands along with Calga

7 November, 2016

Mary says:

I strongly support the "Springbank offstream Reservoir Project, Mary

7 November, 2016

basyas says:

Maximize use of excess water to areas of the province that are drought prone. Irrigation!

7 November, 2016

H says:

The Sprinbank Reservoir solution is the most effective and well thought out solution to avoid a repeat disaster and needs to proceed ASAP.

7 November, 2016

Hannah Geist says:

Why doesn't this map show the full scale of the dry dam (almost the size of Airdrie!)? More misinformation meant to push SR1. Go Maclean.

7 November, 2016

SR1 Please says:

We have seen the destruction of a large portion of the City of Calgary. Not convinced that SR1 will destroy grassland. It doesn't equate.

7 November, 2016

hgfjg says:

Has anyone even looked at the plans for SR1? They have water running uphill! No to Springbank! Dam Maclean, protect everyone!

7 November, 2016

Maureen says:

The SB reservoir has been studied and best serves the city .It has been approved; a few neg private interests should change the decision

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

RockyView County is opposed to SR1. They state it will sterilize farmland, contaminate water and pollute the air. No upside for RVC. Yes MC1

7 November, 2016

BL says:

I fully support the Springbank option. It protects river communities BUT just as importantly, protects downtown businesses -small & large.

7 November, 2016

T says:

The Springbank Option has been reviewed by a number of experts and comes out as the best alternative overall. It's time to committ to it.

7 November, 2016

DJ says:

As a flooded resident I can tell you that the biggest myth is that we were offered a buyout, or indeed any public funds at all.We paid!

7 November, 2016

Greg L. says:

Doesn't anyone realize 2013 was a freak occurrence that will never happen again in our lifetimes? Why ruin any communities over nothing?

7 November, 2016

no sr1 says:

What ever happened to being good neighbours? A dam at MacLean Creek would offer the most protection without further destroying communities.

7 November, 2016

basyas says:

Prague floods. Vienna does not. They figured it out and DID something!

7 November, 2016

basyas says:

Instead of buying land, agree to cover crop or property losses if and when flood occurs. MB farmers still farm beside the dike.

7 November, 2016

CW says:

The Springbank option has been throughly vetted by two governing parties (Conservatives & NDP). Please end the delays and begin construction

7 November, 2016

basyas says:

If downtown Calgary is not protected head offices will leave Calgary particularly in light of the higher tax rate that now exists in AB.

7 November, 2016

Tyler says:

AS albertans are paying for this, it must protect the most albertans possible. Not just YYC Elbow River communities.

7 November, 2016

Eric M says:

I feel Springbank dam is not right. Protect more people is a must. SR1 does not provide equal protection to all citizens, in YYC our out

7 November, 2016

Maria says:

Springbank is the most viable option to protect homes, businesses and important city infrastructure. Calgary cannot afford another 2013.

7 November, 2016

Jeff says:

Springbank's wide input channel will safely ingest large debris (many large trees) whereas McLean's narrow flow channel is susceptible. Duh

7 November, 2016

Tom Kent says:

great idea. need to protect downtown and water from Elbow wants to go to Bow once it overflows banks. get Springbank done soon!

7 November, 2016

Jeff says:

With the Springbank project being closely positioned to the City, it provides snow/rain protection sourced on the greatest land area. Duh.

7 November, 2016

Mary Saucier says:

By far my biggest concern to the time it is taking to begin the Spring bank Reservoir!!!! What is the hold-up?

7 November, 2016

Mary Saucier says:

My biggest worry just now is that the decision to build the upstream reservoir on the Elbow river, which caused by far the greatest damage

7 November, 2016

Darlene rogers says:

I am not an environmentalist nor do I have scientific credentials but it makes sense to protect our city from upstream activity.

7 November, 2016

PTSD says:

Yes, still PTSD symptoms! Action on Springbank is needed to protect YYC lives, businesses and homes and to help turn around our economy.

7 November, 2016

fklein68 says:

I fully support this concept. I think it would protect the city with very little negative impact. Only some 20 landowners would be affected

7 November, 2016

F Cropper says:

SR-1 needs to go ahead as soon as possible to protect the citizens of Calgary and the downtown core. Do not wait!

7 November, 2016

Jean Beca says:

Equal protection from river flood to all citizens/communities Protect Calgary's economic core? I live in Rideau Rocksbough.DOIT

7 November, 2016

Richard says:

These upstream reservoirs are essential to protect people and property in Calgary. Building dykes/concrete walls is not enough; we need both

7 November, 2016

Rich says:

Properly assess the McLean Creek option using recent data (NOT the outdated data of the previous and current governments)

7 November, 2016

DnT says:

Flood Mitigation is critical to the long term safety and prosperity of Calgary. Springbank is the best option for Calgary, period.

7 November, 2016

Roxboro Owner says:

SR1 has been thoroughly studied, and has been rigorously compared to the alternatives. It is clearly the choice to be made. Action is needed

7 November, 2016

Dooley r says:

Clearly this is required since the repeat of a 2013 flood or worse would have a terrible impact on the city, Alberta and nationally.

7 November, 2016

Concerned owner says:

Environmentalists will stall McLean Creek indefinitely. We need flood protection now, so I support Springbank and improving Glenmore Dam.

7 November, 2016

Concerned owner says:

Two provincial governments have agreed on Springbank. Let's proceed. We cannot afford another downtown flood, caused by the Elbow River.

7 November, 2016

ratfink says:

There is no comparison between the massive damage to an entire city from another flood, and the minimal disruption to a few landowners.

7 November, 2016

Jason says:

It is ludicrous this decision is based on public opinion versus which will protect the city the best. Concept 1 is the best choice.

7 November, 2016

HD says:

The environmental impact of flooded appliances and building materials headed for the landfill is enormous compared to water in a field.

7 November, 2016

ratfink says:

Please get this project underway. It will protect everyone. Don't let a few vocal landers owners obstruct the right solution.

7 November, 2016

dbe says:

Build the springbank reservoir asap. Enough time has been wasted.

7 November, 2016

DJ says:

SR1 would have prevented tens of thousands of families losing their homes and billions of dollars in damage. Build it now!

7 November, 2016

Allan says:

Need to protect Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows as well as Calgary.

7 November, 2016

Agata korth says:

Please just get this dry dam completed, we've all discussed this every which way possible....we are sick of discussing, just get it built!!!

7 November, 2016

SR1 NOW says:

Baloney that a few dozen people can NIMBY and keep Calgary at risk. Expropriate, the rent pasture back to the original owner. SR1 NOW

7 November, 2016

SR1 NOW says:

Floods caused many BILLIONS of damage. And will happen again. Do not forget 2013. SR1 NOW

7 November, 2016

NDM says:

Maclean Creek is the best initiative and perhaps finding an insurance company that insures for floods in the interim.

7 November, 2016

SR1 NOW says:

Naysayers complain that dust will blow out of SR1. Don't they think dust will blow out of flooded Calgary? SR1 NOW.

7 November, 2016

SR1 NOW says:

SR1 land will still be grazing land 99% of the time. It is not lost, in spite of what a VERY FEW NIMBY types say.

7 November, 2016

SR1 NOW says:

Springbank is the best choice. Being downstream of McLean Creek the Springbank option can catch water from the mountains AND the foothills

7 November, 2016

Mbhannam says:

It is now going on four years post flood. Our neighbourhood is still rebuilding. PLEASE build the spring bank dam and let us rest easy.

7 November, 2016

Angelique says:

Protecting our city and rivers are mandatory. This is the strongest option to prevent and assist in another devastating flood.

7 November, 2016

Mandy says:

The ability to support a 2013 flood level is essential to protect not just residents along the Elbow river, but also Calgary's economic core

7 November, 2016

MB says:

Please get moving on SR1. The benefit to the entire inner city of Calgary outweighs the concerns of a few Springbank residents.

7 November, 2016

PP28 says:

does nothing to protect the communities of Bragg Creek or Redwood Meadows. It will destroy heritage farm lands and families in Springbank

7 November, 2016

Tim says:

Springbank dry dam is the best solution.

7 November, 2016

Sally says:

Since when did destruction of a community become an acceptable choice when there are alternatives? Mclean Creek, the Tunnel or Tri River!

7 November, 2016

BM says:

Action SR-1. McLean Creek will never happen so stop putting it out as some viable option. You're all just distracting from viable options.

7 November, 2016

Rachel says:

It seems like a few dozen landowners against hundreds of thousands of Albertans that need the downtown core protected. Let's move on SR1

7 November, 2016

protect everyone says:

Upstream mitigation is LONG overdue. Build SR 1 before another catastrophic flood affects ALL Calgarians.

7 November, 2016

BM says:

Action SR-1. Three years have passed since Calgary was shutdown. Stop the navel gazing. It's embarrassing. Springbank will be fine.

7 November, 2016

SR1 please says:

Sediment management is easier in a dry reservoir as the reservoir is not continually subject to daily sedimentation - flood events only.

7 November, 2016

gm says:

Build! The Springbank Dry Dam is the best choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary

7 November, 2016

Michael Mulloy says:

I am in favour of the Springbank reservoir

7 November, 2016

Conrad says:

Calgary cannot afford another flood.We must build the Springbank dry dam!!!

7 November, 2016

tdwr says:

The Springbank Project is in the public interest of the City of Calgary, and the operations of downtown Calgary.

7 November, 2016

david says:

best overall option ... fully support this plan.

7 November, 2016

Percy Lazdins says:

Not an option. as it makes no sense!!!! Does not protect Red Wood Meadows, Bragg Creek and residences in between.

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Protection of Calgary must be top priority given the number of people with property and livelihoods at risk.

7 November, 2016

NH says:

We support the Springbank Dry Dam. Please act quickly to protect the homes of families in the path of Elbow River flooding.

7 November, 2016

Bbiddell says:

Please proceed with spring bank- this will benefit the most people and homes by far and we can't risk this extensive damage again!

7 November, 2016

Living on a hill says:

Pandering to rich fools who buy riverfront property and then cry when it floods. Work with Mother Nature and buy out flood plain properties

7 November, 2016

Paul V. says:

I think this solution affects the least amount of people and is a fair balance to all parties. Please proceed ASAP.

7 November, 2016

LMH says:

Protect our city. Build SR1. It will benefit the majority. We need mitigation now!

7 November, 2016

Kim says:

We need to do this ASAP!!!

7 November, 2016

Build springbank says:

Protect downtown calgary and build spring bank

7 November, 2016

MR says:

The Springbank Dry Dam is the essential choice as a first defence to protect the citizens and the economic core of Calgary and Alberta.

7 November, 2016

Bryan W says:

Springbank Reservoir is the best solution: its quick, relatively inexpensive and least likely to run into environmental roadblocks.

7 November, 2016

David Calnan says:

I support the idea. It is low impact and low cost solution. It will protect in some flood events and provide needed time in all.

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Maclean Creek is not necessary to protect those upstream of SR1 & will take 10 years to be put in place, if ever.

7 November, 2016

Springbank says:

Import to proceed with spring bank due to cost benefit to the downtown corr

7 November, 2016

Sue says:

Build Springbank. It is the best option for the money and for the environment. The Elbow flooded downtown Calgary!

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Residents upstream of SR1 have already seen mitigation measures instituted to protect Red Wood Meadows & Bragg Creek

7 November, 2016

Linda Gardner says:

We need to get moving on this as soon as possible. Time is of the essence. The further we are away from 2013, people start forgetting.

7 November, 2016

BowRiverResident says:

There needs to be more than just operational changes on the Ghost Reservoir - need more storage capacity on the Bow to properly protect YYC!

7 November, 2016

SRCJ says:

The destruction of pristine grasslands & agricultural land is disturbing. What is motivating the NDP to renege on their stance b4 election?

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

Require Springbank reservoir to be built ASAP - the #of residents hurt by flooding greatly outweighs the few well off landowners impacted

7 November, 2016

Greater Good says:

Just curious if the DDSB folks realize the folly of their arguments? 2 very different governments came to the same conclusion. YES TO SR1!!

7 November, 2016

SRCJ says:

This approach causes environmental & ecological damage to the Springbank area, and leaving the effluent in situ introduces health concerns.

7 November, 2016

SRCJ says:

This plan is not the most comprehensive solution available as it provides no protection to Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows.

7 November, 2016

Gail M says:

Calgary residents expect empathy for flooding, yet show none for their upstream neighbours? Dam MacLean Creek and keep everyone safe!

7 November, 2016

SR1 yes says:

Nutrients from floods can be beneficial to grasslands. City waste in our rivers can't be good for downstream irrigation / municipalities.

7 November, 2016

JKS says:

ruining springbank to protect Calgary still does nothing for those residents upstream of springbank, other solutions make more sense.

7 November, 2016

James says:

Maclean offers protection to the most number of people and costs are predictable. SR1 will cost the province too much for coverage of few.

7 November, 2016

EB says:

The health and economics of the whole city, along Bow and Elbow Rivers, hangs in the balance as we stall on mitigation upstream. Build it.

7 November, 2016

SR1 now says:

Rockyview is moving ahead with local flood mitigation in Bragg Creek. We also need to protect a large population in Calgary.

7 November, 2016

SG says:

Maclean Creek is the best option. Protection to Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Elbow residents. Even NDP knew this to be true pre election

7 November, 2016

sdb says:

Springbank has been proven to be the best option, with less environmental impact. DO IT QUICKLY! Protect Calgary.

7 November, 2016

ka says:

the options have been analyzed and springbank is the best option to protect the elbow and downtown. Do not delay

7 November, 2016

Anthony says:

The govt's figures for land acquisition at Springbank are way too low. What is really going on here? And the proposed dam is ENORMOUS.

7 November, 2016

Coexistance says:

Off Stream storage would be empty most often. Could off stream reservoir land continue to be used for grazing in non flood season? SR1 go!

7 November, 2016

Margaret says:

Buying 6800 acres of farmland makes no sense. It would cost us tax-payers billions and not be effective. Build berms and barriers.

7 November, 2016

PTSD says:

It is ridiculous that a handful of people upstream of Calgary continues to put the entire city at risk. Build Springbank soon!

7 November, 2016

Sandra says:

People seem to think that a dam at Springbank will protect ALL Calgary. It won't. It will only protect along the Elbow River,

7 November, 2016

Grass and Cattle says:

Temporary flooding of grasslands could work for livestock and grassland. Mclean Creek would require massive clear cutting of trees.

7 November, 2016

dc says:

Why is this a popularity contest? We need upstream mitigation measures now. Two successive government have chosen SR1. Get on with it!!!

7 November, 2016

Luellaj says:

This option provides no protection for any community upstream of Springbank. Use McLean Creek.

7 November, 2016

Action Required says:

Options have been closely analyzed. SR1 has the best CB ratio and the least environmental impact. Time for action. SR1 Please!

7 November, 2016

Practical Catchment2 says:

80% of the excess runoff is generated in the mountains before it ever gets to Bragg Creek. SRI being downstream of Mclean does not help.

7 November, 2016

Practical Catchment says:

SR1 is closer to Calgary and will catch more upstream runoff than McLean Creek ever could. SR1's proximity to Calgary makes more sense.

7 November, 2016

Marc says:

Such a bad plan. Springbank resevoir makes no sense - cost or practical considerations. Protect upstream communities! Use MacLean Creek!

7 November, 2016

Flood Safety Risk says:

One death from flooding is too many; it could easily have been much worse. Failure to protect a major City is unacceptable. SR1 ASAP.

7 November, 2016

Fisheries says:

Off Stream storage has less impact on fisheries. Stream flow interruptions are minimum during normal operating stream flow. Yes Sr1!

7 November, 2016

emee says:

We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Please proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.

7 November, 2016

WMR says:

This option makes the most sense considering all perspectives: environmental, community impact and financial. Proceed NOW!

7 November, 2016

JamesYYC says:

SR1 avoids the need for walls 6m to 10m high along the Elbow, RUINING community. Confined by walls, flood water height will be greater!

7 November, 2016

Sustainability says:

Off Stream Storage is more sustainable to manage in the long term. Build SR1 Now

7 November, 2016

Cost of No Action says:

The Environmental Cost of doing nothing is too great. Flooded Calgary businesses pollute our rivers. Build Sr1 now.

7 November, 2016

JamesYYC says:

Safety DICTATES SR1. It is only 10m high and can avoid being used before it is safely finalized - unlike MacLean Creek (50m high).

7 November, 2016

Fran says:

Enough fear mongering. No one in Calgary was harmed by any toxic dust - and we had all of Calgary's sewer in our basements. Yes to SR1

7 November, 2016

JamesYYC says:

Safety is ALL IMPORTANT with dams, particularly high dams (50m) like MacLean Creek. Poor rock and vulnerable during the lengthy construction

7 November, 2016

Long Term Vision says:

The Environmental cost of not building SR1 is too Great. 90,000 tons of incremental waste in Calgary Landfills from 2013 alone. Build SR1!

7 November, 2016

Protect us! says:

8 grizzlies in Springbank? They'll be just fine. The grizzly corridor at McLean Creek however will pose a major problem. Build Springbank!

7 November, 2016

Build the reservoir says:

Do you seriously think the professional environmentalists will let McLean Creek see the light of day? Not likely. Build SR1. Only option.

7 November, 2016

Build it! says:

The dry dam is being engineered as a reservoir that could be used for longer term containment, e.g., if a drought. It's the best option!

7 November, 2016

Enough already says:

Toxic flood mud? Really? Fear mongering is all that is. Your grassland will survive. All our lawns did just fine. Build the dry dam.

7 November, 2016

Stop fear mongering says:

The province will remediate any harm to the Springbank land. No one did that for Calgary and all the grass survived just fine. Build SR1!!

7 November, 2016

build SR1 says:

Very tired of the fear mongering. Flood mud will not kill your pasture. City parks and lawns all recovered without any mitigation.

7 November, 2016

False Info says:

Parks all over the city were covered in flood mud. Guess what? After some rain they all looked good as new. Nothing died. Build SR1!

7 November, 2016

JamesYYC says:

RE SR1, the current EIA is taking FAR too long. Cut time in half and let the NRCB decide if it is adequate. SR1 s/b flood ready Spring 2019.

7 November, 2016

Sara says:

Ranchland is not usable after flooding. Lack of oxygen and light kills grassland. Disease laden dust bowl left. Google dry dam photos.

7 November, 2016

JamesYYC says:

SR1 will put river water on prairie grass a couple of times a century. Zero environmental impact compared to power plants, refineries, etc.

7 November, 2016

James Cran says:

Springbank is absolutely the best item. It is cheap and quick to build and safe during construction while MacLean Creek is dangerous (50m hi

7 November, 2016

Sara says:

SR1 will kill the grassland, contaminate groundwater and blow diseases towards Calgary. Environmental concerns are real. Use McLean Creek.

7 November, 2016

Colleen says:

Upstream reservoirs are a good idea, but why not further upstream than Bragg Creek, why Springbank?

7 November, 2016

Colleen says:

Why are Springbank and communities upstream from Springbank considered acceptable sacrifices? Calgarians need to consider others too.

7 November, 2016

Tom says:

The so called "independent" study done by Deltares was not much more than a book report. Lots of "according to the reports" in it. Dam MC.

7 November, 2016

John says:

We need Upstream Reservoirs for both the Bow and Elbow Rivers. Time to proceed with SR1 and plan for the Bow River ASAP.

7 November, 2016

Khan says:

SR1 has far less impact to the environment as MC is further upstream, affecting countless wildlife habitats. SR1 is the smart choice.

7 November, 2016

BL says:

SR1 has been researched and has been shown to be the best option. It has been over 3 yrs since the flood and time for SR1 to proceed.

7 November, 2016

Calgary-1 says:

Springbank was approved by two separate government bodies, after extensive studies, scientific data was used to come to the right conclusion

7 November, 2016

CM says:

Please explain how can they acquire 6,800 acres of prime ranchland (and riverfront) at a cost of only $40 million? Less than $6K per acre?

7 November, 2016

kc says:

@Basement Water: Why are Urban lives and livelihoods more important than rural ones? The MacLean dam would protect everyone!

7 November, 2016

Mbetzner says:

We absolutely need protective measures for both the Bow River and the Elbow river. Massive property damage occurred along both systems.

7 November, 2016

kc says:

Drought will be a much bigger issue in the coming years than flooding. What good will a dry dam do? Build MC1!

7 November, 2016

LLG says:

Why should some be sacrificed for the good of others when an option to protect everyone exists? Dam MacLean Creek!

7 November, 2016

K says:

@ Martin: SR1 opponents care VERY MUCH about flood mitigation that works for all involved, that's why we are pushing for MacLean Creek.

7 November, 2016

Jeff says:

I support the Bow River reservoir. It's a necessity for flood mitigation in Calgary.

7 November, 2016

rsw says:

Springbank is necessary and benefits ALL Calgarians. We must protect the core and Springbank is the BEST option.

7 November, 2016

LL says:

I support the Springbank project.

7 November, 2016

Evonne says:

DO NOT unnecessarily delay the Springbank mitigation project. The Springbank Project is in the best interests of Calgarians and Albertans.

7 November, 2016

Paul says:

The Springbank dam will protect from the environmental damage of the massive clean up and rebuild. One years worth of landfill usage for ex

7 November, 2016

Paul says:

The cost benefit analysis of losing the downtown core for an extended period (which almost happened last time) needs to be considered.

7 November, 2016

Concerned citizen says:

As an individual who wants flood mitigation and has reviewed all options, I see MANY issues with SR1. MC1 protects more ppl. No to SR1.

7 November, 2016

Basement Water says:

Note to the selfish lot of Springbank land owners; this is about protecting a city & lives NOT some farmland.

7 November, 2016

Paul says:

An independent study, confirmed by the NDP, have identified Springbank as the best upstream solution for the Elbow River

7 November, 2016

Calgary-1 says:

We need protection for the city of Calgary, downtown core, and the 100,000 residents that were last affected by the flood. SR1!!!

7 November, 2016

Terri says:

Only those who live outside Springbank support this dam, not those who actually will be affected by the project. It's an unhealthy choice.

7 November, 2016

#WOEISME says:

Poor Springbank owners, your soooooo right. Let a city of 1M plus be vulnerable so your cattle can graze. Build it!

7 November, 2016

mly says:

MacLean Creek - YES!!!! No to SR! Where does Bragg Creek fit into this scenario?? Why would we want to be exclusive?

7 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

There is simply no way that MacLean Creek, given environmental concerns, would ever be built - so build SR1. Now. Period.

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

97% of letters to CEAA were against SR1. These well researched, carefully drafted letters outlined many environmental concerns. No to SR1.

7 November, 2016

Martin says:

I support SR1 - Don't Dam Springbank don't care about mitigation. Period.

7 November, 2016

Bob says:

I fully support SR1!

7 November, 2016

MelanieS says:

Why not manage dams better? Lower Ghost and Bearspaw every spring? Nice star on map please show actual size of Springbank Drydam. McLean #1.

7 November, 2016

Nenshi says:

MacLean Creek is a better solution. Cheaper, faster, and helps all involved communities.

7 November, 2016

Greg says:

The options have been well studied (i.e., SR1, MacLean Creek Dam and the Glenmore Tunnel) - the conclusion is that SR1 is best.

7 November, 2016

ProtectYYC says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

7 November, 2016

Save YYC says:

Premier Prentice picked the SR1 as the best option after a full review. Don't kid yourself - Mclean Creek will never be built.

7 November, 2016

PProtectYYC says:

The Springbank reservoir is a NO-BRAINER! Sorry Springbank residents, the very few of you affected cannot deny a city of 1.1M protection.

7 November, 2016

LaurieEH says:

SR1 will contaminate Calgary water & ruin agricultural lands & wildlife habitat for YEARS! Dam McLean Creek & protect EVERYONE upstream!

7 November, 2016

Donna Robinson says:

Residents of Springbank should not be flooded out to save those in the City of Calgary. Use Maclean Creek option to protect everyone.

7 November, 2016

Clay Robinson says:

Maclean Creek protects everyone on the Elbow River including Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows. Springbank protects only the City of Calgary

7 November, 2016

Calgary now says:

I strongly support the Springbank project. The landowners will be treated fairly and receive far better compensation than any flood victims

7 November, 2016

Aileen for YYC says:

Stop flood water from entering the City - starting with the Springbank project. It's the only hope for protecting our future as a City.

7 November, 2016

Modernize YYC says:

We are a modern City and we need modern protection! Build the springbank off-stream reservoir and figure out how to fix the Bow.

7 November, 2016

Karen W says:

Duff's Ditch had opponents too - but is now viewed as a huge success! Get on with it Alberta - build the Springbank project!

7 November, 2016

Yes to protection! says:

Yes to Springbank! We can't leave the downtown vulnerable. Both rivers flood the Core - start now!

7 November, 2016

Build now! says:

Springbank land is grazing land and can continue to be used for that the majority of the time. Build the dry dam and protect the City!

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

8 Grizzle bears settled and are living in the proposed Dam area, not to mention countless other animals. Don't destroy their habitats.

7 November, 2016

SR1 says:

Inconvenient Truth: Yes - SR1 protects the Core which is flooded by BOTH RIVERS! Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

Calgary needs protection - just like every other major city in the world. Start with Springbank - build the dry dam ASAP!

7 November, 2016

Harold says:

Good job province for acting swiftly post-flood to find solutions. Build SR1 now and find solutions on the Bow. Protect Calgary!

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

These are heritage ranches that have had generations ranching and farming on them. But why would Albertans care about that?

7 November, 2016

Merran says:

Build Springbank dry dam now! And find a solution on the Bow. The province is doing a great job- keep it up!

7 November, 2016

SR1 Now says:

The province acted swiftly post-2013 flood to find solutions for flooding. SR1 is the first project that needs building. Fix the Bow too!

7 November, 2016

Val in Calgary says:

I strongly support protecting Calgary and the first project we need to get done is the Springbank dry dam.

7 November, 2016

Harold says:

Yes, protect downtown. Springbank does NOT protect downtown. Other options need review. No to SR1, it is misguided.

7 November, 2016

Meg says:

Yes to the Springbank Dry Dam! It's doable. It's needed. It must be done!

7 November, 2016

Calgary says:

Save Canada's economic engine and start with the Springbank Off-stream Reservoir!

7 November, 2016

AB says:

This Concept - flood infrastructure on both rivers - is absolutely the way to go. Build Springbank now and fix the Bow too!

7 November, 2016

SaveCalgary says:

Tearing down homes and skyscrapers in Calgary is not a viable solution. Springbank project is. Build it ASAP and fix the Bow too!

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

The Springbank Dam will be a health hazard to anyone who lives down wind or down stream, they have no plans to clean it up after flooding it

7 November, 2016

Urgent!! says:

The Elbow and Bow Rivers both flood downtown. Start with SR1 for the Elbow and find solutions for the Bow. It's urgent!

7 November, 2016

Harold says:

The BOW River caused the majority of the City's grief. WHY is a fix on the Elbow being pushed? SR1 is bad public policy and irresponsible.

7 November, 2016

Still Vulnerable says:

Yes to Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir! It's about time. Look at Duff's Ditch? A 70 year dry spell has left us complacent. Wait no longer

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

There are other options that don't destroy one community to save another, choose McLean Creek.

7 November, 2016

Protect us! says:

The majority may not be as loud as the minority - but make no mistake, this City wants the Springbank project built ASAP!

7 November, 2016

Paul YYC says:

SAVE THE CORE or whoever you are, stop spamming under different names. It only shows desperation.

7 November, 2016

Save the city says:

Calgary was built on the confluence of two rivers. Both need fixing. Start with Springbank dry dam and find a solution for the Bow!

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

The Springbank reservoir is bad public policy, a health hazard after it being flooded and is a huge environmental impact to animals homes

7 November, 2016

LM says:

It's ludicrous that no action has yet been taken, almost 4 years after the flood. Build Springbank! It is objectively the best choice.

7 November, 2016

Calgary! says:

Springbank is the best solution for Calgary. Do not delay. Prioritize this important public works project! Work with the province!

7 November, 2016

Say no says:

Why is it okay to flood out one community to save another when they live on a flood plain. Why punish one community to save another.

7 November, 2016

Save our City says:

I strongly support the Springbank project. It protects thousands of homes and businesses and is needed to protect the Core.

7 November, 2016

Harold says:

McLean Dam and Tri-River Joint Reservoir were not thoroughly reviewed as options. Springbank Dry Dam is irresponsible water management.

7 November, 2016

Save the Core says:

Yes to Springbank Off-stream Reservoir. Protect the downtown by fixing both rivers ASAP!

7 November, 2016

Build Springbank! says:

City water engineers have repeatedly said the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown - which cannot be protected without fixing both rivers.

7 November, 2016

Protect Downtown says:

Both rivers flood the Core - the centre of our City and basis of our province's economy. Build Springbank and find a fix for the Bow!

7 November, 2016

No more flooding! says:

Like all mitigation measures, the Springbank dam will negatively affect some, but will benefit a much larger community and economic centre.

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

Inconvenient Truth 4: SR1 will create ideal conditions for the breeding of Mosquitos. Zika mosquitos have made it to Canada. Calgary next?

7 November, 2016

Protect the Core says:

Calgary needs the Springbank dam and a fix on the Bow. Both are needed to protect the downtown Core, City Hall, the East Village, etc.

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

Inconvenient Truth3: Agricultural lands can be used after flooding. 90 days without oxygen or light will kill all vegetation and crops.

7 November, 2016

LMack says:

The Springbank project has already been objectively proven to be the best to protect downtown Calgary & communities. I support it.

7 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

Build SR1. There is strong support in Calgary. Along with empathy for the Springbank landowners - but they will be treated fairly.

7 November, 2016

Save Downtown says:

The Core floods from both rivers. We can't save the core without upstream mitigation on both. Start with Springbank and find a fix for Bow!

7 November, 2016

Save the Core says:

The City of Calgary knows that the Elbow contributes to flooding the downtown. Fix both rivers - starting with the Springbank project.

7 November, 2016

Fix the Elbow! says:

Calgary wants SR1. Yes - the Elbow contributes to flooding downtown. Both rivers need fixing. Let's get on with fixing the Elbow ASAP.

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

Inconvenient Truth 2: Stantec Project Report 5.3.5. Residue from SR1 may contain raw sewage susceptible to blow into Calgary on west winds.

7 November, 2016

Average citizen says:

Springbank background suggests that governments are listening to private wealthy people Vs looking at wise spending of provincial tax dollar

7 November, 2016

Save Calgary! says:

There is strong support in Calgary for the Springbank reservoir - especially amongst those well informed. It's our only option. Build it!

7 November, 2016

Save the City says:

Calgary needs the Springbank dry dam. Using private land for public works is an old concept. Happens all the time for the greater good.

7 November, 2016

LW says:

Springbank Reservoir is presented as a " quick Fix" Do we want quick fix or spend our tax dollars cost effectively. good for all

7 November, 2016

Harold says:

SR1 opposers are not against prudent flood mitigation. City Land Use needs review. City needs a plan, not on the backs of others!

7 November, 2016

save calgary says:

Yes to the Springbank dry dam. It makes sense. Keep the flood water out of the City. The land will be useable for grazing when no flood.

7 November, 2016

LW says:

Springbank Reservoir .. most overall costly project . Combined costs for it, Bragg Creek, Redwood meadows, and First nations besides losses

7 November, 2016

Yes to mitigation says:

Build Springbank! The government is being pragmatic. McLean Creek would never get built. Too many contingencies. Expropriation is normal.

7 November, 2016

Jim says:

Inconvenient Truth 1: Stantec Project Report 5.3.4. SR1 may contaminate groundwater and wells. Springbank relies on clean water wells.

7 November, 2016

Baymare says:

The Springbank Reservoir- is bad public policy. Does not protect Bragg Creek, Redwood or Tsuu Tina. It takes homes, heritage and businesses.

7 November, 2016

Stop Floods! says:

Yes to Springbank! McLean Creek has too many contingencies and will never get built. Where does that leave Calgary? Protect YYC!

7 November, 2016

Stop Floods! says:

The less vocal majority wants SR1. Anyone informed on flood mitigation understands why it's the best solution. Fix the river!

7 November, 2016

YesSR1 says:

I strongly support building the Springbank project and finding a solution for the Bow. Please do not delay! Their is strong support!

7 November, 2016

Fix YYC says:

Calgary is vulnerable to floods. Why?? It's embarrassing. Please build SR1 ASAP and find a solution on the Bow.

7 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

Yes to Springbank Dry Dam. The City needs protection. And find a solution for the Bow too.

7 November, 2016

City wants SR1 says:

Build SR1. Calgary needs it and everyone wants it! Strong support in the City for those informed on flood mitigation.

7 November, 2016

Prioritize fixes! says:

We need the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir and a fix for the Bow. Please make this a priority for the City!

7 November, 2016

Yes to dry dam says:

Springbank landowners will be fairly compensated and many will be able to retain the grazing use of their land. Please build SR1!

7 November, 2016

Build the dam says:

Studies have shown SR1 to be the best contender. Please build it ASAP - this City cannot handle another devastating flood.

7 November, 2016

BP says:

Upstream Reservoirs are a good solution to protect Calgary's communities & economic core. Proceed with Springbank & a Bow River Reservoir.

7 November, 2016

Yes to the dry dam says:

There is strong support for SR1 - in spite of a vocal minority. Expropriation is an oft-used tool for public works. Build SR1.

7 November, 2016

Urgent Fix Needed says:

Please build SR1 right away. 2020 is the best timeline. It's so far off! Every year the City is at risk.

7 November, 2016

Upstream Mitigation says:

We need upstream protection on both rivers. Find a solution for the Bow and build SR1 ASAP. The vocal minority will be fairly compensated.

7 November, 2016

Ross C says:

As an Alberta taxpayer and YYC resident and business owner, SR1 is wrong. A dam at McLean is the responsible thing to do.

7 November, 2016

Fix Calgary says:

Build SR1 for the Elbow and find a solution for the Bow ASAP. This City needs protection. ASAP!

7 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

It's embarrassing this City has no flood protection - it's had more than dozen major floods in the past 120 years. Get SR1 done!

7 November, 2016

Yes to Springbank says:

It's unfortunate that expropriation may be required - but it's quite common for public works. Build Springbank ASAP!

7 November, 2016

calgary citizen says:

We Must protect the city, a few will be inconvenienced, but properly compensated. the land in question is not historically significant.

7 November, 2016

Build SR1 says:

Springbank is essential. The city remains vulnerable and this is the best identified option. Bragg Creek protection is already underway.

7 November, 2016

Yes to SR1 says:

Build Springbank as soon as possible. The city cannot afford another devastating flood. And find an upstream solution for the Bow River!

7 November, 2016

kc says:

Rehab what's left of Maclean Creek (now a giant gravel pit full of atvs) into a dam/rec area/ natural habitat. Protection on crown land.

7 November, 2016

cdorr says:

I strongly support the Springbank Reservoir. Please move to protect our inner city communities and downtown. It's time.

7 November, 2016

KC says:

No to SR1! It destroys yet another community and protects only a fraction of the people Maclean Creek would!

7 November, 2016

Hal Couillard says:

Carving up valuable and historic agricultural land is insane as an alternative. Maclean Creek is already owned by the crown. Go there.

7 November, 2016

JN says:

The economics here are a lie! Land values are incorrect and no costs for expropriations. The Cost benefit makes no sense. A fail. A lie.

7 November, 2016

Adrian Nagy says:

I do no t agree with the proposed plan, I believe that their are alternatives that are probably better and less intrusive to the parties

7 November, 2016

K says:

Damming McLean Creek will protect more people and doesn't destroy another community. And is already government owned land

7 November, 2016

Anne says:

Environmentalists and First Nations against this plan. Build berms and use McLean.

7 November, 2016

Lucy says:

This option does not protect downtown or anywhere along the Bow. It is a strange and unproductive idea. What is really in the govt's mind?

7 November, 2016

Lesley says:

No Springbank Dam! Environmentally dangerous and unpopular with Calgarians. Use crown land at McLean Creek

7 November, 2016

DL says:

This is the best plan. It is so important we make this happen. The benefits are significant.

6 November, 2016

Keep Your Promise says:

NO to SR1. McLean Cr protects more people and doesn't destroy another community. Bow caused most damage to Calgary.SR1is bad public policy.

6 November, 2016

Ryan says:

More research needs to be conducted for the McLean Creek dam. It's crown land, and will provide a recreational area in the future. NO to SR1

6 November, 2016

Shawn says:

This is the best plan. Let's go ahead and get the Springbank and Bow reservoirs done!

6 November, 2016

SG says:

What happened to #AlbertaStrong? Stop looking to destroy the ranching community in Springbank and consider the other options. Maclean Creek.

6 November, 2016

sg says:

I support the springbank reservoir project. This must be completed soon to protect the economically vital portions of the city.

6 November, 2016

Concerned says:

Both Springbank and additional dams on the Bow River are needed to avoid another national catastrophe which will cost billions.

6 November, 2016

Concerned says:

Downtown Calgary and all the communities along the Elbow and Bow rivers must be protected from future floods. Concept 1 is the best option.

6 November, 2016

Jamie says:

SR1 is not cost effective, and proposed costs have not been realistic up to this point.

6 November, 2016

Jamie says:

Why should one community should be protected at the cost of several others?? Dam McLean, Say NO to SR1.

6 November, 2016

Mark says:

People against SR1 want Calgary protected. They just don't want Springbank destroyed as well. McLean Creek is the best option.

6 November, 2016

Marlene says:

Springbank wants flood mitigation to benefit all. Build MC1 and everyone wins.

6 November, 2016

Larry says:

Springbank Dam will destroy 6,800 acres of ecologically significant private land. McLean Creek land is free and will protect far more people

6 November, 2016

CW says:

Flood mitigation should never involve flooding one community to protect another. SR1 is poor public policy.

6 November, 2016

Marlene says:

SR1 does not provide any benefit other than in the event of a flood- build McLean for drought and flood protection.

6 November, 2016

SR1 is wrong says:

If I had been a victim of the 2013 flood the last thing I'd want is to fling injurious affection onto anyone else for my future well being.

6 November, 2016

DM says:

"YES" to the McLean Creek Dam "No" to the Springbank Dam.

6 November, 2016

SW says:

Completely against Damning Springbank. A complete eye sore

6 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 5 - SR will prevent $billions of damage. $750 million according to report on gov.ab. SR will cost more than that. Dam McLean Cr

6 November, 2016

Deborah Ward says:

This is devastating to a longstanding rural community with founding forefathers still in this area. more common sense approach needed

6 November, 2016

PG says:

Given the risks to downtown Calgary and affected communities, and the ~ $6 billion cost of previous flood damage, SR-1 is a must!

6 November, 2016

HM says:

SR1 studies only go so far. Who knows where the ranching sediment will end up? Likely in Calgary drinking water and filling up Glenmore dam.

6 November, 2016

Larry Fichtner says:

The Springbank project and the raising plates on the dam are a big and vital start to full flood mitigation. Downtown Calgary is at risk.

6 November, 2016

Larry Fichtner says:

I am a very strong proponent of upstream flood mitigation and I believe that the two projects that are in process are absolutely mandatory.

6 November, 2016

HEM says:

Map needs to show the entire 6300 acres that flood will effect for SR1. Private land grab. MC1 would be on crown land saving all communities

6 November, 2016

MK says:

The City of Calgary needs to align with the Province's efforts in support of Springbank off stream reservoir

6 November, 2016

Tom says:

How can diverting water kilometres off stream to stagnate possibly be more natural than holding it within the river valley? Dam McLean Cr.

6 November, 2016

LAR says:

McLean proposal offers better protection for more folks & use of Crown lands would be fair for all at risk, urban and rural Albertans alike.

6 November, 2016

No more floods says:

I'm in favor of the Springbank Reservoir. This project is taking way too long. Let's get on with it. Save the inner city.

6 November, 2016

D says:

Springbank off stream reservoir is the superior solution and should proceed first.

6 November, 2016

C.R. says:

No to Springbank, Yes to MacLean.

6 November, 2016

Protect downtown yyc says:

More than 3 years post flood and all we have to show is fingers crossed that there is no new flood. Time to act!!!

6 November, 2016

hoffthehammer says:

It is essential that we undertake the construction of the Springbank upstream reservoir to protect the city.

6 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 3 (again) SR opponents are against flood mitigation. Fact - We have consistently advocated for McLean Cr to protect more Albertans

6 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

SR1 SUPPORTER u r proving why you guys dig a deeper hole for ur selves with every statement.

6 November, 2016

Mark says:

McLean protects more people and communities without destroying valuable farm and ranch land. SR1 is a mistake that should not be built.

6 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

Poor SR1 SUPPORTER. Take people's homes and biz and community cause of ur wet drywall. Typical attitude from these FOLKS. Drywall B4 PEOPLE?

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

Here's an idea. Let's have the Prov offer the buy-out to every impacted homeowner in the City at the 2012 tax assessment. Any guess on cost?

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

One wonders if the SR1 opponents spent any time at all seeing first hand the devastation in Calgary. How much drywall did they pull down??

6 November, 2016

YYC FLOOD RESIDENT says:

SR1 SUPPORTER you fighting a losing battle. Get behind McLean and lets get mitigation.

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

The facts and science support SR1. Look at the studies done. They all support SR1 over the other options. It can get built.

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

Isn't this the "false equivalencies" like Trump/Clinton? And the mis-information in these anti-SR1 comments? Stunning.

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

22 ranch land owners and, what, 1 residence? vs 80000 evacuees, thousands of buildings, hundreds of families, and $billions. Really?

6 November, 2016

RFLOG1 says:

The cost of SR1 will continue to mushroom. I strongly support the McLean Creek option as was promised as part of the NDP election platform.

6 November, 2016

P C says:

To support Springbank is to support ignorance over reason. Protect more than a few, sacrifice no one. DONT DAM SPRINGBANK!

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

...and Bragg Creek and upstream areas are now building $33m worth of 1/100 protection

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

Make no mistake. The SR1 opposition in Springbank fundamentally don't care about ANY infrastructure on the Elbow.

6 November, 2016

SR1 Supporter says:

McLean Creek will never get built if SR1 dies. You wanna see opposition? Just wait for that.

6 November, 2016

SHL says:

Let's get this flood mitigation in place ASAP. Springbank is the obvious choice

6 November, 2016

Mightbeuseful says:

Use the Springbank land folks, it's only needed should a flood event ever happen again. Remember the tax base is generated downstream.

6 November, 2016

David Chalack says:

Control the Bow by another dam upstream--this is the most important/impactful/economic initiative to protect our city and my lot in Bowness

6 November, 2016

Elbow Valley says:

Our mother's home in Elbow Park was hit hard. BUT. We strongly oppose SR 1 and support McLean. Use Crown land and protect more areas.

6 November, 2016

Jumping Pound Guy says:

Home owners below Glenmore Dam have already been given a buyout option. Anyone left now wants a Springbank floodplain. Buyout Elbow Park.

6 November, 2016

Z24GIRL says:

Would those individuals pro SR1 be willing to give up their homes, businesses and heritage for minimal compensation? Not likely!

6 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

We need flood mitigation. But let's ALL get behind McLean as it protects the most people. As a cohesive group we would get it done!!

6 November, 2016

Marlene says:

Springbank is a valuable cultural and agricultural site. It is productive farm and ranch land - It would be a mistake to destroy it.

6 November, 2016

Dave says:

You already own the land at McLean, so use it to protect many. Don't wreck Springbank to protect a few.

6 November, 2016

Helen says:

This would be quite wrong. McLean Creek is the right answer. Downtown needs the protection.

6 November, 2016

Colin says:

The proposed figures for land purchase at Springbank are far too low for an area almost the size of Airdrie. This sounds like theft to me.

6 November, 2016

Tom says:

McLean protects Calgary, Bragg Creek, Redwood and is on Crown land. Gov't experts say enviro concerns can be mitigated. Build McLean!

6 November, 2016

Colin says:

Use McLean Creek! Already have land. Why buy more at vast expense? And why is it not better to protect downtown from the Bow?

6 November, 2016

Denise says:

This is best option. Please protect thousands of residents and businesses. And a life was lost, let's not forget what it really protects.

6 November, 2016

deejay says:

Instead of flood mitigation the focus needs to be on water management. Drought is an ominous concern also. SR1 doesn't cut it.

6 November, 2016

ranchman 1 says:

GOA said no to MacLean because grizzlies are protected. Grizzlies are now in Springbank - eating our profit and the City's food. Now what?

6 November, 2016

Marlene says:

Springbank will not protect enough people to be a feasible option; it is being pushed through at the expense of one community over another.

6 November, 2016

Jim says:

Berms work for all except wealthy communities along Elbow. They like mitigation that costs taxpayers 10 times and does harm to others.

6 November, 2016

Debra says:

No to Concept 1 Maclean Creek is the obvious solution for the majority.

6 November, 2016

Trapper says:

All Ab will pay 4 a few. Purchasing the land is the biggest cost Ab already owns McClean creek it's a natural site reality is dead NDP - RIP

6 November, 2016

Trapper says:

highest unemployment to date thousands of forclosures the city and province want to build a dam a cancer hospital a golf coarse and ringroad

6 November, 2016

Jessica says:

Destroying one community to protect a FEW is disgraceful. MacLean Creek protects more communities and is already crown land.

6 November, 2016

Harold says:

Bonavista resident/Nov5 Is that really true bureaucrats refused to examine Tri-River Joint Reservoir?? Springbank DRY dam is a boondoggle!!

6 November, 2016

Dr R B Church says:

The real problem is that Springbank slough will be a up wind site for new Aedes mosquitoes species/ Zika outbreak as a health hazard.

6 November, 2016

Justin says:

Wjat about the people of Bragg Creek? They are still not included with this? McLean Creek is the obvious choice.

6 November, 2016

MW says:

NO SR1! Silt and debris left behind would shower anyone downwind with particles containing dead animals and sewage. Not healthy!

6 November, 2016

Murray says:

Time is of the essence. Calgary needs protection. No option is perfect, without environmental & social issues. Concept 1 has best balance.

6 November, 2016

Tom Mullane says:

Upstream flood mitigation protects core areas of the city. I support dams for water storage and flood protection.

5 November, 2016

Sam says:

Benefit to *all* those downstream Even if it costs more now, need to do the right thing for long term health of ALL communities (2/2

5 November, 2016

Sam says:

Downriver needs to be protected but so do the heritage, agricultural, Indigenous, and other areas upriver. SR1 destroys those w/o true (1/2)

5 November, 2016

Sam says:

Why is the first question about the way the community looks/feels/moves? This should first and foremostmost be about protecting Albertans

5 November, 2016

Sam says:

Flooding one community to *potentially* save another & not save all the communities that might be affected is a bad idea & bad public policy

5 November, 2016

Bonavista resident. says:

GOA only puts forward two options despite promising to examine all. Tri-River Joint Reservoir was turned down by bureaucrats, not experts.

5 November, 2016

Dave says:

Only Tri-River Joint Reservoir would protect from spring floods plus conserve water. Best for Albertans. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca.

5 November, 2016

C. Michael Fellows says:

How will ranchers be compensated for deprivation of grazing and home loss during water storage at Springbank?

5 November, 2016

C. Michael Fellows says:

Calgary needs more water storage for growth in the city and recreation. MacLean Creek provides both. Springbank can't.

5 November, 2016

Jumping Pound Guy says:

Anyone who supports Springbank Dam is either politically motivated - misinformed or has self interests to protect- Better options upstream

5 November, 2016

C. Michael Fellows says:

I several open houses on Springbank dry reservoir. I have never received an credible explanation why MacLean Creek isn't a better option.

5 November, 2016

Sara says:

Zika virus was found in Canada. Climate Change warms Canada. SR1 leaves behind countless pools of stagnant water. Zika mosquitos breed.

5 November, 2016

Linda says:

The springbank reservoir is a great idea. I support it fully. We must protect the city and those who live and work along the Elbow river.

5 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

No SR1! Silt and debris left behind will shower pathogens over people downwind of the site. Not healthy!

5 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

GoA claim after SR1 flooding it's back to business as usual on the land. Fluvial clastic sediment and denudation will NOT support that!

5 November, 2016

Tom says:

The 2013 flood was a 1 in 200/250 year event. Why has the gov.ab and city not disclosed this fact? Let's take the time to get this right.

5 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

IBI reported 2/3 of damages to Calgary were from the Bow. Focus on the Bow and berm Elbow River. GoA are paying for berms in Bragg Creek!

5 November, 2016

Brenda L. says:

This is not Albertans pulling together. How is this okay to sacrifice one community to serve so few at enormous cost to Albertans? NO to SR1

5 November, 2016

MW says:

NO SR1! Silt and debris left behind will shower pathogens over anyone living downwind of the site. NOT HEALTHY!!

5 November, 2016

Emma says:

The pro-SR1 arguments come across to me as futile and impatient. Now tell me, why not Maclean Creek?

5 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 8 - Bragg Creek and Redwood will be protected by berms. Then why did the gov.ab tell Calgary River Group that berms inevitably fail?

5 November, 2016

Grant Gunderson says:

It amazes me that 20 families with political connections can hugely increase the risk borne by hundreds of thousands of downstream residents

5 November, 2016

yycNorth says:

No to SR1. Terrible cost/benefit balance. GoA needs to come clean on this! Go McLean. An area to protect all with potential for recreation.

5 November, 2016

Grant Smith says:

McLean Creek would provide protection for Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Native lands including Redwood Golf Course. More cost effective

5 November, 2016

Ellis F says:

The proposed site for the Springbank dam is full of wildlife. This area, so close to Calgary, is a treasure which needs to be preserved.

5 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 7- opposition to Springbank dam is only 20 landowners. This is insulting to the thousands of Albertans who support a dam at McLean Cr.

5 November, 2016

James Pasieka says:

We absolutely need the Springbank Off Stream reservoir. It's been through enough technical and political analysis. Get the EIA done ASAP.

5 November, 2016

Diane says:

Build the Springbank dry dam. It's cost effective and can be completed quickly. It's been 3 years since the flood. let's get this done.

5 November, 2016

Dave says:

McLean Creek is obviously the best choice. All parties are protected while being the most cost effective! McLean Creek protects more!

5 November, 2016

Land owner rights! says:

McLean Creek option will protect more folks/areas, cost less & save heritage, food-producing lands. Springbank idea is the wrong one!

5 November, 2016

Build The Reservoir says:

I support building the Springbank Reservoir. This project is taking way too long. Time to get on with it. too many delays.

5 November, 2016

McLean Creek instead says:

Bad plan. Springbank dam won't protect Bragg Creek (of whom many work in Calgary) like the McLean creek solution will. Do NOT support this!

5 November, 2016

Don't Flood Calgary says:

I support SR1. The City of Calgary and my family were hit hard by the 2013 flood and I donty want to ever see that happen again.

5 November, 2016

Trapper says:

2 flood in more than 200 years is this cost necessary. Do u want to pay 4it should Springbank pay, how bout the province McClean Creek

5 November, 2016

Don Newton says:

The Springbank dry dam is obviously the best choice.

5 November, 2016

Peter McMurray says:

Let's get moving forward with the Springbank dam!!

5 November, 2016

Sally Littlechild says:

Build the Springbank dry dam. Expropriation of the land may be required.

5 November, 2016

Judy says:

Why the delay with the most cost effective solution. We need to protect Calgary, High River etc. Get this done !

5 November, 2016

Judy says:

The city of Calgary, High River and other outlying areas can not afford another flood, build Springbank, the most cost effective solution.

5 November, 2016

Kel says:

We need the Springbank dry dam.

5 November, 2016

Chris says:

I support the building of the Springbank dam.

5 November, 2016

Martin says:

Build the Springbank dry dam!!

5 November, 2016

Alice says:

What happens to Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek when the canal system entering the dam plugs with debris? logs rocks etc like Cougar Creek?

5 November, 2016

Alice says:

This is taking the livelihood of some of the best agriculture land in Canada out of production for the few houses built on a flood plain

5 November, 2016

Trapper says:

Yes to McClean Creek. Protect Bragg Creek , Redwood Meadows and everything downstream Why should everyone payfor building in flood plain

5 November, 2016

Trapper says:

No to Springbank, No to the NDP who changed there original choice,,Yes to protecting heritage families and agricultural life.

5 November, 2016

Brian says:

McLean Creek offers less protection, has higher environmental impact and will take longer & cost more to approve & complete than Springbank.

5 November, 2016

Brian says:

Springbank is strongly supported by thousands of downstream residents vs. approx 20 individual landowners & others without a direct stake.

5 November, 2016

Miss Patt says:

NO to Springbank!! Our Government needs to protect as many ALBERTANS (not just Calgarians) as possible by using McLean Creek.

5 November, 2016

CW says:

Why should all Albertans pay for those who continue to build/live in flood plains? Take responsibility for your own life choices.

5 November, 2016

Ellis F says:

A Springbank dam does nothing for Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows or TsuuT'ina Nation. McLean Creek on gov't-owned land is a much better choice

5 November, 2016

Mrs. Walker says:

Wake up guys! McLean Creek is the only option best for all parties. Support an option that doesn't help one group while injuring others.

5 November, 2016

Terrill Shoults says:

What about protecting Bragg Creek, Red Wood Meadows by the suggested Central reservoir at the vicinity of the Sheep River. Extent of type???

5 November, 2016

Les says:

Ridiculous waste of tax-payer money. Little protection. It would make much more sense to protect downtown from the Bow.

5 November, 2016

Richard says:

Berms and Barriers can eliminate the devastating effects of flooding along the Elbow River in most scenarios. Consider them.

5 November, 2016

Richard says:

A berm at the same elevation as the bike path in Erlton to tow onto the Talisman Center hill would have prevented flooding our homes in 2005

5 November, 2016

Richard says:

Springbank Reservoir. I appeal to the landowners of Springbank to do what they can to help mitigate the impact of flood disasters on Calgary

5 November, 2016

Richard says:

The springbank Reservoir is the lowest cost / highest benefit project when it comes to protecting the city of Calgary's neighbourhoods

5 November, 2016

Richard says:

The Springbank Reservoir is needed infrastructure for the province.

5 November, 2016

Mac says:

Springbank is not the place! Far too expensive for very little gain. Farmers' live and livelihoods would be devastated.

5 November, 2016

Munlaw2 says:

It is unfortunate that there is a negative impact by SR1 to 16 upstream landowners, but it seems to be the single best cost effective sol'n.

5 November, 2016

Norm F says:

McLean Creek better and doesn't penalize Springbank and other areas for the City allowing people to build on flood plain.

5 November, 2016

Heth says:

Cost ludicrously high. Does nothing for downtown Calgary and businesses there. Devastates wonderful ranch land and ranchers' lives.

5 November, 2016

John says:

I believe Springbank is the most feasible economically and in terms of early impact. We need to get it down, but fairly compensate.

5 November, 2016

Duke says:

Build it at McLean creek. We should not penalize people in Springbank at the expense of Calgarians (and I'm a Calgarian saying this).

5 November, 2016

Carol says:

It is time to make decisions and get flood mitigation and protection moving forward to protect our city from the Bow and Elbow Rivers.

5 November, 2016

Karl L. says:

Do not sacrafice one area to protect another! There are better options that protects all. Homes do not have to be destroyed in the process.

5 November, 2016

PaulineH says:

Please stop and think about what SR1 will do to your upstream neighbours. Do your own independent research. There are other options!

5 November, 2016

Kerrie says:

Think back to 2013. Reflect on the effects of global climate change. The downsides of the Springbank proposal pale in comparison.

5 November, 2016

Susan Rees says:

I support upstream reservoirs. Downtown must be protected from future flooding.

5 November, 2016

Shelly says:

Providing flood prevention in YYC means you will flood some place else to compensate. One place sacrificed for another. McLean Creek <people

5 November, 2016

SG says:

It is sad to have communities fighting against each other. Equally sad is that we are talking about destroying one of these communities.

5 November, 2016

SamanthaK says:

The Springbank Reservoir is the best option to protect Calgary's economic core and vital urban communities against another flood.

5 November, 2016

CW says:

All Albertans will pay. Any project of this size and expense should be put to an ALBERTA-WIDE REFERENDUM.

5 November, 2016

Forseth Elizabeth says:

I strongly support the Springbank Offstream Reservoir idea as the best solution for flood future mitigation for Calgary.

5 November, 2016

WendyD says:

The Springbank Reservoir is the best option for protecting all property downstream of the Glenmore Dam (from overland flow & groundwater).

5 November, 2016

Jim says:

All "concepts" have some downsides. Dithering is a greater downside. We cannot afford to lose downtown Calgary again, so let's get this done

5 November, 2016

Chris says:

I am against this concept as the city/ province could use public land farther up stream for this mitigation project. Mclean Creek is better.

5 November, 2016

zenapw says:

DON'T DO THE SBR! I know many ppl that live in the proposed SB floodplain; 1family has a 100yr working ranch. This will destroy their lives.

5 November, 2016

Rose says:

McLean Creek is the better choice. It perfects more communities, and would provide a nice recreational area.

4 November, 2016

Flood Zone Owner says:

Start campaigning for McLean people!!! It will be built sooner with less resistance.

4 November, 2016

mamak says:

McLean Creek is the obvious choice if you look at the facts, more people need to read the real facts, do your research people.

4 November, 2016

Anthony says:

There is a thousand residents in Redwood Meadows alone that all predominantly work in Calgary and support its economy. Protect us too

4 November, 2016

Dave A says:

Unanimous consensus will never happen. Implement the professional's recommendations, build SR1, and save our city. Enough already...

4 November, 2016

Sue G says:

McLean Creek!

4 November, 2016

Sue G says:

Springbank is one of the most picturesque beautiful areas. If you do this, you will trash one of Alberta's jewels. Shame on you!

4 November, 2016

Sue G says:

Do not steal from the original settlers to give to those without the forethought to build away from flood plains or move after repeat floods

4 November, 2016

DM says:

The McLean project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect "the most" neighbourhoods and Calgary. I support it 100%.

4 November, 2016

Sue G says:

DamNing Springbank destroys our heritage, the original settlers who had the good sense to know where to build so as not to flood.

4 November, 2016

DL says:

We are completely in favour of the Springbank Off Stream Reservoir. Please stop studying... and start building.

4 November, 2016

Sue G says:

Poor choice! Too expensive. Sacrifices Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and the Tsuu Tina Nation. Destroys our heritage.

4 November, 2016

Dan Wise says:

Dam Mclean Creek I can.t bieleve that any calgarian would support dam spring bank when the other would save redwood meadows and bragg creek

4 November, 2016

Robert says:

We need to prevent another flood of the city. To do nothing is not exceptable.

4 November, 2016

Lorne W says:

Springbank Cost/Benefit does not justify building. Not to mention on going costs which also were not included.

4 November, 2016

KCpatrol says:

What will be done with all the silt that fills up the Springbank reservoir and creates a potential dust bowl

4 November, 2016

PC says:

Alberta's struggling: Schools and healthcare need help. Unemployment rising. Nenshi says 1in 10 live in poverty in YYC . NO WAY to SR1

4 November, 2016

MS says:

If you oppose SR1, do you really think McLean Creek would go ahead without environmental protests? What else are you suggesting could work?

4 November, 2016

MS says:

We need the province on board. They need to support upstream measures for both Bow and Elbow. The province can't afford another flood.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

All options other than berms lie outside the City's jurisdiction. Berms would need negotiations with too many homeowners, wouldn't happen.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

Anyone who spend months cleaning and rebuilding a flooded home wants action soon. Doing nothing is not an option. SR1 is the best we have.

4 November, 2016

Greg S says:

Springbank Resevoir is the best option to protect the downtown and downstream residents. Construction should begin as soon as possible.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

SR1 isn't perfect, but it's the most feasible and most likely to actually happen. McLean Creek would have environmental protests for years.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

Calgary's economic core is on the Bow. The Bow has the largest volume and flow rate. Upstream measures are necessary, not optional!

4 November, 2016

kymf says:

Transportation impact to school buses and tractor trailers bypassing city not evaluated in the Springbank Dam assessment.

4 November, 2016

NoSpringbank says:

Too costly, unfair expropriation, not faster, McLean better site and protection alternative for all.

4 November, 2016

kymf says:

Springbank Dam cost will ballon due to dewatering required and sediment/erosion control. No costs included in current estimate for these

4 November, 2016

kymf says:

Contaminated dust blowing from the Springbank Dam to the east would impact agricultural and ranching operations and the City of Calgary

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 6 -Springbank Dam has been well studied. As of a couple of months ago, they didn't even how they would drain the dam thing.

4 November, 2016

kymf says:

Springbank Dam would result in a significant visual impact to tourists travelling on TransCanada Hwy

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

The province has put forward no rational debris and solids management plan for the SR1 reservoir. Eastern slope floods are debris flows.

4 November, 2016

kymf says:

Springbank dam would harm sensitive wildlife species that reside in the area and damage fish habitat.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

The SR1reservoi r will create a debris field, full of fluvial clastic sediments, that will be airborne particulate matter during Chinooks.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

Under sluice gates installed on existing facilities allow for safe passing of the front end of a flood, preserving storage for the back end.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

Under sluice gates installed on existing facilities allow for safe passing of the front end of a flood, preserving storage for the back end.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

Under sluice gates installed on the existing facilities allow for natural sediment flushing and restoration of lost storage capacity.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

Under sluice gates installed on the existing facilities allow for maximizing the existing "Live" reservoir storage volume.

4 November, 2016

EBA says:

Create an ability to manage extreme flows of water into Calgary is critical to our communities reasonable protection.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

Install undersluce gates in Glenmore, Bearspaw, and Ghost. Drain all of these empty during flood season. Safely pass the front of a flood.

4 November, 2016

Ghost River says:

The Springbank reservoir is an ill-conceived concept, promoted by self serving interests that have no conception of fluvial dynamic systems.

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 5 - Springbank dam will save billions in damage. Gov.ab reports say $750 million, a little bit less than Springbank will cost.

4 November, 2016

GLS@YYC says:

The provincial and municipal govts need to remove emotion and rhetoric from the decision making and implement the Springbank reservoir proje

4 November, 2016

GLS@YYC says:

Need to proceed with this well studied mitigation project. The cost of inaction far exceeds any downsides of the project

4 November, 2016

Jeannette says:

It won't work! Clear cuts need to be stopped on the east slopes and the existing reseviours should have been lowered and better managed.

4 November, 2016

Leigh Blakely says:

The dam in Springbank is not right. I don't want my taxes to pay to sacrifice one community to save another.

4 November, 2016

MG says:

Way too expensive to protect a few while destroying another community. Use the dams we have.

4 November, 2016

yes to springbank! says:

Majority of flood mitigation professionals support Springbank. It's not perfect, but it's our best option by a landslide. Enough said.

4 November, 2016

Frank says:

Flood mitigation must be done. Billions in losses cannot happen again. The government has been collecting high taxes on these properties

4 November, 2016

Tom Yeoman says:

Yes, Springbank will be expensive but so will another flood WHEN (not if) it occurs. Let's build Springbank.

4 November, 2016

Jess says:

This is a great project to protect our city with least impact on people and environment.

4 November, 2016

Genavieve says:

Destroying one community to save another is not the right choice when there are other upstream options!

4 November, 2016

Jenna says:

I think springbank dam will not protect enough of Calgary to make it worthwhile.

4 November, 2016

Hal says:

@ckayser why should they? They didn't build on a flood plain...

4 November, 2016

Sean M says:

Upstream protection is required. Springbank is the right place as numerous studies have shown. Get on with it. Downtown needs protection.

4 November, 2016

jenb says:

SR1 has relied almost entirely on misinformation to gain supporters. Don't Dam Springbank!

4 November, 2016

Jenny36 says:

Destroying one community to save another is not a responsible option. An upstream reservoir is a good idea, just go further upstream.

4 November, 2016

Janevirtue says:

We absolutely need upstream reservoirs in order to protect business closures from 5 days to months with huge financial losses.

4 November, 2016

CC says:

Dams give illusion of protection at great public expense, degrade river ecology. Voluntary buyouts & floodproofing structures best use of $

4 November, 2016

Rosemary P says:

Cost is too high and doesn't consider the negative effects to Bragg Creek and Springbank residents, as well as drinking water.

4 November, 2016

dave says:

Too expensive as is. McLean Creek, if at all.

4 November, 2016

RMB says:

For the greater good, do the right thing and build Springbank.

4 November, 2016

BB says:

This is by far and away the most viable option. Lets get on with it!!!!

4 November, 2016

Alana says:

Why is it okay to destroy someone's home to protect someone else's. Don't dam Springbank! McLean Creek is a way better option!

4 November, 2016

MS says:

Suggesting residents on the river are rich and deserve what they got forgets about all of Downtown and those who rent in Bowness, Sunnyside.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

Flow rate on the Bow is much greater than the Elbow yet other than Ghost Dam level lowering, NOTHING has been done. Downtown is on the Bow.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

It is not feasible to create berms from one end of Calgary to the other. Too many kilometers. Need an upstream option for the Bow.

4 November, 2016

MS says:

We need upstream solutions for the Bow! Soon! It is the largest river, affects all of downtown even more than the Elbow did.

4 November, 2016

George says:

Taking the land of those who did not build in the floodplain to protect those who did seems completely unjust

4 November, 2016

Steve says:

Is turning some of the most valuable land into a moonscape dry dam the best idea the government can come up with? Good grief.

4 November, 2016

JOhn says:

For Greg - People in Springbank do NOT object to flood mitigation, they say its better placed where more people will be protected

4 November, 2016

SherryZ says:

McLean Creek best option! Protects more & would make a great recreation area. Allen Bill Pond was wiped out in 2013. Drive out Hwy 66!!!!

4 November, 2016

ScienceRules says:

The Mclean Creek Dry dam is best for the Elbow (diversion to Spgbk not feasible) and enhancement of Ghost and BearsPaw dams for the Bow.

4 November, 2016

Adrian says:

What happened to the tunnel from the reservoir to the Bow?

4 November, 2016

Lorraine Mackintosh says:

I believe that we are overdue already in not having a project such as this already underway.. The city was devastated by the last flood .

4 November, 2016

Adrian says:

What about fixing the bridges over the Elbow? These are huge flow barriers,

4 November, 2016

Adrian says:

This is the only plan the city is entertaining which will protect the city when the next flood comes. And it will come. it must go ahead

4 November, 2016

SG says:

Maclean Creek is the way to go. Protection to Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Elbow residents. Even NDP knew this to be true pre election.

4 November, 2016

LLH says:

Trying to control the river is always a bad idea! Look for solutions that are environmentally sound and protect a larger portion of Calgary.

4 November, 2016

LLH says:

Hey Calgary be a good neighbour! Let's find solutions that protect more people, cost less money and doesn't destroy a community !

4 November, 2016

LLH says:

It's not cheaper, it's not faster and it doesn't protect enough people! It's not fair to spend that amount on two communities!

4 November, 2016

Derick says:

The cost has been understated and the benefits are not as good as the Kananaskis project. Don't Dam Springbank

4 November, 2016

Jim says:

It is very unfortunate that some made this into an US vs THEM debate. McLean Creek helps everyone harms no one and would be underway by now.

4 November, 2016

C Nadeau says:

All the people this protects are millionaires - Frankly i don't want to spend my families money to invest in their properties.

4 November, 2016

C Nadeau says:

This seems like a long term solution for something that will likely not happen. The cost is very high to protect a very limited number of

4 November, 2016

CW says:

SR1 does NOT meet the "needs of the many." It only promises to protect a couple of Calgary communities. The Bow is the threat to DT YYC.

4 November, 2016

Frank says:

Springbank dam does little to protect downtown. It is most vulnerable to a Bow River flood.

4 November, 2016

Bill says:

Maclean creek is the only viable solution for flood mitigation

4 November, 2016

cm115 says:

I live in Riverbend in Calgary. Damming springbank is a terrible idea. Why are the lives of Calgarians more important than rural people?

4 November, 2016

Derrick Jewlal says:

Nothing is possible that will protect Calgary from all flood scenarios. Be self insured, or move to high ground. Not a new idea. Waste of $$

4 November, 2016

findlaym says:

no new reservoir construction, no loss of fish or wildlife habitat. Lower costs, faster construction. The only drawback is the rich NIMBY's

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 4 - Springbank will be the cheapest option - wait until the new cost estimates come out, McLean Creek will look really cheap

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 3 - Springbank opponents are against flood mitigation - we have consistently advocated for McLean Creek to protect the most Albertans

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 2 - McLean Creek cannot ever be built - check the studies, it doesn't say that anywhere

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

Myth 1 - Springbank Dam protects all of downtown. Check the studies - the Bow is the downtown threat.

4 November, 2016

CW says:

NO to SR1. All Albertans should know that this project is being forced on them WITHOUT transparency, and no good science to back it up.

4 November, 2016

Cameron Peters says:

YES to SR1. Unless we are willing to relocate Downtown and Calgary's older neighborhoods, this is by far the best approach.

4 November, 2016

Sean says:

I support the Springbank mitigation project to ensure protection for the communities and lives impacted by the 2013 flood.

4 November, 2016

jpb says:

This shouldn't be a beauty contest about who can click the most. Science and economics show SR-1 is the best option, let's not be silly.

4 November, 2016

CW says:

NO to SR1. Other options were never fully investigated. All Albertans should be concerned about how their money is being spent.

4 November, 2016

GE says:

Option 1 needs to be McLean Creek...protects the most people and property, and stops everyone's bitching!

4 November, 2016

robin says:

Upstream dam in McLean Creek protects Calgary AND protect Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Tsuu T’ina & Springbank. Protect the most people!

4 November, 2016

Gary says:

This is a short sited proposal that only has City of Calgary interests in mind, what about residents in Bragg and Redwood?

4 November, 2016

Anne-Marie says:

An integral part of a long-term solution for the City of Calgary as a whole. Important to protect downtown Core & sustainability of city.

4 November, 2016

dee says:

Building at McLean Creek is the only option worth pursuing. From minimal cost to protecting the most communities.

4 November, 2016

P C says:

The Bow has been proven to be the risk to downtown. Google it. Springbank is on the wrong river.

4 November, 2016

Dragan says:

Fantastic. This returns multiples of the hard costs and many more times the soft costs (individual's losses, pain and economic disruptions)

4 November, 2016

GC says:

The flood had a massive impact on many home owners and businesses. Concept 1 is the most immediate approach to help protect the city

4 November, 2016

Robert Lehodey says:

A good long term solution that will clearly benefit the City - it eliminates risk and will increase property values in the flood plain.

4 November, 2016

Bruce says:

Build at McLean Creek and protect Calgary-Springbank-Red Wood Meadows and Bragg Creek. All experienced devastating flooding and damage.

4 November, 2016

Calgary Urban Eq. says:

The Springbank Reservoir is indisputably the best solution for the Elbow River, which contributed an estimated 70% of the 2013 flood damage.

4 November, 2016

jpb says:

Most of the Springbank landowners are multimillionaires. The value of their land is in future development, not ranching. Greed is petty.

4 November, 2016

jpb says:

The Springbank reservoir project will save money, and more importantly, lives. The potential of liability is too high to play games.

4 November, 2016

aepd says:

Stop building dams. They don't stop floods. They upset the natural flow and ecology of the river.

4 November, 2016

Krausert says:

the city needs to look after its downtown core as well as the neighboring communities. with out the downtown we don't have a city.

4 November, 2016

mcgoverness says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

4 November, 2016

westways says:

It is imperative that we go ahead with the Springbank reservoir. We need to protect the city from the inevitable climate change damages.

4 November, 2016

Nancy says:

Still dealing with health issues & financial losses! There will be MORE DISASTROUS WEATHER EVENTS so why are we dithering? Get on with SR1!!

4 November, 2016

Ian Bryden says:

Concept 1, after thorough study, has been shown to be the best alternative to protect Elbow properties and the Downtown Business Area.

4 November, 2016

CH says:

Please get this project as presented going. We do not want to go through this again.

4 November, 2016

Peter C says:

Springbok does not protect enough people. It is not the best idea nor will it be fast. There are better options for all.

4 November, 2016

BG says:

This concept seems to be the most expedient to keep our family and homes safe from another devastating flood . Let's move on this ASAP.

4 November, 2016

Lyn dean says:

I absolutely disagree with the spring bank reservoir. There are better options than this. Why can't the option of McLean creek be conside

4 November, 2016

Forbes Newman says:

Spring Bank reservoir is the best idea by a long shot. It needs to be done ASAP. Every delay puts the entire city at risk.

4 November, 2016

Barb says:

SR1 needs to get done as soon as possible. We are putting our city at risk every year until it is done.

4 November, 2016

Brian Purcell says:

Hurry up and get it done already - it's been over 3 years since 2013 flood and NOTHING has happened to protect downstream communities & city

4 November, 2016

Brian Purcell says:

Upstream mitigation is essential to protect the city and downstream communities. Potential env impacts pale in comparison to other impacts

4 November, 2016

Carsten Jensen says:

We need upstream mitigation, the costs of doing nothing are too high

4 November, 2016

CB says:

The Springbank upstream reservoir must be completed as soon as possible. Failing to do so puts the whole city in jeopardy.

4 November, 2016

Carl says:

The Springbank upstream reservoir is a vital first step in protecting the city. Please get on with it.

4 November, 2016

Chad says:

A multi-faceted approach is needed, including the construction of SR1. Let's also do some local protection (barriers) in the interim.

4 November, 2016

hopefull in Elbow Pk says:

Calgary needs this

4 November, 2016

Doug says:

SR1 must proceed immediately. Thousands of homes will be protected from next flood while some farmland will be flooded temporarily.

4 November, 2016

Greg says:

This is not a referendum on who wants what. The province has the responsibility & obligation to get this done to protect assets and lives!

4 November, 2016

KSL says:

It's time to stop the decision paralysis and pursue projects for the greater good. Important decisions are seldom universally agreed upon.

4 November, 2016

KSL says:

The human and financial costs of another flood are not acceptable, for people and businesses across the socioeconomic spectrum.

4 November, 2016

Doug says:

Springbank upstream reservoir is a concept that must see reality as soon as possible. Cost effective, fast to implement and low env. impact

4 November, 2016

KSL says:

We must support objective analysis. Here, the recommendation was Springbank. Doing nothing is not an option. The risks are apparent to all.

4 November, 2016

Greg says:

Objections to this project from a few Springbank residents are solely based upon self interest with no regard for the greater good.

4 November, 2016

Greg says:

It has been made clear from assessments that this upstream project is in the best interest of the Calgary as a whole - businesses & homes.

4 November, 2016

ckayser says:

Protecting downtown is common sense, as is protecting the homes of thousands who live near our rivers! When is something going to be done?

4 November, 2016

ckayser says:

The Province and City delays are playing Russian Roulette with the city of Calgary, its homeowners, and the prosperity of Calgary businesses

4 November, 2016

ckayser says:

If the Springbank residents want to veto this idea, let them put up their homes as collateral to compensate for future floods in Calgary

4 November, 2016

ckayser says:

How can the City or Province continue to show more concern for a few in Springbank, than the well-being of thousands of Calgarians???

4 November, 2016

ckayser says:

When compared to all other proposed solutions, this makes the most sense. Don't let 20 homeowners rule against the best solution

4 November, 2016

Cam says:

The risk of flooding the downtown core again is unacceptable to all citizens. We must proceed with the Springbank off-stream reservoir.

4 November, 2016

Cam says:

The question is not "whether" we will see another flood, but "when". Proceed with Springbank off-stream reservoir.

4 November, 2016

Haozhang says:

I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam.

4 November, 2016

Tom says:

gov.ab figures - $750M damage caused by Elbow River for 1 in 100 year flood. Over half is residential. Downtown core is a Bow River issue.

4 November, 2016

Cam says:

As a long time inner city resident - please proceed with the Springbank off-stream reservoir ASAP.

4 November, 2016

chris2 says:

Think long-term folks. Build the Springbank Reservoir to protect all future generations living in Calgary. What a legacy to leave.

4 November, 2016

chris2 says:

The Springbank Reservoir is an essential economic protection system for the City of Calgary. The cost/benefit for just this is worth it!!!

4 November, 2016

Dave Putnam says:

Upstream reservoirs are critical to providing long term, cost effective and environmentally sound flood protection for the Calgary area.

4 November, 2016

LDQ says:

I think it is crucial for the city to build the Springbank reservoir to protect the economic core and improve moral of the city

4 November, 2016

Garry says:

Please get on with flood mitigation ASAP. Doing nothing is not acceptable. 20 landowners should not override 100,000 affected citizens.

4 November, 2016

Scooter says:

Stop the political B.S. Build the dam

4 November, 2016

Shirley says:

I believe we need the springbank project is a must do option. We need some serious mitigation now not after the next flood.

4 November, 2016

DVH says:

Springbank is the obvious choice for the Elbow mitigation.. It has the least footprint, and is the cheapest and fastest option. Get moving!

4 November, 2016

SMO says:

People need to stop obsessing about 'rich' people's property and focus on protecting our city. We must get this project completed.

4 November, 2016

David S says:

The Springbank project is needed. It is a economically reasonable solution to a predictable problem.

4 November, 2016

Suzanne says:

Sprinkbank has been deemed to be the most efficient and environmentally wise choice. Please move forward with this project quickly!!

4 November, 2016

Richard Maire says:

We can't allow a couple of wealthy land owners in Springbank to delay the building of the much needed Springbank dry dam.

4 November, 2016

Jack says:

Enough talking,build Springbank dry dam.

4 November, 2016

HJM says:

Flood mitigation is essential to maintain vibrant inner city communities of Calgary. Springbank is the best option, let's get on with it!

4 November, 2016

Greg S says:

The potential cost of doing nothing runs in the billions. I firmly believe that the Springbank reservoir is necessary for the greater good.

4 November, 2016

TS says:

SR1 provides the best chance to protect Calgary as the nearest upstream, feasible solution. More will be impacted by a lack of action.

4 November, 2016

DR says:

Upstream mitigation is critical for the city of calgary . The downtown core is at risk, city hall, stampede grounds, the zoo , and more.

4 November, 2016

gboje says:

This is essential to the future well being of the City of Calgary. Please get on with it!

4 November, 2016

George says:

What if climate change makes the flooding even worse and we have to build both projects? Let's get 'at least' Springbank done!

4 November, 2016

sf says:

We can not listen to inferior source about the "best flood mitigation" the experts have been commissioned, studied & reported. Start SR1 now

4 November, 2016

sf says:

Flood mitigation is essential for Calgary and surrounding communities and will become more so in future years. Listen to the experts. Build.

4 November, 2016

sf says:

We've hired experts and exhaustively studied the flood mitigation. The experts suggest Springbank Dam. What are we waiting for?

4 November, 2016

sf says:

The province of Alberta has funding set aside for infrastructure building and the springbank dam is clearly the best solution.Lets get going

4 November, 2016

Gary Cronin says:

Essential for the future of Calgary. Another flood would be devastating for downtown businesses and we would see companies leave Calgary

4 November, 2016

George says:

Benefit analysis - is $2.6 billion EVERY TIME there is a flood. This inaction is insane, more than 3 years later and we're still debating?

4 November, 2016

Michelle says:

We must protect our communities and our downtown economy and have to build the Springbank reservoir. We are exposed and must act faster.

4 November, 2016

GT says:

Urgent action required to protect Calgary. Please proceed with Springbank as soon as possible,

4 November, 2016

robert mitchell says:

It is the best option available and will offer protection to Calgary - and downstream communities - from another flood.

4 November, 2016

K Podavin says:

Calgary must be protected from a flood shutting it down - flood is too costly ($ & emotionally). We need protection (like other cities)!

4 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

For example: original c/b analysis....2 million to raise highway 22. Now they say 19 million! UPDATE the Cost benefit analysis!

4 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

The province needs to release an updated cost benefit analysis on SR 1. It is NOT cheap. Close to 1 billion $$!

4 November, 2016

Bill says:

Generating electricity on a reservoir used once in many years is ridiculous! Mitigating drought not feasible for the same reason. Build now!

4 November, 2016

WV says:

SR-1 protects not just the Elbow valley, but the downtown of Calgary as well. It is the nearest shovel ready project. Do it now!

4 November, 2016

JBRideau says:

Calgary cannot be a serious competitive world class city without basic infrastructure, including fundamental flood control. Alberta's loss

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

“Springbank DAM is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would sink in water in minutes and there is no backup plan?

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

SR1 can NOT generate electricity? Not the best for the money.

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

SR1 can NOT mitigate drought? Not the best for the money.

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

Deltares and IBI, hired consultants warned SR1 is not the best option and could cause full damages; unfortunately many don’t know this fact.

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

Deltares and IBI, hired consultants warned SR1 in not the best option and could cause full damages; unfortunately many don’t know this fact.

3 November, 2016

Janet Davies says:

I support the mitigation measures for Bowness. You had to have lived in that community in 2013 to understand the trauma the flood caused.

3 November, 2016

DGB Riverdale says:

I strongly support SR1 ASAP. Both cost and c/b ratio are reasonable. SR1 land exposure is minimal, especially with new Glenmore Dam gates.

3 November, 2016

Tom Yeoman says:

Calgary has a long history of serious flooding. It seems with each flood, damage costs are higher and higher. Let's at least do Springbank

3 November, 2016

Stephen. Brown says:

We have wasted 3 valuable years of dithering about the need to protect Calgary from another devistating flood .The solutions are know.

3 November, 2016

Tom Yeoman says:

Building Springbank seems a logical thing with cost/benefit 1.4 to protect WHOLE downtown area

3 November, 2016

SR1 A NO GO says:

Springbank is not the answer. Come on peeps, there are alternatives everyone can get behind. Work on a solution for all.

3 November, 2016

APG says:

This project not an us vs. them debate. Studies are clear. Springbank dry dam will protect ALL citizens of Calgary. Let's get started!

3 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

With climate change we may be facing drought. A dry dam makes absolutely no sense at all. A dam at McLean addresses both flood and drought!

3 November, 2016

Tom says:

Calgary River Group calls Springbank the opposition. Springbank calls for a dam at McLean Creek to protect Calgary. Hmmmm?

3 November, 2016

Evelyn says:

Experts recommend bldg the reservoirs. I say let's get on with it. Not to do so would be irresponsible.

3 November, 2016

Bowness Resident says:

Flood/Drought, we need reservoirs. Build the dams and insure they are controlled by someone in charge with no conflicting priority.

3 November, 2016

Tom says:

Premier declares SR the best. Bureaucracy and consultants reports support Premier. Deltares does book report on consultant report. Science?

3 November, 2016

Suzanne says:

International experts in this field have already said this is the best option. Time to take action.

3 November, 2016

Suzanne says:

The environmental and economic impacts of NOT proceeding with this project are clear. Build the reservoirs now!

3 November, 2016

Douglas T says:

I have attended the information sessions. The Springbank project definitely seems to be a worthy project

3 November, 2016

CAH says:

The needs of the many outweigh the concerns of the few. The Springbank Project should be started immediately

3 November, 2016

DClarkT says:

The Sprinbank mitigation project provides significant benefits at a modest cost. It's long over due to be started.

3 November, 2016

Andy says:

Build the dam without anymore delay. We need to protect our city!

3 November, 2016

Robin says:

We are wasting valuable time. Build the Springband Project!!!!

3 November, 2016

Cathy steedman says:

So much has been spent on rebuilding and strengthening the river banks, stampede park tee. It will all be destroyed with another flood.

3 November, 2016

Cathy steedman says:

We need to bring people back to the empty lots and build. No more ghost town streets! Can't happen when people are scared of flooding.

3 November, 2016

Cathy steedman says:

This could ncept will protect our inner city neighbourhoods and most importantly downtown Calgary! It will bring buyers back to my neighbour

3 November, 2016

Andrea Gould says:

please proceed with Springbank dry reservoir ASAP! Calgary can't handle another flood economically or mentally.

3 November, 2016

DNR says:

SR1 does not pass the "designed for worst case scenario" test. Deltares warned it could be overcome in flood circumstances similar to 2013.

3 November, 2016

DNR says:

GOA hired Amec & IBI to submit proposals on SR1 & MC1 & Deltares to choose between them. TRJR was result of researching all possible sites.

3 November, 2016

Deejay says:

Water needs to be managed in times of flood and drought. McLean Creek dam would do both.

3 November, 2016

Tom says:

Gov.ab tells calgary River group berms likely to fail. Gov.ab tells Bragg Creek berms will keep you safe. McLean Creek keeps both safe.

3 November, 2016

marina paperny says:

This is critical infrastructure for this City as a whole. It must be done without delay. The sooner the better.

3 November, 2016

Linda Hayes says:

Time has come to stop the procrastination and start protecting the city. The downtown core can't handle another flood. Another year????

3 November, 2016

Alex McCartney says:

The sooner the better.Build the Springbank dry dam.

3 November, 2016

Robert Levin says:

Our entire family supports the construction of the Springbank dam.

3 November, 2016

City dweller says:

I've been to all the open houses on flood mitigation and SR1 made by far the most sense. Stop wasting time and start flood proofing YYC

3 November, 2016

Dave says:

Elbow River uncontrollable by time it reaches Bragg Creek. Consultant Deltares warned SR1 could be overcome in some flood circumstances.

3 November, 2016

Dave says:

Opportunity with TRJR for flood management, water conservation, hydro power, recreation & income generation. Leave legacy future generations

3 November, 2016

Dave says:

Water Experts advise Alberta needs a `Water Bank` & Tri-River Reservoir would provide this for flood prevention water conservation.

3 November, 2016

Dave says:

Start ASAP an EIA & CEIA on Tri-River Joint Reservoir site. Protection for all communities could be provided quickest with this project.

3 November, 2016

Dave says:

Manage rivers in the mountain valley before they become uncontrollable. See Tri-River Reservoir project www.preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

Junbao Wu says:

Option #1 is to complete the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir.

3 November, 2016

Junbao Wu says:

Calgary is a dynamic city that was severely damaged in 2013. The downtown and affected surrounding neighbourhoods cannot afford a repeat.

3 November, 2016

Louise G says:

This has been studied to death already. It is time to move forward with this project. Another major flood is just around the corner Calgary

3 November, 2016

Linda verhun says:

Strength - instead of going on popular vote; do what is right for the city. Protect downtown and others. Weigh landfill impact after flood.

3 November, 2016

Steve says:

Two very different provincial governments came to the same conclusion. It must make sense. Let's proceed with SR1 and move on from the flood

3 November, 2016

Bonavista resident says:

Tri-River Joint Reservoir would provide flood prevention soonest once diversion channels built.See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

Margaret Nielsen says:

Concept 1 will help prevent or at least minimize the catastrophic effect of a 2013 flood - the faster Springbank can happen the better

3 November, 2016

Steve says:

reservoirs have the best economics and most certainty of protection. Let's protect the City Of Calgary to the benefit of all Albertans

3 November, 2016

John C says:

Springbank Reservoir. Yes! The best option by far. Why are we still debating this?

3 November, 2016

Marilyn W says:

I support the Springbank Reservoir 100%. Enough already! Let's do this!

3 November, 2016

Tom Edwards says:

Calgarians demand immediate action on building the Springbank dry dam.

3 November, 2016

Fred says:

Build the Springbank dry dam.

3 November, 2016

ratfink says:

Concept 1 will prevent the catastrophic environmental, property and economic damage of the flood of 2013. Why spend money on half measures?

3 November, 2016

Barbara McGregor says:

I think all of the above confirm that Springbank MUST be built.

3 November, 2016

JH says:

Environmental impact studies are not a drawback to any project. McLean Creek has extreme environmental impacts. SR1 less so.

3 November, 2016

Bacardi says:

As a river community homeowner, I wholly support the Springbank Reservoir as viable and necessary for downstream flood mitigation

3 November, 2016

Jorg says:

The Springbank dam project should proceed. There is no viable alternative! Why this is taking so long to approve is beyond me.

3 November, 2016

crjmca says:

This is the most effective solution that will safeguard the most people, although it may not be large enough to cope with a larger flood

3 November, 2016

Terry says:

I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam ASAP.

3 November, 2016

Michael B. says:

I support the Springbank Reservoir project. Get on and build it!

3 November, 2016

LH says:

Our city cannot afford another flood like 2013. Springbank reservoir has been shown as the best alternative and should be built.

3 November, 2016

Kelly Brett says:

This design will cause some concern amongst the people directly affected but thousands of peoples live were literally destroyed in the flood

3 November, 2016

Michael B. says:

How much longer are we going to place the economic hub of Western Canada, the City of Calgary, at risk while we delay the inevitable?

3 November, 2016

Cathy McAvoy says:

We need to get moving on the Springbank reservoir ASAP to protect our communities. Too much time has passed already. It's the best option!

3 November, 2016

CWH says:

I support the Springbank Reservoir project. This project has been recommended at by experts from Holland.

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary Now! says:

Calgary and Alberta cannot afford another flood. The Springbank reservoir should be built without delay.

3 November, 2016

NR says:

SR1 destroys fish & wildlife, water quality & land & as size of future floods unknown no guarantee safety. www.preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

Cathy McAvoy says:

I believe this option provides for the best protection with the least environmental impact and the shortest time frame.

3 November, 2016

Xiumei Feng says:

I strongly support springbank project!

3 November, 2016

Xiumei Feng says:

Upstream Springbank is the best option for our city and citizens devastated affected!

3 November, 2016

Shep Secter says:

Build springbok reservoir ASAP. Both my OFFIC and my home were flooded last time!!! Two separate buildings

3 November, 2016

NR says:

The Bassano dam was severely threatened in 2013. What would happen if SR1 failed so close to Calgary? See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

Yes to Springbank! says:

I strongly support building the Springbank reservoir to protect the City of Calgary.

3 November, 2016

RM says:

This project is needed and makes sense to protect a large number of home and the downtown core. Let's get on with it.

3 November, 2016

F. C. says:

Springbank dam is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would be drown in minutes. There is no backup plan, bad idea

3 November, 2016

NR says:

See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca for info re The Tri-River Joint Reservoir of Alberta for quickest flood protection to most communities.

3 November, 2016

RDC says:

I support the springbank reservoir project. There are tradeoffs 4 public good. Environmental impact of the "do nothing" option far worse.

3 November, 2016

Cmcdermid says:

The Springbank Reservoir has been shown time and time again to be the the most effective tool for preventing another 2013 incident. Do it.

3 November, 2016

F.C. says:

Springbank dam is 18km. from Calgary, if it fails (a true possibility), Calgary would be drown in matter of minutes. There is no backup plan

3 November, 2016

Cori says:

The entire downtown core was affected by the 2013 flood. We can't let this happen again! We need action immediately.

3 November, 2016

Steve says:

Postponing the decision to proceed with the Springbank project places Calgary at continued risk, in a particularly tedious time for our city

3 November, 2016

Deborah Provias says:

The negative environmental impact will be significant if we don't proceed with Springbank. The river areas still haven't recovered from 2013

3 November, 2016

JK0001 says:

It is imperative, particularly given the current fragility of the Calgary economy, that our inner city communities & families are protected.

3 November, 2016

Michael says:

Fully support the Springbank project. All families downstream should never have to endure the hardship of another flood like 2013.

3 November, 2016

E.G. says:

The proposed “TRJR" solution is a better solution than the Springbank dam "SR1" or McLean C, read more at: http://preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

M Palmer says:

Numerous studies conclude Springbank reservoir is the most cost effective mitigation measure. Let's not waste any more time and build it now

3 November, 2016

E.G.J. says:

There is a better solution than SR1 or McLean C., it is called the “TRJR. read more at: http://preventingalbertafloods.ca

3 November, 2016

Mendy Chernos says:

Springbank option is the obviously preferable option that absolutely needs to be implemented immediately without any further delay.

3 November, 2016

Jim says:

Calgary is a dynamic city that was severely damaged in 2013. The downtown and affected surrounding neighbourhoods cannot afford a repeat.

3 November, 2016

Nancy says:

I believe it is essential that an upstream reservoir at Springbank be created! A flood like 2013 cannot be allowed to happen again!

3 November, 2016

strainj says:

fully support the dry dam- critical to protect 1000's of calgary homes, downtwn core and environment from flood damage-pls get on with it!

3 November, 2016

JH says:

The water supply for Calgary is predominately the Glenmore Dam. It needs the protection of the Springbank Reservoir.

3 November, 2016

JH says:

Calgary will be protected with the Spring Reservoir. Not "luxury" homeowners, but all river valley inhabitants!

3 November, 2016

grbbenny says:

The primary strength of this concept is the protection afforded to the City and the revitalization of the neighbourhoods in the flood zone.

3 November, 2016

martha oconnor says:

Upstream mitigation is mandatory for the safety of the people of Calgary and to protect peoples homes and the economic core of the city

3 November, 2016

SaveYYC says:

SR1 must happen. Calgary's entire downtown is at risk. The economy is already too fragile and we cannot survive another flood.

3 November, 2016

George says:

I support this

3 November, 2016

easy choice says:

The choice: Siding w a few stubborn land owners vs. Protecting the economic engine of Alberta. Support Springbank, it just makes sense.

3 November, 2016

Kyle says:

Do not let bad NIMBY neighbors influence what is in the best interest of a hundred thousand Calgaryians and our infrastructure. Build SR1!

3 November, 2016

DC says:

SR1 is the closest project to Calgary, so will protect Calgary from Elbow flooding from the widest variety of storms

3 November, 2016

DC says:

SR1 affects the health of the rivers and floodplain the least as it is an off-stream project.

3 November, 2016

DC says:

I understand that tied in with SR1, are berms at Redwood Meadows and Bragg Creek. With these 3, all communities are equally protected

3 November, 2016

Upstream Mitigation says:

Upstream infrastructure is how sophisticated, modern cities protect against disaster. Build Springbank and find solutions for the Bow. Now

3 November, 2016

BuildSpringbank says:

Springbank is an amazing opportunity for this City - let's get this done. A C+ rating for flood readiness for Calgary is embarrassing.

3 November, 2016

BLB says:

Flood mitigation infrastructure is very common in Europe and Asia - because all major cities are built around waterways. Build SR1!

3 November, 2016

MW says:

SR 1 will end up costing a billion dollars or more. Update the cost benefit analysis. As a taxpayer I demand it!

3 November, 2016

Fix the problem says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

Flood defense construction is planned for Bragg Creek. Mclean Creek is unfeasible. SR1 best option to protect YYC. We must protect downtown!

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

I support SR1-is less costly, will have less environmental impact, shorter timelines & capture more runoff. YYC needs protection. Lets do it

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it. Let’s get it done!

3 November, 2016

M says:

It has been shown that Springbank will cost more than we have been told - so why support SBD when McLean Creek will "save Calgary" & MORE

3 November, 2016

M says:

"Save Calgary" building at Mclean Creek WILL save Calgary as well as many others without taking away land from people and agricultural land

3 November, 2016

ranchman 1 says:

Wealthy landowners? Gosh that could include the houses along the Elbow in Calgary, couldn't it?

3 November, 2016

ranchman 1 says:

All this talk about saving downtown Calgary - only Bow River changes can do that. SO DO IT.

3 November, 2016

Darwin Perrier says:

Building a ssolution on provincial land at mclean creek can restore the recreation in the area, protect Bragg creek, redwood and springbank

3 November, 2016

Jim says:

Everyone wants protection for their businesses and homes. This concept destroys some for the sake of others. Unfair, UnAlbertan, unjust.

3 November, 2016

JB240 says:

I strongly support SR1. Calgary cannot withstand another flood like 2013, would be devastating for our fragile economy. Please proceed!!

3 November, 2016

Protect Calgary says:

Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it.

3 November, 2016

Kevin Wagner says:

Put the reservoir upstream of Bragg Creek in Mclean Creek which protects ALL communities and it creates a recreation area. Use common sense

3 November, 2016

No More Floods says:

Remember that 5 lives were lost in the 2013 flood. More than property damage is at stake. Calgary cannot afford another flood.

3 November, 2016

No More Floods says:

An earthen dike is proposed to protect Bragg Creek. Springbank will have less environmental impact and is less costly than McLean Creek.

3 November, 2016

No More Floods says:

Many opposed Duff's Ditch near Winnipeg. It has since prevented over $100 billion in flood damages. No more delay over a vocal minority.

3 November, 2016

No More Floods says:

Two governments and many studies have found Springbank to be the best alternative to protect Calgary. I support it. Let's get it done!

3 November, 2016

cm115 says:

Damming Spring bank will ruin pristine land, and destroy homes.

3 November, 2016

MW says:

Springbank is rich in wildlife. It would be turned into an ugly moonscape devoid of life. We should work WITH nature, not against it!

3 November, 2016

Tom says:

I am a Calgarian and oppose the Springbank dam. Expropriation of private homes/land is wrong when McLean Creek option is on gov't land.

2 November, 2016

YYC Flood Zone Resid says:

No one posting here will live to see another major flood. '13 was one-in-a-million combo of events. Don't destroy Springbank because of it.

2 November, 2016

PRC says:

SCIENCE? LOL!! A baseless, un-researched Prentice attempt to get Dirks elected in Calgary Elbow - only science in SR1 is political science!

2 November, 2016

bob says:

Stand w science and oppose fear. Support Springbank!!

2 November, 2016

Philip says:

Seems as though the provincial govt and Calgary city council want the most expensive solution.

2 November, 2016

Deejay says:

Wonder how well the City of Calgary will cope with the putrefaction of water after it has been festering in a shallow dam in Springbank.

2 November, 2016

MW says:

Springbank Reservoir would be a shameful misuse of a beautiful area of Alberta. Our children will question our sanity.

2 November, 2016

RancherS says:

A dry dam at Springbank will take away heritage farm land, be an eyesore and displace wildlife and people. McLean creek all the way!

2 November, 2016

smcyyc says:

I don't see any strengths in this concept. The environmental impact and cost to taxpayers are ridiculously high and unnecessary.

2 November, 2016

smcyyc says:

I don't see any strengths in this proposal. There is no mitigation relief for Bragg Creek, McLean Creek, or Redwood Meadows.

2 November, 2016

Deejay says:

Pushing a door from both sides will never open it. If we all get on one side and give it a good shove we could get on with a dam at McLean!

2 November, 2016

R.takir says:

As a citizen of the city of Calgary, I strongly oppose the building of this Dam. It will be more expensive and protect less people!

2 November, 2016

Billy Goat says:

Lets think of everyone in making this huge decision. It's not just about Calgary !!! Mcleen creek is the logical solution

2 November, 2016

Common Sense Guy says:

Springbank makes sense. Don't let a handful of wealthy landowners tell you otherwise. Most studies support it's construction. Save Calgary!

2 November, 2016

Phil C says:

Win-win solution: Dredge and deepen Glenmore as it has gotten so full of debris and lost capacity. Don't Dam Springbank!

2 November, 2016

Tom says:

Springbank Dam protecting downtown is classic misdirection. The downtown core is threatened by the Bow, not the Elbow.

2 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

YYC downtown core needs protection with over 1 million people relying on it as an economic engine. This is not just a homeowner issue.

2 November, 2016

Canuckistan2010 says:

Try managing the 3 dams we already have better. You can lower Ghost every spring and let it fill up..same with Bearspaw and Glenmore.

2 November, 2016

Act Now says:

Storing water on open field a few days every couple decades rather than have it clean out the heart of Calgary kinda makes common sense. SR1

2 November, 2016

Act Now says:

Many opponents to SR1 don't care if any mitigation is ever built if that project dies. They will be well compensated and have continued use

2 November, 2016

Act Now says:

For a cost less than the Airport Tunnel, this city can be protected. SR1 is achievable and is the only realistic option.

2 November, 2016

Act Now says:

Far and away Spring Bank is the right choice. If it dies, so does mitigation on the Elbow and Calgary can no longer be exposed to that risk

2 November, 2016

Protect Downtown Cal says:

It has been 40 months since the flood. We need to put a plan in place now and the SR1 is the best option.

2 November, 2016

Protect Downtown Cal says:

I strongly support the Springbank dam. We need to protect the downtown! A catastrophic flood in downtown would paralyze Calgary forever.

2 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

Flood defense construction is planned for Bragg Creek. Mclean Creek is unfeasible. SR1 best option to protect YYC. We must protect downtown!

2 November, 2016

LB says:

NDP gov campaigned on stopping the Springbank dam because it does not protect communities such as Bragg Creek. McLean Creek would. Land grab

2 November, 2016

LB says:

Stealing land which has belonged to families for generations in order to protect a few rich people whose homes are on a flood plain- wrong!

2 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

I support SR1-is less costly, will have less environmental impact, shorter timelines & capture more runoff. YYC needs protection. Lets do it

2 November, 2016

Protect YYC says:

Downtown Calgary & surrounding neighborhoods need flood protection. SR1 is proven to be the best project. I support it. Let's get it done!

2 November, 2016

SG says:

It is not just about Calgary! The Springbank Dam has negative effects on Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows and Springbank!! Don't Dam Springbank!

2 November, 2016

Dr Karen Massey says:

I support the idea of a dam, it just needs to be upstream of Bragg Creek for more bang for the BILLION dollars. No more secret on cost.

2 November, 2016

Dr Karen Massey says:

There is considerable erosion from a flood on the Elbow. An upstream dam would help manage this major problem.

2 November, 2016

Dr Karen Massey says:

The cost of a Springbank Reservoir alone is over $1 Billion dollars. Let's spend this money wisely upstream of Bragg Creek.

2 November, 2016

Dr Karen Massey says:

Bragg Creek & Redwood Meadows also need to be protected. Build a reservoir further upstream.

2 November, 2016

Dr Karen Massey says:

The Springbank dry dam would not provide drought protection as the water will be released back into the Elbow on a graduated basis in 30days

2 November, 2016

MM says:

My family does NOT support the Springbank Dam. I stand with the overwhelming % of Alberta taxpayers who should not bear this burden.

2 November, 2016

MM says:

My family supports the Springbank dam. I stand with the overwhelming % of flood engineers and flood mitigation experts that also support it.

2 November, 2016

john elbow park says:

I strongly support the Springback diversion project, mainly for protection of the of the communities along the Elbow River and city core

2 November, 2016

MW says:

Springbank would only accomodate a flood the size of 2013. Anything larger would breach the dam. I'm glad I don't live downstream!

2 November, 2016

MW says:

The taking of private land, homes and businesses when there is a viable alternative on public land is POOR PUBLIC POLICY

2 November, 2016

M says:

People opposed to the Springbank Dam still want to protect Calgary - we also want to protect surrounding communities & not take away land

2 November, 2016

Carter says:

1. Protects Calgary's commercial center. 2. Avoids downstream environmental disaster of what a flood picks up in a city

2 November, 2016

pioneerlady says:

The Springbank reservoir is basically a land grab by Calgary developers over the rural communities.

2 November, 2016

pioneerlady says:

Springbank is NOT the best option for flood mitigation, it destroys valuable farmland that will be needed in the future. Clear flood zones.

2 November, 2016

M says:

what exactly does "objectively proven" mean?? Mclean Creek makes more sense as it would also protect Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows

2 November, 2016

Kevin wilson says:

Mclean creek is the logical solution

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

Did it ever occur to some that perhaps the SBD project isn't about protection? Could be about future development around a lake in the area!

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

Expropriating homes and land from families that have been there for generations is a crime! Some self serving people don't care.

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

The area in question is a huge wildlife corridor! Too bad you don't care about them either. I do and I don't live in the area.

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

It's a shame that you people that support the dam don't give a dam about the rest of the folks affected. Says a lot about your character.

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

SBD will be a health hazard to all down stream. It's in the documents. Check it out! Your water and air will be polluted if a flood.

2 November, 2016

Sanbill says:

McLean Creek can provide a future water source for Calgary and equally protect all communities. It won't steal land and homes from families.

2 November, 2016

Jennifer B. says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Mike says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Craig says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Jamie says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Marco says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Arianna says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

2 November, 2016

Jon Beatz says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Theatre Mom says:

McLean dam seems to be a much better option - I do not believe it has been adequately explored by the province.

1 November, 2016

Diane says:

I support the Springbank reservoir project. It has been shown to be a good solution to help prevent future flooding in Calgsry.

1 November, 2016

Deejay says:

Dam McLean Creek and build on the recreational area it already is. A solution to flood mitigation and one that all could enjoy.

1 November, 2016

RT says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Scott Jenkins says:

I support this project. This project has been proven to be the best solution.

1 November, 2016

Tana says:

By the way, your "box" for comments is a joke - doesn't allow for well thought-out comments as you limit the amount of words.

1 November, 2016

Terri says:

Contrary to what people believe, the Springbank reservoir will not be the healthiest or least expensive option.

1 November, 2016

Terri says:

There are better options than the Springbank reservoir ... spend the time and do the studies to protect Springbank citizens and wildlife.

1 November, 2016

Sarah says:

Upstream flood mitigation is essential to protect Calgary's economy and the city as a whole. This project appears to have the best balance.

1 November, 2016

Beverley says:

Please go through with the mitigation....my family and I are counting on it!!!

1 November, 2016

shoults says:

A recent article in the Cochrane Eagle (October 13, 2016, by Lindsay Seewalt. The Tri-River Joint Reservoir Project. Please read this.

1 November, 2016

Kymf says:

Springbank costs have been grossly understated. Groundwater studies have not been completed & dewatering costs not included.

1 November, 2016

Tom says:

If we had all supported McLean Creek two years ago, construction would have started by now. Instead we have community vs community.kinda sad

1 November, 2016

Dan Wise says:

the fish after a flood will be devistated they will end up in dry resivor and die it will elemate them from the elbow river

1 November, 2016

Dan Wise says:

it will impact migrating of the elk with the inflow channel crossing though there route as well as other animals /fish will be most impact

1 November, 2016

Dan Wise says:

it may not work unproven in moutain and forest regions witch could block inflow and do catitrofic damage to the fish as well

1 November, 2016

Terry says:

There is another option (McLean Creek) so Calgary can have protection beyond this option...

1 November, 2016

Dan Wise says:

please dam mclean creek and save calgary and bragg creek and red wood meadows it will great water for times of drought and possibley hydro

1 November, 2016

Terry says:

It will put a local community at risk (Bragg Creek, Redwood Meadows, Tsuu Tina)...not very neighbourly Restricts westward development

1 November, 2016

K says:

Why should those who built ABOVE floodplain loose everything to those who decided to build/live on a KNOWN FLOODPLAIN?

1 November, 2016

RGodderis says:

Springbank is the wrong choice. A betterChoice is in theMountains protecting 3 RiverValleys & Bragg Creek, TsaTina Nation, Redwood Meadows.

1 November, 2016

TF says:

Dear folks of YYC's elite areas: insure, move, or accept wet carpet every 100 years. UnAlbertan to expect others to pay for your lifestyle.

1 November, 2016

mike martin says:

Strongly support the project. It would be foolish of Calgary to knowingly ignore the environmental, human and economic risks of not acting.

1 November, 2016

Jessica Minovitch says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

IG says:

McLean dam provides recreation opportunities, protection for communities upstream of Calgary and potentially helps long term water supply fo

1 November, 2016

IG says:

Springbank dry dam is not a cost effective or ecologically sound option. It does nothing to benefit any of the points asked.

1 November, 2016

PRC says:

Springbank won't protect downtown. That has been proven and reported on. Claims of this are false.

1 November, 2016

Bbbn says:

Too few communities protected. Very little if any protection of downtown Calgary. Bad idea for Springbank. Bad for Elbow River ecology.

1 November, 2016

anita james says:

where there are families who may be displaced expropriated because of this plan, then the authorities must find another way, democracy first

1 November, 2016

SKearl says:

I fully support the Springbank project. It's the best option to protect 1000s of homes and DT Calgary (the economic engine of AB).

1 November, 2016

CD says:

Downtown Calgary affected vs. a small # of compensated landowners. Best proven protection is Springbank - it's crucial for our economy

1 November, 2016

ESL says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Janine Clarke says:

McLean Dam would protect more people. It's on crown lands--would be far less expensive and displace fewer people. I support McLean Dam!

1 November, 2016

Dave Reesor says:

After use, SDD will leave an unsightly mud flat. The next year it will become a dust bowl affecting all downwind including West Calgary

1 November, 2016

CK says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Grant MacKenzie says:

The Springbank project is the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. 1000's will benefit vs a few who will get cashed.

1 November, 2016

JKV says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

RSW says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Jon says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

Jon says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

rachwest says:

The Springbank project has been objectively proven to be the best project to protect neighbourhoods and downtown Calgary. I support it.

1 November, 2016

DDSB says:

It is not Calgary, but how about Bragg Creek and Redwood Meadows? In case the project is not funded solely by the city...

1 November, 2016

NO SR1 says:

Springbank Dam only serves a few posh areas along the Elbow - Readeau/Roxboro and Elbow Park. NO ONE ELSE! It's POLITICS before PEOPLE again

1 November, 2016

Tom says:

Impact on ALL communities indicates that McLean Creek is clearly the best. Environmental impacts could be mitigated and its on crown land.

1 November, 2016

ranchman1 says:

SR1 removes 8000 acres of local food production in order to help houses approved by City decisions? Wrong!

1 November, 2016

ranchman1 says:

SR1 will have no impact on downtown. That was the swollen groundwater from the underground Bow River that underlies all of downtown.

1 November, 2016

ranchman1 says:

Grizzly bears have been sited all summer on the 8000 acres ranch land to be destroyed. They are a protected species.

1 November, 2016

ranchman1 says:

Calgary thinks it is correct to use my provincial tax dollars to solve the problems they created?

1 November, 2016

Phil says:

Springbank not the right answer. Too expensive, protects too few while downtown left exposed. McLean Dam would at least protect more people.

1 November, 2016

Adriana says:

I am very strongly supportive of the Springbank reservoir! Please help protect Calgary now!

1 November, 2016

Adriana says:

To prevent devastating damage to downtown, it is worthwhile to construct SR1 to protect Calgary's economic viability

1 November, 2016

Jim says:

Dry residue from SR1 will contain pathogens. Prevailing winds will blow dust into Calgary. Read Stantec SR1 Project Report 5.3.5.

1 November, 2016

Adriana says:

I wholly support SR1 - it is by far the cheaper and most effective solution!

1 November, 2016

Jim says:

SR1 will contaminate groundwater and wells in surrounding communities. Google Stantec SR1 Project Description 5.3.4. Remember Walkerton.

1 November, 2016

Jim says:

SR1 will leave may shallow pools of stagnant water behind. Mosquitos will breed. Zika is in Canada. Is Calgary next.?

31 October, 2016

Tom says:

I am concerned about the water quality that would be released into the Elbow from the Springbank reservoir. Keep the river in the river bed.

31 October, 2016

Tom says:

McLean Creek is the option that should be pursued. I don't understand why we would so willingly cause damage to our neighbours to the west.

31 October, 2016

Don E. says:

Terrible destruction of good land when land around the city will become increasingly scarce. Use Maclean Creek which already partially

31 October, 2016

Mary says:

An upstream solution is necessary but must include west of Bragg creek. Rural not responsible for poor development practices of the past

31 October, 2016

altadiva says:

While it is important to consider the effect that new reservoirs may have on river health, surely these can be built with minimal impact

31 October, 2016

altadiva says:

As a homeowner in Bowness, who was forced to evacuate in June 2013, I support the construction of a new reservoir for the Bow River upstream

31 October, 2016

R.J. says:

Dam project simply transfers costs and damage to Springbank. Can't we do better than to destroy one community to (try to) save another?

31 October, 2016

CC says:

Springbank is not fast, cheap or easy as it was promoted. Alternative options available, such as McLean Creek & TriRiver need consideration

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

The GOA was offered a solution that would protect our river communities. See www.preventingalbertafloods.ca and demand action of your reps.

31 October, 2016

AJ says:

MacLean Creek. Cheaper, protects more communities and provides recreation for Calgary.

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

Taxpayer funds should be used to protect all communities to the highest levels as is possible with an expert water management project TRJR.

31 October, 2016

AJ says:

Springbank is too costly. Will be over $1/2 a billion after land is purchased at market price even during the downturn. Use Crown land.

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

Calgary's economic core MUST be protected to the highest of levels. Springbank is not designed for "worst case scenario" (Deltares Report)

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

Water is our most precious resource and Springbank does nothing for long=term supply and quality of water for Albertans.

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

Springbank does not ensure the health of the river & floodplain as diverting it then returning it to the river would add many pollutants

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

32 communities were devastated in the 2013 flood so a comprehensive solution such as Tri-River Joint Reservoir of Alberta is needed.

31 October, 2016

Noelle Read says:

Destroy a beautiful area which citizens and tourists enjoy when travelling to the mountains. Hinder traffic flow. Destroy wildlife habitat

31 October, 2016

DDSB says:

no strength weekness nature will be destroyed pepole will loose properties Toxic waste will be spread over the area with erery flood

31 October, 2016

jack says:

Dry dam, yuck! Makes no economic or environmental sense, has to be a better solution than the Springbank project.

31 October, 2016

hoffthehammer says:

I am very supportive of the Springbank project and I would like to see it go ahead as soon as possible. Calgary cannot another disaster.

31 October, 2016

Tom says:

Springbank does little to protect the downtown core. The Bow is bigger threat. Use existing dams more wisely.

31 October, 2016

Tom says:

Rural communities should not have to pay the price - this is only a viable option if crown land is used.

31 October, 2016

Cameron says:

Calgary's inner city and downtown core remain totally vulnerable. The Springbank reservoir MUST proceed ASAP. Lowest cost/highest impact.

31 October, 2016

bracken says:

Global warming necessitates protective action as businesses & residences cannot be re-located from Calgary's river valleys without huge cost

31 October, 2016

bracken says:

Lowest environmental impact of all alternatives; necessary to protect both residential communities and downtown core. Move fwd ASAP.

31 October, 2016

Morten says:

Vastly too expensive. And totally unfair to Springbank. Build a reservoir at McLean Creek instead.

31 October, 2016

Purdys says:

YES! This is our #1 choice for upstream flood mitigation. We live in East Elbow Park + were devastated with the last flood. We support 100%

31 October, 2016

Kyle Keith says:

Great concept! The Springbank reservoir should be the #1 priority. Low enviro impact & big YYC protection. Push the province to build.

30 October, 2016

Peter says:

I am in favour of the upstream reservoirs as I feel it will have the least impact overall while maintaining Calgary as a world class city.

30 October, 2016

Bill says:

If best technical, environmental and economic analyses result in the SR-1 proposal, then let's stop the open houses and start building!

30 October, 2016

Brenda says:

The Springbank reservoir is essential to flood mitigation along the Elbow River. This will protect downtown as well as neighborhoods.

29 October, 2016

Flood Victim #117000 says:

Please, Please, Please..... Build the Springbank Reservoir now!!!!! Enough talk. Do something.

29 October, 2016

Patricia says:

I wholeheartedly support the Sprinkbank reservoir. If development, and indeed life, are a balance this option provides the lowest impact.

29 October, 2016

Jan F says:

Our riverbanks need aesthetic protection from erosion but are only bandaid solutions to flooding. Springbank Dam needs to be built NOW!

29 October, 2016

Jan F says:

Springbank has been studied/analyzed for over 3 years-only feasible solution! ALL levels of govt need to show some leadership!

29 October, 2016

Ken says:

Also agree with Cheryl. A 140 character limit is frustrating, and limits our capacity to provide meaningful fact based input.

29 October, 2016

Ken says:

Agree with Maureen. Any reservoir, if considered, should be multi-use? Changes benefit/cost. Why is Springbank dry?

29 October, 2016

maureen says:

Preferred option. Provides provisions for drought as well, and communities downstream from Calgary as well. Greater cost/benefit

29 October, 2016

Suzanne says:

Moving forward with Springbank is the only sensible course of action to protect downtown Calgary from the next flood. Please act quickly.

29 October, 2016

Glenn says:

My home and business were substantially affected by the 2013 flood. I completely support the Springbank project and urge quick action.

29 October, 2016

KHayes says:

ected as we have built the downtown core on a flood plain and requires upstream mitigation sooner rather than later.

29 October, 2016

Geoff Granville says:

please ensure you total up the # of citizens in favour of Springbank option and give that info to the prov and CEAA - and to the Herald.

28 October, 2016

Kerrie says:

The 2013 flood was devastating to Calgary's economy and to its citizens. The negative effects of the Springbank reservoir pale in comparison

28 October, 2016

Caroline says:

-good beginning keeping the Elbow at 2005 flood level. The culvert from the Glenmore to the Bow - essential. The downtown MUST be protected

28 October, 2016

Barbara McGregor says:

I think that the amount of time and energy being expended to resolve this matter is ridiculous. Build Springbank.

28 October, 2016

Terry Fishman says:

I strongly support the building of the Springbank dry dam and the increase capacity of the Glenmore dam.

28 October, 2016

Ed Engstrom says:

As I live in the Elbow River flood zone, I believe upstream protection is a task mandatory for my elected government to execute asap. Nike.

28 October, 2016

Cheryl says:

We need affordable flood insurance!! Upstream reservoirs will help, but equal in-city berms/barriers would also protect neighbourhoods

28 October, 2016

Cheryl says:

A 140 character limit is very frustrating!!! If you REALLY want feedback, make it easier to do so!!

28 October, 2016

Cheryl says:

The City should Install permanent or seasonal berms along the Elbow to protect the inner city neighbourhoods. The dam is taking too long!!!

28 October, 2016

Cheryl says:

Our family has huge support for the Springbank Reservoir, as we believe this will provide excellent protection for downstream residents.

28 October, 2016

James Meadow says:

It is critical that this viable flood mitigation project move forward with due dispatch. As time goes on, people begin to forget.

28 October, 2016

urenpat says:

The clamshell type Springbank reservoir looks good. Another flood of Elbow Park and Roxborough will destroy these historic areas. Do it now!

28 October, 2016

Tom Yeoman says:

It is VERY important to protect residential districts AND downtown Calgary by building Springbank Reservoir

28 October, 2016

Tom Yeoman says:

I want to `Register' my whole-hearted support for building the Springbank reservoir.

28 October, 2016

Blair M says:

I am strongly in favor of the Springbank Dry Dam project. It needs to be approved and constructed ASAP in order to protect Calgary.

28 October, 2016

Steve says:

It seems as though downtown Calgary needs to be protected and the Spring bank reservoir is the best way to accomplish that.

28 October, 2016

Douglas Long says:

As an affected citizen, both as a home owner and as a businessman in Calgary, I support the Springbank dam

28 October, 2016

Louise G says:

I am strongly in favour of proceeding with the Springbank Dry Dam project as soon as possible. We can not wait for the next flood. Please!

28 October, 2016

grbbenny says:

The Springbank Project must proceed-the concept has been extensively studied and found to be the best option. Let's get on with it.

28 October, 2016

stefan says:

The upstream solutions are the only viable solutions. Yes, it will impact a few landowners but will protect downtown and thus our economy

28 October, 2016

Steve says:

SR1 has been proven to protect our downtown and neighbourhoods. Please find ways to speed this project up to project our City.

28 October, 2016

Randy Leighy says:

@livesonahill, thank you for prioritizing 3 fields and a couple cows over hundreds of homes and thousands of people's lives.

28 October, 2016

Randy Leighy says:

Springbank residents, please remember the dam will rarely be filled, and when it is filled, you will be saving thousands of people's homes.

25 October, 2016

livesonahill says:

upstream projects are hugely expensive, environmentally controversial and shift the mitigation impact to people who will not get the benefit

24 October, 2016

Eric says:

In favour of these proposals - additional and substantial ongoing benefits for southern Alberta in years of low moisture

23 October, 2016

Justin says:

This is the best option. Effort should be made to explore the potential electrical generation opportunities associated with the Bow dam.

23 October, 2016

Truth Seeker says:

IBI estimates total damages for the Bow River at $1.07B, how can you estimate C-B ratio when location & size of the reservoir is unknown?

23 October, 2016

Truth Seeker says:

This is a disgrace. No info about reservoir location & size. An AMEC study has already been done, release it to the public.

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

One measure of the adequacy of community flood mitigation is that flood insurance is available and affordable.

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

Flood mitigation infrastructure must protect against reasonably foreseeable future floods so that affordable flood insurance would be avail.

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

Implement management improvements at TransAlta’s reservoirs while enabling rapid lowering of Ghost to balance flood, drought and recreation

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

At least one new dam upstream of Calgary should be built, but with the recognition that completion is likely decades in the future.

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

Protection for mixed-income Sunnyside must match the protection provided to the downtown condos of the wealthy.

23 October, 2016

Charlie Lund says:

Build TBL justified berms now while waiting decades for upstream mitigation.

22 October, 2016

Brian Castle says:

Need barriers in combination with dams - not enuf protection

22 October, 2016

Debbie Young says:

some blanket protection and management of flows & drought -could not take forever to get approved funded and built=no protection for 20 yrs